Avigilon Buyout Potential Analyzed

By John Honovich, Published on Sep 08, 2015

A number of Avigilon investors and analysts have asked us about the potential for Avigilon to be bought out / taken over.

Basically, with the stock price down so far (60%+ since the peak last year), the idea here is that Avigilon is now very 'cheap' and would be quite attractive to large companies wanting to expand into or within the security industry.

In this note we:

  • Examine Avigilon's management barriers to a buyout
  • Compare Canon / Axis to an Avigilon acquisition
  • Assess the potential for a Chinese acquirer

Management ******** ** ******

*** ******* ******* ** that ********'* ********** ******** its ***** ***** ** far ***********. *** ******* at ~$**.**, ** ******** doubt ******** ********** ***** support * ~$** ****** offer, **** ****** **** would ********* * **% premium **** *** ******* price.

**** ****, ********'* ********** has ********* ******** *** target ***** ***** ** in *** $**+ *****. Indeed, *** ***** ***** just ** ****** *** was ~$**. ******** ****** to *** ******** *** a $*** ******* *** rate, *** ****** ********* for $* ******* *******, compared ** ********'* ******* market ************** ** **** ~$550 *******, ** ******** that *** ******* ****** be ****** ****** ** multiples of *** ******* *****.

******* ** ****, *** a ****** ** ******, it ** ****** **** the ******** ***** **** to ***** ** ***** $30 * *****, ** not ****. ** ********* terms, **** ***** *** acquirer ***** ** ***** $1.2+ *******.

** ******, ** *** Canon / **** **** shows, ** **** ***** a ****** ******* ** get * **** *****, but ***** *** **** few ******** **** *** willing ** ***** **** a ******* **** **** than * ******* *** any ***** ************ ************.

Canon / **** ******** ** ********

*** ********** **** *** ****** *** **** ****** justification *** * *** higher ******** ***** *****. Applying *** ******* ** Canon's $*.* ******* ******** to ********, ***** ********'* higher ****** **** *** roughly **** ** ****' revenue, ******** ****** ** worth ** ** ** what ** ** *****, the ***** ****.

*** ******* ******* **** the ********** ** **** Canon **** * *** mistake ****** **** *** $2.8 *******. ***** **** the ***** ************ ******** as * ***** *** Avigilon ************, **** ****** rate *** ********* ** drop, ****** ** *** most ****** *********** ******* ********** ******** ********. ****** on ********* *****, ********* in *** ********* ***** the ***** ** *** market ***, *** ******* are ** ****** *********** nor **********.

*** ** *** ******* positive ******* ** **** acquisition ** **** *** company ** ********** *** risk. **** **** * long ***** ******, ***** management *********, *** * strong *&* ************. ** contrast, ******** ******* *&* investment ** ** ****** patents *** **** **** turned **** **** ********** this ****** **** **** has ** *** **** decade. ******** ********** * lot **** ****.

Chinese ********

* ****** ** ******** have ********** **** * Chinese ************ ***** ****** Avigilon. *** ****** **** that *** ******* *** strong ** ******** *** weak ** ********. ** particular, ********* *** ***** are *** **** ********* worth *****-********.

** *** **** ****, Avigilon *** ******** *** and ********* ******** **** any ******* ************.

*******, ***** *** * number ** ********** ** making **** ****:

  • *** *****: ** *** Chinese *************, **** ********* could ****** ****** ** pay * $*+ ******* for * *******. *******, Hikvision ***** ****** ******* Genetec *** * ******** of **** ***** ** they ****** ****** *** most ************* *** ********.
  • *** ********: ** ** not ***** **** ********* even ***** ** ******* its *** ******** *********** positioning ** ** ** doing ********* **** ********** with *** ********* ******* massive ******* ** *******.
  • ********'* *********: ** ******* companies **** ********'* * North ******** ********** ********** given **** **** ***** own ************* ********** ** China? ******* **** *** this ** * *** to ** **** '********' or **** ***** *** it ** ********.
  • ****** ** ****: ** would ** **** **** for ******** ** ** paid ** ******* *****, given *** ******* ********** in *** ******* ***** markets ********. ** ***** suspect ******** ***** **** to ** **** ** cash (********* ******** *** **** Infinova). *******, ***** ********* really **** ** ** able ** *** $*+ billion ** **** *** Avigilon?¬†

*******

****** *** * ****** would ** ********* ** it **** ***** *** large ********* ******* ** make * **** ******.

*******, ** ******** *********** anytime ****, **** *** stock ***** **** ** is, ** ********, ***** Avigilon's ********** *******, *** realities ** *** ***** surveillance *********** *** *** challenges *** ********* ****** justifying **** * ****.

** ** ***** ********* possible **** ******** ****** itself, ***** **** *** turnover **** **** ** long **** ****** *** delivers ******** ****** / profits, *** **** ** a *** **** ******** outcome **** * ******.

Comments (28)

I think Pelco or Cisco would be a better buyer since they are up market and better aligned with Avigilon type customers.

Pelco???

I wonder how that conversation would go at SE:

"Hey so remember eight years ago when we bought Pelco for $1.5 billion? So yeah, revenue is actually lower now than when we bought it but if only you gave me another $1.5 billion, this time it really is going to work out. And yeah, don't worry that Avigilon and Pelco products 100% overlap. We'll figure it out"

As for Cisco, you never know with them. They certainly have bought companies for even more than what Avigilon would want but, even for them, it would not be an easy/cheap deal to justify.

Both companies pretend to be serious in the surveillance market. This is one of the few remaining opportunities to be a top contender immediately. It's right out of the Canon playbook.

The 'let's go big' play is always the critical factor in getting a large buyout. Some mega company needs to commit, smart or stupid, to taking the gamble.

"Both companies pretend to be serious in the surveillance market."

That's quite the burn on Pelco....

Seriously, though if SE/Pelco was going to spend a billion, might as well invest it internally than buy an overlapping offering.

They haven't had the talent or vision to execute on such a recovery. It's much harder and riskier to start over from scratch than to buy your way into something that has positive momentum.

"buy your way into something that has positive momentum."

Yes but we are talking about Avigilon in September 2015. Avigilon, even at its price, is a fairly high-risk play for an acquirer, given the executive turnover, brand issues and patent enforcement campaign.

1. Executive turnover is going to happen under an acquisition.

2. Brand issue goes away with Pelco/Cisco name

3. Patent enforcement can be converted to an olive branch by opening them up.

If you do not value the brand, nor the management, nor the patent portfolio, why spend ~$1.5 billion on Avigilon?

1. Run rate revenue

2. Market share/position

3. Solid end-to-end solution

4. Solid engineering team

Basically all the things that Cisco/Pelco aren't doing well at...

The point is how much to pay. You can certainly make a solid case for all 4 but if you have to pay ~$1.5 billion and you don't make use of the brand, the management team or the patents, it's going to be hard to justify the deal.

That said, imagine Pelco or Cisco could get Avigilon at today's stock price of ~$550 million, that would be a reasonable deal to make, though I think Avigilon's CEO would not take anywhere close to that price.

I think it is more likely that Pelco will be bought than it is that Pelco will be buying...

However, an Avigilon acquisition anytime soon, with the stock price what it is, is unlikely....

A lower stock price makes a deal more likely than a higher one.

For example, if it crashes to $6 a share, offer comes in at $12...

The key thing is what Avigilon management (i.e., the Founder / Chairman / CEO, COO, etc.) can justify to shareholders (especially given that he and his co-founder own nearly 20% themselves). As long as they are near their $500 million 2016 run rate goal, I doubt they are going to accept $12 or $20 or even $25 as they can easily run numbers that justify a much higher mid to long term value.

I don't think Avigilon is as bullish as they seem. Do you?

They're unlikely to say "Wow, China's really progressed much faster than we anticipated back when we made our run rate predictions..."

Fernandez isn't stupid, he sold one company already. Besides at some point he is virtually compelled by fiduciary responsibility.

Sure, but I still think things would have to get worse. I am just saying he's not willing to throw in the towel right now. If things do not improve in 9 to 12 months, then he might change or simply have to given into the pressure on the stock.

Don't Avigilon execs have a history of being "greedy" and wanting to cash out early, making a sale more likley? [sic]

Well, the CEO has always made clear he is in it for the long term, that he enjoys what he is doing and that he believes that they can get a lot bigger and more valuable.

Accepting that is what he does believe and that the events of the past year have not changed him, I would think that makes him less likely to sell.

Even putting aside the noble claims, clearly he has a healthy ego and strong desire to go for a huge exit, so that would make selling now at (hopefully for them) the bottom unlikely.

For a publicly traded company, though, a buyout isn't a decision for only the CEO to make. About a million or more shares of Avigilon regularly trade each day, representing about 2% of the outstanding shares. If another company really feels Avigilon is undervalued, it could slowly build up a decent minority stake in the public market before it even makes a move. For example, if the other company could get, say, 15% of Avigilon, (about 7 million shares) then it would only need to make an offer on another 35%. Once it has a majority stake, it can appoint the board, etc, and the rest of the takeover falls into place.

...a buyout isn't a decision for only the CEO to make...

He's not just the CEO though. He holds several positions which would likely make a takeover infeasible.

CEO

President

Chairman of the Board

Founder

Biggest Shareholder (by far)

Not to mention he might be a real prick if you tried to take his company away from him. :)

Of course. A takeover on friendly terms would go much smoother, and be cheaper . When management is opposed, they can make things much more difficult, but it still is not like buying a private company.

Tim, and what price point do you think Avigilon's board is going to be comfortable with for a friendly takeover?

Or what price point can a hostile takeover get enough shares to buyout with management's support?

John, I agree with your assessment of what Avigilon management sees as the underlying value of the company long-term, and undoubtedly it is a lot higher than its current capitalization.

Today's P/E of 15 seems quite low for the company, unless one assumes that it is going to fall apart. Even if we give a fair P/E of, say, 25 for a growing tech-style company, that moves it into the $20 range. And then a premium for a takeover ... and a higher premium if its hostile ... could be in the $30+ range, no?

Whether a buyer would offer $1 billion to $1.5 billion for the company is another question. If Avigilon can execute on its growth strategy, then it would definitely be worth it. But you would have to feel that the current "bumps" are temporary and solvable.

Honeywell?

I would not be surprised if Honeywell acquired a video surveillance company. I would be surprised if they spend the amount of money that Avigilon would require. This is more a judgment on Honeywell's willingness to spend rather than the quality of Avigilon or any other large available manufacturer.

The most cut-throat deal of all time?

Hik buys Avigilon.

Hik then demands Dahua license the OV patents. As John pointed out they are one of the remaining camera mega-mfrs who have not come to an agreement regarding the OV intellectual property.

Impact: One high-end competitor would eliminated completely, Avigilon.

On the low-end, Dahua, could be affected by licensing more than an a Axis or Genetec would be, because even a modest per camera fee could impact their ultra-low pricing.

I'm not saying I want this to happen, but it does give Hik a lever against Dahua/Axis/Uniview.

Update: In the past 16 months, it has become much more likely that Avigilon gets bought out. 2016 was another tough year for the stock with it going down to ~$8 but now back up to $14, though still far off their 2014 high.

There's a lot of credible chatter about an Avigilon acquisition happening now.

If I could get a buck how many times I heard (since Schneider bought Pelco) that it is prepared for a buyout... I would be a rich person. :D

Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 6,592 reports, 889 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a member? Login here | Join now

Related Reports

Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Avigilon Now Available At ADI In EMEA, Not Americas on Jul 21, 2020
ADI, the home for Dahua and Hikvision flash sales, is now selling Motorola...
Costar Technologies / Arecont H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 16, 2020
Costar's financial results have been hit by the coronavirus with the company...
PSIM CNL Acquired By Everbridge on Mar 09, 2020
The end has finally come for CNL. Despite for years saying they would...
Uniview H1 2020 Financials Examined on Sep 08, 2020
While Dahua and Hikvision, helped by fever camera sales, are recovering from...
Junk Debt Laden Convergint Facing Coronavirus Crisis on Apr 08, 2020
Convergint has $1+ billion in junk debt putting significant pressure on the...
The Booming Multi-Billion Coronavirus Fever Camera Market on Apr 21, 2020
The market for elevated body temperature detection cameras, aka 'coronavirus...
Avigilon Open Analytics Tested on Apr 16, 2020
After years of effectively closed analytics, Avigilon decided in late 2018 to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Avigilon Announces 10K / 61MP H5 Pro Camera on Oct 05, 2020
Avigilon announced its 10K / 61MP H5 Pro camera at the 2020 IPVM Fall New...
Hikvision Fever Screening Thermal Solutions Examined on Apr 13, 2020
Hikvision is marketing "safer, faster, smarter" with their Fever Screening...
Quantum Dots Potential for Surveillance Cameras Explained on Sep 08, 2020
Quantum dots are starting to be used in TVs for better images, but how will...
CDW Sells School District 36 Low-Res, No Blackbody Hikvision Fever Cameras With Federal Funds on Oct 01, 2020
Mega IT distributor CDW sold low-resolution Hikvision fever cameras with no...
Verkada Coronavirus Response: Free Temp Systems For Government and Health Care on Apr 07, 2020
Verkada has built a reputation on giving away things for free - free Yeti...
Anixter Resisting Takeover From Competitor, Bidding War Emerges, Wesco Wins on Jan 13, 2020
Mega distributor Anixter is going to be acquired but by whom? Initially,...

Recent Reports

ISC Brasil Digital Experience 2020 Report on Oct 23, 2020
ISC Brasil 2020 rebranded itself to ISC Digital Experience and, like its...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems 2020 on Oct 23, 2020
3 primary and 4 secondary issues stood out as causing the most problems when...
GDPR Impact On Temperature / Fever Screening Explained on Oct 22, 2020
What impact does GDPR have on temperature screening? Do you risk a GDPR fine...
Security And Safety Things (S&ST) Tested on Oct 22, 2020
S&ST, a Bosch spinout, is spending tens of millions of dollars aiming to...
Nokia Fever Screening Claims To "Advance Fight Against COVID-19" on Oct 22, 2020
First IBM, then briefly Clorox, and now Nokia becomes the latest Fortune 500...
Deceptive Meridian Temperature Tablets Endanger Public Safety on Oct 21, 2020
IPVM's testing of and investigation into Meridian Kiosk's temperature...
Honeywell 30 Series and Vivotek NVRs Tested on Oct 21, 2020
The NDAA ban has driven many users to look for low-cost NVRs not made by...
Ubiquiti Access Control Tested on Oct 21, 2020
Ubiquiti has become one of the most widely used wireless and switch providers...
Avigilon Aggressive Trade-In Program Takes Aim At Competitors on Oct 20, 2020
Avigilon has launched one of the most aggressive trade-in programs the video...
Mexico Video Surveillance Market Overview 2020 on Oct 20, 2020
Despite being neighbors, there are key differences between the U.S. and...
Dahua Revenue Grows But Profits Down, Cause Unclear on Oct 20, 2020
While Dahua's overall revenue was up more than 12% in Q3 2020, a significant...
Illegal Hikvision Fever Screening Touted In Australia, Government Investigating, Temperature References Deleted on Oct 20, 2020
The Australian government told IPVM that they are investigating a Hikvision...
Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic i-PRO presented its X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...
Augmented Reality (AR) Cameras From Hikvision and Dahua Examined on Oct 19, 2020
Hikvision, Dahua, and other China companies are marketing augmented reality...
18 TB Video Surveillance Drives (WD and Seagate) on Oct 19, 2020
Both Seagate and Western Digital recently announced 18TB hard drives...