Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance

By: Charles Rollet, Published on Jan 29, 2019

Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas?

This is what happened with Austria’s first GDPR fine, imposed on a betting shop for filming public areas with its security cameras.

austria gdpr fine

The case racked up a total of almost $6,000 in fines, some of which were for non-GDPR violations. It has been appealed, so is not final. The case is nevertheless an important example of the heightened risk faced by end users in the GDPR era, particularly since it was the GDPR-related fine that was by far the highest.

In this note, we examine:

  • How They Got Caught
  • Alleged Violations
  • GDPR vs non-GDPR Violations
  • How The Fines Were Calculated
  • Why the GDPR Fine was the Highest
  • The frequency of Video Surveillance Fines in Austria
  • Timing & Gravity of Offense
  • Broader Meaning

****** ** ********** ** concerned ** ****** *** a ********' ************ ******* filming ****** *****?

**** ** **** ******** with *******’* ***** **** fine, ******* ** * betting **** *** ******* public ***** **** *** security *******.

austria gdpr fine

*** **** ****** ** a ***** ** ****** $6,000 ** *****, **** of ***** **** *** non-GDPR **********. ** *** been ********, ** ** not *****. *** **** is ************ ** ********* example ** *** ********** risk ***** ** *** users ** *** **** era, ************ ***** ** was *** ****-******* **** that *** ** *** the *******.

** **** ****, ** examine:

  • *** **** *** ******
  • ******* **********
  • **** ** ***-**** **********
  • *** *** ***** **** Calculated
  • *** *** **** **** was *** *******
  • *** ********* ** ***** Surveillance ***** ** *******
  • ****** & ******* ** Offense
  • ******* *******

[***************]

*** *** **** *** Caught

********* ** ********** **** *******, ***** ****** ******** ******* two ************ ******* ******* public ***** ***** *** entrance ** * ******* shop ** *** ****** of****** ** ***** **, ****. (Betting ***** *** ****** in ***** ** ****** and ******* ******* ** a ***** *****/*** ***** patrons *** *** **** machines ** ***** ****.)

* **** *** ****** which *** *********** ** the ******** **** ********** agency,*** ***, ***** *** **, 2018, *** **** *** GDPR *** *******. **** is ******* ***** ** the ****, ******* ***** surveillance ***** **** ******* by ***** ***********, *** the ***, *** ****** told ****.

List ** **********

*** *** ****** **** the ******* **** ********* four ******** ******* **********:

  1. *** ******** ******* ******* at *** ****’* ******** monitored * ****** ******* lot *** ******* *****, recording ****** ******* ** and ********’ ******* ******.
  2. *** ******* **** *** registered **** ***********.
  3. ***** ************ ******* *** kept *** ** ********** time ****** **** ** justification ********. (******** ******* law ******** ***** ************* for *** ***** ************ storage ******* ****** **** 72 *****.)
  4. ***** *** ** ****** sign ********** **** ***** surveillance *** ***** ****.

*** ******* **** *** unnamed ** *** *** does *** **** **********, although *** ******* *** mention ** *** **** of * *****. 

GDPR ** ***-**** **********

*** ***** ********* – filming ****** ***** – was *** **** ****** listed ** ********* *** GDPR, **** *** *** highlighting *** ******** ******** of *** ***:

  • ******* *, ***** ****** **** the ********** ** ******** data ** “******* ** **** ** necessary ** ******** ** the ******** *** ***** they *** *********”. *** DSB ***** **** *** betting ****’* ********** *********** *** *** cameras’ ******** ******* ** surveilling *** ********.
  • ******* *, ***** **** *** the ********** *** ****** processing, **** ** “*******” and “********** ********”. *** DSB ***** **** *** betting ****’* ******* ********* none ** ***** **********.

*** ***** ***** ******* were *** ********** *********’* ******** ******* ***, ***** *** ****** in ****.

*** ****** ****** *** GDPR ** ***-**** ***** is **** “*** ******** of *** ******* ******* occurred ****** ** *** 2018” *.*. *** **** the **** *** *******. Therefore ********** *, *, and * **** ******* under ******** ******* *********** while *** ***** *** charged ***** *** ****.

How *** ***** **** **********

*** *** **** *********, the **** *** ***** 2,400 ***** ($*,***). *** other *****, ***-**** ********** received ***** ** *** euros **** ($***), ** laid *** ** ******** Austrian ******* ***. *** ***** ** ***** was **** *,*** ***** ($5,435). * **% ***** fee *** *****, ******** the ***** ** *,*** euros ** $*,***.

(**********: “**** ** *****”, “Penalty ** **** ***** are *** *********”, “************ period”, “[*****] *********”)

GDPR ****** ****** *****

*** **** **** *** GDPR ********* *** ***** was *,*** ***** ***** the ***-**** ***** **** only *** ***** ** not * ***********.

*** ***'* ****** **** Matthis ******* ********* ** IPVM (******** *****):

********* ********, *** **** allows ****** ****** **(*) *** (*)significantly ****** **** concerning the determination of the total amount of an imposed fine in relation to prior legal provisions in force before the GDPR.

************, ******* **** ************* ********************* **** ***** **** ** proportional ** *** **** of *** ********; * small ******* **** ***** not ** ******* **** the ******* **** ****, which *** ***** ** million ***** ** *% of ****** ****** *******.

*** **** ** ** proportionate. *** *******, * cannot **** * ******** who *** ** ****** income ** **,*** ***** [$45,300] **** * **-*******-**** fine [$** *******].

Frequency ** ***** ************ ***** ** *******

**** ** *** *** first **** ******* ***** surveillance ** ***** ** Austria. ******** ** *** not ******* **********, ******* told **** **** ***** are * "****** **********", before *** ***** *** GDPR:

*** ******** ** *** fining ***** ******* *** presumed ******* *** ** CCTV.

Timing/Gravity ** *******

*** ****** ************* ** the ******* **** ***** in ***** **** *** the ***** **** ********* in ********* ****. *** shop *** ******** *** case *** *** *** to *******’* ******* *****, which *** *** ** rule ** **, *** DSB ********* ** ****.

*** *** **** ********* that **** ** *******’* first **** ****. *** months-long ***** ** **** fines ***** **** *** fact **** **** ********** are ***** ******* * backlog ** ***** ***** began **** ****** *** GDPR’s *********.

*** *** ****** *** shop’s ******* ** ** “negligent” ****** “**********” ** “aggravating”. **** ** ******* the ******* **** ****’* have *** ******** ****** of **********, ******* *** illegal *** ******-**** ***** surveillance.

**********

**** **** ******** * particularly ************ ******* ** how ***** *** ** higher ****** ** *** GDPR. * $*,*** **** *** a ****** ***** **** can ** ***** * significant ******, *** ** is ****** **** *** total **** ***** **** been ****** *** *** the ********** ***** ***** after *** ****’* ********* on *** **. 

**** ** ********* *** users, ***********, *** *** others ********** ***** ************ data ****** ****** **** in ****.

Comments (32)

**** *****. 

* **** *** "******* Public *****"???

"*** ******* **** *** registered **** ***********"

*** ****!

***** ** *** **, however ** ******* **** have *** * **** time ********* ***** ************ much **** *********** (*** this ******** *** ****.) For ******* ** ****** the ******************** **** ********** **** ********** ******** cameras **** **** ****** areas, "**** ** **** want ** ****** *** security ** ***** ******* parked ** ***** ** their ****.”

"***** *****" ** *** best....

************** *********, *** ***** are ****** ** ***** unknown “*******” ******** ******** of ****** ***** ******. Out ** ***** *** of ****...

*** ****** ****** *** GDPR ** ***-**** ***** is **** “*** ******** of *** ******* ******* occurred ****** ** *** 2018” *.*. *** **** the **** *** *******. Therefore ********** *, *, and * **** ******* under ******** ******* *********** while *** ***** *** charged ***** *** ****.

**** ******* **** *** the *************************** ** **** **** just *** **** **** of $*,*** ***** **** been ******; *** **********, had *********************** ** ****, **** just *** * $*** fines ***** **** **** imposed.

** **** ** **, why ** *** *** that

** *** *** ****-******* fine **** *** ** far *** *******.

**** ** **** ****** to **** ** $****, just **** *** ***-**** spread **** ***** *****, but **** *** *** same *******?

 

 

****, *** ** *******. What *'* ****** ** that *** *** *** alleged ********** ***** ***** after *** **, *** 4 ********** ***** **** been *********** ** **** violations, ****** **** **** 1. ***** *** **** gives *********** ************* **** leeway ** ******** *****, each ** *** ********** could **** **** *****, for *******, *,*** ***** - ** ****'* *,*** x * = *,*** euros ***** ** *****, or ****** $**,***.

**** *** ***-**** ********** were *** "****** **** three *****"; **** *** was * ********** ********* of ******* ***********.

* **** **** ** check ** ************** **** fines *** **** ********** are ********* ****** **** the ****** **** ** the ******** **** ********** agency ******** *******. ** confirmed **** ** **, stating ** **** (******** added):

"********* ********, *** **** allows ****** *** *** 83 (*) *** (*)significantly ****** **** concerning the determination of the total amount of an imposed fine in relation to prior legal provisions in force before the GDPR. In addition, in this particular case, the Austrian DPA had to take transitional provisions into account, which ******* *** ***** ***** ***** ** *** ******** ***** ********* prior to the GDPR in which the infringing action started before the 25th of Mai 2018."

**** *'* ****** ** that *** *** *** alleged ********** ***** ***** after *** **, *** 4 ********** ***** **** been *********** ** **** violations, ****** **** **** 1.

** *** *** ****** that******** **, *** **** illegal ******* *** *** filming ** ******* *****?

*** **** *********, ***************** **, **** *** registered *** *******, *** signs **, ******** *** retention ****** ***?

**** ****** ******** ** me, *** **’* ********.

** *** ***** ****, if *** ** *** 4 ******** ******** ** both ************* * *** ******* under **** ********, ** would **** * *** arbitrary ** ****** **** capriciously *** **************, **** because **** **** ********* over * ****** ** shorter **** ******.

**** **** **** ***** :)

* *** *** ** check ******, *** *** link *** **** ******** the *******  “*** ***** wurde ***** ********”...

** *** *** ****** that ***** *** **, *** **** illegal ******* *** *** filming ** ******* *****?

*** **** *********, ******** ****** *** **, **** *** registered *** *******, *** signs **, ******** *** retention ****** ***?

*** **** ***** **** "most ** *** ******* misconduct ******** ****** *** 25." ** ********** *, 3, *** * **** found ** *********** ****** the ****, *** ********* 1 *** **** ********* afterwards. ******* ********** *-* were ******* ***** ************ prior ** ****, *** shop ***'* ** ********** for *** **** ******* post-GDPR. There ** ** ******* of *** **** *********** cameras, ******* ** *****, etc.

* *** *** ** check ******, *** *** link *** **** ******** the ******* “*** ***** wurde ***** ********”...

** ***, * ***** the **** ** *** article. *** *** ********* ****.

* **** * *** camera **** ****** *** cars **** ***** ** my *******, ** ****** don't **** ** **** drive ******* ***. *** cops ***** *** ***** when **** ********* ******* up *** ** *** cars.

*** ** *** ****** the ****** ******* *****? Also, *** *** ****** the **** *** *** retrieved ** **** ******** firmware ************* ** ***** in ******** ** *** switch?

* ***** *** ********** a ****** ******* ** person ******** *** ******* where * *****.

***** ** ******** ** the ******?

** *** ******... :)

**** *** ***** ** the ****** ** ****** :)

* ****** ***'* ********** the ******** ********* ** GDPR. **** ***-** ******* seem ** **** ** nothing **** **** * hassle.

** ** * *** two ***** *********

- **** ************* ** data
- **** ***** *** trunkslammers

********** *** ****** ****** should ** *********. **** makes * ****** ***** for *** ******** *** better *** * ****** level ** ********* *** installation.
********** **** ****** **** a ****** ******* *** higher ******.

******* ****, ****** ******* design, *** **** **** the *********** ******, (**** up *** *** **). 

* **** * ****** that's ***** ** ** driveway ** ***, * see *** **** ** cars ******* **, *** no ****** **** **** turn **** ** ********. It *****'* *** *** of ***** *****, *********, or ***** *****. **'* a "***** ************" ** if * ******* *** angle ** **** ****** driving ** **** ******'* mind.

* ****** **** *** of ** ********* *** a *** ******* **' off *** ****** ** the **** ** ***** house, ****** **** ** don't ** * **** comes **** ****. ******* just ******* ** ** neighborhood *** * ***** wifi ****** *** **** in ******* **** **** decided ** **** ******** of * ***** **** student ******* ******* ***** backyard **** ***** ******** them. *** *** *******'* of **** *****, *** posting ** ** *** towns ******* ******** ***** (over ** ******* ** see) *** ****** ** get **** ** ******* for ****.

* **** * *** camera **** ****** *** cars **** ***** ** my *******, ** ****** don't **** ** **** drive ******* ***.

* ****** **** **** message ** *** ********* all ***, ***** *** no ********* ** **** driveway ******** ***** ********.

** **'* **** ******** you *** ****** *** rights, **** **** *** the *** *******. ** argument *****.

**'* *** ****** ** not ****** * ****** of ***** ******, ** public ***** ** ******* looking ** ** **** private ********. **** *** enter ******** ******* ******** you ***'* **** *** say ** ***** ****** choices. *********** **** *** need ** ** ***** though... * ***'* ***** agree **** **** ****

** ******* **** ** odd ******, * ******* road **** **** ******* to ** ** *** property **** ******* *** of *** *********, ** someone **** *** **** to ***** **** *** vs *** ***** * entrances ** *** ***** they **** ** ** that's ***** ******.

** *** ** *****, my *** ****** ****** on * ****** ****, I *** *** **** of ***** ***, *** only *** ***** ** the **** **** **** down ** ********, **** if **'* **** ** turn ******. ****** * PTZ *** * ****** story **** *** **** into ****** * ******* isn't *** **** ** a ***** ****** **** sees * ******** ****. 

*** ** *** ****** who **** ** *****/******** of ****** ** ***** backyard ** ********, ** my ******** ** * felt *** **** ** shame ****** ****** ** would ** ******* **** issues ** *** ***. I'm *** **** ** the **, *** ** the ******, **** ** intended ** ** **** private, *** ********* ****** to ********.

******** *** ******** ** law *** *** ******** different ******.

******, ***** *** ********* already **** ********** ***** us.

  **** *** ******** camera ************, ** **** sounds **** * *** for *** **** ** have ********* *** ****** to *** ******* **** a **** ** *** public ******* ****** ** pay/install **********. ** ***** is ******* ******** ***** on ** *** ******* that *** **** ** wanting ** ****.

  ****, * ***** think * **** ** unnecessary ** *** ******* are ** ***** ****.  Call ** *********** ** you ****

**** **** ** ************** on * ********* *****, however, *****'* ** ********* anywhere ** *** **** or ******** ** ******* laws **** ***** ******** video ************ *** *** required ** **** ** the ******* *** ** plain ****. (*** *** see ***: * *********** may ***** ***** ******* are ****** ******* **** many ******** ***'* **** bother ** **** ** and ****** ****).

*** * **** ** eye ***** *** **** won't **** *** **.

**** ** *****, "***'** on ******".

 

* *** ********** *** feel **** ***, *** what ******* **** **** not ** ******** ********* installs ******* ** *** house, ******* ** *** road *** **** ******* at **** ****** *** private ****?

**** ** * ******, but * **** ***** for *** *** ****

...*** **** ******* **** your *** ** ******** neighbour ******** ******* ** his *****, ******* ** the **** *** **** looking ** **** ****** and ******* ****?

****?

* ******* ****** *********** of **** ***** ***** they *****, *** * advocate *** ********* ********* in ***** ***** *** laws ** *** *****.  The ************ ** ********** surveillance ** ******** **** is ********* ** * notionally **** *******.

*'* ****** **** **** we ***'* **** **** laws ** *********, ***** private ******* ** ***** that ****** ** **** the ******** ** ***** of *** ***** **** been ******* *********** *** the ************ ** * rapist/murderers, *** ******* * number ** ***** ******.  The ****** ********* **** on ******* **** *****.

** ** **** **** other ****** **** ****** encryption ******.

 

***, **** *****. * similar ******** ****** ** the ** **** ******* to ***** ******* ******* to **** ***** ****** cases. ******, ** *** US, * ****** ** local ****** *********** ***** databases ** ******* ******* to **** ***** ******. It ** ** ** interesting ******** ******* *******, security, *** **** (*.*., those ******* ******* *** much **** ********* **** building *** ********** ****** systems).

*********** *******, ****** **** them ****** ** *** learn ***** **** ********** and *****.  **** *** knowledge ** **** **** privacy **** *** ***** in *** ****** ****** and ***** *********.

*********: 

****** ********* * ******* privacy ***

****** ******* *** *** on *******

******* ********* ******* ** the ********** ******* **** and *********.  ** **** really ***** **** *** people ***** *** ****** are ***** ** ****** with ***** *** ***********.  I'm *** *** **** practices, ******** ******* *** controlling ** ******** ****, but ****** **** ** be ********* ***** **** makes ***** *** ***** are **** *** *** ones **** ****** ****.

******: **** **** *** weeks ***** **** ******* shop **** *** ******, Austria's **** ********** **************** * $*,*** ****** * *** *** violating *** **** ***** he ********* ******** ******* in *** ********* **** filmed ****** ***** ** the *******.

** ******** **, ****, the ******** *** ***** that * *** ***** Mr. ****** - *** first **** *** *** disclosed - ********* * cameras (*** ** *** doorway, *** ***** ** his ******) **** **** filmed "***** ** *** property ******** *** ******* use" **** **:

****** **** "********* ** ****** *****" at ***** **** ** the ******* *** ****'* put ** * **** indicating *** ***** ************.

*** *** ***** *** this ******** ******** * and * ** *** GDPR, **** **** *** betting **** ****, *** fined **. ****** *,*** euros ** ***** $*,***:

*** **** ******** **** Rudolf's ****: ****** ***** in ********** **** *******, walkways, *** *** **** considered "******"; ** ** GDPR *********, ********* *** only **** ***** *** property.

* *** ***** **. Rudolf - *** ***** name *** *** *********...

******* ** ****? ;)

**, **, * ***** this ** **** ************ policy (**** ******** *** GDPR) ** *********** *** naming ********/****** ******** ** court *****/***. **** ******** countries **** ******* ********.

******, * ***** **** his **** **** ** not *********, *****?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

France Declares School Facial Recognition Illegal Due to GDPR on Oct 31, 2019
France is the latest European country to effectively prohibit facial recognition as a school access control solution, even with the consent of...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France on Jul 08, 2019
The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing...
Nortek and SDS Fight Over Failed Settlement on Jun 05, 2019
Distributor SDS said they reached a deal with Nortek but Nortek says no settlement was reached and the suit is still on. In this post, based on...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Dahua Faked Coronavirus Camera Marketing on Apr 01, 2020
Dahua has conducted a coronavirus camera global marketing campaign centered around a faked detection. Now, Dahua has expanded this to the USA,...
Video Surveillance Trends 101 on Apr 01, 2020
This report examines major industry factors and how they could impact video surveillance in the next 5 - 10 years. This is part of our Video...
USA's Seek Scan Thermal Temperature System Examined on Apr 01, 2020
This US company, Seek, located down the road from FLIR and founded by former FLIR employees is offering a thermal temperature system for the...
Terrible Convergint Coronavirus Thermal Camera Recommendation on Apr 01, 2020
A week after Convergint disclosed falling revenue, pay and job cuts, Convergint is touting 'extensive research' that is either grossly incompetent...
The IPVM New Products Online Show April 2020 Opens With 40+ Manufacturers on Mar 31, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce the first New Products Online show, with 40+ manufacturers, to be held April 14 to the 16th, free to IPVM members,...
USA's Feevr Thermal Temperature System Examined on Mar 31, 2020
This US company has burst on to the scene, brashly naming itself 'feevr' and branding itself as a "COVID 19 - AI BASED NON CONTACT THERMAL...
JCI Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 31, 2020
JCI has made coronavirus cuts, the company told employees in an email that IPVM has reviewed. Inside this note, we examine the cuts made, the...
Add Door Operators To Fight Coronavirus on Mar 31, 2020
IPVM recommends that integrators advocate and end-users consider adding door operators to fight the spread of coronavirus. This delivers...
Video Surveillance Business 101 on Mar 30, 2020
This report explains the fundamental elements of the video surveillance business for those new to the industry. This is part of our Video...
FDA Gives Guidance on 'Coronavirus' Thermal Fever Detection Systems on Mar 30, 2020
The US FDA has given IPVM guidance on the use of thermal fever detection systems being marketed for coronavirus, as an explosion of such devices...