Arecont Claims Best Project Registration Program

By: John Honovich, Published on Mar 08, 2017

Arecont's project registration program [link no longer available] is literally like nothing IPVM has ever seen.

Despite our historical criticisms of Arecont, what they are doing here may very well meet their claim of being the industry's best project registration program.

In this note, we examine the key differentiators, the discounts involved, and the main advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

*******'* ******* ************ ******* [link ** ****** *********] is ********* **** ******* IPVM *** **** ****.

******* *** ********** ********** ** Arecont, **** **** *** doing **** *** **** well **** ***** ***** of ***** *** ********'* best ******* ************ *******.

** **** ****, ** examine *** *** ***************, the ********* ********, *** the **** ********** *** disadvantages ** **** ********.

[***************]

Key **************

*** **** ****** ** *** huge *********, ** ** an ********** **%, **** Arecont ** ********* ** project ************. **** ******* registration ******** **** ** extra *% ** *% or ***** *% *** additional *********. ***** *********** ones *** ******* * little **** ****** *** it ********* ** *** big ****** ** **** a **** ********** ** to ****** ******* * very *** / **** volume **********.

Range ** ******* *********

******* **** *** ******* registration ********* ***** **** 8 - **% **** the ******* ********** ******** being **% **** *** past ****. *** ******** ****** by ******* *** (**** products ***** * ****** project ********), *** *********** situation ** *** *******, size/scale ** *** *******, and ********* *** ****** of *** *** ****.

Impact ** *********

** *** *** **** benefits ** ********:

  • *** ****** **** ******* Arecont ****** *** **** the ********** ****** ** quite *** ******* *** discount ** ** **** and **** ** * specific *******. ** ********, with ****, *********, ***. the ********** ** **** that ******** *********** **** access ** ******* ** not ******* ********* **** the ******* ******, **** if **********.
  • *** **** ****** ******** is **** ****** ***** those ****** ****** ** not ******* *** ******* project ************ ******** **** the ****** ** *******. This ****** *** ******* of *** ******** ****** "Hey * *** *** those ****, *********, ***. cameras ****** *** $** less **** **** *** are ********".

*******, *** *******, ** lets **** ******* **** they *** *** ********* in *** **** ** the ****** ***** *** prices ******** ***** *** much ****** **** **** they *** ******** ******** for ****** ********.

Confidentiality ********

*********** *** ***** ********* that ** **** ******** the *******, **** *********** can ** ****** **** competitors *** **** ******* them. ******* **** ****:

******* ****** ******** *** project ***********.  **** **** 99% ** *** **** only *** **/****** ** registered *** *** *******.  If *** *** **** requires **** **** *** SI/dealer, ******* ****** ******** both **/******* *** ***** corresponding *********** ** ******* that **** *** *** the **** **** ** get *** ******* ******* registration ********.  **** *** there *** ** *********.

** ******, *** ********** will ***** **** ** trust ******* *** ******** employees ** ************ *** this *********** ** *******.

*********

*** **** ******** ** to ***** *** **** to *** ******, ******* integrator ** *** **** who ***** ** ***. For ***** ******, **** would **** ** *** much **** **** ***** who ********. ******, ******* of ****, *******'* ****** pricing ** *** **** competitive ***** ***** ******* less ******* ** ******* mass ****** / *** sale ********.

** ******, *** ******* who **** ***** **********, this ** ************** ** upside. 

Vote / ****

Comments (14)

Undisclosed #1

03/08/17 03:14pm

As a firm who helps with PR's weekly, we encounter dealer's claiming to have access to 15%-25% discount from various brands. The net/net to consider:

1) The % off is always relevant to what the "suggested" dealer costing is. For example, a competing manufacturer could raise their dealer costing to in effect, offer a deeper discount than they would have reflected previously.

2) % off can indeed vary by model, whether it is new introduction, a need to move inventory or pending EOL status.

3) Are the models apples-to-apples in comparison, feature wise/warranty/etc. Getting 25% off on a 2MP camera when 5MP is the desired solution as an example.

Another ripple effect is that when an integrator hears another competitor has already secured a PR with such a deep discount, it can motivate them to find another more cost effective brand to compete against that tactic, therefore introducing even more brand options to the end user.

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #1 | 03/08/17 03:30pm

we encounter dealer's claiming to have access to 15%-25% discount from various brands.

But in Arecon'ts case this is not general dealer discounts. This is in addition to them, which makes a difference because it prevents larger competitors or online sellers to stock up at much lower prices (since they would not be tied to a project) and then undercut the smaller dealer who has project registration. Yes/no?

Undisclosed #2

03/08/17 03:27pm

I can't believe every Axis partner isn't voting that this is VERY attractive given they have been asking for exactly this for many years!

Undisclosed Integrator #3

In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 03/08/17 03:36pm

True, but couldn't Axis also counter with "well look, it's only Arecont. Of course they have to discount that much."

Undisclosed #2

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #3 | 03/08/17 03:39pm

Agreed but we are not talking about product just the program...

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed #2 | 03/08/17 03:42pm

Axis main issue with such a project registration structure is that it would cripple sales to large end users and others who buy directly from the Internet or through distributors, etc.

Arecont has effectively given up such sales with this approach but Axis certainly has not.

Undisclosed #2

In reply to John Honovich | 03/08/17 04:25pm

Axs does give very deep discounts to large end users when they want even though they go through distribution.

Undisclosed Manufacturer #4

03/09/17 05:54pm

I've worked with Arecont over the years in multiple capacities, and the one thing for sure is that programs like this are one of the reasons there are still so many loyal dealers.  Sure, talk about the failure issues -- it's a pain, but they take care of it.  Their dealers are able to make a healthy margin, and when it works (which is most of the time), the product actually performs very well.  Add to the mix that their RSM's are typically very professional, knowledgeable, and understand strategy, and you've got a winning combination that we don't often see in the security marketplace...at least with regard to video surveillance (I guess it is more common in the access control arena).

Let's be honest -- those that voted no or neutral either don't place any value on strategic partnerships (maybe because they don't understand them), have been burned in the past by an issue (or issues) relating to Arecont and aren't willing to say anything positive about them even if it is warranted, or are making a political statement due to competition or support for another favorite manufacturer.

I am not personally familiar with every registration program available out there, but I will say that I've never found any that provide as much tangible value and protection for their dealers as this one.

Undisclosed Integrator #3

In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #4 | 03/09/17 06:47pm

Let's be honest --

If I had a dime for every pitch like that which ended up being not honest or informed enough.

 -- those that voted no or neutral either don't place any value on strategic partnerships....

Maybe those that voted no don't believe it is a strategic partnership that pays off. Maybe they have been burned by many issues. Maybe they don't say anything positive because they feel on the balance there is little positive. Or maybe they do concede positive things, but the negative outweighs the positive to them. Maybe it's not based on politics, maybe it's based on experience. Years of experience.

That is a possibility right?.... if we're being honest.

 

Undisclosed Manufacturer #4

In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #3 | 03/09/17 07:25pm

Sure, it's a possibility.  That was kinda my point, as I was referring specifically to the strength of the registration program structure itself, which is undoubtedly strong.  Which is why those that voted no or neutral likely did so for reasons other than simply answering the question based on the merit of the actual question.

I have no horse in this game, by the way...but seriously -- apply this same program to any other manufacturer (perhaps your favorite manufacturer) and tell me...would you not be thrilled with it?  What, other than politics or history that were not part of the poll question as it was framed, could be justification for saying no?  

Undisclosed Integrator #3

In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #4 | 03/09/17 07:37pm

From that aspect, I would agree, and marked your comment as so.

Undisclosed #5

03/09/17 07:09pm

In my opinion, Arecont's program rewards exactly those it is intended to reward -- integrators who are on the streets actually driving Arecont's business. Period. If you want to lead with Arecont, and better yet get a customer to specify Arecont in their requirements, then you're going to have a considerable advantage when it comes time to compete and win the project if it has to go out to bid. 

If you're a consultant driving specifications, you can set up a program that will offer discounts to the customer regardless of the integrator, and that is fine. The integrator is not driving that business, and has no right to special treatment. But if the integrator is acting as the consultant to specify product for a client's needs, the integrator gets protection, the customer gets better pricing, and Arecont drives additional sales.

It's a win all around. 

Compare that to the garbage program from Axis, who basically ignores the integrator who drove the business to Axis in the first place, and even if a registration is granted, it's a rounding error in most cases.  

Arecont's program is definitely a differentiator. No question about that. 

 

Undisclosed Manufacturer #6

In reply to Undisclosed #5 | 03/10/17 03:32am

It's a shell game.  They keep the dealer prices at regular rates, then give a 40% discount. If they did that from the beginning they would seem cheap chasing the low end import players. The key to any registration is how well it is policed. How do they track who drove the spec?  It's a trick question,they don't. It's the first one to call or register online, as a placeholder.  What about when the dealer gets a quote from distribution for 35 cameras and the disty registers it with a fake name, who has time to check?  Or when I see a spec on the street that reads arecont and register it first, there is no way to possibly keep track of every project or consultant who specs things, especially from out of a different region.  I like their program in the fact it gives a better amount of protection on projects, but let's be realistic about the ways it can be sidestepped.  

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Undisclosed Manufacturer #6 | 03/10/17 12:36pm

They keep the dealer prices at regular rates, then give a 40% discount. If they did that from the beginning they would seem cheap chasing the low end import players.

I see that as having an advantage though.

One, by doing that, they lose the ADI / trunkslammer / "what's the cheapest thing today pal?" buyer. The upside is they protect their own dealers who are loyal to them over that low cost buyer.

As for how well it is policed, I do not have enough experience or feedback to know how well that is handled.

Login to read this IPVM report.

Related Reports

HID Presents Signo on Apr 23, 2020
HID Global presented their new Signo readers they claim read farther and...
Drako's Companies (Brivo, Eagle Eye) Take $4+ Million in PPP Funds on Jul 14, 2020
While centimillionaire Dean Drako is the owner of two of the largest SaaS...
Sunell "Panda Cam" Thermal Body Temperature System Examined on Apr 09, 2020
Sunell's Panda Cam is the most visually recognizable coronavirus camera, sold...
Hikvision Fever Screening Thermal Solutions Examined on Apr 13, 2020
Hikvision is marketing "safer, faster, smarter" with their Fever Screening...
Access Credential Form Factor Tutorial on Feb 10, 2020
Deciding which access control credential to use and distribute, including...
Milestone Presents XProtect On AWS on May 04, 2020
Milestone presented its XProtect on AWS offering at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Canon Company Milestone Takes $1+ Million PPP Money on Jul 16, 2020
Milestone, a Canon company, took $1 million+ in PPP loans, despite being part...
IronYun AI Analytics Tested on Feb 17, 2020
Taiwan / US startup IronYun has raised tens of millions for its "mission to...
PSIM CNL Acquired By Everbridge on Mar 09, 2020
The end has finally come for CNL. Despite for years saying they would...
Bottom: Integrators Start To Stand Vs Coronavirus on Apr 20, 2020
Good news - IPVM integrator statistics show that while coronavirus has hit...
Bias In Facial Recognition Varies By Country, NIST Report Shows on Jul 15, 2020
While many argue that face recognition is inherently racist, results from one...
HID Releases Lower-Cost Signo Readers on Mar 06, 2020
HID Global is releasing a new line of readers called Signo they claim read...
Idemia Presents AI Facial Recognition Access Reader on May 18, 2020
Idemia presented its VisionPass AI Facial Recognition Access Reader at the...
Verkada Raises $80 Million, Triples Valuation To $1.6 Billion on Jan 30, 2020
Verkada's rocketing valuation continues. 9 months ago, they got a...
Dahua, Hikvision, ZKTeco Face Mask Detection Shootout on Jun 19, 2020
Temperature tablets with face mask detection are one of the hottest trends in...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...