Arcules CEO has retracted a false claim about his organization being a "fully compliant GDPR company" after IPVM reporting (Arcules CEO Threatens Over "Security Breach") raised this concern.
False GDPR claims are an ongoing problem as technology companies try to gain unfair competitive advantages by deceiving about their EU government GDPR conformance.
In this note, we examine the issue with Arcules and problems with other surveillance companies including major industry participants Milestone and Dahua.
Arcules ***** *****
** ******** **, ****, Arcules *** ********:
** ******** **, ****, IPVM **** ******* *** a ****** ** ********* raising ******** ***** **** GDPR *****. ** ******** that *** ** ***** Code ** ******* ***** they **** ** ***** GDPR ********* "**** *** make ******* ***** *********". The **** ***, ** asked * ******-** ******** of **** ** *** is ********** ******* '***** compliant **** *******" *****. Arcules *** ***** ********* to ****.
*** *********** *** ***** size **** ** **** to ****. **** ** said ***:
*********'* ******** ********* ******* catalogue ** ******* ******** pursuant ** ******* **(*) GDPR *** ********* **** hasnot **** ********** as a certification body pursuant to Article 43 GDPR yet. EuroPriSe is dedicated to receiving the approval of its certification criteria and the accreditation as a certification body in accordance with Art. 42 f. GDPR asap. [emphasis added]
***** ****** - * am **** * ******* misanthrope. * ********** * new **** ** * kind ** ******** ** IP *****, *** ** wife ******** ** ** living ** * ******.
Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 3
Create New Topic
Read this IPVM report for free.
This article is part of IPVM's 6,906 reports, 922 tests and is only available to members. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.
Comments (3)
Morten Tor Nielsen
12/04/19 09:43am
**** ** ***** *** a **** ************* **** in *** **, ** probably ******'* ** **** to ******* * *** as ***** *** ******* conditions ******* *** ******** that ***** ** ** met, *** ********* ***** *** *** ***** be ** ********* ** GDPR ********** ** *** the *** ** ******** and **** ******** ** offers.
* ***** *** **** lies *** ** ******* to **** **** ******** and ********* ********* *** are ******* **** ********** a *** **** ***** GDPR ******* ******, *** -*********** **** *********** - seed *** (*****) **** that ********* *** ** not *** ***** **** are *** "**** *********" and ********* ****** ** avoided. **'* * ******** way ** ******* ********, but * ***** ********** goes.
*** ***** ** **** most ****** **** **** not ** ********* ****** way *** **** **** be ******** ********** ** fines *** * *** of **** ** **** eventually **** ******** ** CCTV ******* - ********** of **** ****** **** buy. ***** ***** ** wonder ** *** **** make *** ********* ****** for *** **** ******* losses **** * ******** might **********? (*'* **** there's * **-************** ****** in *** ****).
** ***** ** **** the ** ********** ****** a *** ** ********** that ***** **** ****** without ******* *** ********* we're ****** **** *** current *****. *********, ******, such ********** ** *** exists, ***** ***** **** a ** ******* *** walk **** * ***** and ****** ****** ** every ******** ***** **** were ******** ** ***** (as ***** ** ********** personally ************ ****) ***** would **** ****** ******** every ***** ****** ** the *****. * ***'* think *** ********* ****'* think ** **** **** they **** **.
Create New Topic