Arcules CEO Retracts False GDPR Claim + Dahua and Milestone Claims Examined

By John Honovich and Charles Rollet, Published Dec 03, 2019, 07:39am EST

Arcules CEO has retracted a false claim about his organization being a "fully compliant GDPR company" after IPVM reporting (Arcules CEO Threatens Over "Security Breach") raised this concern.

False GDPR claims are an ongoing problem as technology companies try to gain unfair competitive advantages by deceiving about their EU government GDPR conformance.

In this note, we examine the issue with Arcules and problems with other surveillance companies including major industry participants Milestone and Dahua.

Arcules ***** *****

** ******** **, ****, Arcules *** ********:

IPVM Image

** ******** **, ****, IPVM **** ******* *** a ****** ** ********* raising ******** ***** **** GDPR *****. ** ******** that *** ** ***** Code ** ******* ***** they **** ** ***** GDPR ********* "**** *** make ******* ***** *********". The **** ***, ** asked * ******-** ******** of **** ** *** is ********** ******* '***** compliant **** *******" *****. Arcules *** ***** ********* to ****.

** ******** **, ****,**** ********* * ****** examining * "******** ******" at ******* *** ******** out *** **** ***** was *****. ** ** ********* then,***** ******, *** ************ **** runs **** **** ** Conduct ***** **** **** confirming **** **** ** false:

** ********* *** ****, but ******* ******** **'* not *******. ** ***** be * ******* ** say **** ********* **** adhere ** *** *** are ************* **** *********. With ** ***, **** can *********** ********** [** the ****] ** **** of ***** ******** ** processors. *** *** ***** company.

********, ************** ********* ******* *** EU **** ** ******** **** ***,******* *** *** ********* even *** *********** ********** that **** *****.

*******, ** ******** **, 2019,******* ************ '***** ********* **** company' *****, ********* ** with * **** **** qualified *** ******* ***********:

******* *** *********** * Privacy ************** ********* ***** on ******* ************* ******* regulations (*** ******* *** EU’s ****) *** **** practice. *** ******* ********** reviews, ******** *** ******* this ********* ** ****** that *** *********** ********* and ************** ******** **** been *********** ** ******* the ******* ** *** Arcules ************ (*********, ********, and *******).

** *** ******** ****, Arcules ******** ****** *** actually ********** **** *** placing * ****** ******. All *** *****, ********* ignore ** **** **** false ******.

** *** ******** ****, Arcules ***** ** **** their ***** ** ****** being **********:

*** **** **** ********** as ***** ** ** established ******** *** **** GDPR **********

*******, ** ******* ******, there ** ** ******** process ** ****** * 'fully ********* **** *******' so ** ** ****** factually ***** ** ***** to ** ***. *** EU *** *** *** introduced/approved *** ******** **** accreditation *********.

***********, ***** *** **** 'misleading' **** ****** ***** out *****.

Milestone **** *****

******* ****** / ******* company ********* *** *** its *** ********** **** GDPR ******.

********* ****** * "****-*****" certification *** *** ****** XProtect *** **** * private ******* **** *** not ********** ** *** EU, ********* ********* *** not ******** ******* *** company's *** **************.

***** **** ****** **** out ** *** ********, Milestone ***** * **** footer** ***** *******:

IPVM Image

*** *********** *** ***** size **** ** **** to ****. **** ** said ***:

*********'* ******** ********* ******* catalogue ** ******* ******** pursuant ** ******* **(*) GDPR *** ********* **** hasnot **** ********** as a certification body pursuant to Article 43 GDPR yet. EuroPriSe is dedicated to receiving the approval of its certification criteria and the accreditation as a certification body in accordance with Art. 42 f. GDPR asap. [emphasis added]

**** **** ****** ********** Milestone's ****** ******** **** still ****** "********* ********® Corporate ******** ******* ****-***** certification".

********, *** ************* **** covered ***** ** *********'* VMS, ******** ******* ********* components ********* ******. *** more, ************ "****-*****" ************* ***** Critiqued.

Dahua **** *****

**** ****,***** ********** ** ***** ******** were ********* ** “****** with *** ****” ** TÜV *********, * ********** claim ***** *Ü* ********* is * ******* ****** company ************ **** *** EU ** ****** **** compliance.

IPVM Image

***** *** ***** ********* not ********* **** *****.

******

******* **** ********** ****** are ************* ****** ** video ************.

******-***** ***** ******* ************************** **** ****** *Ü* Rheinland ************ **** **** legal ********/******. ** *** UK, ****** *********** ******* Facewatch ****** ** ** "fully **** *********" ***** largely ** *** ******* of * ****** ******* lawyer ** *****,**** *****.

Comments (3)

Avatar

Morten Tor Nielsen

prescienta.com
12/04/19 09:43am

**** ** ***** *** a **** ************* **** in *** **, ** probably ******'* ** **** to ******* * *** as ***** *** ******* conditions ******* *** ******** that ***** ** ** met, *** ********* ***** *** *** ***** be ** ********* ** GDPR ********** ** *** the *** ** ******** and **** ******** ** offers.

* ***** *** **** lies *** ** ******* to **** **** ******** and ********* ********* *** are ******* **** ********** a *** **** ***** GDPR ******* ******, *** -*********** **** *********** - seed *** (*****) **** that ********* *** ** not *** ***** **** are *** "**** *********" and ********* ****** ** avoided. **'* * ******** way ** ******* ********, but * ***** ********** goes.

*** ***** ** **** most ****** **** **** not ** ********* ****** way *** **** **** be ******** ********** ** fines *** * *** of **** ** **** eventually **** ******** ** CCTV ******* - ********** of **** ****** **** buy. ***** ***** ** wonder ** *** **** make *** ********* ****** for *** **** ******* losses **** * ******** might **********? (*'* **** there's * **-************** ****** in *** ****).

** ***** ** **** the ** ********** ****** a *** ** ********** that ***** **** ****** without ******* *** ********* we're ****** **** *** current *****. *********, ******, such ********** ** *** exists, ***** ***** **** a ** ******* *** walk **** * ***** and ****** ****** ** every ******** ***** **** were ******** ** ***** (as ***** ** ********** personally ************ ****) ***** would **** ****** ******** every ***** ****** ** the *****. * ***'* think *** ********* ****'* think ** **** **** they **** **.

Agree: 3
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

John Honovich

IPVM | In reply to Morten Tor Nielsen | 12/04/19 12:46pm

**** *** (*****) **** that ********* *** ** not *** ***** **** are *** "**** *********" and ********* ****** ** avoided. **'* * ******** way ** ******* ********, but * ***** ********** goes.

******, * ********* *** are****-******** ************... *** ***** ** us ******* ***** ****** out ** ** **** balance **** **** *** and ************ ********* **** making **** ***** ******.

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny
Avatar

Morten Tor Nielsen

prescienta.com
In reply to John Honovich | 12/04/19 12:58pm

***** ****** - * am **** * ******* misanthrope. * ********** * new **** ** * kind ** ******** ** IP *****, *** ** wife ******** ** ** living ** * ******.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 3
Read this IPVM report for free.

This article is part of IPVM's 7,205 reports and 959 tests and is only available to subscribers. To get a one-time preview of our work, enter your work email to access the full article.

Already a subscriber? Login here | Join now
Loading Related Reports