ADI Scare Tactics Against DIY Security

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Nov 27, 2015

ADI wants you to buy alarm system parts from them, not those kits on the Internet.

Leveraging scare tactics, they have made an unsurprisingly weak case against DIY. In this note, we break it down, look at the real tradeoffs and better counterarguments.

*** ***** *** ** buy ***** ****** ***** from ****, *** ***** kits ** *** ********.

********** ***** *******, **** have **** ** ************** weak case ******* ***. ** this ****, ** ***** it ****, **** ** the **** ********* *** better ****************.

[***************]

Start **** ****

*** ****** ** ****** "***** *** ***** ******** to ******* *** **** brakes ** **** *** car?” ********* *** ****** that "********** ****** ******* ***** ones *** ******** *********** on *** ****." *** then *********,“** *** **** ***** a ************ ** **** your ****** **** ** the ***, *** ******’* you ** *** **** for **** ** ****?”

** **** ******* **, it ** * ***** ***. After ***, *** ** *** want ** **** **** family.

*** ********** ** ***** down ** *** **** risks *** *********.

ADI's **** *********

*** ****"*** ***** ***:

  • *** ******* **** ******** more **** ***** ***** of ***** ******, ********* due ** ************* ***** improperly ********** ****** ********* and ***** ***** *******.
  • ** * ******, *** client’s *** ****** ****,**********, ******** * ****** of ***** ******,********* ** ***** ***** fees**** ***** ************.
  • **** **********, ***** *******, coupled **** ************, *********** ********** ***** ****** ** customers ************* *** *** of * *** ******, and ********** ******* ** a ************** ********* ***."

**** ******** **** **** by taking **** "'************' ******** *** ********", you **** *** ********* ****.

Problems **** ***'* ********

**** ********

***** *** *******, **** Simplisafe, ***** **** ******* first, *** **** ********, with****** * ***** ** Amazon:

** **** *** ***** accessing *** ********* ********* reviews ** ** **** and ***********, ******* **** these *** '***********, *********** systems' ** *** **** of **** ****** ******* makes *** '************' **** unprofessional *** ************.

*** ** ********** ***************** **** *** *** majority ** *********** ********* the ****** ** ********** to **** ********** *****.  Overall *********** *** ********* of *** ****** ** alarm ******* ** ***** bit **** * '************' system ********. ** **** cases, ***** **** '**** their ****** ******' **** what * ************ ****** provides, ******* *** **** themselves ****** **** * key **** ** **********, configuring, *** ******* *** system.

******** ** ************ *******, the *** ****** ********* are **** *****, ***** only ******** * ****** alarm **** *** * fixed ****** ** ********** sensor *****, *** *** an ******* ********* ***** limits *** *** ** issue.

****, * *** ******** ADI ***** ******* *** systems ****** ** ******:

"** * ******, *** client’s *** ****** ****, inevitably, ******** * ****** of ***** ******, ********* in ***** ***** **** from ***** ************."

** ******, **** *** alarm ******* ** *** come **** ********* ********** and *** ********* ****/********, and **** **** ***** is **** ******* **** ** *** such * ******. **** *** system ** ****-*********, *** likelihood ** ***** ***** dispatching ** *** *********** is *********** ***.

** **********, *** ******* that ******** ***** / will *** ******* ********** services, *** **** ****** are **** ********** **********. With *** ************* ** smartphones, ** ***** **** a *** ****** ***** can ****** ***** *********, nearby *********, ** ****** friends *** ****** ****** seconds, *** ***** ** no ********* ******* ******* to *** ***** ***** month.  *********, ** ********** is *******, ** ** an *****-** ****** **** can ** ********* ** any ****.  ***'* *********** misunderstanding ** **** ***** reveals *********** ********* ** a ***** ******* ********* factor.

Better ****************

** ******, ***** *** some **** ****** **** DIY ******** *******, **** as ******* ************* *********, ******** vulnerabilities, *** ****** ***********. Product dependability ** * ******* due ** *** **** of ******** ******** *** space ***** ** ****** platforms **** *** ***** half-baked.  *** ***** ********** platform, **************, ***** *** * number ** *** *********, like ******.  

******** ************* ** ******* characteristic ****, **** ** professional *******, ** *** more ****** ** *******. As ** ******* ** our *** ** **** ** ADT ***** ****** ****, *** ********** ************* is ******* ******** ****** transmission ******* ******* *** panels. **** **** ** endemic ** **** ********** wireless *******, ***** *** mainstays ** *** *** market. **** * *********** emphasis ** '**** ** install', *** *********** ** running ***** ** ****** points ** ****** *** realistic *** *** ******* DIYer. ********** *** '****' risk ** ***** * wired ****** ** *** an ****** *** *** vast ******** ** *** systems.

*** *******, **** * professional ******, ****** ******* abound. **** *** ******* are ******** ** ********* dwellers ** ***** ****** where *** ***** ******* and *** ***** ****** sensor **** *** ********, while * ************ ****** often *** ******** ***** that *** ** ********* for ****** ***** ** atypical ************.  ***** * single ******* *** ****** may *** ******* ******* indoor ************, **** ****** or ************ **** ******** areas **** ********* ********* areas ** ******** ** harsh *******. ******** *** best ****** *** *** job ***** ***** ******* something ***** **** *** most ******* ****.

Comments (16)

If adi actually had good prices, and kept any inventory when they put items on sale, let alone provide good service, they wouldn't have to use petty tactics to get business. I only use them if I have no other option.

Who is this targeted towards? Most end users that would consider DIY have no clue who ADI is.... And when ADI sells direct to the end user, isn't that still a DIY project?

I believe ADI is attempting to 'educate' their dealers who sell to end users.

Also, a key argument ADI makes against DIY systems simply is hollow: "As a result, the client’s DIY system will, inevitably, generate a number of false alarms, resulting in false alarm fees from their municipality."

IMHO, this IS the main fallacy/falsehood with their argument, since they clearly call out Simplesafe and Canary as the examples, which as you correctly point out don't typically tie into central stations.

But, if they were to restrict the systems under discussion to DIY alarms that DO connect to central stations then I think the argument is valid. DIYers, due to less experience, are more likely to misconfigure their system than pros.

Lets talk specifics. Which DIY systems require both manual configuration and must be centrally monitored?

In both cases, configuration is done before shipping or monitoring is optional, as is typical of the DIY market.

The point is that the DIY alarms market, even those that might be monitored, do not cause a volume of surprise fees or false-alarm gridlock. In our experience testing multiple DIY systems, sensor mounting and configuration instructions receive good, plain-language treatment that even novices can follow successfully.

ADI is trumpeting a fear that is not a significant factor.

The point is that the DIY alarms market, even those that might be monitored, do not cause a volume of surprise fees or false-alarm gridlock.

What is your basis for this statement? It sounds like an assumption based on reviewing the materials in DIY kits and judging how likely consumers are to install it correctly. If it's based on statistics or other please indicate.

As for what I meant by mis-configured, I am not talking about connectivity or addressing.

I am talking about sensor installation. Regardless of the completeness of the instruction, every house presents challenges that may NOT be listed. Can I use mounting tape here, How should I rig French double doors, how much clearance is required there?

I've had these issues with my own system and would expect others might too. I would think that someone who does it for a living would do it better and in a way that lasts longer than the first major storm (like mine didn't). But that's just my opinion.

What is your basis for this statement? It sounds like an assumption based on reviewing the materials in DIY kits and judging how likely consumers are to install it correctly. If it's based on statistics or other please indicate.

If systems are not monitored, then they don't cause false alarm fees.

Most DIY systems are self-monitored. We take note of this aspect in the system reviews and updates we do. This is one of the central buying criteria of these systems.

In fact, it often costs more money to purchase a DIY system outright than a heavily subsidized '$0 move-in' special that many mandatory monitored incumbent systems offer.

I've had these issues with my own system and would expect others might too. I would think that someone who does it for a living would do it better and in a way that lasts longer than the first major storm (like mine didn't). But that's just my opinion.

You don't need to answer this, but have you paid false alarm fees because of sensor installation errors?

If systems are not monitored, then they don't cause false alarm fees.

Of course. That is why I said:

But, if they were to restrict the systems under discussion to DIY alarms that DO connect to central stations then I think the argument is valid.

As for being charged, no. Only warned, twice. Because of doors that blew open when away. They said you get 3 freebies, then $50 bucks after that.

ADI is actually scared out of their wits right now. Their golden Willy Wonka Chocolate Bar ticket is the Honeywell Intrusion/Fire Line. They do not want DIY alarm systems to flood the market at all or for dealers to buy Honeywell Intrusion products online which cuts into their biggest source of revenue. ADI without the Honeywell Intrusion/Fire Products would go out of business.

In a perfect world, ADI would be really direct and honest about this, but it's tough when there are big numbers at risk for them and their shareholders. With this propaganda, they are probably speaking to their manufacturers, as much as they are installers and end users as far as letting them know they will try to neutralize the DIY growth of the market and will take a stance against it to help slow it down and protect the trade. In that regard it's good for the trade, because the manufacturers that believe they need ADI, might slow down a bit with the DIY push.

The bigger issue for installers and distributors is the fact that for smaller jobs you can get similar quality equipment directly in big box stores, which in essence is giving the installer cost to the general public. I'd love to see them take a hard stance on that to protect the margins of the trade, maybe by boycotting brands that are selling through DIY channels. The irony is that in the end, Honeywell will go all in the DIY market as well.

Another major issue is that some of this home security equipment is becoming very easy to install, which will devalue the installer and turn it into more of a commodity and driving installation pricing down. A young homeowner that grew up on the internet, might be better trained than some of the old time security installers.

Think of the ADI scare tactics approach as the right wing stance on this topic, verses the left wing DIY manufacturer marketing tactics of making it seem like magic plug and play stuff, that will keep your family 100% safe. Somewhere in the middle, with out the drama, is reality.

If someone really wants to DIY, then so be it. You might be better off to let them do it. Hopefully for the installer, they understand the value in central station monitoring, best you can do is it explain it and if they don't cut your losses. If not, they will just end up getting that set up on their own as well. The key for installers is to identify the relentless DIY'er, to make sure they are not wasting their time on this person. It's the same as for home AV, networking, etc.

For example, I have friends that do their own carpentry (moudling, trim work) etc. in their house, they enjoy it and don't see the reason to pay someone to do it for them. I on the other hand, want it to come out mint and don't see the value in me spending my time learning how to make the perfect cut, I'd rather work on my company, and spend my off time with my family. I don't paint either, I pay a painting company to do it. And I don't need scare tactics for me to see the value in paying a painting company to paint for me. I just need a reasonable price from someone that does quality work, and knows their trade.

These days, where there is a will there is a way. If the end user wants to do it themselves and is into learning, they will. If they see more value in working their day job and spending their off time with their family the will do that.

Unfortunately though, costs in just about all trades are wide open, so anyone can figure out how much a contractor is roughly making on them if they really want to. As a contractor, you must be able to explain the value (system design, support, one point of warranty, etc) rather than using scare tactics. New and smaller companies can adapt to such change, it is harder for larger companies that are reliant on past market conditions.

Whether you are a manufacturer, integrator, or distributor these days if you are not innovating or offering something different or better, then you are a commodity.

Sal, interesting points!

One question:

"The bigger issue for installers and distributors is the fact that for smaller jobs you can get similar quality equipment directly in big box stores, which in essence is giving the installer cost to the general public."

Are there many DIY alarm system kits being sold at Costco, Sam's Club, etc.? For example, seems like a lot of Simplisafe is sold at Amazon, which would make it a potential fit for the big box retailers as well. Any ideas?

It's getting there, I am seeing Samsung starting to more aggressively promote their acquired SmartThings platform with multi-purpose sensors. Of course Nest has sensors.

Not necessarily a straight up alarm system, but an eco-system that accomplishes the same goal of securing one's home and notified the home owner directly on their smart phone. There are some other's as well. ADI's business analyze certainly recognize this.

I personally think it's foolish not to have a professional alarm system on your home with a reliable central station, but many people don't see it this way.

Actually I do replace my own disc brakes. Drum brakes are harder- but still pretty straightforward. As someone mentioned earlier the upside is a deeper understanding of how the system works, cost savings, and the knowledge that it is done correctly by someone concentrating on the job- not music blaring in the background. Unfortunately some in the security industry have used scare tactics for years. I think we would be better off explaining the value we add and seeking customers that appreciate what we offer. If a customer can do as good a job installing a system without any training we will have a tough time justifying more than a basic labor rate.

Timothy, I think this is the new "open" approach way. People are just smarter now with great information resources readily available. Many of the industry veterans were spoiled for so long, and their businesses were based on their customers not having a clue. This allowed for much greater profits.

"I think we would be better off explaining the value we add and seeking customers that appreciate what we offer. " I could not agree more with this quote. Many people just "want to know" what they are getting and don't want to feel like they are being duked. If you are honest, in many cases, they will be happy for you to make your money.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camera Disruptor Wyze Enters Sensor / Security Market on Mar 28, 2019
Wyze, the company that has disrupted consumer IP cameras, combining American marketing and Chinese manufacturer, has just announced its expansion...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Alarm.com Suffers Outage on Jul 26, 2019
Alarm.com suffered a major outage this week, impacting its 5+ million customers. Inside, we examine what happened, what Alarm.com told IPVM and...
TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
"UL Has Blood On Their Hands" Alleges The Interceptor / Keith Jentoft on Oct 14, 2019
"UL has blood on their hands" alleges Keith Jentoft of "The Interceptor Project". We examined The Interceptor in-depth last year, see: The...
Alarm Veteran "Demands A Criminal Investigation" Of UL on Oct 18, 2019
The Interceptor's Project pressure against UL continues to rise. Following Keith Jentoft's allegation that "UL Has Blood On Their Hands", Jentoft...
ADT CEO Not Worried About DIY: "2 Discrete Markets" on Dec 13, 2019
ADT's CEO is not worried about DIY, characterizing DIY and ADT's DIFY as "2 discrete markets" at the Imperial Capital Security Investor's...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Motorola / Avigilon Drops ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
Motorola Solutions has pulled out of ISC West 2020 effective immediately, because of coronavirus concerns, IPVM has learned. This is done amidst...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be canceled. New IPVM survey results of 400+ respondents show heated...
Coronavirus Hits Sony, Bosch Says Switch on Feb 26, 2020
Sony's fall in video surveillance has been severe over the past decade. Now, they may be done. In this note, we examine Bosch's new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...
Vulnerability Directory For Access Credentials on Feb 20, 2020
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be difficult to see, especially because most look and feel the same. Even insecure 125 kHz...