Testing Videolarm's Liberty (Cellular Housing)

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Jan 12, 2011

One of the largest challenges for outdoor surveillance is backhaul: How do you bring the video back to the central monitoring location? Without question, doing so consumes a large part of any outdoor surveillance deployment’s capital and operational budget -- thousands per camera for backhaul is relatively common. 

The two most common approaches are building your own wired or wireless networks. Wired access, if even possible across city streets, often requires huge up-front costs for trenching and conduits. Building your own wireless system, while often less expensive than wired, still has significant up-front costs. Additionally, wireless presents frequent reliability issues (especially if the system is poorly designed, installed or maintained) as well as notable operation and maintenance costs.

Cellular, wireless provided by telecommunication carriers, has only started to compete with the traditional two options above. First, 3G speeds became widely available but 5GB per month caps on bandwidth have limited its usability.  Now, with the expansion of 4G, increased speeds, and 'unlimited' bandwidth, cellular becomes much more attractive for use in video surveillance deployments.

A recent product from Moog Videolarm, called the Liberty Series, aims to simplify the use of cellular backhaul. Consisting of two models, the Liberty series are intended to be a solution for rapid deployment of surveillance cameras on 3G/4G networks. All that is required is 120V power and a USB 3G or 4G modem. We've embedded Videolarm's overview that does a good job on showing what the product is:

In this report, we share our findings from testing the Liberty Series. As a housing, the product is fairly straightforward. The key issues we found are the tradeoffs on price, feature sets and design constraints. Inside the PRO section, we dig into these elements.

Contrast to our test on Ubiquiti - an offering for low cost DIY wireless surveillance networks.

Key Findings

Here are our key findings in our review of the product.

  • Installation is simple, requiring only installing the camera, a small amount of programming,  and powering the enclosure.
  • Compatible with a large variety of 3G/4G USB modems, across most, if not all, carriers.
  • Dome is not compatible with some PTZ cameras featuring above-horizon tilt.
  • Certain applications will most likely be better off using lower-cost Ethernet links if line of site is available.

Product Overview

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

The Liberty series currently consists of two models:

  • The first model, the LDW75CLG is an all-in-one enclosure constructed of aluminum with a bottom-mounted polycarbonate dome.  The latching (and lockable) lid is non-metallic for better cellular signal levels without an external antenna, although the enclosure does include a port for an antenna if desired.  A universal mounting plate provides options for mounting cameras from most manufacturers.  Note that PTZ cameras featuring above-horizon tilt such as Sony’s 5th generation PTZ’s will not be able to see above horizontal due to the construction of the dome.
  • The second model, the PB26LG is similar to other models in Videolarms "power box" line, featuring a power supply mounted in a NEMA-4 enclosure.  The front door of the enclosure contains penetrations to accept their line of standard wall and gooseneck mounts, which are compatible with all major manufacturers.

Both models contain a small 3G/4G router which accepts the USB modem and is factory configured to forward all ports to the device attached to its Ethernet port.  They also contain surge protection and Videolarms own IPRS01 IP reset module, which is intended to cycle power of unresponsive cameras (though we have not tested this).  Installation is about as simple as advertised.  The camera is prepared by setting it to DHCP and its HTTP port to 1234, then mounted in the enclosure.  The USB modem is plugged in.  Then, the entire enclosure is mounted and powered.

Competitive Comparison

Examining the financials of using 4G versus traditional Ethernet wireless backhaul, some interesting numbers come to light. The LDW75CLG, for example, can be found online for an average price around $1,500.  Contrast this with a typical housing with heater and blower, which is available online for $300-600.  Only two other components are required: a camera and the USB modem (typically free with 2-year contract).  For installations requiring only a single wireless bridge such as the sub-$200 Ubiquiti Nanostation M5, the economics of deployment over 4G make much little sense.  Data costs would overtake installed wireless Ethernet equipment costs in only a few months.  Contrast this with $2,000-3,000 for a single wireless mesh node, which does not include the camera housing, nor installation.  If an unlimited 4G cellular data plan costs $60 per month for unlimited access, an end user could pay for more than eight years of 4G access before exceeding the cost of only two mesh nodes.  Taking into consideration that multiple links are regularly required in municipal deployments, especially to reach remote areas, 4G becomes an extremely cost-effective backhaul method.  


The following limitations come to mind with this, as well as other, 3G/4G products:

  • Bandwidth, while greatly increased over 3G, is still not comparable to wireless Ethernet.  It may be sufficient for a few standard definition or a single high definition camera, but larger camera counts pose significant problems.  
  • 4G coverage is also still in its early stages.  Many metropolitan areas are not in any providers 4G coverage area, and rural areas are highly unlikely to be covered for some time.  
  • Further, while unlimited 4G plans are currently truly unlimited, as opposed to the 5GB monthly bandwidth cap imposed on 3G plans by carriers, our guess is that it is only a matter of time before usage caps of some sort are imposed on 4G plans.
  • Utilizing a wireless carrier’s network places performance squarely in the hands of the wireless carrier.  Performance is not guaranteed, and bandwidth may be throttled without warning.  Asking multiple carrier reps the same question, “What happens if I put ten of these up in a neighborhood?” results in multiple answers.  Some say throttling is possible.  Some say it’s not a concern, pointing at how many users can simultaneously be on their 3G or 4G mobile phone without performance concerns.  Organizations and integrators planning an implementation utilizing these technologies, beware, and pilot programs are recommended.

Specific to the Liberty series, some other drawbacks exist.  

  • The on-board router has no documented options for built-in VPN tunneling.  Without this, cameras utilizing these enclosures are open to the public internet.  While some simple (use of non-default ports, periodic changing of ports in use) and more advanced (IP and MAC address filtering) security features exist on most cameras, these methods still do not compare to the security of a firewall with VPN access.  We would imagine most law enforcement or corporate entities would be hesitant to deploy cameras on the public internet without greater security.
  • Additionally, since the enclosures are meant to be plug-and-play, they are not highly customizable.  So adding additional features like battery backup or local recorders is not possible, or at the very least, requires a separate enclosure, reducing the Libertys value as a simple, easy-to-deploy, solution.  An integrator could (and many probably already have), however, easily create a package equivalent to the Liberty Series.  A Dotworkz D3 with heater and blower sells for about $700 online with appropriate pole mounting hardware.  With a 3G/4G router, such as SonicWALL or Proxicast (online pricing between $300-700), the same functionality -- with the added benefit of VPN capability -- could be had for nearly the same price.


The Moog Videolarm Liberty series may be a useful solution for certain applications.  We see a couple of applications being an excellent fit for this product:

  • Organizations requiring surveillance of a remote areas, unreachable by wireless Ethernet or hardwired infrastructure.
  • Municipalities aware of the limitations in security and bandwidth may see cellular deployment as a viable option.  We would recommend against deploying cameras on 3G without local recording of some sort, however, as bandwidth is far too low, and limited to 5GB/month without special terms.

For integrators seeking a practically plug-and-play solution for 3G/4G surveillance deployments, and are aware of the drawbacks, the Liberty will serve well.  There are significant labor cost savings to be realized by purchasing a ready-to-go package versus fabricating an enclosure, setting up a router, and performance testing themselves.  However, if customization, such as built-in VPN capability, battery backup, or other functionality is required, we’d recommend considering other options.

1 report cite this report:

Brickcom IP Camera Overview on Oct 11, 2011
Camera manufacturer Brickcom, spun off from Taiwanese manufacturer Gemtek in 2009, is aiming to provide users an alternative to the major brands in...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Save $50 Ends Tomorrow - April 2018 IP Networking Course on Mar 21, 2018
Save $50 ends this tomorrow, March 22nd. Register now and save. Lots of generic network training exists but none of it really explains how it...
Network Racks For Surveillance Guide on Mar 21, 2018
In this guide, we look at network rack infrastructure, one of the fundamentals of IP video surveillance. Inside, we cover: What is a rack unit...
'As-Built' Drawings Tutorial on Mar 20, 2018
Closeout documentation can be invaluable for future expansions or maintenance work, and 'as-built' drawings are a key aspect for finishing projects...
May 2018 Camera Course on Mar 16, 2018
Our next course starts on May 8th. Register now for the Spring 2018 Camera Course This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based...
Rack Mounting NVRs Tutorial on Mar 14, 2018
Rack mounting recorders is common in professional systems, but manufacturers are making it difficult, with simple design failures causing multiple...
3D Install App For Physical Security (BILT) on Mar 13, 2018
Installation of security hardware is a skill that has historically been complicated to train new installers, and just as complicated to quote...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2018 on Mar 12, 2018
A number of major moves in integrator's favorite camera rankings for 2018: Two manufacturers make major moves up One major manufacturer moves...
PoE for IP Video Surveillance Guide on Mar 08, 2018
This guide provides comprehensive explanations of the elements in selecting and using Power Over Ethernet with IP cameras, covering: PoE vs Low...
Cellular (4G / LTE / 5G) For Video Surveillance Guide on Mar 06, 2018
In this report, we explain using cellular for video surveillance including: 4G vs LTE vs 5G 4G standards 5G future Advantage: Placing cameras...
Door Position Switches (DPS) For Access Control Tutorial on Mar 05, 2018
Door position switches do not get enough respect. They solve a major problem of access control systems yet are frequently ignored or...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Final Day - Save $50 - April 2018 IP Networking Course on Mar 22, 2018
Today, March 22nd is the last day to save $50. Register now and save. NEW - 2 sessions per class, 'day' and 'night' to give you double the chance...
Favorite Access Control Credentials 2018 on Mar 22, 2018
In this 2018 access integrator statistics result, which credential type holds the favored spot to unlock access doors? More than 150 integrators...
ISC West Bans Booth Babes on Mar 22, 2018
Booth babes, goodbye. Technically, ISC West banned them 2 years ago with a 'staffing attire' requirement but it looks like ISC West is going to...
Hikvision Fails To Fix Unsafe Browser Plugin on Mar 21, 2018
More than 2 years ago, Hikvision committed to resolving the use of unsafe and ineffective browser plugins. Despite that, today, Hikvision still has...
Network Racks For Surveillance Guide on Mar 21, 2018
In this guide, we look at network rack infrastructure, one of the fundamentals of IP video surveillance. Inside, we cover: What is a rack unit...
Security Robot Sales Struggle on Mar 21, 2018
2 year ago, PSA Security CEO Bill Bozeman called security robots one of “the biggest game changers” in decades for security integrators. Just over...
Dahua Global Launch LeChange on Mar 20, 2018
Dahua is getting into the consumer video surveillance market globally, with "LeChange", an offering long available inside of China is now being...
Axis Z-Wave IP Camera Tested Poorly on Mar 20, 2018
Z-Wave is drawing notable interest for video surveillance use. In IPVM's initial coverage, 84% expressed interest in it, with nearly half being...
'As-Built' Drawings Tutorial on Mar 20, 2018
Closeout documentation can be invaluable for future expansions or maintenance work, and 'as-built' drawings are a key aspect for finishing projects...
Hikvision RSM Professional Misconduct on Mar 19, 2018
A Hikvision RSM engaged in professional misconduct of a US State's licensing law, involving continuing education held at an ADI branch. In this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact