Shootout: 4K vs PTZ Cameras

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 19, 2015

Resolutions continue upwards, with 4K cameras hitting the street. Meanwhile, PTZ usage continues its downward trend, with fewer and fewer integrators choosing them.

The question is: how does this increase in resolution compare to the optical zoom of HD or even SD PTZs? 

Test Area

We tested these cameras day and night in an outdoor parking lot, to ~500' range. Light levels at night varied from about 0.3-0.5 lux, from building and ambient lights.

This image shows the overall scene from a wide FOV taken from a 4K camera. The angle of view in this image is ~70°.

Cameras were tested side by side, with the fixed cameras maintaining the same angle of view regardless of distance to target, while the PTZ cameras were optically zoomed in to a 15-16' field of view at each point (30', 100', 250', and 500'). At 500', both 1080p PTZ models' field of view was slightly wider, as we reached their maximum telephoto zoom range, while the SD PTZ was narrower and able to maintain the same field of view width.

Axis, Bosch, Canon and FLIR Cameras Tested

To find out, we tested three PTZs (from Axis, FLIR and Canon) against three multi-megapixel (Axis 4K, Bosch 4K and Bosch 5MP) cameras in our outdoor test scene at ranges up to 500', day and night.

*********** ******** *******, ****** ************** *** ******. *********, *** ************** *** ******** *****, **** ***** *** ***** *********** ******** ****.

*** ******** **: *** **** **** ******** ** ********** ******* to *** ******* **** ** ** ** **** ** ****? 

Test ****

** ****** ***** ******* *** *** ***** ** ** ******* parking ***, ** ~***' *****. ***** ****** ** ***** ****** from ***** *.*-*.* ***, **** ******** *** ******* ******.

**** ***** ***** *** ******* ***** **** * **** *** taken **** * ** ******. *** ***** ** **** ** this ***** ** ~**°.

******* **** ****** **** ** ****, **** *** ***** ******* maintaining *** **** ***** ** **** ********** ** ******** ** ******, while *** *** ******* **** ********* ****** ** ** * 15-16' ***** ** **** ** **** ***** (**', ***', ***', and ***'). ** ***', **** ***** *** ******' ***** ** view *** ******** *****, ** ** ******* ***** ******* ********* zoom *****, ***** *** ** *** *** ******** *** **** to ******** *** **** ***** ** **** *****.

Axis, *****, ***** *** **** ******* ******

** **** ***, ** ****** ***** **** (**** ****, **** and *****) ******* ***** *****-********* (**** **, ***** ** *** ***** ***) cameras ** *** ******* **** ***** ** ****** ** ** 500', *** *** *****.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** ******** **** **** ****:

******* ***********

  • ** ***** *****, ***** ** *** *** ******* ***** * wider *** ******* ******* ******* ** ***** **** ****** **** the ******* ** * ********. *** ** *** ******** ***** details ** **** *****.
  • ** ****** ** **** *****, *** *******, ********* *** ** model, ******* **** ****** ******* ** *** **** ******* *** chart ******** ** ***** ** *******.
  • *** ** *** ****** ********* ***, *** *** *** ******** better ******* ** *** ******* ** ***' **** *** ***** non-IR ***, ****** ********** ***** **** *** ** ***.

***** ***********

  • ** ***** ***** (~**'), *** ** *** *** ******* ********** all *** *** ********** ** ***, **** ****** ******* ** our **** ***** *** *******.
  • ****** **** (***'+), *** ********** ** *** ****** *********** *** other ******* ******, **** ******* ** *** ******* ** **** 250', *** ********* **** ***'. 
  • *** ** *** ************ *** ***** ***-** *** ***** ** medium ****** (***-***'), ********* ********* ** *** ******* ***** *** 1080p ***** ******** ** ****** ******.

***************

** ******** ********** *** *** ***** ******* ****** ***** *** detail **** **** ** ***** ******* *** *******, ******* *** jump ** ********** *** ********** **** **** ********** *******. *** **** monitored ************* ***** ******* *** ****** ******, **** * ******** definition *** ******** ****** ******* ** *** *** **** ***** ranges **** ** *******. *** *******' ********** *** ******* ********* **** the ************ ** ********** ** ****, ***** ******* ********* *** some ******* ** **** ***** ** *** *****, * ******** weakness ** ****.

*******, ** *** ****** **** *** ** ******** ****, ***** cameras ****** ** ****. ******* *** ******* ** **** ********** the *********** **** **** **** ** ***** ** *** ***** direction ****** ** ********, ******* *** ******, *** ******* **** stationary ******* ***** ******* **** ********.

Angle ** **** ***********

** **** * ***** ** **** *** **** ***** ** view ******* ******* *** ***** ************** *** *** ******* ****** here, *** *** ***** *****. *** ***** ** *** *** angles ***** ** *** ***** *******' ***** ** ****, ~**°. By ********, *** ****** ********** *** ****' ***** ** **** at ***** ******* ***** ******, ~*°. 

******* ** **** **** ********** ** ***, ** **** ** the *********** *****, **** ***** ***** ***** ** ****, *** fixed *** ******* ******* ***** *******, *** **** ******** *********** of *** ***** **** * ****** *** ********. *** **** provide **** ****** ******* **** ****** ** ****** ******, *** completely **** ******** *********** **** ****** ** ***** ********* ******.

Daytime ***********

********* ** ***** ***** (~**' **** *******), *** ** **** in **** *** **, ***, *** ** *** ******, **** solid ******* ** *** ******* *** *****. ** **** ***** even *** ** ***** *** ******** **** ** *** *** some ******* ** *** *******.

**** **** *** **** *****-* ** ********** ****** ** **** scene, **** ***** ****** *** **** ********, ***** *** ***** in *** ****** ***** ** **** ******, ** ****.

 

****** ** ***' **** *** *******, ***** ** * ******* drop ** ****** ** *** ***** *******, ** *** ***** below ** ** *** ** ******, *** ***** ** ** the ***. *** ***** ******** ** *** *** ******* ** field ** **** ***** ******* ************* *** **** ** *** cameras ********* ****. 

 

** ***', ** ******* *** ********* ** *** ** *** fixed *******, ** *** ** ****** *** ***. *****, ******* of *** **** *** *******. ***** ** **** ****** **** in ****** *** ** *** **** ****** **** (** ** found ** *********** *****), *** *** ** ***** ********* ****. 

*******, ** ~***' **** *** *******, *** ** *** ***** PTZs ***** ** ** ***** ***** ******* ******* **** *****. The ***** *** ***, *******, ********* ** ***, ********* ******* similar ** ******* ******. 

Nighttime ***********

** *****, *********** ** *** ***** ************** ****** ***** *************. Some ******* *** *** ***** *-* ***** ** *** ***** are *********, *** *** ***** ** ****** *** **** ** provide ***********.

*** **** *** ******** *** **** ****** ** **** ***** due ** *** ***** ** **. *** ***** *** ***** outperforms *** **** ***** *** *** ** *** ****** *** light ***********, ******* *** **** **** **% **** ** ***.

 ** ** *** *******, ******* **** ******* ** *** ***** cameras, *** *** **** *** ******** *** **** ******* ** this *****. *** ***** *** ***** ******** ********* ** *** subject *** *****, *** *** **** ***** ** ****** *****, providing ** ****** ******.

*******, ** ***', **** *** **** *** ** **** ** provide ****** ****** ** ***, **** ***** ******* ****** *** dark, *** *** ***, ** ****. 

Comments (19)

So have we reached a conclusion on how many dozen analog cameras can be replaced by one 4K camera? :o)

Yeah, 1/12 dozen.

How many bakers dozen?

Actually, I was being (mostly) serious! Since I don't believe that any of the fixed cameras could automatically replace the vb-c60. Not to say that the VGA is better overall, only that the vb-c60 will reveal finer detail, at the expense of FOV of course.

By my calculation, even the FLIR is only twice as good, in terms of max PPF, as the vb-c60, and the Bosch and Axis less than that.

The Flir ptz looks great day and night - I am really surprised the axis 4k didnt have a better picture, it looks aweful.

This is a great test. Just goes to show how far fixed has to go.

Given that most cameras are not monitored, this kind of testing just goes to show what you can expect at (say) 100', even from 4K.

Damn that FLIR DNZ30TL2R looks good.

Thanks you, John, for the excellent report.

are these 4K images from H.264 or from MJPEG ?

what is the FPS?

-Ling

All images are from H.264 streams. We recorded at 10 FPS as it's a fair average frame rate.

Thanks Ethan for your timely response.

I agree, the Flir looks very impressive in this shootout as well as this one.

Thanks Ethan!

I would think that even the lowly Canon VGA could provide finer details than any of the 4K cameras, at all distances.* Do you agree?

I would even expect that the reigning MP King, the 29MP Avigilon, equipped with a equivalent lens to the 4K models (> 30 degrees?), would come up short against the VGA PTZ.

Just doing the simple math of (Fixed AOV/PTZ AOV) - (Fixed HorPixels/PTZ Hor Pixels). When the result > 0 the PTZ should have a greater PPF. **

Is that a good rough way to estimate whether a PTZ or fixed can resolve better?

*assuming daylight and > minimum focus distance, of course the PTZ FOV is extremely small.

**Of course there may be 'some slight loss of detail' due to the long lens.

Wow, great report, Ethan. The pictures really tell the story.

At 4-6 ppf, stills from the fixed cameras seem pretty unusable, but what about the video? At 4-6 ppf, can you usually distinguish when something is moving "out there?" Otherwise, might you need something like SpotterRF to cue and point the PTZ before you can benefit from the PTZ's higher quality image?

"At 4-6 ppf, can you usually distinguish when something is moving "out there?"

This relates to the problem of long varifocal lenses in PTZs, see: Major Flaw in Long Lenses and PTZs.

Theoretically, and with a short lens (e.g., 70° AoV), like on typical boxes and domes, yes, you should be able to distinguish something with 4-6ppf. However, with a PTZ at its maximum telephoto (typically ~2° AoV), the image quality is significantly degraded compared to the 'theoretical' PPF.

Are the PPF numbers shown the theoretical ones?

PPF numbers are actual. The point about theoretical is theoretically what one might expect performance to be.

In the calculator for the FLIR at 500 feet and max zoom it says PPF should be 105. The report says 95 PPF. Not a large difference by any means, but is the reason that they are different that the 105 is the theoretical PPF, or I am I doing something wrong?

Ethan, can you share any shots showing the entire FOV of the of the 4K images versus the entire FOV of the PTZs? That go along with what you show diagrammaticaliy with the FOV triangles up top.

I think it would be instructive to see how much overview you are really sacrificing to get similar detail, when using a PTZ.

Great report and contains one item that is wholly unexpected:

There is a remarkable difference in these 4K cameras. I am quite disappointed in the optics on the Axis 4K vs. the Bosch 4K and even Bosch 5MP camera at the 30' mark.

Also surprising is that the Bosch 5 MP appears better than either the overly noisy Bosch 4K and slightly more blurry Axis 4K at night. None of them are particularly impressive, but there is a noticeable difference.

Were any changes made to compression to level the playing field or are they all at default?

Good article.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Worst Products Tested In Past Year on Jan 09, 2019
IPVM has done over 100 tests in the past year. But which products performed the worst? Which ones should users be most aware of? In this report,...
2019 Video Surveillance Cameras Overview on Jan 07, 2019
Each year, IPVM summarizes the main advances and changes for video surveillance cameras, based on our industry-leading testing and...
IPVM Best New Products 2019 Opened - 70+ Entrants on Jan 07, 2019
The inaugural IPVM Best New Product Awards has been opened - the industry's first and only program where the awards are not pay-to-play and the...
Camera Course January 2019 on Jan 03, 2019
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
ASCMA / Moni Problems Deepen, Lenders Terminate Support Agreement on Dec 28, 2018
Ascent Capital Group, aka ASCMA, currently branded Brinks Home Security, formerly known as Moni and Monitronics faces a troubling end to a rocky...
8MP / 4K Fixed Lens Camera Shootout - Dahua, Hikvision, TVT, Uniview on Dec 17, 2018
8MP / 4K fixed lens models are now common in lower cost lines, with nearly every Chinese brand and their OEMs now offering multiple options. To...
Ubiquiti $79 Flex IP Camera Tested on Dec 07, 2018
U.S. Manufacturer Ubiquiti has released a 1080p, integrated IR IP camera, selling it directly for $79, making this one of the least expensive IP...
Hanwha L Series Lowest-Cost Camera Tested on Dec 04, 2018
Hanwha has released their lowest-priced IP camera line ever, the L series, that competes on price with low cost competitors Dahua and...
Alarm.com "AI" Video Analytics Tested on Nov 30, 2018
Alarm.com has announced what it calls an "artificial intelligence (AI) architecture and video analytics service", touting that  Alarm.com's...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
Intersec 2019 Live Day 1 - Massive China Presence on Jan 21, 2019
There’s a massive presence from Chinese or China-focused video surveillance firms, chiefly Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei, and Infinova, at...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact