Shootout: 4K vs PTZ Cameras

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 19, 2015

Resolutions continue upwards, with 4K cameras hitting the street. Meanwhile, PTZ usage continues its downward trend, with fewer and fewer integrators choosing them.

The question is: how does this increase in resolution compare to the optical zoom of HD or even SD PTZs? 

Test Area

We tested these cameras day and night in an outdoor parking lot, to ~500' range. Light levels at night varied from about 0.3-0.5 lux, from building and ambient lights.

This image shows the overall scene from a wide FOV taken from a 4K camera. The angle of view in this image is ~70°.

Cameras were tested side by side, with the fixed cameras maintaining the same angle of view regardless of distance to target, while the PTZ cameras were optically zoomed in to a 15-16' field of view at each point (30', 100', 250', and 500'). At 500', both 1080p PTZ models' field of view was slightly wider, as we reached their maximum telephoto zoom range, while the SD PTZ was narrower and able to maintain the same field of view width.

Axis, Bosch, Canon and FLIR Cameras Tested

To find out, we tested three PTZs (from Axis, FLIR and Canon) against three multi-megapixel (Axis 4K, Bosch 4K and Bosch 5MP) cameras in our outdoor test scene at ranges up to 500', day and night.

*********** ******** *******, ****** ************** *** ******. *********, *** ************** *** ******** *****, **** ***** *** fewer *********** ******** ****.

*** ******** **: *** does **** ******** ** resolution ******* ** *** optical **** ** ** or **** ** ****? 

Test ****

** ****** ***** ******* day *** ***** ** an ******* ******* ***, to ~***' *****. ***** levels ** ***** ****** from ***** *.*-*.* ***, from ******** *** ******* lights.

**** ***** ***** *** overall ***** **** * wide *** ***** **** a ** ******. *** angle ** **** ** this ***** ** ~**°.

******* **** ****** **** by ****, **** *** fixed ******* *********** *** same ***** ** **** ********** of ******** ** ******, while *** *** ******* were ********* ****** ** to * **-**' ***** of **** ** **** point (**', ***', ***', and ***'). ** ***', both ***** *** ******' field ** **** *** slightly *****, ** ** reached ***** ******* ********* zoom *****, ***** *** SD *** *** ******** and **** ** ******** the **** ***** ** view *****.

Axis, *****, ***** *** **** ******* ******

** **** ***, ** tested ***** **** (**** Axis, **** *** *****) against ***** *****-********* (**** **, ***** 4K *** ***** ***) cameras ** *** ******* test ***** ** ****** up ** ***', *** and *****.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

******* ***********

  • ** ***** *****, ***** 4K *** *** ******* using * ***** ***** of **** ******* ******* details ** ***** **** zoomed **** *** ******* in * ******** ***. The ** *** ******** fewer ******* ** **** range.
  • ** ****** ** **** range, *** *******, ********* the ** *****, ******* much ****** ******* ** our **** ******* *** chart ******** ** ***** 4K *******.
  • *** ** *** ****** telephoto ***, *** *** PTZ ******** ****** ******* of *** ******* ** 500' **** *** ***** non-IR ***, ****** ********** worse **** *** ** PTZ.

***** ***********

  • ** ***** ***** (~**'), the ** *** *** cameras ********** *** *** the ********** ** ***, with ****** ******* ** our **** ***** *** subject.
  • ****** **** (***'+), *** integrated ** *** ****** outperforms *** ***** ******* tested, **** ******* ** the ******* ** **** 250', *** ********* **** 500'. 
  • *** ** *** ************ the ***** ***-** *** model ** ****** ****** (100-250'), ********* ********* ** the ******* ***** *** 1080p ***** ******** ** usable ******.

***************

** ******** ********** *** can ***** ******* ****** range *** ****** **** even ** ***** ******* can *******, ******* *** jump ** ********** *** processing **** **** ********** *******. For **** ********* ************* which ******* *** ****** detail, **** * ******** definition *** ******** ****** details ** *** *** very ***** ****** **** ** cameras. *** *******' ********** are ******* ********* **** the ************ ** ********** IR ****, ***** ******* detection *** **** ******* at **** ***** ** low *****, * ******** weakness ** ****.

*******, ** *** ****** will *** ** ******** live, ***** ******* ****** be ****. ******* *** cameras ** **** ********** the *********** **** **** will ** ***** ** the ***** ********* ****** an ********, ******* *** events, *** ******* **** stationary ******* ***** ******* zoom ********.

Angle ** **** ***********

** **** * ***** of **** *** **** angle ** **** ******* between *** ***** ************** and *** ******* ****** here, *** *** ***** below. *** ***** ** the *** ****** ***** is *** ***** *******' field ** ****, ~**°. By ********, *** ****** represents *** ****' ***** of **** ** ***** longest ***** ******, ~*°. 

******* ** **** **** difference ** ***, ** seen ** *** *********** below, **** ***** ***** field ** ****, *** fixed *** ******* ******* fewer *******, *** **** overview *********** ** *** scene **** * ****** PTZ ********. *** **** provide **** ****** ******* when ****** ** ****** ranges, *** ********** **** overview *********** **** ****** to ***** ********* ******.

Daytime ***********

********* ** ***** ***** (~30' **** *******), *** is **** ** **** the **, ***, *** HD *** ******, **** solid ******* ** *** subject *** *****. ** this ***** **** *** SD ***** *** ******** over ** *** *** some ******* ** *** subject.

**** **** *** **** P1428-E ** ********** ****** in **** *****, **** after ****** *** **** focusing, ***** *** ***** in *** ****** ***** of **** ******, ** well.

 

****** ** ***' **** the *******, ***** ** a ******* **** ** detail ** *** ***** cameras, ** *** ***** below ** ** *** 4K ******, *** ***** 20 ** *** ***. PPF ***** ******** ** the *** ******* ** field ** **** ***** remains ************* *** **** as *** ******* ********* zoom. 

 

** ***', ** ******* are ********* ** *** of *** ***** *******, as *** ** ****** too ***. *****, ******* of *** **** *** similar. ***** ** **** slight **** ** ****** due ** *** **** lenses **** (** ** found ** *********** *****), *** *** ** still ********* ****. 

*******, ** ~***' **** the *******, *** ** the ***** **** ***** as ** ***** ***** maximum ******* **** *****. The ***** *** ***, however, ********* ** ***, providing ******* ******* ** shorter ******. 

Nighttime ***********

** *****, *********** ** the ***** ************** ****** drops *************. **** ******* and *** ***** *-* lines ** *** ***** are *********, *** *** scene ** ****** *** dark ** ******* ***********.

*** **** *** ******** the **** ****** ** this ***** *** ** its ***** ** **. The ***** *** ***** outperforms *** **** ***** PTZ *** ** *** better *** ***** ***********, despite *** **** **** 50% **** ** ***.

 ** ** *** *******, details **** ******* ** the ***** *******, *** the **** *** ******** the **** ******* ** this *****. *** ***** PTZ ***** ******** ********* of *** ******* *** chart, *** *** **** model ** ****** *****, providing ** ****** ******.

*******, ** ***', **** the **** *** ** able ** ******* ****** images ** ***, **** other ******* ****** *** dark, *** *** ***, or ****. 

Comments (22)

So have we reached a conclusion on how many dozen analog cameras can be replaced by one 4K camera? :o)

Yeah, 1/12 dozen.

How many bakers dozen?

Actually, I was being (mostly) serious! Since I don't believe that any of the fixed cameras could automatically replace the vb-c60. Not to say that the VGA is better overall, only that the vb-c60 will reveal finer detail, at the expense of FOV of course.

By my calculation, even the FLIR is only twice as good, in terms of max PPF, as the vb-c60, and the Bosch and Axis less than that.

The Flir ptz looks great day and night - I am really surprised the axis 4k didnt have a better picture, it looks aweful.

This is a great test. Just goes to show how far fixed has to go.

Given that most cameras are not monitored, this kind of testing just goes to show what you can expect at (say) 100', even from 4K.

Damn that FLIR DNZ30TL2R looks good.

Thanks you, John, for the excellent report.

are these 4K images from H.264 or from MJPEG ?

what is the FPS?

-Ling

All images are from H.264 streams. We recorded at 10 FPS as it's a fair average frame rate.

Thanks Ethan for your timely response.

I agree, the Flir looks very impressive in this shootout as well as this one.

Thanks Ethan!

I would think that even the lowly Canon VGA could provide finer details than any of the 4K cameras, at all distances.* Do you agree?

I would even expect that the reigning MP King, the 29MP Avigilon, equipped with a equivalent lens to the 4K models (> 30 degrees?), would come up short against the VGA PTZ.

Just doing the simple math of (Fixed AOV/PTZ AOV) - (Fixed HorPixels/PTZ Hor Pixels). When the result > 0 the PTZ should have a greater PPF. **

Is that a good rough way to estimate whether a PTZ or fixed can resolve better?

*assuming daylight and > minimum focus distance, of course the PTZ FOV is extremely small.

**Of course there may be 'some slight loss of detail' due to the long lens.

Wow, great report, Ethan. The pictures really tell the story.

At 4-6 ppf, stills from the fixed cameras seem pretty unusable, but what about the video? At 4-6 ppf, can you usually distinguish when something is moving "out there?" Otherwise, might you need something like SpotterRF to cue and point the PTZ before you can benefit from the PTZ's higher quality image?

"At 4-6 ppf, can you usually distinguish when something is moving "out there?"

This relates to the problem of long varifocal lenses in PTZs, see: Major Flaw in Long Lenses and PTZs.

Theoretically, and with a short lens (e.g., 70° AoV), like on typical boxes and domes, yes, you should be able to distinguish something with 4-6ppf. However, with a PTZ at its maximum telephoto (typically ~2° AoV), the image quality is significantly degraded compared to the 'theoretical' PPF.

Are the PPF numbers shown the theoretical ones?

PPF numbers are actual. The point about theoretical is theoretically what one might expect performance to be.

In the calculator for the FLIR at 500 feet and max zoom it says PPF should be 105. The report says 95 PPF. Not a large difference by any means, but is the reason that they are different that the 105 is the theoretical PPF, or I am I doing something wrong?

Ethan, can you share any shots showing the entire FOV of the of the 4K images versus the entire FOV of the PTZs? That go along with what you show diagrammaticaliy with the FOV triangles up top.

I think it would be instructive to see how much overview you are really sacrificing to get similar detail, when using a PTZ.

Great report and contains one item that is wholly unexpected:

There is a remarkable difference in these 4K cameras. I am quite disappointed in the optics on the Axis 4K vs. the Bosch 4K and even Bosch 5MP camera at the 30' mark.

Also surprising is that the Bosch 5 MP appears better than either the overly noisy Bosch 4K and slightly more blurry Axis 4K at night. None of them are particularly impressive, but there is a noticeable difference.

Were any changes made to compression to level the playing field or are they all at default?

Good article.

Just read the article, and was a good read. Though there was this typo that had me reading over and over the same section. Is there a missing word or two after 'narrower' ?

 

Daytime Performance

  • At short range, fixed 4K and 5MP cameras using a wider FOV provide similar details to 1080p PTZs zoomed into the subject in a narrower. The SD PTZ provides fewer details at this range.

Yes, there absolutely is a missing word. I've updated it to read "in a narrower FOV." Thanks for calling it out!

Anytime. I just mentally couldn't process that line. ☺

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

IR Surveillance Camera Guide on Feb 06, 2020
Integrated infrared (IR) cameras are everywhere in 2020, but not all IR is created equal, with many differences in coverage, overexposure,...
Camera Field of View (FoV) Guide on Nov 13, 2019
Field of View (FoV) and Angle of View (AoV), are deceptively complex. At their most basic, they simply describe what the camera can "see" and seem...
Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) Guide on Oct 01, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Lens Iris Tutorial on Aug 08, 2019
Cameras, like humans, have irises, controlling the light which hits the imager and impacting image details. However, cameras have multiple types of...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Avigilon 32MP and 12MP H4 Multisensor Cameras Tested on Jun 11, 2019
Avigilon has released their H4 Multi-Sensor line of cameras claiming "broad scene coverage and high image detail" We bought and tested the...
Vivotek 20MP Multi-Imager Tested on May 30, 2019
Vivotek has released their latest repositionable multi-imager camera, the MA9321-EHTV, a 20 MP model claiming "Supreme Night Visibility", "Optimal...
Panasonic 32MP Multi Imager Camera Tested (WV-X8570N) on May 16, 2019
Panasonic has released their first multi imager models including the 32MP (4x4K) WV-X8570N, claiming "Extreme image quality for evidence capturing...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Pivot3 Mass Layoffs on Mar 27, 2020
Pivot3 has conducted mass layoffs, the culmination of grand hopes, a quarter of a billion dollars in VC funding, and multiple failures to gain...
Athena CEO Criticizes 'Deplorable' 'Nitpicking', IPVM Refutes on Mar 27, 2020
Athena Security's CEO Lisa Falzone has strongly objected to IPVM's reporting on Athena, calling it 'deplorable' and repeatedly criticizing IPVM's...
Hikvision Admits Sanctions Harming Its Financial Performance on Mar 27, 2020
While Hikvision initially downplayed being sanctioned for human rights abuses, the company is now admitting a significant impact in a new PRC...
New Axis M30 Cameras Tested on Mar 26, 2020
Axis has released a new generation of, for them, relatively low cost M30 series cameras, claiming to deliver "sharp video quality even in poor...
Coronavirus Shuts Down ADT Door Knockers on Mar 26, 2020
Coronavirus has another victim - this time, alarm giant ADT has stopped all door to door sales. Door knockers are a critical but controversial...
Access Control Course Spring 2020 - Save $50 Last Day on Mar 26, 2020
Register Now - Spring 2020 Access Control Course. Today, March 26th is the last day to save $50. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
Convergint Coronavirus Cuts on Mar 25, 2020
One of the world's largest security integrators, Convergint, has made a major move to handle the impact of coronavirus, with cuts across the...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud video. But what does it mean? How does it all work? Inside this...
TVT / InVid Facial Recognition Tested on Mar 25, 2020
Facial recognition is frequently sold for thousands of dollars per channel but some China manufacturers are offering full facial recognition...
IPVM Launches On-Demand Courses on Mar 24, 2020
For nearly a decade, IPVM has been a leader in online live courses. Now, we have added on-demand versions for all courses. The same course...