Shootout: 4K vs PTZ Cameras

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 19, 2015

Resolutions continue upwards, with 4K cameras hitting the street. Meanwhile, PTZ usage continues its downward trend, with fewer and fewer integrators choosing them.

The question is: how does this increase in resolution compare to the optical zoom of HD or even SD PTZs? 

Test Area

We tested these cameras day and night in an outdoor parking lot, to ~500' range. Light levels at night varied from about 0.3-0.5 lux, from building and ambient lights.

This image shows the overall scene from a wide FOV taken from a 4K camera. The angle of view in this image is ~70°.

Cameras were tested side by side, with the fixed cameras maintaining the same angle of view regardless of distance to target, while the PTZ cameras were optically zoomed in to a 15-16' field of view at each point (30', 100', 250', and 500'). At 500', both 1080p PTZ models' field of view was slightly wider, as we reached their maximum telephoto zoom range, while the SD PTZ was narrower and able to maintain the same field of view width.

Axis, Bosch, Canon and FLIR Cameras Tested

To find out, we tested three PTZs (from Axis, FLIR and Canon) against three multi-megapixel (Axis 4K, Bosch 4K and Bosch 5MP) cameras in our outdoor test scene at ranges up to 500', day and night.

*********** ******** *******, ****** ************** *** ******. *********, *** ************** *** ******** *****, **** ***** *** fewer *********** ******** ****.

*** ******** **: *** does **** ******** ** resolution ******* ** *** optical **** ** ** or **** ** ****? 

Test ****

** ****** ***** ******* day *** ***** ** an ******* ******* ***, to ~***' *****. ***** levels ** ***** ****** from ***** *.*-*.* ***, from ******** *** ******* lights.

**** ***** ***** *** overall ***** **** * wide *** ***** **** a ** ******. *** angle ** **** ** this ***** ** ~**°.

******* **** ****** **** by ****, **** *** fixed ******* *********** *** same ***** ** **** ********** of ******** ** ******, while *** *** ******* were ********* ****** ** to * **-**' ***** of **** ** **** point (**', ***', ***', and ***'). ** ***', both ***** *** ******' field ** **** *** slightly *****, ** ** reached ***** ******* ********* zoom *****, ***** *** SD *** *** ******** and **** ** ******** the **** ***** ** view *****.

Axis, *****, ***** *** **** ******* ******

** **** ***, ** tested ***** **** (**** Axis, **** *** *****) against ***** *****-********* (**** **, ***** 4K *** ***** ***) cameras ** *** ******* test ***** ** ****** up ** ***', *** and *****.

[***************]

Key ********

**** *** *** *** findings **** **** ****:

******* ***********

  • ** ***** *****, ***** 4K *** *** ******* using * ***** ***** of **** ******* ******* details ** ***** **** zoomed **** *** ******* in * ******** ***. The ** *** ******** fewer ******* ** **** range.
  • ** ****** ** **** range, *** *******, ********* the ** *****, ******* much ****** ******* ** our **** ******* *** chart ******** ** ***** 4K *******.
  • *** ** *** ****** telephoto ***, *** *** PTZ ******** ****** ******* of *** ******* ** 500' **** *** ***** non-IR ***, ****** ********** worse **** *** ** PTZ.

***** ***********

  • ** ***** ***** (~**'), the ** *** *** cameras ********** *** *** the ********** ** ***, with ****** ******* ** our **** ***** *** subject.
  • ****** **** (***'+), *** integrated ** *** ****** outperforms *** ***** ******* tested, **** ******* ** the ******* ** **** 250', *** ********* **** 500'. 
  • *** ** *** ************ the ***** ***-** *** model ** ****** ****** (100-250'), ********* ********* ** the ******* ***** *** 1080p ***** ******** ** usable ******.

***************

** ******** ********** *** can ***** ******* ****** range *** ****** **** even ** ***** ******* can *******, ******* *** jump ** ********** *** processing **** **** ********** *******. For **** ********* ************* which ******* *** ****** detail, **** * ******** definition *** ******** ****** details ** *** *** very ***** ****** **** ** cameras. *** *******' ********** are ******* ********* **** the ************ ** ********** IR ****, ***** ******* detection *** **** ******* at **** ***** ** low *****, * ******** weakness ** ****.

*******, ** *** ****** will *** ** ******** live, ***** ******* ****** be ****. ******* *** cameras ** **** ********** the *********** **** **** will ** ***** ** the ***** ********* ****** an ********, ******* *** events, *** ******* **** stationary ******* ***** ******* zoom ********.

Angle ** **** ***********

** **** * ***** of **** *** **** angle ** **** ******* between *** ***** ************** and *** ******* ****** here, *** *** ***** below. *** ***** ** the *** ****** ***** is *** ***** *******' field ** ****, ~**°. By ********, *** ****** represents *** ****' ***** of **** ** ***** longest ***** ******, ~*°. 

******* ** **** **** difference ** ***, ** seen ** *** *********** below, **** ***** ***** field ** ****, *** fixed *** ******* ******* fewer *******, *** **** overview *********** ** *** scene **** * ****** PTZ ********. *** **** provide **** ****** ******* when ****** ** ****** ranges, *** ********** **** overview *********** **** ****** to ***** ********* ******.

Daytime ***********

********* ** ***** ***** (~30' **** *******), *** is **** ** **** the **, ***, *** HD *** ******, **** solid ******* ** *** subject *** *****. ** this ***** **** *** SD ***** *** ******** over ** *** *** some ******* ** *** subject.

**** **** *** **** P1428-E ** ********** ****** in **** *****, **** after ****** *** **** focusing, ***** *** ***** in *** ****** ***** of **** ******, ** well.

 

****** ** ***' **** the *******, ***** ** a ******* **** ** detail ** *** ***** cameras, ** *** ***** below ** ** *** 4K ******, *** ***** 20 ** *** ***. PPF ***** ******** ** the *** ******* ** field ** **** ***** remains ************* *** **** as *** ******* ********* zoom. 

 

** ***', ** ******* are ********* ** *** of *** ***** *******, as *** ** ****** too ***. *****, ******* of *** **** *** similar. ***** ** **** slight **** ** ****** due ** *** **** lenses **** (** ** found ** *********** *****), *** *** ** still ********* ****. 

*******, ** ~***' **** the *******, *** ** the ***** **** ***** as ** ***** ***** maximum ******* **** *****. The ***** *** ***, however, ********* ** ***, providing ******* ******* ** shorter ******. 

Nighttime ***********

** *****, *********** ** the ***** ************** ****** drops *************. **** ******* and *** ***** *-* lines ** *** ***** are *********, *** *** scene ** ****** *** dark ** ******* ***********.

*** **** *** ******** the **** ****** ** this ***** *** ** its ***** ** **. The ***** *** ***** outperforms *** **** ***** PTZ *** ** *** better *** ***** ***********, despite *** **** **** 50% **** ** ***.

 ** ** *** *******, details **** ******* ** the ***** *******, *** the **** *** ******** the **** ******* ** this *****. *** ***** PTZ ***** ******** ********* of *** ******* *** chart, *** *** **** model ** ****** *****, providing ** ****** ******.

*******, ** ***', **** the **** *** ** able ** ******* ****** images ** ***, **** other ******* ****** *** dark, *** *** ***, or ****. 

Comments (22)

So have we reached a conclusion on how many dozen analog cameras can be replaced by one 4K camera? :o)

Yeah, 1/12 dozen.

How many bakers dozen?

Actually, I was being (mostly) serious! Since I don't believe that any of the fixed cameras could automatically replace the vb-c60. Not to say that the VGA is better overall, only that the vb-c60 will reveal finer detail, at the expense of FOV of course.

By my calculation, even the FLIR is only twice as good, in terms of max PPF, as the vb-c60, and the Bosch and Axis less than that.

The Flir ptz looks great day and night - I am really surprised the axis 4k didnt have a better picture, it looks aweful.

This is a great test. Just goes to show how far fixed has to go.

Given that most cameras are not monitored, this kind of testing just goes to show what you can expect at (say) 100', even from 4K.

Damn that FLIR DNZ30TL2R looks good.

Thanks you, John, for the excellent report.

are these 4K images from H.264 or from MJPEG ?

what is the FPS?

-Ling

All images are from H.264 streams. We recorded at 10 FPS as it's a fair average frame rate.

Thanks Ethan for your timely response.

I agree, the Flir looks very impressive in this shootout as well as this one.

Thanks Ethan!

I would think that even the lowly Canon VGA could provide finer details than any of the 4K cameras, at all distances.* Do you agree?

I would even expect that the reigning MP King, the 29MP Avigilon, equipped with a equivalent lens to the 4K models (> 30 degrees?), would come up short against the VGA PTZ.

Just doing the simple math of (Fixed AOV/PTZ AOV) - (Fixed HorPixels/PTZ Hor Pixels). When the result > 0 the PTZ should have a greater PPF. **

Is that a good rough way to estimate whether a PTZ or fixed can resolve better?

*assuming daylight and > minimum focus distance, of course the PTZ FOV is extremely small.

**Of course there may be 'some slight loss of detail' due to the long lens.

Wow, great report, Ethan. The pictures really tell the story.

At 4-6 ppf, stills from the fixed cameras seem pretty unusable, but what about the video? At 4-6 ppf, can you usually distinguish when something is moving "out there?" Otherwise, might you need something like SpotterRF to cue and point the PTZ before you can benefit from the PTZ's higher quality image?

"At 4-6 ppf, can you usually distinguish when something is moving "out there?"

This relates to the problem of long varifocal lenses in PTZs, see: Major Flaw in Long Lenses and PTZs.

Theoretically, and with a short lens (e.g., 70° AoV), like on typical boxes and domes, yes, you should be able to distinguish something with 4-6ppf. However, with a PTZ at its maximum telephoto (typically ~2° AoV), the image quality is significantly degraded compared to the 'theoretical' PPF.

Are the PPF numbers shown the theoretical ones?

PPF numbers are actual. The point about theoretical is theoretically what one might expect performance to be.

In the calculator for the FLIR at 500 feet and max zoom it says PPF should be 105. The report says 95 PPF. Not a large difference by any means, but is the reason that they are different that the 105 is the theoretical PPF, or I am I doing something wrong?

Ethan, can you share any shots showing the entire FOV of the of the 4K images versus the entire FOV of the PTZs? That go along with what you show diagrammaticaliy with the FOV triangles up top.

I think it would be instructive to see how much overview you are really sacrificing to get similar detail, when using a PTZ.

Great report and contains one item that is wholly unexpected:

There is a remarkable difference in these 4K cameras. I am quite disappointed in the optics on the Axis 4K vs. the Bosch 4K and even Bosch 5MP camera at the 30' mark.

Also surprising is that the Bosch 5 MP appears better than either the overly noisy Bosch 4K and slightly more blurry Axis 4K at night. None of them are particularly impressive, but there is a noticeable difference.

Were any changes made to compression to level the playing field or are they all at default?

Good article.

Just read the article, and was a good read. Though there was this typo that had me reading over and over the same section. Is there a missing word or two after 'narrower' ?

 

Daytime Performance

  • At short range, fixed 4K and 5MP cameras using a wider FOV provide similar details to 1080p PTZs zoomed into the subject in a narrower. The SD PTZ provides fewer details at this range.

Yes, there absolutely is a missing word. I've updated it to read "in a narrower FOV." Thanks for calling it out!

Anytime. I just mentally couldn't process that line. ☺

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Camect "Worlds Smartest Camera Hub" Tested on Oct 18, 2019
Camect is a Silicon Valley startup that claims the "Smartest AI Object Detection On The Market", detecting not only people and vehicles, but...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
IPVM Camera Calculator User Manual / Guide on Oct 16, 2019
Learn how to use the IPVM Camera Calculator. The guide below includes instructions, images, gifs, and videos demonstrating and explaining the...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Oct 14, 2019
Camera focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can significantly reduce details, making cameras less effective. In this guide, we...
Avigilon H5A Analytic Cameras Tested on Oct 07, 2019
Avigilon has released its H5A analytic cameras, claiming to "detect more objects with greater accuracy even in crowded scenes." We tested the...
Hikvision ColorVu is Smart Marketing on Oct 03, 2019
Hikvision ColorVu (see IPVM test results) is smart marketing, a lesson to be learned by competitors and a rising trend. Inside this note, we...
Vivotek 4K S-Series Camera Tested on Sep 30, 2019
Vivotek's highest-end S-series camera claims "Supreme Night Visibility", "Smart IR II", "Smart Stream II", "WDR Pro for unparalleled visibility in...
Consumer IP Camera Analytics Shootout - Arlo, Google / Nest, Amazon / Ring, Hikvision / Ezviz, Wyze Cam, Yi Home on Sep 26, 2019
AI analytics are hitting the mainstream in the consumer camera market, with entrants Wyze and Yi Home releasing free people detection on their...
Hikvision Acusense Analytics Tested on Sep 23, 2019
Hikvision touts "The Magic Behind It All" in their new Acusense line are 'deep learning algorithms' inside these cameras and recorders. But how...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Alarm Veteran "Demands A Criminal Investigation" Of UL on Oct 18, 2019
The Interceptor's Project pressure against UL continues to rise. Following Keith Jentoft's allegation that "UL Has Blood On Their Hands", Jentoft...
Camect "Worlds Smartest Camera Hub" Tested on Oct 18, 2019
Camect is a Silicon Valley startup that claims the "Smartest AI Object Detection On The Market", detecting not only people and vehicles, but...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Oct 17, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Camera Calculator V3.1 Release Improves User Experience on Oct 17, 2019
IPVM has released a new version of our Camera Calculator, V3.1, with significant user experience improvements, a new development plan, and an...
Securing Access Control Installations Tutorial on Oct 17, 2019
The physical security of access control components is critical to ensuring that a facility is truly secure. Otherwise, the entire system can be...
Access Control Course Fall 2019 - Last Chance on Oct 17, 2019
Register Now - Fall 2019 Access Control Course. Thursday, October 17th is the last day to register. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access...
US DoD Comments on Huawei, Hikvision, Dahua Cyber Security Concerns on Oct 16, 2019
A senior DoD official said the US is "concerned" with the cybersecurity of Hikvision, Dahua, and Huawei due to "CCP" (China Communist Party)...
Pelco Sarix Pro3 Camera Tested on Oct 16, 2019
Pelco has released their Sarix Professional Series 3 cameras, claiming "more security detail in challenging scenes with excellent low light and...
IPVM Camera Calculator User Manual / Guide on Oct 16, 2019
Learn how to use the IPVM Camera Calculator. The guide below includes instructions, images, gifs, and videos demonstrating and explaining the...
Altronix Claims Tango 'Eliminates Electricians' on Oct 15, 2019
Power supply provider Altronix claims its new Tango power supply 'eliminates the need for an electrician, dedicated conduit and wire runs'. In...