Subscriber Discussion
Napco Vs Honeywell Vs Interlogix Vs DSC For Commercial Burglary
05/07/18 06:51pm
Does anyone have feedback on which manufacture they like more for Commercial Burglary platforms? And why?
We have been using Honeywell. My biggest problem is support. Today I had to wait 30 minutes then leave a message for SALES, not even tech support (that was a couple of hours ago and I'm still waiting for a call back). With tech support I have had to wait over 1 hour, get someone then have them rush me off, and need to call back for another 1 hour+. That seems to happen every time.
We do mostly access control and security camera system, with only a few alarm systems sprinkled in. With access control and cameras there is a UI that everything is programmed in. What you see is what you get, easy.
With alarms everything wants to be programmed at the keypad. Honeywell has "Compass" which is software based but it's not very user friendly and if you call tech support for any questions when using that forget about getting help.
Thanks in advance for your input.

For commercial burg, I'd suggest looking at DMP and Bosch too. Those brands have a commercial bend with regards to features, technology, and support. We tested both:
The other brands you mentioned, ie: Honeywell/DSC/Napco/Interlogix are certainly used in commercial installs too, but are also heavily installed in residential applications. Honeywell Vista, DSC Neo, Interlogix NX-8, Napco Gemini, etc. They all are dated compared to the type of client interface and programming you're used to seeing on access and video.

I actually used to ask the tech who managed the internal Honeywell system at my job why he didn't just keep a serial adapter online and pop open Compass to make changes when needed (new hires, code changes, quick programming changes, etc.). And he told me it was quicker to use the keypad... I watched him one day and he wasn't kidding.
I think it's important to standardize on a brand. It appears your frustration is not with the product itself, but is actually frustration with not being familiar with the product. If you've been using Honeywell, have a number of those systems to support and change to another manufacturer's panel, you'll aggravate your problems by needing to know multiple programming protocols and operation procedures, not to mention compatibility issues, etc. I speak from experience in this area. I now standardize, using Honeywell, and have less of a need to call tech support because I'm more familiar with their product. In commercial, I use the Honeywell Vista series panel.
I recently installed a Vista 250BPT, with six 6160PX keypads, using 3 partitions, for a company with 70 employees using unique user codes with various authorities coming and going at all hours of the day, and their administrators use Total Connect 2.0 remote services. The system self arms, per a schedule, when someone forgets to arm. This system was commissioned several months ago and there have been less than five user error alarms, no other false alarms and no questions or complaints on how to operate the system. I'm quite pleased with the system.
I use Honeywell Compass for remote programming and I don't find it intimidating at all. Like any other programming software, you need to become familiar with it to achieve a degree of confidence.
I wish I could change out all of my other brands to Honeywell, that way I need to know few programming protocols, wouldn't need to stock so many other brands of equipment, and would have fewer questions for technical support. I try not to call tech support because I know I'll wait on the phone, sometimes I email them, and they are very good at returning emails. But, when I do contact them, by phone or email, I find them quite helpful.
I'm not saying Honeywell is the best, I'm just saying try to stick to one manufacturer's product and your life will be less complicated.
We are extremely new to intrusion and chose the ADC path. We have installed several DSC panels with no issues. Tech support wasn't bad, and we have 2 local reps who have been outstanding in helping us when we ask some pretty dumb and basic questions.
I agree about Honeywell being stuck in the dark ages. We are somewhat new to burg, and coming from an IT background, the Compass software is hilarious.
The honeywell panel / keypad programming is also a joke. I understand that it is all based on phone programming as it was designed to work over POTS lines
Every “upgrade” they’ve done is simply bolt more features on top of an archaic programming system. I have taken the time to study it, learn it and can program a system quickly. However, I feel that the learning curve was unnecessary. So much more can be done with a web interface and modern menu system.
I too too have been subjected to incredible wait times with tech support. If you move enough product, you do get access to a priority queue.
We have switched to Bosch and ICT and been much happier. Although I do think that commercial burg is ripe for disruption from a new player. The whole industry is very set in their ways. I understand the don’t fix if not broken but cmon.
Well good finding a better provider !!
I work with one of the Biggest companies but Can't disclose it for contractual reasons BUT
THE WHOLE INDUSTRY (Burglar/Surveillance )Right now feels to me very uncertain!!
I can see there's an evolving war between Asian manufacturers and US based manufacturers, and this latest trump speech at the UN is not helping either.
We use Honeywell as the main provider if you think your having trouble with them, in terms of tech troubleshooting support, just imagine trying one of the lesser well known companies. I'm not 100% sure if Honeywell does it, but sometimes you gotta pay extra like a PREMIUM membership in order to get full access to troubleshooting services I've seen it with other companies like DMP.
DMP is good but they tend to charge for every little thing !! Plus when it comes to contracts they want to keep as long as possible. I work in NYC and at least once every 2 months we get this DMP guys come to headquarters supposedly talking about training with certain central station receivers and the similar devices; they give mini classes on how to be complaint with the NYC fire codes,and stuff, but after 10 minutes they change the topic and you can see the sales pitch starts to come in and then criticizing and bragging how their equipment is much better than the rest. don't get me wrong DMP is a really good solid company I'm not gonna come here and say otherwise.
That's like asking should you buy a chevy, ford, or ram. Everyone will have a preference and all have pros and cons. Personally I like DSC. The programming seems more installer friendly then Honeywell. The Neo has a very strong wireless range and like everyone else a lot of add on options. Tech support is fairly quick and rarely am i holding more then 30 minutes. Usually within 15 minutes I have a rep. There is a language accent barrier but they are never condescending when working with you. I like to stay mainly with one system and become very efficient with it. Nothing is worst then fumbling on a system in front of a client trying to program. With that we have other systems we work with mostly from acquisition a few we have put in while finding what we like. . Honeywell, 2GIG, Bosch, Napco and yes ALOT of old FBII systems. 2GIG has some features I like that is useful in certain environments and will install them and programming is pretty simple.
But to circle back to the question you asked, I like DSC have good support from my regional sales rep and tech support is good. I don't need an engineering degree to program and the remote software is decent. So all that combined I stayed with DSC as my main product and became efficient with it.
Are DMP minimums really that much? It’s like 10k a month right? If you sell access control, doorbell cameras, zwave, Fire etc on a few projects you can hit that pretty easily it’s not 10k solely of panels. It’s 10k of spend.
I would take Interlogix off that list if I were you.

IPVMU Certified | 09/20/19 01:19pm
I have installed many DMP systems. They are rock solid and DMP is a great company to work with. I have installed a few Honeywell. Pretty much everyone knows what they are getting with Honeywell. Bosch G series panels rock. As far as all manufacturers go I agree with the comment of "the devil you know." They all have strengths and weaknesses. You have to dive in and learn all the nuances. Oh yeah then retrain yourself when major software or hardware revisions come out. That is our life.
If I was looking to change manufacturers to a truly integrated Access Control and Intrusion manufacturer I would tread extremely slow. Interview the company from top to bottom. Find out who owns their code and hardware. I would also test drive it and ask for end user references.
I am sure there are others however I would take a look at ICT. It does conventional burg however it is an integrated database between access control and intrusion with an enterprise offering.
I've been working with Napco, Bosch, interlogix, Honeywell and DSC. They all have their positives and negatives. Interlogix has an extremely easy menu driven keypad programming but is very limited by lack of customization. Bosch has a solid product but can only be software programmed. Napco is has extreme flexibility in configuration but has a dated product line. Honeywell is Honeywell, it feels like every modern advancement on their systems has a back door tweak just so they can make it work. DSC is from my experience the most versatile. It can be easily programmed via keypad and through DLS with easy transitions between them along with clean and modern devices.
Newest Discussions
Discussion | Posts | Latest |
---|---|---|
Started by
Brian Rhodes
|
17
|
less than a minute by Brian Rhodes |
Started by
Undisclosed Integrator #1
|
17
|
less than a minute by Undisclosed Integrator #9 |
Started by
Ross Vander Klok
|
5
|
less than a minute by Matthew Hoenig |
Started by
Scott Zuniga
|
41
|
less than a minute by Daniel S-T |
Started by
Brian Rhodes
|
37
|
18 minutes by Daniel S-T |