A Hikvision partner makes an interesting point in light of 3 UK MPs calling for Hikvision to be investigated over Xinjiang:
Now that's a though one. While Hikvision doesn't make buildings they seem to have taken on the contract to oversee work that was done in the province. How much was voluntary we don't know and we don't fully understand it. [emphasis added]
It is an interesting take.
On the positive side, if Hikvision did not do this voluntarily, we should not hold Hikvision at fault (or at least not the same level), since they would simply be following orders of the authoritarian China Communist Party.
On the negative side, if Hikvision did not do this voluntarily, this proves that Hikvision can be forced into doing the orders of the authoritarian China Communist Party which would solidify the risk that Hikvision can be forced to put in backdoors and to allow their products to be used to spy on Western targets.
What do you think?