Migrated Large Systems Away From Lenel?

JH
John Honovich
Apr 30, 2018
IPVM

It is safe to say that many integrators are not huge fans of Lenel, e.g. Worst Access Control 2018

However, I am curious how often large end users actually migrate away from Lenel because, use of Mercury panels notwithstanding, it is a big project to migrate and risks operational issues, i.e., if certain doors don't work at certain times or certain credentials need to be changed, etc., it risks upsetting a lot of people.

So have you personally been involved or know of such migrations? Curious to hear how well or not it went?

(2)
(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #1
May 01, 2018

A large VMS platform is even offering their professional services to convert Lenel's databases to their platform for an easy migration. Has anyone used that service?

(2)
JH
John Honovich
May 01, 2018
IPVM

Which VMS platform?

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #9
May 22, 2018

Honestly most of them we have talked to offer that service and will even flash Lenel panels for use on their access control.  I know we are looking at migrating away from Lenel and that another company of our size has recently done the same thing.  They did not have a hard time with it and seem to be much happier with the newer system.  

(1)
SD
Shannon Davis
May 18, 2018
IPVMU Certified

I know RS2 has a tool they call the "Lenel-in-nator" Put Lenel database in and 20 minutes later out pops the RS2 database. I converted one several years ago that was about 50 readers. Easy peasy for the most part. The vice president of RS2 was even going to come out and help with the programming until I told not to bother as I had already completed it. The conversion didn't include everything but it had most things you needed and what it didn't convert needed to be re-done anyways.

(1)
(1)
(1)
Avatar
Brian Rhodes
May 18, 2018
IPVMU Certified

It is really called that!?!? 

I am doing a post on the 'Lenel-in-nator'.

Sometimes you pick the topics, but sometimes they pick you.  This is one of those times.

(3)
SD
Shannon Davis
May 18, 2018
IPVMU Certified

Well back in 2012 it was called that. Don't hold me to the exact spelling though :)

(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #6
May 19, 2018

They have several.  There is a CASI-IN-NATOR amongst others.

We have migrated many, many sites away from legacy UTC products but never from Onguard. Lots of Facility Commander, Picture Perfect, and Secure Perfect clients calling due to recently discontinued transition series F2F readers.

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #5
May 21, 2018

They still call it that.. 

The part number handles a couple of things:

 

1, The use of their utility to convert the DB. again, if more than one facility code, some manual interaction will need to be made. Also, tasks and some other advanced programming doesn't come over and therefore needs to be established.

2, Inputs and Outputs (stikes, DC's REX's, etc.) are assigned differently so the "Lenelinator" addresses that per site. Also, Lenel allows the same SIO address on different channels, RS2 does not so some addressing changes need to be made depending on how the Lenel system was laid out. 

By use of this method, I can recall converting a hospital and a municipality both within a single day. Neither customer has looked back. 

(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #2
May 01, 2018

RS2 has a part number to convert Lenel's database. Normally it's not a huge issue to migrate away from Lenel as long as the controllers are not the 500 series as those need to be updated usually (depending on the software suite) and there are not a bunch of custom integrations to other systems.

(1)
U
Undisclosed #3
May 01, 2018

Prior to version 6.5.4 Lenel was easy to rip data with MS DTS. One was known to convert B.A.S.I.S and Ready Key Pro DBs before the OEM license came into play. Large or small it only becomes complex if they have segmented partitions, overkill redundant access levels and time zones with GOS linkages. I just focus on grabbing the raw functional data and using excel to build the rest. Lenel to SWH, Lenel to Prowatch, Lenel to Brivo, Lenel to Hirsch been there done that and tossed the mercury hardware into the service technicians junk pile. 

(1)
(1)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #4
May 01, 2018

It's interesting that you mention "Lenel to Prowatch" in that list.  Prowatch can certainly talk to Mercury panels, as Prowatch panels themselves are a Mercury variant.  A Lenel-to-Prowatch conversion would almost certainly have left the Mercury panels in place, because ripping them out would create nothing but an avoidable expense.

Also, Brivo now talks to Mercury as well, so I would doubt that a Brivo takeover would rip/replace.

Because of the huge installed base of Lenel OnGuard, I don't doubt that SWH, Prowatch, Brivo and Hirsch have picked off more sites than Lenel has picked off in the other direction.  But any integrator savvy enough in all of those products to do conversions, would also know that Mercury panels are very broadly used.  If it were me, and I was converting OnGuard to SWH or Hirsch, I'd keep those Mercury panels in inventory for the next job, not the junk pile.

I have found Rip & Replace jobs from Mercury are excruciatingly rare.  Why?  Because changing out a system has more to do with the company's head-end software and support.  The panels are just one part of it.  If you don't like your system, you have nearly 20 other companies that you can go to without going to the expense of ripping out the panels.

In my long experience in this industry, I have witnessed countless migrations between Mercury-based systems, but only 1 migration from Mercury. (a CCURE customer that absolutely needed an obscure clustering feature on the iStar panel).

(5)
(2)
DF
David Fogle, CSEIP
May 18, 2018

The best approach to serve the customer is to find a way to protect their investment. Mercury hardware is not the issue, LENEL is the issue and that is software and contemptuous support.

There are more than one software solution that can fit the bill with worst case only minor hardware changes. (older 500 panels as mentioned already) Even that is not the end of the world.

I am absolutely in total agreement that eliminating Lenel installs serves the Client, but throwing the baby out with the bathwater not so much.

 

Everything comes down to support, the better the vendor supports the dealer the better the dealer can support the customer. That was never a priority for Lenel which is a shame as they were a game changer when they hit the market, but got too full of themselves to stay on top due to arrogance.

I am still pissed that Bosch did not buy them out and kill their culture and assimilate it into the Bosch family of products since they already had a hook in with Readykey Pro.

(4)
(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #5
May 18, 2018

We have converted literally thousands of readers from the Lenel platform. While there are some inherent challenges (different methods of handling SIO addressing, facility code association (held at the cardholder level VS. panel level, etc.) we have made ourselves familiar with these, and have built a good process mitigating interruption to our end users. 

I personally cannot remember an instance over the past decade or so of which an end user wasn't beyond satisfied (especially when realizing what good service really feels like, and when the non existence of SSA's show a return on the investment). 

(1)
Avatar
Daniel S-T
May 18, 2018

What type of customers are you generally switching away from Lenel? My Lenel experience was limited, but once I started working with it, I was very unimpressed. But the company I was working for at the time was getting a lot of extra access control jobs, from large enterprise clients wanting Lenel for god knows what reason.

I can't ever see those large enterprise clients switching away from Lenel, I don't know why they love it so much, but they do.

I can how ever see smaller clients doing so. Ones with maybe a small handful of buildings, or one large one. Curious as to what your experience was with that.

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #5
May 21, 2018

Everything from Hospitals, to municipalities, to colleges. Here is a case study for a large Lenel - RS2 conversion. I want to say that this account has reached over 12,000 readers now. Folks seem to reach a boiling point, and with the right solution, good timing, and a bit of luck, we have been very successful.

Application Cast History

 

(1)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #4
May 18, 2018

When you converted away from Lenel, was it to another Mercury-based system?

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #5
May 21, 2018

Our offerings are ALMOST exclusively Mercury based, so in every situation to my recollection, yes. 

Avatar
Brian Rhodes
May 18, 2018
IPVMU Certified

From a procedural point of view, what is the typical process for migrating away from a Lenel (or any large system)?

Is everything cut over to the new system all at once, or is it done in phases (ie: one building at a time)?

 

SD
Shannon Davis
May 18, 2018
IPVMU Certified

Typically in a system that is more than one controller you will keep the old system running as you replace or update firmware on the controllers. Example building one is transferred then two then three and so on. Ideally if planned accordingly you shouldn't have any doors down overnight. This way there is minimal downtime for the customer and fewer service headaches. Typically you will run into issues of hardware not working the way it is supposed to or parts not wired correctly in the field or say rex motion sensors not adjusted properly to avoid forced door alarms. You will typically exclude any non-functioning hardware and to bill that at T&M. Often we will setup the new system completely fully programmed that way when you start the cut-over it goes even quicker. This scenario is the same regardless of whether your taking Lenel out or even as we did recently putting Lenel in in-place of an existing Winpak/Honeywell system.

(1)
Avatar
Daniel S-T
May 20, 2018

Shannon pretty much nailed it. Get the new database and software running, if changing cards or card type, get them all issued well ahead of time, with users instructed to carry both cards. And then it's one door at a time, or one controller at a time, depending how the old or new system functions. It's not too hard of a process.

Although funny story the only time I ever upgraded to Lenel was from Facility Commander, which was previously upgraded from something much older. Used this four wire bus, and then the original readers handled the strike output, door contact input, and REX input. Those readers had long been replaced with a module that took over that job. What we didn't know is that the module like changed the data transmitted from the reader, so the lenel database and controller just thought every card was invalid, because it would show up something funky. I can't quite remember, it was awhile ago.

Some one ended up building a custom card type for us, for Lenel, so that the customer could still just put in the card number as "12345" and not have to add all the extra digits. That held things up when we first encountered that problem.

 

JH
John Honovich
May 20, 2018
IPVM

Daniel, thanks!

with users instructed to carry both cards.

I am wondering, how much or how often do users get upset with things like that? I can imagine that some users don't get the new card or don't have it with them or some other mistake occurs and they get locked out, causing frustration and complaints. Any color on that?

Avatar
Daniel S-T
May 20, 2018

I've only done two switch overs that required new cards. Both were done well in advance of the intended switch over, and we left key doors (like the main entrance, or what ever) towards the very end.

The last time we were moving from the standard prox, 125khz to the iclass, 13.5mhz cards and that was a big change for folks. We found that we were getting some form of interference with the two cards, so many people's cards wouldn't even read, and then combine that with the significant drop in read range from prox to iclass, there was some level of frustration I am sure. With that one I was pretty lucky, the guy in charge of the project from the customers stand point was pretty understanding. And it was a government building, I always feel like they generally don't care about stuff as much, lol. They get paid pretty good, and have decently easy jobs.

But to answer your question more simply, yes. People get missed. Either they "don't see the e-mail" or were away on holiday, or happened to be in from another building. It's unavoidable, really. In my experience people were frustrated as I said before, but understanding for the most part. And if they weren't, their frustrations and anger were not directed at or towards me anyways ;)

UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #4
May 18, 2018

Generally you need to plan for a period of time in which both systems are running side by side, and you cut-over one panel at a time until its done.  While it's straightforward to do this for the hardware, badging is a different concern.  It is not desirable to have to enroll people twice, once for each system, during the transition period.

If you have an active badging office with large numbers people getting or updating credentials, you generally need to set up automated updates so that if a badge/credential is added to the old system (that the badging office is still using), it will be regularly "shipped-over" to the new system automatically.

Once the door hardware is fully covered, then the last thing you do is cut over the badging office to the new system.

(1)
(2)
Avatar
Rick Caruthers
May 19, 2018
Galaxy Control Systems

One of our business partners in Dubai recently converted a 200+ reader Lenel install for the offices of the Crown Prince of Dubai. All panels and software was removed for the Galaxy solution. The client was growing weary of paying high software maintenance and support fee's and found that by staying with the Mercury panels they would only continue this trend. 

(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #7
May 19, 2018

The Crown Prince of Dubai concerned with software maintenance fees!  That's interesting.  

(2)
U
Undisclosed #8
May 23, 2018
IPVMU Certified

The Crown Prince of Dubai concerned with software maintenance fees! 

 

(1)
(8)
Avatar
Brian Rhodes
May 23, 2018
IPVMU Certified

pun score = 8/10

not bad

U
Undisclosed #8
May 20, 2018
IPVMU Certified

One of our business partners in Dubai recently converted a 200+ reader Lenel install for the offices of the Crown Prince of Dubai. All panels and software was removed for the Galaxy solution.

Sounds like a royal pain in the ass ;)

(1)
Avatar
Ross Vander Klok
May 21, 2018
IPVMU Certified

What panels does the Galaxy system use?  Are they proprietary?  

TM
Ty Mullen
May 24, 2018
COR Security, Inc.

Yes they are

Avatar
Ross Vander Klok
May 26, 2018
IPVMU Certified

So moving from an open solution (Mercury panels) to a proprietary closed system?  Or are there other systems that run on Galaxy panels?  Seems like they just should have switched from Lenel to something that doesn't charge you thousands of dollars every time you even sneak a glance in their general direction.

(2)
PD
Paul DiPeso
May 22, 2018

Depending on what qualifies as 'large', Feenics VARs have converted dozens of OnGuard systems, most to hosted applications but some to on premise servers, ranging from 10 readers to systems with hundreds of readers.  As mentioned multiple times, the hardware flip is relatively easy, since Feenics uses Mercury as well.  Database conversions could be tricky, however, similar to RS2, Feenics has built a utility that converts the database rather quickly, depending on the number of custom fields that have been built over time.  Larger-based end users may have to run parallel systems for a brief period, so creating a cutover schedule with the end user is imperative.  

The benefit to Mercury-based software solutions is that the end user always has other options, if needed.  

(2)
U
Undisclosed #10
May 26, 2018

Many end-users are shocked when they are getting the bill at the end of the year....

When using the existing Mercury Panels, integrators are challenged by both "Flashing" the panel and compatibility issues when the panels are dated.

We had great experience with KEYKINGs Sphinx system. Even though, required to replace the panels, the benefits worth the time. First of all, the chance of a competitor "taking over" your customer is off the table.

In ALL cases, we could provide the customer with far more capabilities and options that they had before. KEYKING do not charge any monthly/annual fees for using the system, making the customer happy.

SPHINX has several tools that makes the users database transfer simplified (just import an excel spreadsheet), though, the doors configurations and the access levels need to be redone. But, Sphinx has many shortcuts in the access level process what makes it reasonable.

KEYKING Panels are robust and allow "hooking up" to the existing equipment, readers, locks, switches, sensors etc. So not much to do on the wiring side.

New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions