Does video surveillance suffer from similar problems to banking? We are all learning that easy money combined with little regulation ultimately creates disasters. What's interesting is that video surveillance shares some characteristics with banking:
- 9/11 triggered a massive surge in video surveillance funding
- Governments have pushed through large scale projects quickly
- We have pushed cutting edge unproven new technologies
There's been a lot of easy money available for video surveillance and we have rolled many speculative city wide surveillance and video analytic projects. Reports are fairly common about significant problems with video surveillance systems - recently Washington DC
, a few months ago at the Mexico border
and continuously from the broader public
. And, if you have been around long enough, you know that these examples are just the tip of the iceberg. There are many more failing projects out there that no one wants to publicly address.
For those of us in industry, the pressure is high to close the deal. While most genuinely care about improving security, if the client is willing to take the risk, we are generally more than happy to commit to it. Easy money has made many security managers open to more risks and industry has been happy to feed that.
What's the Risk
Beyond a false sense of security, what we are learning from the financial fiasco is that the public will eventually crack down on systematic problems. It may take years and spectacular failures to do so but eventually it will get stopped. When it does get stopped, it's likely that cultural, political and legal restrictions become so strong that it impedes even legitimate activity.
The risk for video surveillance is that the public failures and the fear of destroying privacy creates a powerful backlash.
I do not think that the extent of the problem is anywhere near the level of the financial industry. However, I do think the days of easy security money are ending
and that we are entering into a new climate of scrutiny. Overpromising with the public's funds on speculative video surveillance may have been overlooked for the last few years but times are changing. Thoughts?
Most Recent Industry Reports
New IPVM Calculator V3 Released
on Sep 20, 2017
The New IPVM Calculator V3 is released. An entirely new architecture delivers the following benefits:
The calculator is now ~50% faster in...
HID Buys Mercury Security
on Sep 19, 2017
One of the biggest access control deals in years.
Mercury Security, the most widely used access hardware OEM, and partner to 20+ manufacturers,...
Hikvision Backdoor Exploit
on Sep 18, 2017
Full disclosure to the Hikvision backdoor has been released, allowing easy exploit of vulnerable Hikvision IP cameras.
As the researcher, Monte...
Avigilon Touting 'Made In America'
on Sep 18, 2017
Canadian manufacturer Avigilon, who completed a US manufacturing facility in 2015, is now running a marketing campaign touting 'Made In America',...
Cloud Guy Prints Book, Misses Irony
on Sep 15, 2017
On-premise security systems are dead.
But $75 print books are alive and well.
Such are the lessons from Brivo's CEO new book "The Five...
Forgotten Password Problem Importance
on Sep 15, 2017
Forgotten passwords has become a major industry topic.
For example, Hikvision has been emailing admin passwords in plain text until IPVM's...
September IP Networking Course
on Sep 14, 2017
LAST Chance - Registration is ending. Register now.
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals...