IT vs Security: Surveillance 'Ownership' Stats

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 05, 2012

Who calls the shots when it comes to video surveillance? Given the close proximity of the system to several distinct departments, we were curious to see has ultimate 'ownership' of end user's surveillance systems and equipment. We reveal and analyse the answers in this note.

Overview

In our recent global survey of surveillance end users, we asked:

owns surveillance

We left the question open to any answer, and asked end users to explain their situation in detailed comments. From the chart above, it is easy to see answers broke in three main groups:

  • Security Ownership: The majority of answers indicate that end user security departments clearly 'own' surveillance, however, very few answers in this group suggest they are alone in maintaining the system.
  • IT Ownership: Less commonly, the end user answered that "IT" owned security, even if they were not primary users of the system. The technical similarity between network video and other network equipment was the key driver, up to IT being responsible for product recommendations and provisioning of system access.
  • Mixed Ownership: The third major group listed system 'ownership' between two or more groups. Often these groups included other groups specific to individual customers (eg: Facilities/Maintenance/Engineering) or noted 'ownership by committee' where final decisions are made jointly.

Disclaimer

The results may be skewed towards IT as they are based on an online survey of 60 end users who were disproportionately from rich western countries, a majority of which managed large 500+ camera systems. Keep this in mind as you interpret the results.

Poll Insights

The answer to this question clearly has political significance for many end users. "Ownership" often indicates "budget" or human resources that "support" responsibility alone does not provide. As such, the idea of "ownership" is not the same across all respondents, but it does characterize the final authority on buying and support decisions. In the section below, we examine some of the trends that emerge from the detailed responses:

Security Needs IT: Frequently Security purchases and/or operates surveillance systems, but IT is responsible for maintaining them. Categorical 'ownership' may vary from one end user to the next, but the incorporation of IT resources into operations are common regardless of system size or market vertical.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

  • "The Security Division is the business representative, on account of this being where much of the system knowledge resides. However, the IT/Comms people are the system managers."
  • "Install of system, ongoing maintenance, and improvements to the system are managed by the Facilities/IT department. Day to day operations of the system are carried out by a 3rd party and overseen by Corporate Security."
  • "Security, with the support of IT on certain systems."
  • "IT does IT best, and public safety handles live video and investigations. We have one IT and one safety person who work together to resolve issues, bringing in other IT staff as necessary. This provides some overlap and continuity."
  • "Joint ownership between Security and IT. [This] allows end users to stay close to product selection and functionality while maintaining the supportability of the enterprise."
  • "Control was recently moved to the engineering/facilities department, though the backbone network is technically owned by the IT department."
  • "Law enforcement or security management because they must do the monitoring and drive the procurement process via their budgets. IT can only assist in recommending which technology to consider."

How does IT get involved? The purpose of IT and Security are different in many organizations, with entirely different organizational focuses. In many cases, IT has no operational interest in video surveillance beyond ensuring devices are online and functioning, while Security in heavily dependent on the visibility of the system in every phase of operation. Despite having different operational focuses, Security and IT are often intertwined. The detailed answers our end users provide describe 'why' this situation is often present:

  • "IT controls/manages all the cameras. It happened that way for one because other staff members in our organization don't have the technical knowledge to understand the requirements or don't have the time to dedicate to them."
  • "University Information Systems "owns" all technology decisions, including video surveillance."
  • "IT - because it is totally dependent on the IT Infrastructure."
  • "The IT department makes sure all IP cameras running on the existing network ."
  • "The surveillance system is owned/controlled by the IT department because of the technical nature involved in setting up and maintaining the complete system."
  • "Law enforcement or security management because they must do the monitoring and drive the procurement process via their budgets. IT can only assist in recommending which technology to consider."

Communication is Key: When sharing ownership, mutual system involvement and communication is critical to success. Because the importance of operational video has a heavy bias towards Security, and may be 'just another system to support' for IT, many answers describe the critical importance of deliberate coordination to keep all parties working toward the same goals:

  • "Security owns and controls it, I think because that's the way it's always been. My IT department and I communicate frequently on needs and impacts and we trust each other. If they didn't trust me and my ability to look after how my surveillance system affects our network, I'm sure the system would quickly become their responsibility."
  • "Information Systems works closely with security and other departments to define requirements."
  • "Loss Prevention/Security - because it is primarily analog based and has always been under Security/Loss Prevention control - however...under IP/Networked video scenario - IT will have a much larger role."
  • "This is split between public safety and central information technology, with some overlap and communication gaps in the middle."
  • "While security department "owns" the surveillance system, I take extra effort to include our IT department in making all significant decisions however, and it has paid off. "

Conclusion

Not surprisingly, network video systems have expanded stakeholders to include departments other than Security. The days of a truly 'self sufficient' Security department appear to be ending. Ownership of the system may belong or be divided among non-traditional operational groups, but this circumstance seems to amplify the 'voice' that traditional Security departments have in coordinating work and defining system performance goals.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Strong Outlook For 2019 on Nov 29, 2018
Integrators are bullish for 2019, with nearly 80% showing a positive outlook in our integrator results from 160+ respondents: This is almost...
Video Surveillance Hard Drive Size Statistics 2018 on Nov 08, 2018
What is the most common hard drive size for video surveillance? 150+ integrators answered: What size hard drive do you most commonly use? What...
Favorite Video Surveillance Hard Drive Manufacturer 2018 on Nov 06, 2018
Who is the favorite hard drive for video surveillance use? 150+ integrators answered: What is your preferred brand/model of hard drive for...
Worst Products on Nov 03, 2018
Security integrators periodically report on their favorite and worst products to IPVM. These are known integrators who IPVM pays to answer surveys....
Video Surveillance Hard Drive Failure Statistics 2018 on Nov 02, 2018
Hard drive failures can be significant service problems but how common of an issue are they in video surveillance? How long do drives last when...
Cloud Video Storage Usage 2018 on Oct 31, 2018
Storing email and documents in the cloud have long been common, with on-site email or file servers increasingly eliminated. However, what about...
Best Alternatives to Banned Dahua and Hikvision on Oct 17, 2018
With the US government ban and a growing number of users banning Dahua and Hikvision, one key question is what to use for low cost? While Dahua and...
Integrator Laptop Guide on Oct 16, 2018
This 18-page guide provides guidance and statistics about integrator laptop use. 150 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their laptops,...
Security System Health Monitoring Usage Statistics 2018 on Oct 09, 2018
How well and quickly do integrators know if devices are offline or broken? New IPVM statistics show that typically no health monitoring is...
IP Camera Installability Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Oct 08, 2018
What are the best and worst cameras from an installation standpoint? Which manufacturers make it harder or easier to install their cameras? We...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Dec 10, 2018
The 300 page, 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide, covers the key events and the future of the video surveillance market, is now available,...
Multi-Factor Access Control Authentication Guide on Dec 10, 2018
Can a stranger use your credentials? One of the oldest problems facing access control is making credentials as easy to use as keys, but restricting...
Top 2019 Trend - AI Video Analytics on Dec 10, 2018
160+ Integrators answered: What do you think the top industry trend will be in 2019? Why? AI / video analytics was the run-away winner with...
AV Tech Company Profile on Dec 07, 2018
Taiwanese manufacturer AV Tech's revenue declined ~70% since 2012. Planning a comeback, AV Tech spoke to IPVM about their opportunities and...
Ubiquiti $79 Flex IP Camera Tested on Dec 07, 2018
U.S. Manufacturer Ubiquiti has released a 1080p, integrated IR IP camera, selling it directly for $79, making this one of the least expensive IP...
Infinova's Xinjiang Business Examined on Dec 07, 2018
As pressure mounts for companies to stop doing business in China’s Xinjiang region amid a severe human rights crisis, IPVM has found Infinova sold...
Akuvox Intercom Profile on Dec 06, 2018
Akuvox, a Chinese manufacturer of VoIP products, is expanding heavily into Video Intercom products with disruptive pricing targeted for commercial...
Sublethal Camera Gun Examined on Dec 06, 2018
Sublethal is a South African company that manufactures a remotely-controlled, camera-enabled gun called the Boomslang, which is Afrikaans for tree...
UK ICO Denies IPVM GDPR Complaint Against IFSEC, Decides Each Exhibitor Responsible on Dec 06, 2018
The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has denied IPVM's complaint against IFSEC for misuse of facial recognition. Each Exhibitor...
VMS Live Monitoring Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone, Network Optix on Dec 05, 2018
Viewing live video is the first interaction and most common task most users have with a VMS. Who does it best and worst? Who offers the most...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact