IT vs Security: Surveillance 'Ownership' Stats

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 05, 2012

Who calls the shots when it comes to video surveillance? Given the close proximity of the system to several distinct departments, we were curious to see has ultimate 'ownership' of end user's surveillance systems and equipment. We reveal and analyse the answers in this note.

Overview

In our recent global survey of surveillance end users, we asked:

owns surveillance

We left the question open to any answer, and asked end users to explain their situation in detailed comments. From the chart above, it is easy to see answers broke in three main groups:

  • Security Ownership: The majority of answers indicate that end user security departments clearly 'own' surveillance, however, very few answers in this group suggest they are alone in maintaining the system.
  • IT Ownership: Less commonly, the end user answered that "IT" owned security, even if they were not primary users of the system. The technical similarity between network video and other network equipment was the key driver, up to IT being responsible for product recommendations and provisioning of system access.
  • Mixed Ownership: The third major group listed system 'ownership' between two or more groups. Often these groups included other groups specific to individual customers (eg: Facilities/Maintenance/Engineering) or noted 'ownership by committee' where final decisions are made jointly.

Disclaimer

The results may be skewed towards IT as they are based on an online survey of 60 end users who were disproportionately from rich western countries, a majority of which managed large 500+ camera systems. Keep this in mind as you interpret the results.

Poll Insights

The answer to this question clearly has political significance for many end users. "Ownership" often indicates "budget" or human resources that "support" responsibility alone does not provide. As such, the idea of "ownership" is not the same across all respondents, but it does characterize the final authority on buying and support decisions. In the section below, we examine some of the trends that emerge from the detailed responses:

Security Needs IT: Frequently Security purchases and/or operates surveillance systems, but IT is responsible for maintaining them. Categorical 'ownership' may vary from one end user to the next, but the incorporation of IT resources into operations are common regardless of system size or market vertical.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

  • "The Security Division is the business representative, on account of this being where much of the system knowledge resides. However, the IT/Comms people are the system managers."
  • "Install of system, ongoing maintenance, and improvements to the system are managed by the Facilities/IT department. Day to day operations of the system are carried out by a 3rd party and overseen by Corporate Security."
  • "Security, with the support of IT on certain systems."
  • "IT does IT best, and public safety handles live video and investigations. We have one IT and one safety person who work together to resolve issues, bringing in other IT staff as necessary. This provides some overlap and continuity."
  • "Joint ownership between Security and IT. [This] allows end users to stay close to product selection and functionality while maintaining the supportability of the enterprise."
  • "Control was recently moved to the engineering/facilities department, though the backbone network is technically owned by the IT department."
  • "Law enforcement or security management because they must do the monitoring and drive the procurement process via their budgets. IT can only assist in recommending which technology to consider."

How does IT get involved? The purpose of IT and Security are different in many organizations, with entirely different organizational focuses. In many cases, IT has no operational interest in video surveillance beyond ensuring devices are online and functioning, while Security in heavily dependent on the visibility of the system in every phase of operation. Despite having different operational focuses, Security and IT are often intertwined. The detailed answers our end users provide describe 'why' this situation is often present:

  • "IT controls/manages all the cameras. It happened that way for one because other staff members in our organization don't have the technical knowledge to understand the requirements or don't have the time to dedicate to them."
  • "University Information Systems "owns" all technology decisions, including video surveillance."
  • "IT - because it is totally dependent on the IT Infrastructure."
  • "The IT department makes sure all IP cameras running on the existing network ."
  • "The surveillance system is owned/controlled by the IT department because of the technical nature involved in setting up and maintaining the complete system."
  • "Law enforcement or security management because they must do the monitoring and drive the procurement process via their budgets. IT can only assist in recommending which technology to consider."

Communication is Key: When sharing ownership, mutual system involvement and communication is critical to success. Because the importance of operational video has a heavy bias towards Security, and may be 'just another system to support' for IT, many answers describe the critical importance of deliberate coordination to keep all parties working toward the same goals:

  • "Security owns and controls it, I think because that's the way it's always been. My IT department and I communicate frequently on needs and impacts and we trust each other. If they didn't trust me and my ability to look after how my surveillance system affects our network, I'm sure the system would quickly become their responsibility."
  • "Information Systems works closely with security and other departments to define requirements."
  • "Loss Prevention/Security - because it is primarily analog based and has always been under Security/Loss Prevention control - however...under IP/Networked video scenario - IT will have a much larger role."
  • "This is split between public safety and central information technology, with some overlap and communication gaps in the middle."
  • "While security department "owns" the surveillance system, I take extra effort to include our IT department in making all significant decisions however, and it has paid off. "

Conclusion

Not surprisingly, network video systems have expanded stakeholders to include departments other than Security. The days of a truly 'self sufficient' Security department appear to be ending. Ownership of the system may belong or be divided among non-traditional operational groups, but this circumstance seems to amplify the 'voice' that traditional Security departments have in coordinating work and defining system performance goals.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
FLIR Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 08, 2019
FLIR has had a challenging past few years including FLIR Security business struggling, FLIR restructuring their security division and FLIR selling...
Sony Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 06, 2019
Sony Favorability amongst integrators improved moderately compared to their 2017 favorability results, with a modest net positive...
No Genetec Major Releases In Over A Year on Feb 06, 2019
Annual VMS licenses are a controversial practice in the video surveillance industry, with many questioning their need or value. However, enterprise...
Vivotek Favorability Report 2019 on Jan 29, 2019
Taiwanese video surveillance manufacturers, even relatively large ones like Vivotek, have lost ground in the PRC-China-driven race to the bottom....
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on Jan 28, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
Genetec Favorability Report 2019 on Jan 25, 2019
Genetec's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing solid, but...
Bosch Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
Bosch's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing strong net...

Most Recent Industry Reports

From The Basement To Buried Behind Chinatown: ISC West Emerging Technology Zone on Feb 22, 2019
What does ISC West think about 'Emerging Technology'? Well, last year, they put those companies in the basement. This year, they moved them up to...
Private School IT Manager Surveillance Interview on Feb 22, 2019
This IT manager describes himself as the "oft-maligned IT person" whose "opinions may not always be appreciated by the integrator crowd." But he is...
Outdoor Camera Mounting Hardware Guide on Feb 21, 2019
Mounting cameras outdoors can be challenging, requiring understanding different types of equipment and methods. In this guide, we teach this...
HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
First US State, Vermont, Bans Dahua and Hikvision on Feb 21, 2019
The first US state, Vermont, has issued a ban on a number of Chinese and Russian manufacturers including the world's 2 largest video surveillance...
ADI 'SAVE BIG' On FLIR And Hikvision Examined on Feb 20, 2019
One is a major US defense supplier. The other is owned by the Chinese government. But you can "SAVE BIG" on both at ADI. In this note, we...
BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Massive Leak Of Chinese VMS Provider Exposes Xinjiang Surveillance on Feb 20, 2019
A subsidiary of China’s claimed largest VMS provider is tracking the precise location and ethnicity of millions in China’s Xinjiang region,...
Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact