IT vs Security: Surveillance 'Ownership' Stats

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 05, 2012

Who calls the shots when it comes to video surveillance? Given the close proximity of the system to several distinct departments, we were curious to see has ultimate 'ownership' of end user's surveillance systems and equipment. We reveal and analyse the answers in this note.

Overview

In our recent global survey of surveillance end users, we asked:

owns surveillance

We left the question open to any answer, and asked end users to explain their situation in detailed comments. From the chart above, it is easy to see answers broke in three main groups:

  • Security Ownership: The majority of answers indicate that end user security departments clearly 'own' surveillance, however, very few answers in this group suggest they are alone in maintaining the system.
  • IT Ownership: Less commonly, the end user answered that "IT" owned security, even if they were not primary users of the system. The technical similarity between network video and other network equipment was the key driver, up to IT being responsible for product recommendations and provisioning of system access.
  • Mixed Ownership: The third major group listed system 'ownership' between two or more groups. Often these groups included other groups specific to individual customers (eg: Facilities/Maintenance/Engineering) or noted 'ownership by committee' where final decisions are made jointly.

Disclaimer

The results may be skewed towards IT as they are based on an online survey of 60 end users who were disproportionately from rich western countries, a majority of which managed large 500+ camera systems. Keep this in mind as you interpret the results.

Poll Insights

The answer to this question clearly has political significance for many end users. "Ownership" often indicates "budget" or human resources that "support" responsibility alone does not provide. As such, the idea of "ownership" is not the same across all respondents, but it does characterize the final authority on buying and support decisions. In the section below, we examine some of the trends that emerge from the detailed responses:

Security Needs IT: Frequently Security purchases and/or operates surveillance systems, but IT is responsible for maintaining them. Categorical 'ownership' may vary from one end user to the next, but the incorporation of IT resources into operations are common regardless of system size or market vertical.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

  • "The Security Division is the business representative, on account of this being where much of the system knowledge resides. However, the IT/Comms people are the system managers."
  • "Install of system, ongoing maintenance, and improvements to the system are managed by the Facilities/IT department. Day to day operations of the system are carried out by a 3rd party and overseen by Corporate Security."
  • "Security, with the support of IT on certain systems."
  • "IT does IT best, and public safety handles live video and investigations. We have one IT and one safety person who work together to resolve issues, bringing in other IT staff as necessary. This provides some overlap and continuity."
  • "Joint ownership between Security and IT. [This] allows end users to stay close to product selection and functionality while maintaining the supportability of the enterprise."
  • "Control was recently moved to the engineering/facilities department, though the backbone network is technically owned by the IT department."
  • "Law enforcement or security management because they must do the monitoring and drive the procurement process via their budgets. IT can only assist in recommending which technology to consider."

How does IT get involved? The purpose of IT and Security are different in many organizations, with entirely different organizational focuses. In many cases, IT has no operational interest in video surveillance beyond ensuring devices are online and functioning, while Security in heavily dependent on the visibility of the system in every phase of operation. Despite having different operational focuses, Security and IT are often intertwined. The detailed answers our end users provide describe 'why' this situation is often present:

  • "IT controls/manages all the cameras. It happened that way for one because other staff members in our organization don't have the technical knowledge to understand the requirements or don't have the time to dedicate to them."
  • "University Information Systems "owns" all technology decisions, including video surveillance."
  • "IT - because it is totally dependent on the IT Infrastructure."
  • "The IT department makes sure all IP cameras running on the existing network ."
  • "The surveillance system is owned/controlled by the IT department because of the technical nature involved in setting up and maintaining the complete system."
  • "Law enforcement or security management because they must do the monitoring and drive the procurement process via their budgets. IT can only assist in recommending which technology to consider."

Communication is Key: When sharing ownership, mutual system involvement and communication is critical to success. Because the importance of operational video has a heavy bias towards Security, and may be 'just another system to support' for IT, many answers describe the critical importance of deliberate coordination to keep all parties working toward the same goals:

  • "Security owns and controls it, I think because that's the way it's always been. My IT department and I communicate frequently on needs and impacts and we trust each other. If they didn't trust me and my ability to look after how my surveillance system affects our network, I'm sure the system would quickly become their responsibility."
  • "Information Systems works closely with security and other departments to define requirements."
  • "Loss Prevention/Security - because it is primarily analog based and has always been under Security/Loss Prevention control - however...under IP/Networked video scenario - IT will have a much larger role."
  • "This is split between public safety and central information technology, with some overlap and communication gaps in the middle."
  • "While security department "owns" the surveillance system, I take extra effort to include our IT department in making all significant decisions however, and it has paid off. "

Conclusion

Not surprisingly, network video systems have expanded stakeholders to include departments other than Security. The days of a truly 'self sufficient' Security department appear to be ending. Ownership of the system may belong or be divided among non-traditional operational groups, but this circumstance seems to amplify the 'voice' that traditional Security departments have in coordinating work and defining system performance goals.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...
China / US Trade War Impact Splits Industry on Jun 04, 2019
As the trade war continues to heat up, 170+ integrators told us "What impact will the US / PRC China conflict have on the industry?" Respondents...
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate. In...
Verkada Favorability Results 2019 on May 29, 2019
Verkada has taken the industry by storm with the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever and a half billion dollar valuation....
Aegis AI Gun Detection Video Analytics Startup on May 07, 2019
Gun detection analytic startups are increasing as the promise of AI and the threats of active shooters grow.  One company, Aegis AI, is being led...
Restaurant Security Manager Interview on May 06, 2019
Wright’s Gourmet House in Tampa, Florida has been around for over 50 years. During most of that time, there were no security measures in place. Now...
Ranking Manufacturer Favorability 2019 on May 06, 2019
24 manufacturer's favorability was ranked based on 170+ integrators feedback. Voting plus in-depth comments revealed insights on which brands were...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
Camera Course Summer 2019 - Register Now on Jun 12, 2019
Register for the Summer 2019 Camera Course.  This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Carnegie Mellon AI Startup Zensors Profile on Jun 11, 2019
Zensors is a startup formed by Carnegie Mellon graduates from a Carnegie Mellon research project, offering customized models per camera that they...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact