Surveillance Recorder Standards Examined (PSIA / ONVIF)

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 25, 2009

Security managers suffer from no standards for surveillance recorders. Even large organizations with thousands of cameras and hundreds of sites rarely use more than 1 or 2 manufacturer's recorders (even if they use more than a dozen manufacturer's cameras).

Emerging interoperability specifications from PSIA and ONVIF aim to eliminate this problem.

Operational Constraints from Poor Interoperability

The main practical issue is that each manufacturer has their own proprietary viewing software that almost never supports viewing video from other manufacturer's recorders. Because of this, if security managers used multiple recorders, operators would be forced to use multiple applications. 

The limitations are serious. Operators would have to switch back and forth to view different cameras, could get confused about what cameras are associated with which manufacturer's recorders and would not be able to display all cameras on a single monitor.

Financial Penalties from Having to Use a Single Vendor

Because of these drawbacks, the pressures to use a single recording vendor is high.

However, the costs and penalties of 'locking in' to a single vendor is also high:

  • If better quality (or less expensive) alternatives arise over time, it's hard to switch.
  • If some sites are better served by other manufacturers (specific features needed or lower price points for different camera configurations), it's hard to choose them.
 
Emerging Interoperability Specifications from PSIA and ONVIF
 
Following last year's launch of IP camera interoperability specifications, both organizations are preparing to launch 'standards' for video surveillance recorders.
 
In October 2009, the PSIA announced a draft specification for video surveillance recorders (RaCM). The full draft of the PSIA's "Recording and Content Management" specification may be obtained by registering at the PSIA's forum.
 
ONVIF is also pursuing specification for video surveillance recorders. ONVIF has a storage working group that is developing similar specifications. However, ONVIF does not plan to release these specifications publicly until 2010.

******** ******** ****** **** ** ********* *** ************ *********. **** large ************* **** ********* ** ******* *** ******** ** ***** rarely *** **** **** * ** * ************'* ********* (**** if **** *** **** **** * ***** ************'* *******).

******** **************** ************** **** **** *** ***** *** ** ********* this *******.

Operational *********** **** **** ****************

*** **** ********* ***** ** **** **** ************ *** ***** own *********** ******* ******** **** ****** ***** ******** ******* ***** from ***** ************'* *********. ******* ** ****, ** ******** ******** used ******** *********, ********* ***** ** ****** ** *** ******** applications. 

*** *********** *** *******. ********* ***** **** ** ****** **** *** forth ** **** ********* *******, ***** *** ******** ***** **** cameras *** ********** **** ***** ************'* ********* *** ***** *** be **** ** ******* *** ******* ** * ****** *******.

Financial ********* **** ****** ** *** * ****** ******

******* ** ***** *********, *** ********* ** *** * ****** recording ****** ** ****.

*******, *** ***** *** ********* ** '******* **' ** * single ****** ** **** ****:

  • ** ****** ******* (** **** *********) ************ ***** **** ****, it's **** ** ******.
  • ** **** ***** *** ****** ****** ** ***** ************* (******** features ****** ** ***** ***** ****** *** ********* ****** **************), it's **** ** ****** ****.
 
Emerging **************** ************** **** **** *** *****
 
************* ****'* ****** ** ** ****** **************** **************, **** ************* *** ********* ** ****** '*********' *** ***** surveillance *********.
 
** ******* ****, **************** ****** ************* *** ***** ************ ********* (****). *** **** ***** ** *** ****'* "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ** ******** ************* ** *** ****'* *****.
 
******* **** ******** ************* *** ***** ************ *********. ***** *** a ******* ******* ***** **** ** ********** ******* **************. *******, ONVIF **** *** **** ** ******* ***** ************** ******** ***** 2010.

[***************]

Business ******* *** ******** *********

******** ********* ****** ** *** ********* ******** ** *************. *** benefits *******:

  • Simplifying *** ***** ***/*** ***********: PSIM and access control manufacturers will clearly find these standards advantageous. Their solutions require integration with a large number of 3rd party DVR/NVRs. These interoperability standards will reduce the cost and complexity of tasks they currently undertake.
  • Reducing **** ** *********** **** **** *** ****** *******: Video recorder manufacturers who need to integrate with many access and PSIM systems may be attracted to supporting the specification, simply to reduce the cost and complexity of performing integrations with a variety of other vendors. On the other hand, such integrations usually do not win projects - the key driving favor for most manufacturers. To the extent they do, video recorder manufacturers may find it easier to perform integrations on a 'one-off' basis using their existing APIs.
  • Supporting ***** ************'* *******: Upstart recorder manufacturers may adopt these standards in an attempt to displace incumbent manufacturers. This would overcome a historic constraint that encouraged end users to stay with their incumbent recorder manufacturer. On the other hand, incumbents who stand to lose because of increased interoperability may find this to be a disincentive.
  • End **** ************: If end users require the support of these specifications, video surveillance recorder vendors will be motivated to add support. However, this will be unlikely to occur until a sufficient number of recorder vendors add support. As such, this could take some time to occur. Also, depending on what specific functionalities an end user require, they may be reluctant to disqualify manufacturers who do not yet support the specifications.

Obstacles ** ******** *********

*** ******* ******** ** ********** ******** ** ******** ********* ** the ********** ** ******** *********** ********** *** ********* *************.

*** **** ** ********* ***** ************* ***** ** ****** *** ****. **** ********* ***** ******** *** ***** of *******, ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ** *** ******** market.

******* *** ********* **** ********* ** **** ******* **** ********* will **** **** *** ******* ****** ******** **** ** ********** smaller ******* **** ***** ******** ******** **** *** ******* ******* from * ****** ******. *******, **** ** ****** *** *** case *** ************ ********* ***** *** ******* ****** ** *** growing *******. **** ** ********** **** *** *** ************* **** have **** ** *** ******** ****** *** **** ** ********* sales.

** * ********* ****** ***** ****** **** ***** ***********, ********* DVR ************* *** / ****** **** ** **** ************ ** delay ** ****** ******** *********. ** *** ***** ****, **** notes **** **** ***** ********* ************* *** ******* *** ************ to **** **************. **** **** ** *********** ** *** ** if *** *** ******* ***** ********** ******* ********** ******* *** such **************.

Examining ****'* **** *************

** ********* **, ****, ******* *.* ** *** "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ********. *** ** **** ******** *** ** ******** by *********** ** *** ****'* *****. ******* *.* ** ******** *******.

************* 

********** *** ********* ************* ******* ** ************ ***** ** *** other **** **************: (*) ***** ***** ****** (****) **************** (*) *** **** ** ** ******** **** *************. *** IPMD ************* ** ********* *** ********** **** ***** *******. *** CMeM ** ********* *** ********** ******** ***** ****** *** ***** analytics.

***** *** ********* ************* ******* ** *** ** ****** *************, this **** ** ******* *** ************* ************ **** *** ** camera ****************. ** *** ***** ****, ************* ************ ***** *** delay *** **** *** *****'* ********* ************* ** ** ******** to ******** ********* ******.

*** ************* ******** *** ************** ************* ******** *********. ***** **** ********* ** *** ******* ******** currently, ** **** **** ** ** *****.

*** ************* ******** *** ********** * ****** ** ***** ****** including *.***, ****-*, *****, ****-****, *** (*** ******** *). ***** new ***** ***** *** ** **********, *** ******* ************* **** not ********* ****** ********* *** *********** ******. **** ***** ******* the ****** ************ ** ******* **** *********** **** **** ***** proprietary ****** - ** ***** **** * ****** ** *********/****** recorders.

******** ** **** *************

*** **** ************* ********** * ***** ****** ** *********/******* ********** features *********:

  • **** ********* ** ***** ********* *** *******
  • ************* ** ********* ********** (**** ** ****** **** *******, **** frame, ***.)
  • ******** ** ******** ***** (**** ********** ******* *** ******/***** ********* video)
  • **** *************** ****** ********* (***** ***)
  • ********* ** ****, *******, ****** *** ******** (**** ** ***** analytic ***** *****)
  • ****** ******** **** ******** ***** (**** ** ********** ** ****** notes ** *****)
  • ***** *** ****** ** ******** ***** *******
  • ******** * ****** ** ******** ************ (******* **.*) *********: ***** by ***** ******** (******* *** ********), * ***** **** ******** (to ****** ********* ****), ******** ******** **** (** ****** ***** frame ** *********) *** ******** ** *** **** ***** ******* for *****/****** ***** *********

Impact ** ******** **************** **************

** ******** ************** *** ******* *******, ** ********** * *********** industry *******:

  • Growth ** ****: Providers of command and control software will find it easier to integrate with video recorders. Today, most PSIM systems only integrate with a handful of the leading recorder vendors. Given the fragmented state of the video surveillance recorder market, a large percentage of products are not supported. The growth in PSIM will still be constrained by limitations in integrating with other access control system such as intrusion detection and access control (though PSIA has a working group in area control dedicated to these segments).
  • Mix *** ***** *********: End users will start considering how to mix and match recorders for different applications and over longer time frames. For instance, a large corporation with branch offices may use Genetec or Milestone for their corporate facilities but deploy low cost DVRs for the branch offices. 
  • Accelerate ********* ** **-***** *************: As end-users look for their next generation of video surveillance recorders, these specifications will make it easier for end users to 'free' them self from the incumbent. Smart up-start VMS manufacturers will add support for this specification so they can manage legacy DVRs, providing a simpler transition to the use of their software/user interface.
  • Free/ ***-**** ***** ********** ********: As these specifications mature, some manufacturers will find it advantageous to offer this software for free or low cost that integrates with any PSIA and/or ONVIF enabled camera or recorder. This could come in the form of selling complimentary products or 'monetizing' from services as is common with open source software providers.
  • Enhanced ******* *** '********'/'******' **** **********: Many VMS UIs are cumbersome to use, often generating comparisons to spreadsheet software. As it becomes easier to interface with recorders, basic support will lose its value. Manufacturers are likely to differentiate themselves with 'easier to use' UIs and end users will have greater flexibility to choose such offerings.

Projected ********* *** ********* ********* ********

***** *** **** ***** ************* *** **** ********, ** ** difficult ** ******** **** ********* *** ********* *** ********** ********** adoption ** ***** **************. ***********, ** **** ********* ****** ** 2 *** *******:

  • How **** ********* ** **** **** ** ********* *** ********* *************? Because recorders are more complex than cameras, implementing the recording specification will likely take more resources than the camera specification. Also, it may take more manual testing and revisions to optimize compatibility.
  • How ********* **** ************* ** ** ***** *** ********* *************? As examined above, incumbents may be resistant to adopting such standards. Even for up and coming IP video companies, recording specifications likely represent less of a growth opportunity than IP camera specifications.
******** **** ************** ** ***** *** ************* *** *********, ******** may ****** * ******* ******** ** **** ** ** ****** standards: * **** **** ************* ************ ** ******* ************; * more ****** ** ******* ******* ******** *** ** ******** ** an ********** **** ** ***** ************. **** ***** ****** ** broad ******** ** ***** ************ ******** ************** ** ***** ****. Assuming ******* ************, ** ***** **** ******** ***** ******. 
 
* **** **** *** **** ****** ** **** *******. ***********, given *** *********** ******** ** *** ** ****** **** *** the ********* *** ******, ********* ************** ****** ** ******* *******.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Hikvision H.265+ Bullet Tested (2035) on Jul 24, 2017
Continuing our tests of Hikvision's new low cost Value Plus line, we bought and tested the 3MP DS-2CD2035FWD-I, now including H.265+. We shot the...
PR Campaign Exploiting Manufacturer Cybersecurity on Jul 20, 2017
Manufacturers increasingly have a bulls-eye on their back. As cyber security solutions providers grow, they realize a great way to get publicity...
Genetec Mission Control Tested on Jul 13, 2017
Genetec continues to move up market with their Mission Control, "Decision Support System", bringing PSIM-like procedures and incident management to...
ONVIF Chairman Criticizes Low Cost Cameras (Also, He Works At Axis) on Jul 12, 2017
ONVIF Chairman Per Björkdahl has taken a strong public stance against low cost cameras that are 'much more vulnerable to attack' as he explains in...
ONVIF Widely Used Toolkit gSOAP Vulnerability Discovered on Jul 10, 2017
A vulnerability has been discovered in a toolkit that video surveillance manufacturers widely use for implementing ONVIF. In this report, we...
Universal HD Analog Encoder Tested (DW Compressor) on Jul 06, 2017
Digital Watchdog has released the Compressor HD, a "universal" HD analog encoder, with support for AHD, CVI, TVI and SD analog cameras. We tested...
Hikvision USA Hires VP of Business Development on Jul 05, 2017
Hikvision USA is expanding again, this time in its drive to move up market to larger integrators and end users. In this note, we analyze...
Smartcard Copier Tested (13.56MHz) on Jul 05, 2017
Copying 125kHz cards is certainly easy, as our test results showed, but how about 13.56MHz smart cards? Are they more secure? IPVM focused on the...
H.265 / HEVC Codec Tutorial 2017 on Jun 30, 2017
For years, video surveillance professionals have talked about the potential for H.265. Now, in 2017, H.265 is starting to gain mainstream...
Hikvision H.265+ Tested on Jun 27, 2017
Hikvision, which in the past few years released H.264+ (see test results) has now released H.265+, that claims even greater bandwidth savings. We...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hikvision H.265+ Bullet Tested (2035) on Jul 24, 2017
Continuing our tests of Hikvision's new low cost Value Plus line, we bought and tested the 3MP DS-2CD2035FWD-I, now including H.265+. We shot the...
Sports Stadium Security Design Recommendations on Jul 24, 2017
Sports stadiums pose many challenges for designing security systems. The facilities vary from being mostly vacant, to packed with tens of thousands...
Competing Against Convergint on Jul 24, 2017
No integrator is more aggressively expanding than Convergint Technologies. Owned and funded by private equity firm KRG, Convergint has acquired...
Security Robots Are Just Entertainment on Jul 21, 2017
Great entertainment, no real security value.  That is the happy (or sad) state of security robots in 2017. Knightscope robot's drowning, the...
Wireless Burglar Alarm Sensors Guide on Jul 21, 2017
Wireless sensors for burglar alarm sensors are an increasingly common option for the historical labor intensive wired alarm systems. However,...
Competing Against ADT on Jul 20, 2017
ADT is one of the biggest players in the security industry, with ~$4 billion revenue. In 2017, they were acquired / merged with Protection...
Hikvision Launching Deep Learning Recorders on Jul 20, 2017
Hikvision has become a common choice for super low cost NVRs. Now, Hikvision is aiming to move up market, with deep learning NVRs that claim far...
PR Campaign Exploiting Manufacturer Cybersecurity on Jul 20, 2017
Manufacturers increasingly have a bulls-eye on their back. As cyber security solutions providers grow, they realize a great way to get publicity...
Axis Door Station Tested (A8105-E) on Jul 19, 2017
Axis continues their push into niche markets, especially audio, with network speakers, an IP horn, and video door stations. We bought and tested...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide on Jul 19, 2017
This 120 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our 20 manufacturer favorability rankings and 20 manufacturer...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact