Surveillance Recorder Standards Examined (PSIA / ONVIF)

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 25, 2009

Security managers suffer from no standards for surveillance recorders. Even large organizations with thousands of cameras and hundreds of sites rarely use more than 1 or 2 manufacturer's recorders (even if they use more than a dozen manufacturer's cameras).

Emerging interoperability specifications from PSIA and ONVIF aim to eliminate this problem.

Operational Constraints from Poor Interoperability

The main practical issue is that each manufacturer has their own proprietary viewing software that almost never supports viewing video from other manufacturer's recorders. Because of this, if security managers used multiple recorders, operators would be forced to use multiple applications. 

The limitations are serious. Operators would have to switch back and forth to view different cameras, could get confused about what cameras are associated with which manufacturer's recorders and would not be able to display all cameras on a single monitor.

Financial Penalties from Having to Use a Single Vendor

Because of these drawbacks, the pressures to use a single recording vendor is high.

However, the costs and penalties of 'locking in' to a single vendor is also high:

  • If better quality (or less expensive) alternatives arise over time, it's hard to switch.
  • If some sites are better served by other manufacturers (specific features needed or lower price points for different camera configurations), it's hard to choose them.
 
Emerging Interoperability Specifications from PSIA and ONVIF
 
Following last year's launch of IP camera interoperability specifications, both organizations are preparing to launch 'standards' for video surveillance recorders.
 
In October 2009, the PSIA announced a draft specification for video surveillance recorders (RaCM). The full draft of the PSIA's "Recording and Content Management" specification may be obtained by registering at the PSIA's forum.
 
ONVIF is also pursuing specification for video surveillance recorders. ONVIF has a storage working group that is developing similar specifications. However, ONVIF does not plan to release these specifications publicly until 2010.

******** ******** ****** **** ** ********* *** ************ *********. **** large ************* **** ********* ** ******* *** ******** ** ***** rarely *** **** **** * ** * ************'* ********* (**** if **** *** **** **** * ***** ************'* *******).

******** **************** ************** **** **** *** ***** *** ** ********* this *******.

Operational *********** **** **** ****************

*** **** ********* ***** ** **** **** ************ *** ***** own *********** ******* ******** **** ****** ***** ******** ******* ***** from ***** ************'* *********. ******* ** ****, ** ******** ******** used ******** *********, ********* ***** ** ****** ** *** ******** applications. 

*** *********** *** *******. ********* ***** **** ** ****** **** *** forth ** **** ********* *******, ***** *** ******** ***** **** cameras *** ********** **** ***** ************'* ********* *** ***** *** be **** ** ******* *** ******* ** * ****** *******.

Financial ********* **** ****** ** *** * ****** ******

******* ** ***** *********, *** ********* ** *** * ****** recording ****** ** ****.

*******, *** ***** *** ********* ** '******* **' ** * single ****** ** **** ****:

  • ** ****** ******* (** **** *********) ************ ***** **** ****, it's **** ** ******.
  • ** **** ***** *** ****** ****** ** ***** ************* (******** features ****** ** ***** ***** ****** *** ********* ****** **************), it's **** ** ****** ****.
 
Emerging **************** ************** **** **** *** *****
 
************* ****'* ****** ** ** ****** **************** **************, **** ************* *** ********* ** ****** '*********' *** ***** surveillance *********.
 
** ******* ****, **************** ****** ************* *** ***** ************ ********* (****). *** **** ***** ** *** ****'* "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ** ******** ************* ** *** ****'* *****.
 
******* **** ******** ************* *** ***** ************ *********. ***** *** a ******* ******* ***** **** ** ********** ******* **************. *******, ONVIF **** *** **** ** ******* ***** ************** ******** ***** 2010.

[***************]

Business ******* *** ******** *********

******** ********* ****** ** *** ********* ******** ** *************. *** benefits *******:

  • Simplifying *** ***** ***/*** ***********: PSIM and access control manufacturers will clearly find these standards advantageous. Their solutions require integration with a large number of 3rd party DVR/NVRs. These interoperability standards will reduce the cost and complexity of tasks they currently undertake.
  • Reducing **** ** *********** **** **** *** ****** *******: Video recorder manufacturers who need to integrate with many access and PSIM systems may be attracted to supporting the specification, simply to reduce the cost and complexity of performing integrations with a variety of other vendors. On the other hand, such integrations usually do not win projects - the key driving favor for most manufacturers. To the extent they do, video recorder manufacturers may find it easier to perform integrations on a 'one-off' basis using their existing APIs.
  • Supporting ***** ************'* *******: Upstart recorder manufacturers may adopt these standards in an attempt to displace incumbent manufacturers. This would overcome a historic constraint that encouraged end users to stay with their incumbent recorder manufacturer. On the other hand, incumbents who stand to lose because of increased interoperability may find this to be a disincentive.
  • End **** ************: If end users require the support of these specifications, video surveillance recorder vendors will be motivated to add support. However, this will be unlikely to occur until a sufficient number of recorder vendors add support. As such, this could take some time to occur. Also, depending on what specific functionalities an end user require, they may be reluctant to disqualify manufacturers who do not yet support the specifications.

Obstacles ** ******** *********

*** ******* ******** ** ********** ******** ** ******** ********* ** the ********** ** ******** *********** ********** *** ********* *************.

*** **** ** ********* ***** ************* ***** ** ****** *** ****. **** ********* ***** ******** *** ***** of *******, ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ** *** ******** market.

******* *** ********* **** ********* ** **** ******* **** ********* will **** **** *** ******* ****** ******** **** ** ********** smaller ******* **** ***** ******** ******** **** *** ******* ******* from * ****** ******. *******, **** ** ****** *** *** case *** ************ ********* ***** *** ******* ****** ** *** growing *******. **** ** ********** **** *** *** ************* **** have **** ** *** ******** ****** *** **** ** ********* sales.

** * ********* ****** ***** ****** **** ***** ***********, ********* DVR ************* *** / ****** **** ** **** ************ ** delay ** ****** ******** *********. ** *** ***** ****, **** notes **** **** ***** ********* ************* *** ******* *** ************ to **** **************. **** **** ** *********** ** *** ** if *** *** ******* ***** ********** ******* ********** ******* *** such **************.

Examining ****'* **** *************

** ********* **, ****, ******* *.* ** *** "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ********. *** ** **** ******** *** ** ******** by *********** ** *** ****'* *****. ******* *.* ** ******** *******.

************* 

********** *** ********* ************* ******* ** ************ ***** ** *** other **** **************: (*) ***** ***** ****** (****) **************** (*) *** **** ** ** ******** **** *************. *** IPMD ************* ** ********* *** ********** **** ***** *******. *** CMeM ** ********* *** ********** ******** ***** ****** *** ***** analytics.

***** *** ********* ************* ******* ** *** ** ****** *************, this **** ** ******* *** ************* ************ **** *** ** camera ****************. ** *** ***** ****, ************* ************ ***** *** delay *** **** *** *****'* ********* ************* ** ** ******** to ******** ********* ******.

*** ************* ******** *** ************** ************* ******** *********. ***** **** ********* ** *** ******* ******** currently, ** **** **** ** ** *****.

*** ************* ******** *** ********** * ****** ** ***** ****** including *.***, ****-*, *****, ****-****, *** (*** ******** *). ***** new ***** ***** *** ** **********, *** ******* ************* **** not ********* ****** ********* *** *********** ******. **** ***** ******* the ****** ************ ** ******* **** *********** **** **** ***** proprietary ****** - ** ***** **** * ****** ** *********/****** recorders.

******** ** **** *************

*** **** ************* ********** * ***** ****** ** *********/******* ********** features *********:

  • **** ********* ** ***** ********* *** *******
  • ************* ** ********* ********** (**** ** ****** **** *******, **** frame, ***.)
  • ******** ** ******** ***** (**** ********** ******* *** ******/***** ********* video)
  • **** *************** ****** ********* (***** ***)
  • ********* ** ****, *******, ****** *** ******** (**** ** ***** analytic ***** *****)
  • ****** ******** **** ******** ***** (**** ** ********** ** ****** notes ** *****)
  • ***** *** ****** ** ******** ***** *******
  • ******** * ****** ** ******** ************ (******* **.*) *********: ***** by ***** ******** (******* *** ********), * ***** **** ******** (to ****** ********* ****), ******** ******** **** (** ****** ***** frame ** *********) *** ******** ** *** **** ***** ******* for *****/****** ***** *********

Impact ** ******** **************** **************

** ******** ************** *** ******* *******, ** ********** * *********** industry *******:

  • Growth ** ****: Providers of command and control software will find it easier to integrate with video recorders. Today, most PSIM systems only integrate with a handful of the leading recorder vendors. Given the fragmented state of the video surveillance recorder market, a large percentage of products are not supported. The growth in PSIM will still be constrained by limitations in integrating with other access control system such as intrusion detection and access control (though PSIA has a working group in area control dedicated to these segments).
  • Mix *** ***** *********: End users will start considering how to mix and match recorders for different applications and over longer time frames. For instance, a large corporation with branch offices may use Genetec or Milestone for their corporate facilities but deploy low cost DVRs for the branch offices. 
  • Accelerate ********* ** **-***** *************: As end-users look for their next generation of video surveillance recorders, these specifications will make it easier for end users to 'free' them self from the incumbent. Smart up-start VMS manufacturers will add support for this specification so they can manage legacy DVRs, providing a simpler transition to the use of their software/user interface.
  • Free/ ***-**** ***** ********** ********: As these specifications mature, some manufacturers will find it advantageous to offer this software for free or low cost that integrates with any PSIA and/or ONVIF enabled camera or recorder. This could come in the form of selling complimentary products or 'monetizing' from services as is common with open source software providers.
  • Enhanced ******* *** '********'/'******' **** **********: Many VMS UIs are cumbersome to use, often generating comparisons to spreadsheet software. As it becomes easier to interface with recorders, basic support will lose its value. Manufacturers are likely to differentiate themselves with 'easier to use' UIs and end users will have greater flexibility to choose such offerings.

Projected ********* *** ********* ********* ********

***** *** **** ***** ************* *** **** ********, ** ** difficult ** ******** **** ********* *** ********* *** ********** ********** adoption ** ***** **************. ***********, ** **** ********* ****** ** 2 *** *******:

  • How **** ********* ** **** **** ** ********* *** ********* *************? Because recorders are more complex than cameras, implementing the recording specification will likely take more resources than the camera specification. Also, it may take more manual testing and revisions to optimize compatibility.
  • How ********* **** ************* ** ** ***** *** ********* *************? As examined above, incumbents may be resistant to adopting such standards. Even for up and coming IP video companies, recording specifications likely represent less of a growth opportunity than IP camera specifications.
******** **** ************** ** ***** *** ************* *** *********, ******** may ****** * ******* ******** ** **** ** ** ****** standards: * **** **** ************* ************ ** ******* ************; * more ****** ** ******* ******* ******** *** ** ******** ** an ********** **** ** ***** ************. **** ***** ****** ** broad ******** ** ***** ************ ******** ************** ** ***** ****. Assuming ******* ************, ** ***** **** ******** ***** ******. 
 
* **** **** *** **** ****** ** **** *******. ***********, given *** *********** ******** ** *** ** ****** **** *** the ********* *** ******, ********* ************** ****** ** ******* *******.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Controller Software Guide on Dec 11, 2017
Properly configuring access controllers software is key to a professional access system. These devices have fundamental settings that must be...
Access Control Course Winter 2018 on Dec 07, 2017
Learn more below about the Winter 2018 IPVM Access Control Course. Register here. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in...
D-Link ONVIF Switch Tested on Dec 04, 2017
D-Link's surveillance switches claim to "enhance ease of use and streamline management" for network administrators, with simplified UIs and...
ZKAccess Control Tested on Dec 04, 2017
China manufacturer ZKTeco / ZKAcces has been expanding in the West, offering a low-cost access control platform. But how good is it? And how does...
Hikvision Door Station Tested on Nov 30, 2017
Hikvision has entered the video intercom market, aiming to bring the race to the bottom to a whole new audience. To see how it stacks up, we...
Hazardous & Explosion Proof Access Control Tutorial on Nov 27, 2017
Controlling access to hazardous environments require equipment meeting specific ratings that certify they will not start fires. Understanding those...
Law Breaking Longse Enters USA on Nov 22, 2017
Longse has established itself as world class, at least in spamming the industry, ripping off Milestone and Video Insight as well as Hikvision. But...
Top Maglock Provider Warns Against Using Maglocks on Nov 21, 2017
Do not buy my company's product. It sounds strange indeed, but a senior Allegion consultant stated that maglocks should not be used in common...
Isonas Cofounders Split, Launch Partner/Competitor on Nov 16, 2017
Breaking up is hard to do, especially when door access security is at stake. But that is exactly what has happened at Isonas. Senior employees...
Hikvision NVR 4.0 Improvements Tested on Nov 14, 2017
Hikvision has released firmware version 4.0 for select NVRs, touting two years of research and development, and claiming "the new generation GUI...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Startup Flock Declares Itself "The New Standard For Neighborhood Security" on Dec 15, 2017
Mega startup generator YCombinator has backed a startup targeting neighborhood video surveillance and security. Flock Safety is taking a...
Directory of VSaaS / Cloud Video Surveillance Providers on Dec 15, 2017
This directory provides a list of VSaaS / cloud video surveillance providers to help you see and research what options are available. 2018 State...
Integrator Managing Projects Statistics on Dec 14, 2017
Who actually manages projects for security integrators? Does the average security integrator have dedicated project managers, or are technicians,...
Hikvision NVR Load Testing on Dec 14, 2017
IPVM members recently debated Hikvision NVR's performance under load in Hikvision 30+ Cameras On NVR - Apps And Client Really Slow Down And CPU...
This Manufacturer Shuns IP Cameras on Dec 14, 2017
One manufacturer has chosen a bold strategy in avoiding getting caught up in the race to the bottom: shun IP solutions. We spoke with an executive...
Testing DMP XTLPlus / Virtual Keypad Vs Alarm.com & Honeywell on Dec 13, 2017
DMP has a strong presence in commercial intrusion alarms, but not in residential. However, the company's XTLPLus wireless combo panel and Virtual...
BBC Features Dahua on Dec 13, 2017
Hikvision is not the only mega-Chinese video surveillance manufacturer getting global attention. Last month, the WSJ investigated Hikvision and now...
Hiring Camera Calculator Product Manager on Dec 12, 2017
We are working on making the Camera Calculator even better and hoping you can help us find the right person to join our team. IPVM is hiring a...
Testing $20 WyzeCam, The Money Losing Amazon Vet Startup on Dec 12, 2017
This startup is perfecting the old adage: We lose money on every sale, but make it up on volume But it is no joke. The company, Wyze Labs, is...
Xiongmai New Critical Vulnerability - Same Manufacturer Whose Products Drove Mirai Botnet Attacks on Dec 12, 2017
The Chinese manufacturer whose products were primarily responsible for the 2016 Mirai botnet attack has a new critical vulnerability, confirmed by...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact