Surveillance Recorder Standards Examined (PSIA / ONVIF)

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 25, 2009

Security managers suffer from no standards for surveillance recorders. Even large organizations with thousands of cameras and hundreds of sites rarely use more than 1 or 2 manufacturer's recorders (even if they use more than a dozen manufacturer's cameras).

Emerging interoperability specifications from PSIA and ONVIF aim to eliminate this problem.

Operational Constraints from Poor Interoperability

The main practical issue is that each manufacturer has their own proprietary viewing software that almost never supports viewing video from other manufacturer's recorders. Because of this, if security managers used multiple recorders, operators would be forced to use multiple applications. 

The limitations are serious. Operators would have to switch back and forth to view different cameras, could get confused about what cameras are associated with which manufacturer's recorders and would not be able to display all cameras on a single monitor.

Financial Penalties from Having to Use a Single Vendor

Because of these drawbacks, the pressures to use a single recording vendor is high.

However, the costs and penalties of 'locking in' to a single vendor is also high:

  • If better quality (or less expensive) alternatives arise over time, it's hard to switch.
  • If some sites are better served by other manufacturers (specific features needed or lower price points for different camera configurations), it's hard to choose them.
 
Emerging Interoperability Specifications from PSIA and ONVIF
 
Following last year's launch of IP camera interoperability specifications, both organizations are preparing to launch 'standards' for video surveillance recorders.
 
In October 2009, the PSIA announced a draft specification for video surveillance recorders (RaCM). The full draft of the PSIA's "Recording and Content Management" specification may be obtained by registering at the PSIA's forum.
 
ONVIF is also pursuing specification for video surveillance recorders. ONVIF has a storage working group that is developing similar specifications. However, ONVIF does not plan to release these specifications publicly until 2010.

******** ******** ****** **** ** ********* *** ************ *********. **** large ************* **** ********* ** ******* *** ******** ** ***** rarely *** **** **** * ** * ************'* ********* (**** if **** *** **** **** * ***** ************'* *******).

******** **************** ************** **** **** *** ***** *** ** ********* this *******.

Operational *********** **** **** ****************

*** **** ********* ***** ** **** **** ************ *** ***** own *********** ******* ******** **** ****** ***** ******** ******* ***** from ***** ************'* *********. ******* ** ****, ** ******** ******** used ******** *********, ********* ***** ** ****** ** *** ******** applications. 

*** *********** *** *******. ********* ***** **** ** ****** **** *** forth ** **** ********* *******, ***** *** ******** ***** **** cameras *** ********** **** ***** ************'* ********* *** ***** *** be **** ** ******* *** ******* ** * ****** *******.

Financial ********* **** ****** ** *** * ****** ******

******* ** ***** *********, *** ********* ** *** * ****** recording ****** ** ****.

*******, *** ***** *** ********* ** '******* **' ** * single ****** ** **** ****:

  • ** ****** ******* (** **** *********) ************ ***** **** ****, it's **** ** ******.
  • ** **** ***** *** ****** ****** ** ***** ************* (******** features ****** ** ***** ***** ****** *** ********* ****** **************), it's **** ** ****** ****.
 
Emerging **************** ************** **** **** *** *****
 
************* ****'* ****** ** ** ****** **************** **************, **** ************* *** ********* ** ****** '*********' *** ***** surveillance *********.
 
** ******* ****, **************** ****** ************* *** ***** ************ ********* (****). *** **** ***** ** *** ****'* "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ** ******** ************* ** *** ****'* *****.
 
******* **** ******** ************* *** ***** ************ *********. ***** *** a ******* ******* ***** **** ** ********** ******* **************. *******, ONVIF **** *** **** ** ******* ***** ************** ******** ***** 2010.

[***************]

Business ******* *** ******** *********

******** ********* ****** ** *** ********* ******** ** *************. *** benefits *******:

  • Simplifying *** ***** ***/*** ***********: PSIM and access control manufacturers will clearly find these standards advantageous. Their solutions require integration with a large number of 3rd party DVR/NVRs. These interoperability standards will reduce the cost and complexity of tasks they currently undertake.
  • Reducing **** ** *********** **** **** *** ****** *******: Video recorder manufacturers who need to integrate with many access and PSIM systems may be attracted to supporting the specification, simply to reduce the cost and complexity of performing integrations with a variety of other vendors. On the other hand, such integrations usually do not win projects - the key driving favor for most manufacturers. To the extent they do, video recorder manufacturers may find it easier to perform integrations on a 'one-off' basis using their existing APIs.
  • Supporting ***** ************'* *******: Upstart recorder manufacturers may adopt these standards in an attempt to displace incumbent manufacturers. This would overcome a historic constraint that encouraged end users to stay with their incumbent recorder manufacturer. On the other hand, incumbents who stand to lose because of increased interoperability may find this to be a disincentive.
  • End **** ************: If end users require the support of these specifications, video surveillance recorder vendors will be motivated to add support. However, this will be unlikely to occur until a sufficient number of recorder vendors add support. As such, this could take some time to occur. Also, depending on what specific functionalities an end user require, they may be reluctant to disqualify manufacturers who do not yet support the specifications.

Obstacles ** ******** *********

*** ******* ******** ** ********** ******** ** ******** ********* ** the ********** ** ******** *********** ********** *** ********* *************.

*** **** ** ********* ***** ************* ***** ** ****** *** ****. **** ********* ***** ******** *** ***** of *******, ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ** *** ******** market.

******* *** ********* **** ********* ** **** ******* **** ********* will **** **** *** ******* ****** ******** **** ** ********** smaller ******* **** ***** ******** ******** **** *** ******* ******* from * ****** ******. *******, **** ** ****** *** *** case *** ************ ********* ***** *** ******* ****** ** *** growing *******. **** ** ********** **** *** *** ************* **** have **** ** *** ******** ****** *** **** ** ********* sales.

** * ********* ****** ***** ****** **** ***** ***********, ********* DVR ************* *** / ****** **** ** **** ************ ** delay ** ****** ******** *********. ** *** ***** ****, **** notes **** **** ***** ********* ************* *** ******* *** ************ to **** **************. **** **** ** *********** ** *** ** if *** *** ******* ***** ********** ******* ********** ******* *** such **************.

Examining ****'* **** *************

** ********* **, ****, ******* *.* ** *** "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ********. *** ** **** ******** *** ** ******** by *********** ** *** ****'* *****. ******* *.* ** ******** *******.

************* 

********** *** ********* ************* ******* ** ************ ***** ** *** other **** **************: (*) ***** ***** ****** (****) **************** (*) *** **** ** ** ******** **** *************. *** IPMD ************* ** ********* *** ********** **** ***** *******. *** CMeM ** ********* *** ********** ******** ***** ****** *** ***** analytics.

***** *** ********* ************* ******* ** *** ** ****** *************, this **** ** ******* *** ************* ************ **** *** ** camera ****************. ** *** ***** ****, ************* ************ ***** *** delay *** **** *** *****'* ********* ************* ** ** ******** to ******** ********* ******.

*** ************* ******** *** ************** ************* ******** *********. ***** **** ********* ** *** ******* ******** currently, ** **** **** ** ** *****.

*** ************* ******** *** ********** * ****** ** ***** ****** including *.***, ****-*, *****, ****-****, *** (*** ******** *). ***** new ***** ***** *** ** **********, *** ******* ************* **** not ********* ****** ********* *** *********** ******. **** ***** ******* the ****** ************ ** ******* **** *********** **** **** ***** proprietary ****** - ** ***** **** * ****** ** *********/****** recorders.

******** ** **** *************

*** **** ************* ********** * ***** ****** ** *********/******* ********** features *********:

  • **** ********* ** ***** ********* *** *******
  • ************* ** ********* ********** (**** ** ****** **** *******, **** frame, ***.)
  • ******** ** ******** ***** (**** ********** ******* *** ******/***** ********* video)
  • **** *************** ****** ********* (***** ***)
  • ********* ** ****, *******, ****** *** ******** (**** ** ***** analytic ***** *****)
  • ****** ******** **** ******** ***** (**** ** ********** ** ****** notes ** *****)
  • ***** *** ****** ** ******** ***** *******
  • ******** * ****** ** ******** ************ (******* **.*) *********: ***** by ***** ******** (******* *** ********), * ***** **** ******** (to ****** ********* ****), ******** ******** **** (** ****** ***** frame ** *********) *** ******** ** *** **** ***** ******* for *****/****** ***** *********

Impact ** ******** **************** **************

** ******** ************** *** ******* *******, ** ********** * *********** industry *******:

  • Growth ** ****: Providers of command and control software will find it easier to integrate with video recorders. Today, most PSIM systems only integrate with a handful of the leading recorder vendors. Given the fragmented state of the video surveillance recorder market, a large percentage of products are not supported. The growth in PSIM will still be constrained by limitations in integrating with other access control system such as intrusion detection and access control (though PSIA has a working group in area control dedicated to these segments).
  • Mix *** ***** *********: End users will start considering how to mix and match recorders for different applications and over longer time frames. For instance, a large corporation with branch offices may use Genetec or Milestone for their corporate facilities but deploy low cost DVRs for the branch offices. 
  • Accelerate ********* ** **-***** *************: As end-users look for their next generation of video surveillance recorders, these specifications will make it easier for end users to 'free' them self from the incumbent. Smart up-start VMS manufacturers will add support for this specification so they can manage legacy DVRs, providing a simpler transition to the use of their software/user interface.
  • Free/ ***-**** ***** ********** ********: As these specifications mature, some manufacturers will find it advantageous to offer this software for free or low cost that integrates with any PSIA and/or ONVIF enabled camera or recorder. This could come in the form of selling complimentary products or 'monetizing' from services as is common with open source software providers.
  • Enhanced ******* *** '********'/'******' **** **********: Many VMS UIs are cumbersome to use, often generating comparisons to spreadsheet software. As it becomes easier to interface with recorders, basic support will lose its value. Manufacturers are likely to differentiate themselves with 'easier to use' UIs and end users will have greater flexibility to choose such offerings.

Projected ********* *** ********* ********* ********

***** *** **** ***** ************* *** **** ********, ** ** difficult ** ******** **** ********* *** ********* *** ********** ********** adoption ** ***** **************. ***********, ** **** ********* ****** ** 2 *** *******:

  • How **** ********* ** **** **** ** ********* *** ********* *************? Because recorders are more complex than cameras, implementing the recording specification will likely take more resources than the camera specification. Also, it may take more manual testing and revisions to optimize compatibility.
  • How ********* **** ************* ** ** ***** *** ********* *************? As examined above, incumbents may be resistant to adopting such standards. Even for up and coming IP video companies, recording specifications likely represent less of a growth opportunity than IP camera specifications.
******** **** ************** ** ***** *** ************* *** *********, ******** may ****** * ******* ******** ** **** ** ** ****** standards: * **** **** ************* ************ ** ******* ************; * more ****** ** ******* ******* ******** *** ** ******** ** an ********** **** ** ***** ************. **** ***** ****** ** broad ******** ** ***** ************ ******** ************** ** ***** ****. Assuming ******* ************, ** ***** **** ******** ***** ******. 
 
* **** **** *** **** ****** ** **** *******. ***********, given *** *********** ******** ** *** ** ****** **** *** the ********* *** ******, ********* ************** ****** ** ******* *******.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Vulnerability Directory For Access Control Cards on Aug 14, 2017
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be unclear, especially because most look and feel the same. Even the most insecure 125 kHz types...
IP Camera Specification / RFP Guide 2017 on Aug 14, 2017
RFPs are hard. Do them 'right' and it takes a lot of knowledge and time. Do them 'wrong' and you can be (a) unwittingly locked into a specific...
Competing Against G4S on Aug 09, 2017
G4S Secure Solutions is a global company, operating in multiple countries and offering a suite of products and services from guards to their AMAG...
ONVIF Releases Profile A for Access on Aug 08, 2017
ONVIF has struggled so far in access control. In 2014, ONVIF released Profile C for access control, but in the 3 years since, only 2 companies...
Access Control Commissioning / Install Checklist on Aug 03, 2017
This 80+ point checklist helps end users, integrators and consultants verify that access control installation is complete. It covers the following...
IR Surveillance Guide on Jul 31, 2017
Infrared (IR) has become an increasing core component to video surveillance systems. In particular, the expansion of integrated IR cameras that...
Bosch G-Series Intrusion Tested on Jul 26, 2017
Bosch is one of the biggest names in intrusion, and the company's G-Series panels are their most advanced commercial and high-security panels. But...
Hikvision H.265+ Bullet Tested (2035) on Jul 24, 2017
Continuing our tests of Hikvision's new low cost Value Plus line, we bought and tested the 3MP DS-2CD2035FWD-I, now including H.265+. We shot the...
PR Campaign Exploiting Manufacturer Cybersecurity on Jul 20, 2017
Manufacturers increasingly have a bulls-eye on their back. As cyber security solutions providers grow, they realize a great way to get publicity...
Genetec Mission Control Tested on Jul 13, 2017
Genetec continues to move up market with their Mission Control, "Decision Support System", bringing PSIM-like procedures and incident management to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Final Day Save $50 - IP Networking Course September 2017 on Aug 17, 2017
Today, Thursday, August 17th is the last day to save $50 on the September IP Networking Course. This is the only networking course designed...
Knightscope Raises $10 Million With $3,320 Average Per Investor on Aug 17, 2017
Congrats to Knightscope. And condolences to their legion of little investors. Knightscope has disclosed they have raised $10+ million from their...
Axis and Arecont Legal Conflict Over Multi-Imager Cameras on Aug 17, 2017
Arecont threatened Axis. Axis has responded by moving to invalidate an Arecont patent. It is an important contest. Multi-imagers are Arecont's...
Directory Of Consumer Security Cameras on Aug 16, 2017
The consumer camera segment continues to grow, with new startups and models from existing players released seemingly every month. In this report we...
Cat 5e vs Cat 6 vs Cat 6a Network Cable Usage Statistics on Aug 16, 2017
Cat 5e? Cat 6? Cat 6a? What do integrators use in practice, today? 140+ integrators told IPVM. Here are the results: For those who want to...
Hikvision Responds To Cracked Security Codes on Aug 15, 2017
Hikvision has responded to IPVM's report on Hikvision's security code being cracked, both with a 2 page update to dealers and communication...
Stolen Video NVR / DVR Statistics on Aug 15, 2017
"But what happens if someone steals my recorder?" Anyone who has done more than a handful of jobs has probably heard this question several times....
Hikvision Europe Cutting Out Unauthorized End User Sales on Aug 15, 2017
The days of anyone buying Hikvision from anywhere off the Internet are numbered, at least in Europe, if Hikvision's plan comes to fruition. In...
Axis Laser Focus PTZ Tested on Aug 14, 2017
Axis has been touting its new Q6155-E laser focus PTZ as 'always in focus' and 'always in color'. Does it really deliver? We bought and tested...
Vulnerability Directory For Access Control Cards on Aug 14, 2017
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be unclear, especially because most look and feel the same. Even the most insecure 125 kHz types...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact