Surveillance Recorder Standards Examined (PSIA / ONVIF)

Author: John Honovich, Published on Oct 25, 2009

Security managers suffer from no standards for surveillance recorders. Even large organizations with thousands of cameras and hundreds of sites rarely use more than 1 or 2 manufacturer's recorders (even if they use more than a dozen manufacturer's cameras).

Emerging interoperability specifications from PSIA and ONVIF aim to eliminate this problem.

Operational Constraints from Poor Interoperability

The main practical issue is that each manufacturer has their own proprietary viewing software that almost never supports viewing video from other manufacturer's recorders. Because of this, if security managers used multiple recorders, operators would be forced to use multiple applications. 

The limitations are serious. Operators would have to switch back and forth to view different cameras, could get confused about what cameras are associated with which manufacturer's recorders and would not be able to display all cameras on a single monitor.

Financial Penalties from Having to Use a Single Vendor

Because of these drawbacks, the pressures to use a single recording vendor is high.

However, the costs and penalties of 'locking in' to a single vendor is also high:

  • If better quality (or less expensive) alternatives arise over time, it's hard to switch.
  • If some sites are better served by other manufacturers (specific features needed or lower price points for different camera configurations), it's hard to choose them.
 
Emerging Interoperability Specifications from PSIA and ONVIF
 
Following last year's launch of IP camera interoperability specifications, both organizations are preparing to launch 'standards' for video surveillance recorders.
 
In October 2009, the PSIA announced a draft specification for video surveillance recorders (RaCM). The full draft of the PSIA's "Recording and Content Management" specification may be obtained by registering at the PSIA's forum.
 
ONVIF is also pursuing specification for video surveillance recorders. ONVIF has a storage working group that is developing similar specifications. However, ONVIF does not plan to release these specifications publicly until 2010.

******** ******** ****** **** ** ********* *** ************ *********. **** large ************* **** ********* ** ******* *** ******** ** ***** rarely *** **** **** * ** * ************'* ********* (**** if **** *** **** **** * ***** ************'* *******).

******** **************** ************** **** **** *** ***** *** ** ********* this *******.

Operational *********** **** **** ****************

*** **** ********* ***** ** **** **** ************ *** ***** own *********** ******* ******** **** ****** ***** ******** ******* ***** from ***** ************'* *********. ******* ** ****, ** ******** ******** used ******** *********, ********* ***** ** ****** ** *** ******** applications. 

*** *********** *** *******. ********* ***** **** ** ****** **** *** forth ** **** ********* *******, ***** *** ******** ***** **** cameras *** ********** **** ***** ************'* ********* *** ***** *** be **** ** ******* *** ******* ** * ****** *******.

Financial ********* **** ****** ** *** * ****** ******

******* ** ***** *********, *** ********* ** *** * ****** recording ****** ** ****.

*******, *** ***** *** ********* ** '******* **' ** * single ****** ** **** ****:

  • ** ****** ******* (** **** *********) ************ ***** **** ****, it's **** ** ******.
  • ** **** ***** *** ****** ****** ** ***** ************* (******** features ****** ** ***** ***** ****** *** ********* ****** **************), it's **** ** ****** ****.
 
Emerging **************** ************** **** **** *** *****
 
************* ****'* ****** ** ** ****** **************** **************, **** ************* *** ********* ** ****** '*********' *** ***** surveillance *********.
 
** ******* ****, **************** ****** ************* *** ***** ************ ********* (****). *** **** ***** ** *** ****'* "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ** ******** ************* ** *** ****'* *****.
 
******* **** ******** ************* *** ***** ************ *********. ***** *** a ******* ******* ***** **** ** ********** ******* **************. *******, ONVIF **** *** **** ** ******* ***** ************** ******** ***** 2010.

[***************]

Business ******* *** ******** *********

******** ********* ****** ** *** ********* ******** ** *************. *** benefits *******:

  • Simplifying *** ***** ***/*** ***********: PSIM and access control manufacturers will clearly find these standards advantageous. Their solutions require integration with a large number of 3rd party DVR/NVRs. These interoperability standards will reduce the cost and complexity of tasks they currently undertake.
  • Reducing **** ** *********** **** **** *** ****** *******: Video recorder manufacturers who need to integrate with many access and PSIM systems may be attracted to supporting the specification, simply to reduce the cost and complexity of performing integrations with a variety of other vendors. On the other hand, such integrations usually do not win projects - the key driving favor for most manufacturers. To the extent they do, video recorder manufacturers may find it easier to perform integrations on a 'one-off' basis using their existing APIs.
  • Supporting ***** ************'* *******: Upstart recorder manufacturers may adopt these standards in an attempt to displace incumbent manufacturers. This would overcome a historic constraint that encouraged end users to stay with their incumbent recorder manufacturer. On the other hand, incumbents who stand to lose because of increased interoperability may find this to be a disincentive.
  • End **** ************: If end users require the support of these specifications, video surveillance recorder vendors will be motivated to add support. However, this will be unlikely to occur until a sufficient number of recorder vendors add support. As such, this could take some time to occur. Also, depending on what specific functionalities an end user require, they may be reluctant to disqualify manufacturers who do not yet support the specifications.

Obstacles ** ******** *********

*** ******* ******** ** ********** ******** ** ******** ********* ** the ********** ** ******** *********** ********** *** ********* *************.

*** **** ** ********* ***** ************* ***** ** ****** *** ****. **** ********* ***** ******** *** ***** of *******, ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ** *** ******** market.

******* *** ********* **** ********* ** **** ******* **** ********* will **** **** *** ******* ****** ******** **** ** ********** smaller ******* **** ***** ******** ******** **** *** ******* ******* from * ****** ******. *******, **** ** ****** *** *** case *** ************ ********* ***** *** ******* ****** ** *** growing *******. **** ** ********** **** *** *** ************* **** have **** ** *** ******** ****** *** **** ** ********* sales.

** * ********* ****** ***** ****** **** ***** ***********, ********* DVR ************* *** / ****** **** ** **** ************ ** delay ** ****** ******** *********. ** *** ***** ****, **** notes **** **** ***** ********* ************* *** ******* *** ************ to **** **************. **** **** ** *********** ** *** ** if *** *** ******* ***** ********** ******* ********** ******* *** such **************.

Examining ****'* **** *************

** ********* **, ****, ******* *.* ** *** "********* *** ******* **********" specification *** ********. *** ** **** ******** *** ** ******** by *********** ** *** ****'* *****. ******* *.* ** ******** *******.

************* 

********** *** ********* ************* ******* ** ************ ***** ** *** other **** **************: (*) ***** ***** ****** (****) **************** (*) *** **** ** ** ******** **** *************. *** IPMD ************* ** ********* *** ********** **** ***** *******. *** CMeM ** ********* *** ********** ******** ***** ****** *** ***** analytics.

***** *** ********* ************* ******* ** *** ** ****** *************, this **** ** ******* *** ************* ************ **** *** ** camera ****************. ** *** ***** ****, ************* ************ ***** *** delay *** **** *** *****'* ********* ************* ** ** ******** to ******** ********* ******.

*** ************* ******** *** ************** ************* ******** *********. ***** **** ********* ** *** ******* ******** currently, ** **** **** ** ** *****.

*** ************* ******** *** ********** * ****** ** ***** ****** including *.***, ****-*, *****, ****-****, *** (*** ******** *). ***** new ***** ***** *** ** **********, *** ******* ************* **** not ********* ****** ********* *** *********** ******. **** ***** ******* the ****** ************ ** ******* **** *********** **** **** ***** proprietary ****** - ** ***** **** * ****** ** *********/****** recorders.

******** ** **** *************

*** **** ************* ********** * ***** ****** ** *********/******* ********** features *********:

  • **** ********* ** ***** ********* *** *******
  • ************* ** ********* ********** (**** ** ****** **** *******, **** frame, ***.)
  • ******** ** ******** ***** (**** ********** ******* *** ******/***** ********* video)
  • **** *************** ****** ********* (***** ***)
  • ********* ** ****, *******, ****** *** ******** (**** ** ***** analytic ***** *****)
  • ****** ******** **** ******** ***** (**** ** ********** ** ****** notes ** *****)
  • ***** *** ****** ** ******** ***** *******
  • ******** * ****** ** ******** ************ (******* **.*) *********: ***** by ***** ******** (******* *** ********), * ***** **** ******** (to ****** ********* ****), ******** ******** **** (** ****** ***** frame ** *********) *** ******** ** *** **** ***** ******* for *****/****** ***** *********

Impact ** ******** **************** **************

** ******** ************** *** ******* *******, ** ********** * *********** industry *******:

  • Growth ** ****: Providers of command and control software will find it easier to integrate with video recorders. Today, most PSIM systems only integrate with a handful of the leading recorder vendors. Given the fragmented state of the video surveillance recorder market, a large percentage of products are not supported. The growth in PSIM will still be constrained by limitations in integrating with other access control system such as intrusion detection and access control (though PSIA has a working group in area control dedicated to these segments).
  • Mix *** ***** *********: End users will start considering how to mix and match recorders for different applications and over longer time frames. For instance, a large corporation with branch offices may use Genetec or Milestone for their corporate facilities but deploy low cost DVRs for the branch offices. 
  • Accelerate ********* ** **-***** *************: As end-users look for their next generation of video surveillance recorders, these specifications will make it easier for end users to 'free' them self from the incumbent. Smart up-start VMS manufacturers will add support for this specification so they can manage legacy DVRs, providing a simpler transition to the use of their software/user interface.
  • Free/ ***-**** ***** ********** ********: As these specifications mature, some manufacturers will find it advantageous to offer this software for free or low cost that integrates with any PSIA and/or ONVIF enabled camera or recorder. This could come in the form of selling complimentary products or 'monetizing' from services as is common with open source software providers.
  • Enhanced ******* *** '********'/'******' **** **********: Many VMS UIs are cumbersome to use, often generating comparisons to spreadsheet software. As it becomes easier to interface with recorders, basic support will lose its value. Manufacturers are likely to differentiate themselves with 'easier to use' UIs and end users will have greater flexibility to choose such offerings.

Projected ********* *** ********* ********* ********

***** *** **** ***** ************* *** **** ********, ** ** difficult ** ******** **** ********* *** ********* *** ********** ********** adoption ** ***** **************. ***********, ** **** ********* ****** ** 2 *** *******:

  • How **** ********* ** **** **** ** ********* *** ********* *************? Because recorders are more complex than cameras, implementing the recording specification will likely take more resources than the camera specification. Also, it may take more manual testing and revisions to optimize compatibility.
  • How ********* **** ************* ** ** ***** *** ********* *************? As examined above, incumbents may be resistant to adopting such standards. Even for up and coming IP video companies, recording specifications likely represent less of a growth opportunity than IP camera specifications.
******** **** ************** ** ***** *** ************* *** *********, ******** may ****** * ******* ******** ** **** ** ** ****** standards: * **** **** ************* ************ ** ******* ************; * more ****** ** ******* ******* ******** *** ** ******** ** an ********** **** ** ***** ************. **** ***** ****** ** broad ******** ** ***** ************ ******** ************** ** ***** ****. Assuming ******* ************, ** ***** **** ******** ***** ******. 
 
* **** **** *** **** ****** ** **** *******. ***********, given *** *********** ******** ** *** ** ****** **** *** the ********* *** ******, ********* ************** ****** ** ******* *******.
Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Glass Doors and Access Control Tutorial on Feb 22, 2017
The biggest challenge for many access control systems are glass doors. Here's what happens when a maglock is improperly installed to an existing...
Customized Access Control Cans (Altronix Trove) on Feb 14, 2017
Access control installs typically require hanging at least two or three different enclosure cans, each holding individual parts.  Open wall space...
Lenel Favorability Results 2017 on Feb 09, 2017
At this point, it is not surprising that Lenel is one of the most disliked security manufacturers. From stories like Lenel Partners Angry, Lenel...
Hitachi Taking On Security Industry on Feb 09, 2017
Hitachi, bigger than Sony and Panasonic overall, with $89 billion USD 2016 total revenue, is expanding into the security industry. They are...
Milestone App - PSIM Lite (Alesys) on Feb 09, 2017
Milestone has many features in their VMS, but it is not a PSIM. Italian PSIM developer Alesys thinks sensor integrations and alarm management can...
VPNs for Video Surveillance on Feb 07, 2017
Remote access in surveillance networks is a key cyber security and usability issue. With cyber attacks rising, how can users ensure their systems...
$18.7M PSIM Acquisition Examined (IDV / Everbridge) on Feb 06, 2017
This may be the biggest deal for a PSIM developer ever. In a segment that has disappointed for more than a decade, a recent IPOed company has...
Boycott Anixter, Says 82% Integrators on Feb 05, 2017
82% of 130 145 integrator respondents say integrators should boycott Anixter, in response to Anixter / Bosch Sells Direct to Amazon. This is the...
Axis Favorability Results on Feb 03, 2017
For many years, Axis sold the most IP cameras but, with the rise of Hikvision and Dahua, that has changed. How would that impact Axis...
Veracity Acquires PSIM Manufacturer on Feb 03, 2017
Most well-known for their Ethernet extenders, with their own video surveillance storage offering, Veracity has now acquired a PSIM. UK-based...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Uniview (UNV) IP Cameras Tested on Feb 22, 2017
"We're #3," in China says Uniview (UNV). While the company significantly trails Hikvision and Dahua in total sales, one notable difference is that...
Glass Doors and Access Control Tutorial on Feb 22, 2017
The biggest challenge for many access control systems are glass doors. Here's what happens when a maglock is improperly installed to an existing...
Exacq Favorability Results on Feb 22, 2017
For years, Exacq has been one of the most frequently favored VMSes in IPVM integrator statistics (e.g., see Favorite VMS Manufacturers...
The Hot RMR Company - Electric Guard Dog on Feb 22, 2017
The financiers at the Barnes Buchanan conference praised a company named 'Electric Guard Dog'. While the name sounds fairly low tech, the money and...
Hikvision Leads Multi-Manufacturer Sales Promo on Feb 21, 2017
Earlier this month, Hikvision launched new 'super value' kits, with 40% discounts, and now Hikvision is offering another promo, but this time they...
Washington DC MPD's Surveillance Equipment on Feb 21, 2017
The Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department's surveillance system was hacked in January 2017. Two immediate questions were: Whose...
Hikvision Ezviz Mini 360 Plus - $80 Autotracking Camera Tested on Feb 21, 2017
Autotracking, integrated IR, local storage, full HD, cloud access: $80. That is the claim of Hikvision EZVIZ's new Mini 360 Plus. But for this...
Lenel Improving Customer Support on Feb 21, 2017
Lenel has faced significant criticism recently (see Lenel Partners Angry, Lenel Does Not Care, Worst Access Control 2016, Lenel Favorability...
'Dirty': Hikvision Attacks Genetec on Feb 20, 2017
Hikvision is angry at the growing public awareness that Hikvision is owned by the Chinese government. They took aim at Genetec,...
Directory of Alarm Company Brokers on Feb 20, 2017
Selling an RMR based business, such as alarm company, can be highly profitable, with acquisition prices of 36 to 48x RMR (equivalent to 3 to 4x...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact