Eliminating Control Panels? Viscount Reviewed

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Dec 05, 2013

Every access control system requires control panels. But now one manufacturer claims that their 'Freedom' system eliminates the panel, trumpeting that:

****'* * ****** ******* claim ***, ** ****, could ** *** **** access ******* **** *******.

** **** ****, ** examine******** ******* '*******', ******** **** ****'* real *** *** ** real.

The ****** **********

*** **** ** ********'* system ** * ****** *** ******* calls * "******". ******* ******** *** device "***** *** **** reader **** ** ** device" ******* *** **** of * **********, ***"******" ** ****** * controller. *** **** ********** like *****, *******, *** door ******** *** ***** into *** ******, *** the ***** ****** ** connected **** ** ******** network - *** **** definition ** *  ******** controller.

*** **** ********** ** that *** ****** ***** no ******* *********, *** acts ** ** ********* ***** *** access ********. ****** ****** comes **** ** **** and *** ********* ** various ******* ***** ********** for ******** ************. *** different ***** *** ****** of *** ***** ********** permit * '**** **' changeover **** *** ******** enclosures, ****** ******, *** termination ******. *******, ** order ** ******* '*******' ~3"X2" *** *******, *** mounting ********** *** ** additional **** *** ******** addition *** **** *********. Viscount ****** '************', *** ************ *** ******** ************* **** ~$**-$**.

*** ****** *** ****** platforms *** ********* **** traditional ******* ******* **** eliminate '******* ******' *** 'virtualize ***** ********' ** software. *** *** ******* Viscount ****** ****** *** it ***** ***:

**** ************: ***** *** **** not ************ *** **** term, **** ****** ********* how * ****** ***** together. *** ****** ********** are ********* ******** ** the **** *** **** remain ********* ** * main ********. ******* *** available ** ******, ******, and **** ****** ********, and *** ****** ********* boards ** ***** ******* like ********* *** *********.  No ************ ** **** control ****** *** ****, just * ******* ** interconnected *******.

****** *********:****** **** ********** ********, Bridges **** ****** ********* to * ****** ** be ***********. ***** ******* can ** ********* ** remote ******* ** '********', *** ******* ******** having ***** ******** ******* on ****. ***** '********' instances *** ******** ** small '****-*******' ** ******** clients ********* ** ******* workstations *** *** ** background *********. ******** ** switched ************* ** *** Bridge, *** ******* ******** servers *** ** ********** with **** ******.

**** ****** ** **** Formats:* ******** ******** ** VSI's ********* ** * wide ***** ** **************** with ********** ******* **** it ****** **** ** '********* *********'. *** ******* ****** a **** ***** ** compatible ******* ********* **** Wiegand, ***, ***, ******, and ********* *****, ** to ***** ***** **** bits. **** ** * credential **** ** *******, it ****** ** ****** through *** ****** ** a ****** *** ******* there. ** ******** ** a *** ********** **** only ***** **** *** credentials, ***'* ******* ******** has ** *********** ** useable *******.

*******

********'* ********* *** ************* priced ******** ** ************, and ********* *** ***** to ********** **** *********. For * ******** ****, ***'* solution ********:

*** ****** ***** ******** ~$550.   ***'* *****/****** platforms *** ******* ** national ************ *** *** be ********* ******* ******* training.

*** **********, ******** ******* offerings **** ********, ***** a ****** ****'***** *****' ************* ******** ***** ~$***.

*** *** ******, ********* costs **** **** *****, readers, ***********, *** ******** networking *** *** ******** and *** ****** ** widely ****** '*** ****' costs.

*********

***** **** ** ***********, VSI's ******** **** *** come ******* ******* **********:

****** *********: ** ******* *****, the ******* ****** ******* with *** ** ****** connection ** * ******** server.

*** **** ************:***** ***, ******* ********, or ****' *********** *** 'open', ***'* ******** ** proprietary. **** *** ******** is *********, ** *** only ** **** **** VSI ********** ********. **** locks ********* **** *** as * ******** ***** is * **** **** users ******** *****.

******* ***********:******* ****** ******* **** video ************ ** *** of *** **** ****** integrations ** ******** ********, yet ***** ** *********** with *** ***** ***.

Ideal ***********

***'* ****** ********* **** features ******** ** ********** and '**** ********' ***********. For *******, *** ******** is *******-* *********, ***** with ***-****** ***/*** ***********, and ******** '**** **/**** out' ************ ** *******. The ******** ** ****** on ******* *** *********, and ****************** ******** ************, ******* is ***********.

*******, *********** *** ******** is ***********, ************ *** limited, *** ** ************ feature ***, **** **** prefer ** **** ****** system **** *** ** used **** ***** ****** of ***** ****** ******* software *********.

 

Comments (10)

Good to see you back writing articles Brian!

I don't think I would be comfortable having door controllers dependent on network connections, and I'm a network guy. It's one thing if a network connection to a camera gets interrupted- so you lose some video.... If these "bridges" loose network connection, you have access issues that prevent you from getting in or maybe getting out, or permitting unrestricted access, I guess whichever way the devices default too or are configured. This possibility increases exponentially if are using wireless access points.

I wish there was more mention or a development in terminology when reviewing access or other devices like this to distinguish systems that use a "sync'd data architecture", where the controllers or bridges are actually syncing and caching data, either with a master controller or PC based server, thus allowing them to operate independently when communication issues occur, versus systems that do not, where the controller or bridge cannot function on its own.

See John, free lunches don't affect my objectivity. =)

Luis, I like the way Mercury defines things. Their single door PoE controller (which has intelligence and will make decisions if th network is down) is the EP1501. The MR51e, on the other hand, they call a door interface, because it contains all the connections to the door, but will not do any decision making on its own. It has to connect back to one of the EP controllers via the network.

I think that's a good distinction. The Viscount Liberty bridge looks to me to be a door interface, in that case.

I approached VSI many times at their booths. I was impressed with the technology however they explained the system as using IT infrastucture and Active Directory to do the management. What I quickly found was that there must be an active directory domain controller on the site that has the devices since as you say, the credentials have to be passed to a system with a database to provide a response. So if you are network dependant, intersite for example, I would not be putting this in. It is a greate idea and can work on a local area network with a domain controller available. And that is where I left the product. The cost of deploying domain controllres everywhere and supporting them far exceeds the cost of a control panel at the site. Maybe what people may want to design is AD Domain Controllers that can fit in the palm of your hand and can hold 100s of thousands or millions of records. It would make the whole system plug and play for everyone.

Viscount has had a system like this for awhile. I've always called it Mesh, though they now have a different product called Mesh.

The Mesh system I worked with was server dependent, but without a "Bridge". The reader was semi-intelligent in that it handled all the connections, including lock relay, RTE, door position switch. But it needed the server for cards. If the server went down you were screwed. A single cat5e ran back to a hub/switch which could also server as a junction point for all the additional hardware if you didn't want to go right at the reader. The switch/hub had an in from previous reader/server, in from the reader, and then out to the next one. As well as a screw terminal set for the door hardware.

We've only ever had one customer on the system (and recently upgraded to a Keyscan system) and it did work surprisingly well for 6-8 years.

I like the idea of the bridge, as it would leave me able to use any reader, where as the older Mesh style we were stuck with Viscounts readers and cards.

My R&D developed a simillr system few years back, where we use fingerprint devices to read fingerprint images from users, and send back to server for verification. Result of verification return from server to the fingerprint devices to response to the users. The idea is similar, where server stores all credentials, verification algorithm, access rules and database. This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers.

When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. The result, only 1 fingerprint device can verify 1 user at the same time, while the rest fail.

By the end, we pull back the development and change to develop bigger fingerprint storage in our products. We know no matter how big the storage of the device can achieve, it cannot compare with server-client based system.

When comes to a server-client based verification system, how many threads can the server handle? Will it accept all "input" in queue? Or it ignore the rest? I am not familiar with the VSI, but I like the idea of server-client verification. However the delay time between every read/verification is my concern.

"When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. "

Kok, I would think that should have been a simple software fix- one system process that receives data and qeues them up for processing and another process that processes the images. If you send the fingerprint straight to the imaging process without any queing then I can see how you'd miss processing requests from other devices.

"This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers. "

What about that would be the ideal? Is it a possibly cheaper cost of the edge devices, since they don't have to perform any or a limited amount of intelligenece and storage? That would be the only benefit I could think of.

Hi Luis

Yes I agreed my R&D missed the part (queing fingerprints for verification) thus finally we discountinue the product. Therefore I am asking, how VSI handles queing of every card ID sent from the Bridge Card, and response to every Bridge Card (door open/close) and other (sensor, alarm output etc)?

VSI's software technology seems admittedly cool. However, I've noticed over the years that cool software technology doesn't always succeed in access control because:

  1. Putting access on a door, even a wireless lockset, is more labor-intenstive and costly than hanging cameras on walls.
  2. Because of point #1, Integrators/Installers like to have a piece of the hardware revenue stream. Thus moving costs from hardware to software provides less incentive to integration partners, as their business models might not be geared to reselling software. In a similar vein, I suspect Axis will see this with their A1001 controller.

VSI will certainly find some success with this in the higher-end market wtih established IT environments. Time will tell if this can become mainstream.

Any thoughts on using the Nano Cube Server or have any experience with it? I find it interesting and am wondering when these are generally installed. I would be worried to have my access database on something that someone could potentially plug into a wall socket not in a secured room.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
ProdataKey (PDK) Access Company Profile on Aug 09, 2019
 Utah based ProdataKey touts low cost cloud access, wireless controllers, and no dealer required national distribution availability.  But how does...
Axis Door Station A8207-VE Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Axis newest door station, the A8207-VE, claims to deliver "video surveillance, two-way communication, and access control" in a single device. But...
Mobile Access Control Shootout - Farpointe, HID, Openpath, Nortek, Proxy on Jul 29, 2019
One of the biggest rising trends in access control is using phones as credentials but which offering is best? IPVM has tested five of the...
Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact