Eliminating Control Panels? Viscount Reviewed

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Dec 05, 2013

Every access control system requires control panels. But now one manufacturer claims that their 'Freedom' system eliminates the panel, trumpeting that:

****'* * ****** ******* claim ***, ** ****, could ** *** **** access ******* **** *******.

** **** ****, ** examine******** ******* '*******', ******** **** ****'* real *** *** ** real.

The ****** **********

*** **** ** ********'* system ** * ****** *** ******* calls * "******". ******* ******** *** device "***** *** **** reader **** ** ** device" ******* *** **** of * **********, ***"******" ** ****** * controller. *** **** ********** like *****, *******, *** door ******** *** ***** into *** ******, *** the ***** ****** ** connected **** ** ******** network - *** **** definition ** *  ******** controller.

*** **** ********** ** that *** ****** ***** no ******* *********, *** acts ** ** ********* ***** *** access ********. ****** ****** comes **** ** **** and *** ********* ** various ******* ***** ********** for ******** ************. *** different ***** *** ****** of *** ***** ********** permit * '**** **' changeover **** *** ******** enclosures, ****** ******, *** termination ******. *******, ** order ** ******* '*******' ~3"X2" *** *******, *** mounting ********** *** ** additional **** *** ******** addition *** **** *********. Viscount ****** '************', *** ************ *** ******** ************* **** ~$**-$**.

*** ****** *** ****** platforms *** ********* **** traditional ******* ******* **** eliminate '******* ******' *** 'virtualize ***** ********' ** software. *** *** ******* Viscount ****** ****** *** it ***** ***:

**** ************: ***** *** **** not ************ *** **** term, **** ****** ********* how * ****** ***** together. *** ****** ********** are ********* ******** ** the **** *** **** remain ********* ** * main ********. ******* *** available ** ******, ******, and **** ****** ********, and *** ****** ********* boards ** ***** ******* like ********* *** *********.  No ************ ** **** control ****** *** ****, just * ******* ** interconnected *******.

****** *********:****** **** ********** ********, Bridges **** ****** ********* to * ****** ** be ***********. ***** ******* can ** ********* ** remote ******* ** '********', *** ******* ******** having ***** ******** ******* on ****. ***** '********' instances *** ******** ** small '****-*******' ** ******** clients ********* ** ******* workstations *** *** ** background *********. ******** ** switched ************* ** *** Bridge, *** ******* ******** servers *** ** ********** with **** ******.

**** ****** ** **** Formats:* ******** ******** ** VSI's ********* ** * wide ***** ** **************** with ********** ******* **** it ****** **** ** '********* *********'. *** ******* ****** a **** ***** ** compatible ******* ********* **** Wiegand, ***, ***, ******, and ********* *****, ** to ***** ***** **** bits. **** ** * credential **** ** *******, it ****** ** ****** through *** ****** ** a ****** *** ******* there. ** ******** ** a *** ********** **** only ***** **** *** credentials, ***'* ******* ******** has ** *********** ** useable *******.

*******

********'* ********* *** ************* priced ******** ** ************, and ********* *** ***** to ********** **** *********. For * ******** ****, ***'* solution ********:

*** ****** ***** ******** ~$550.   ***'* *****/****** platforms *** ******* ** national ************ *** *** be ********* ******* ******* training.

*** **********, ******** ******* offerings **** ********, ***** a ****** ****'***** *****' ************* ******** ***** ~$***.

*** *** ******, ********* costs **** **** *****, readers, ***********, *** ******** networking *** *** ******** and *** ****** ** widely ****** '*** ****' costs.

*********

***** **** ** ***********, VSI's ******** **** *** come ******* ******* **********:

****** *********: ** ******* *****, the ******* ****** ******* with *** ** ****** connection ** * ******** server.

*** **** ************:***** ***, ******* ********, or ****' *********** *** 'open', ***'* ******** ** proprietary. **** *** ******** is *********, ** *** only ** **** **** VSI ********** ********. **** locks ********* **** *** as * ******** ***** is * **** **** users ******** *****.

******* ***********:******* ****** ******* **** video ************ ** *** of *** **** ****** integrations ** ******** ********, yet ***** ** *********** with *** ***** ***.

Ideal ***********

***'* ****** ********* **** features ******** ** ********** and '**** ********' ***********. For *******, *** ******** is *******-* *********, ***** with ***-****** ***/*** ***********, and ******** '**** **/**** out' ************ ** *******. The ******** ** ****** on ******* *** *********, and ****************** ******** ************, ******* is ***********.

*******, *********** *** ******** is ***********, ************ *** limited, *** ** ************ feature ***, **** **** prefer ** **** ****** system **** *** ** used **** ***** ****** of ***** ****** ******* software *********.

 

Comments (10)

Good to see you back writing articles Brian!

I don't think I would be comfortable having door controllers dependent on network connections, and I'm a network guy. It's one thing if a network connection to a camera gets interrupted- so you lose some video.... If these "bridges" loose network connection, you have access issues that prevent you from getting in or maybe getting out, or permitting unrestricted access, I guess whichever way the devices default too or are configured. This possibility increases exponentially if are using wireless access points.

I wish there was more mention or a development in terminology when reviewing access or other devices like this to distinguish systems that use a "sync'd data architecture", where the controllers or bridges are actually syncing and caching data, either with a master controller or PC based server, thus allowing them to operate independently when communication issues occur, versus systems that do not, where the controller or bridge cannot function on its own.

See John, free lunches don't affect my objectivity. =)

Luis, I like the way Mercury defines things. Their single door PoE controller (which has intelligence and will make decisions if th network is down) is the EP1501. The MR51e, on the other hand, they call a door interface, because it contains all the connections to the door, but will not do any decision making on its own. It has to connect back to one of the EP controllers via the network.

I think that's a good distinction. The Viscount Liberty bridge looks to me to be a door interface, in that case.

I approached VSI many times at their booths. I was impressed with the technology however they explained the system as using IT infrastucture and Active Directory to do the management. What I quickly found was that there must be an active directory domain controller on the site that has the devices since as you say, the credentials have to be passed to a system with a database to provide a response. So if you are network dependant, intersite for example, I would not be putting this in. It is a greate idea and can work on a local area network with a domain controller available. And that is where I left the product. The cost of deploying domain controllres everywhere and supporting them far exceeds the cost of a control panel at the site. Maybe what people may want to design is AD Domain Controllers that can fit in the palm of your hand and can hold 100s of thousands or millions of records. It would make the whole system plug and play for everyone.

Viscount has had a system like this for awhile. I've always called it Mesh, though they now have a different product called Mesh.

The Mesh system I worked with was server dependent, but without a "Bridge". The reader was semi-intelligent in that it handled all the connections, including lock relay, RTE, door position switch. But it needed the server for cards. If the server went down you were screwed. A single cat5e ran back to a hub/switch which could also server as a junction point for all the additional hardware if you didn't want to go right at the reader. The switch/hub had an in from previous reader/server, in from the reader, and then out to the next one. As well as a screw terminal set for the door hardware.

We've only ever had one customer on the system (and recently upgraded to a Keyscan system) and it did work surprisingly well for 6-8 years.

I like the idea of the bridge, as it would leave me able to use any reader, where as the older Mesh style we were stuck with Viscounts readers and cards.

My R&D developed a simillr system few years back, where we use fingerprint devices to read fingerprint images from users, and send back to server for verification. Result of verification return from server to the fingerprint devices to response to the users. The idea is similar, where server stores all credentials, verification algorithm, access rules and database. This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers.

When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. The result, only 1 fingerprint device can verify 1 user at the same time, while the rest fail.

By the end, we pull back the development and change to develop bigger fingerprint storage in our products. We know no matter how big the storage of the device can achieve, it cannot compare with server-client based system.

When comes to a server-client based verification system, how many threads can the server handle? Will it accept all "input" in queue? Or it ignore the rest? I am not familiar with the VSI, but I like the idea of server-client verification. However the delay time between every read/verification is my concern.

"When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. "

Kok, I would think that should have been a simple software fix- one system process that receives data and qeues them up for processing and another process that processes the images. If you send the fingerprint straight to the imaging process without any queing then I can see how you'd miss processing requests from other devices.

"This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers. "

What about that would be the ideal? Is it a possibly cheaper cost of the edge devices, since they don't have to perform any or a limited amount of intelligenece and storage? That would be the only benefit I could think of.

Hi Luis

Yes I agreed my R&D missed the part (queing fingerprints for verification) thus finally we discountinue the product. Therefore I am asking, how VSI handles queing of every card ID sent from the Bridge Card, and response to every Bridge Card (door open/close) and other (sensor, alarm output etc)?

VSI's software technology seems admittedly cool. However, I've noticed over the years that cool software technology doesn't always succeed in access control because:

  1. Putting access on a door, even a wireless lockset, is more labor-intenstive and costly than hanging cameras on walls.
  2. Because of point #1, Integrators/Installers like to have a piece of the hardware revenue stream. Thus moving costs from hardware to software provides less incentive to integration partners, as their business models might not be geared to reselling software. In a similar vein, I suspect Axis will see this with their A1001 controller.

VSI will certainly find some success with this in the higher-end market wtih established IT environments. Time will tell if this can become mainstream.

Any thoughts on using the Nano Cube Server or have any experience with it? I find it interesting and am wondering when these are generally installed. I would be worried to have my access database on something that someone could potentially plug into a wall socket not in a secured room.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
OSDP Access Control Guide on Jun 04, 2019
Access control readers and controllers need to communicate. While Wiegand has been the de facto standard for decades, OSDP aims to solve major...
Vidsys New President Interviewed on May 31, 2019
A decade ago, PSIM was hot with projections then of a billion dollar market by now. This has not come close to happening. However, Vidsys, one of...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
Access Control Request to Exit (RTE) Tutorial on May 13, 2019
For access controlled doors, especially those with maglocks, 'Request to Exit', or 'RTE' devices are required to override electrified locks to...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
Camera Course Summer 2019 - Register Now on Jun 12, 2019
Register for the Summer 2019 Camera Course.  This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Carnegie Mellon AI Startup Zensors Profile on Jun 11, 2019
Zensors is a startup formed by Carnegie Mellon graduates from a Carnegie Mellon research project, offering customized models per camera that they...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact