Eliminating Control Panels? Viscount Reviewed

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Dec 05, 2013

Every access control system requires control panels. But now one manufacturer claims that their 'Freedom' system eliminates the panel, trumpeting that:

****'* * ****** ******* ***** ***, ** ****, ***** ** the **** ****** ******* **** *******.

** **** ****, ** *************** ******* '*******', ******** **** ****'* **** *** *** ** ****.

The ****** **********

*** **** ** ********'* ****** ** * ****** *** ******* ***** * "******". ******* ******** *** ****** "***** *** **** ****** **** an ** ******" ******* *** **** ** * **********, ***"******" ** ****** * **********. *** **** ********** **** *****, *******, *** **** ******** are ***** **** *** ******, *** *** ***** ****** ** connected **** ** ******** ******* - *** **** ********** ** a  ******** **********.

*** **** ********** ** **** *** ****** ***** ** ******* decisions, *** **** ** ** ********* ***** *** ****** ********. ****** ****** comes **** ** **** *** *** ********* ** ******* ******* board ********** *** ******** ************. *** ********* ***** *** ****** of *** ***** ********** ****** * '**** **' ********** **** use ******** **********, ****** ******, *** *********** ******. *******, ** order ** ******* '*******' ~*"**" *** *******, *** ******** ********** are ** ********** **** *** ******** ******** *** **** *********. Viscount ****** '************', *** ************ *** ******** ************* **** ~$**-$**.

*** ****** *** ****** ********* *** ********* **** *********** ******* because **** ********* '******* ******' *** '********** ***** ********' ** software. *** *** ******* ******** ****** ****** *** ** ***** are:

**** ************: ***** *** **** *** ************ *** **** ****, **** indeed ********* *** * ****** ***** ********. *** ****** ********** are ********* ******** ** *** **** *** **** ****** ********* to * **** ********. ******* *** ********* ** ******, ******, and **** ****** ********, *** *** ****** ********* ****** ** other ******* **** ********* *** *********.  ** ************ ** **** control ****** *** ****, **** * ******* ** ************** *******.

****** *********:****** **** ********** ********, ******* **** ****** ********* ** * server ** ** ***********. ***** ******* *** ** ********* ** remote ******* ** '********', *** ******* ******** ****** ***** ******** ******* ** ****. These '********' ********* *** ******** ** ***** '****-*******' ** ******** clients ********* ** ******* ************ *** *** ** ********** *********. Failover ** ******** ************* ** *** ******, *** ******* ******** servers *** ** ********** **** **** ******.

**** ****** ** **** *******:* ******** ******** ** ***'* ********* ** * **** ***** of **************** **** ********** ******* **** ** ****** **** ** '********* *********'. *** ******* ****** * **** ***** ** ********** ******* including **** *******, ***, ***, ******, *** ********* *****, ** to ***** ***** **** ****. **** ** * ********** **** is *******, ** ****** ** ****** ******* *** ****** ** a ****** *** ******* *****. ** ******** ** * *** controller **** **** ***** **** *** ***********, ***'* ******* ******** has ** *********** ** ******* *******.

*******

********'* ********* *** ************* ****** ******** ** ************, *** ********* are ***** ** ********** **** *********. *** * ******** ****, ***'* solution ********:

*** ****** ***** ******** ~$***.   ***'* *****/****** ********* *** carried ** ******** ************ *** *** ** ********* ******* ******* training.

*** **********, ******** ******* ********* **** ********, ***** * ****** door'***** *****' ************* ******** ***** ~$***.

*** *** ******, ********* ***** **** **** *****, *******, ***********, and ******** ********** *** *** ******** *** *** ****** ** widely ****** '*** ****' *****.

*********

***** **** ** ***********, ***'* ******** **** *** **** ******* notable **********:

****** *********: ** ******* *****, *** ******* ****** ******* **** *** an ****** ********** ** * ******** ******.

*** **** ************:***** ***, ******* ********, ** ****' *********** *** '****', ***'* platform ** ***********. **** *** ******** ** *********, ** *** only ** **** **** *** ********** ********. **** ***** ********* into *** ** * ******** ***** ** * **** **** users ******** *****.

******* ***********:******* ****** ******* **** ***** ************ ** *** ** *** most ****** ************ ** ******** ********, *** ***** ** *********** with *** ***** ***.

Ideal ***********

***'* ****** ********* **** ******** ******** ** ********** *** '**** security' ***********. *** *******, *** ******** ** *******-* *********, ***** with ***-****** ***/*** ***********, *** ******** '**** **/**** ***' ************ as *******. *** ******** ** ****** ** ******* *** *********, and ****************** ******** ************, ******* ** ***********.

*******, *********** *** ******** ** ***********, ************ *** *******, *** an ************ ******* ***, **** **** ****** ** **** ****** system **** *** ** **** **** ***** ****** ** ***** access ******* ******** *********.

 

Comments (10)

Good to see you back writing articles Brian!

I don't think I would be comfortable having door controllers dependent on network connections, and I'm a network guy. It's one thing if a network connection to a camera gets interrupted- so you lose some video.... If these "bridges" loose network connection, you have access issues that prevent you from getting in or maybe getting out, or permitting unrestricted access, I guess whichever way the devices default too or are configured. This possibility increases exponentially if are using wireless access points.

I wish there was more mention or a development in terminology when reviewing access or other devices like this to distinguish systems that use a "sync'd data architecture", where the controllers or bridges are actually syncing and caching data, either with a master controller or PC based server, thus allowing them to operate independently when communication issues occur, versus systems that do not, where the controller or bridge cannot function on its own.

See John, free lunches don't affect my objectivity. =)

Luis, I like the way Mercury defines things. Their single door PoE controller (which has intelligence and will make decisions if th network is down) is the EP1501. The MR51e, on the other hand, they call a door interface, because it contains all the connections to the door, but will not do any decision making on its own. It has to connect back to one of the EP controllers via the network.

I think that's a good distinction. The Viscount Liberty bridge looks to me to be a door interface, in that case.

I approached VSI many times at their booths. I was impressed with the technology however they explained the system as using IT infrastucture and Active Directory to do the management. What I quickly found was that there must be an active directory domain controller on the site that has the devices since as you say, the credentials have to be passed to a system with a database to provide a response. So if you are network dependant, intersite for example, I would not be putting this in. It is a greate idea and can work on a local area network with a domain controller available. And that is where I left the product. The cost of deploying domain controllres everywhere and supporting them far exceeds the cost of a control panel at the site. Maybe what people may want to design is AD Domain Controllers that can fit in the palm of your hand and can hold 100s of thousands or millions of records. It would make the whole system plug and play for everyone.

Viscount has had a system like this for awhile. I've always called it Mesh, though they now have a different product called Mesh.

The Mesh system I worked with was server dependent, but without a "Bridge". The reader was semi-intelligent in that it handled all the connections, including lock relay, RTE, door position switch. But it needed the server for cards. If the server went down you were screwed. A single cat5e ran back to a hub/switch which could also server as a junction point for all the additional hardware if you didn't want to go right at the reader. The switch/hub had an in from previous reader/server, in from the reader, and then out to the next one. As well as a screw terminal set for the door hardware.

We've only ever had one customer on the system (and recently upgraded to a Keyscan system) and it did work surprisingly well for 6-8 years.

I like the idea of the bridge, as it would leave me able to use any reader, where as the older Mesh style we were stuck with Viscounts readers and cards.

My R&D developed a simillr system few years back, where we use fingerprint devices to read fingerprint images from users, and send back to server for verification. Result of verification return from server to the fingerprint devices to response to the users. The idea is similar, where server stores all credentials, verification algorithm, access rules and database. This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers.

When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. The result, only 1 fingerprint device can verify 1 user at the same time, while the rest fail.

By the end, we pull back the development and change to develop bigger fingerprint storage in our products. We know no matter how big the storage of the device can achieve, it cannot compare with server-client based system.

When comes to a server-client based verification system, how many threads can the server handle? Will it accept all "input" in queue? Or it ignore the rest? I am not familiar with the VSI, but I like the idea of server-client verification. However the delay time between every read/verification is my concern.

"When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. "

Kok, I would think that should have been a simple software fix- one system process that receives data and qeues them up for processing and another process that processes the images. If you send the fingerprint straight to the imaging process without any queing then I can see how you'd miss processing requests from other devices.

"This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers. "

What about that would be the ideal? Is it a possibly cheaper cost of the edge devices, since they don't have to perform any or a limited amount of intelligenece and storage? That would be the only benefit I could think of.

Hi Luis

Yes I agreed my R&D missed the part (queing fingerprints for verification) thus finally we discountinue the product. Therefore I am asking, how VSI handles queing of every card ID sent from the Bridge Card, and response to every Bridge Card (door open/close) and other (sensor, alarm output etc)?

VSI's software technology seems admittedly cool. However, I've noticed over the years that cool software technology doesn't always succeed in access control because:

  1. Putting access on a door, even a wireless lockset, is more labor-intenstive and costly than hanging cameras on walls.
  2. Because of point #1, Integrators/Installers like to have a piece of the hardware revenue stream. Thus moving costs from hardware to software provides less incentive to integration partners, as their business models might not be geared to reselling software. In a similar vein, I suspect Axis will see this with their A1001 controller.

VSI will certainly find some success with this in the higher-end market wtih established IT environments. Time will tell if this can become mainstream.

Any thoughts on using the Nano Cube Server or have any experience with it? I find it interesting and am wondering when these are generally installed. I would be worried to have my access database on something that someone could potentially plug into a wall socket not in a secured room.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

BluB0x Company Profile on Feb 20, 2019
BluB0x has doubled in revenue every year since its founding in 2013, according to CEO Patrick Barry. We originally reported on them in 2015. At the...
Nortek Mobile Access Reader BluePass Examined on Feb 12, 2019
Nortek's Linear access control division claims to make mobile credentials "more secure and easier to use than ever before" with their BluePass...
HID Launches Origo To Fix Mobile Credential Problems on Feb 05, 2019
HID is releasing Origo, an overhaul of its mobile credential platform, this time drastically restructuring the way it is priced and packaged. HID's...
Designing Access Control Guide on Jan 30, 2019
Designing an access control solution requires decisions on 8 fundamental questions. This in-depth guide helps you understand the options and...
Access Control Turnstiles Guide on Jan 28, 2019
Turnstiles control pedestrian access to secured areas, essentially becoming moving portions of fences, walls, or barricades for physically stop...
Genetec Favorability Report 2019 on Jan 25, 2019
Genetec's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing solid, but...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Wavelynx Access Control Manufacturer Profile on Jan 10, 2019
Denver-based WaveLynx is not well known as an access reader manufacturer, but OEMs for big industry brands including Amag, Isonas (Allegion),...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Sales Cuts At Rasilient on Feb 19, 2019
Over the past 2 years, video surveillance storage specialist Rasilient has expanded its workforce significantly, aiming to build its own branded...
Exacq Raises VMS Software Pricing Twice in Less Than a Year on Feb 18, 2019
Most VMSes regularly release new features, but rarely increase their prices. For the 3rd time in 4 years, and 2nd time in 8 months, since being...
Axis IR Multi Imager Camera Tested (P3717-PLE) on Feb 18, 2019
Axis has released their first IR multi imager, the P3717-PLE, a repositionable model listing 360° IR illumination and flexible positioning,...
Ubiquiti Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 18, 2019
Ubiquiti has quietly grown into a $1+ billion annual revenue company, with offerings across wireless, wireline network and video surveillance (see...
Casino Surveillance Pro Interview: James Lathrop on Feb 15, 2019
James Lathrop has been working in casinos for almost 25 years. During that time, he says he has held "just about every job you can do in the...
Hikvision 2018 Revenue Tops $7 Billion USD But Growth Slows To Low on Feb 15, 2019
Hikvision's annual revenue topped $7 billion for the first time in 2018, although growth slowed sharply. In this post, we analyze the latest...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
ADT And 'The Defenders' Silent About Massive Complaints on Feb 14, 2019
ADT's largest dealer, "The Defenders" has been the subject of a massive number of complaints over many years and many forums, most recently a CBS...
Hikvision Chairman Praises United Front on Feb 14, 2019
Hikvision’s controlling shareholder held a meeting last month praising the United Front, a Communist Party organization known for its secretive...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact