Eliminating Control Panels? Viscount Reviewed

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Dec 05, 2013

Every access control system requires control panels. But now one manufacturer claims that their 'Freedom' system eliminates the panel, trumpeting that:

****'* * ****** ******* ***** ***, ** ****, ***** ** the **** ****** ******* **** *******.

** **** ****, ** *************** ******* '*******', ******** **** ****'* **** *** *** ** ****.

The ****** **********

*** **** ** ********'* ****** ** * ****** *** ******* ***** * "******". ******* ******** *** ****** "***** *** **** ****** **** an ** ******" ******* *** **** ** * **********, ***"******" ** ****** * **********. *** **** ********** **** *****, *******, *** **** ******** are ***** **** *** ******, *** *** ***** ****** ** connected **** ** ******** ******* - *** **** ********** ** a  ******** **********.

*** **** ********** ** **** *** ****** ***** ** ******* decisions, *** **** ** ** ********* ***** *** ****** ********. ****** ****** comes **** ** **** *** *** ********* ** ******* ******* board ********** *** ******** ************. *** ********* ***** *** ****** of *** ***** ********** ****** * '**** **' ********** **** use ******** **********, ****** ******, *** *********** ******. *******, ** order ** ******* '*******' ~*"**" *** *******, *** ******** ********** are ** ********** **** *** ******** ******** *** **** *********. Viscount ****** '************', *** ************ *** ******** ************* **** ~$**-$**.

*** ****** *** ****** ********* *** ********* **** *********** ******* because **** ********* '******* ******' *** '********** ***** ********' ** software. *** *** ******* ******** ****** ****** *** ** ***** are:

**** ************: ***** *** **** *** ************ *** **** ****, **** indeed ********* *** * ****** ***** ********. *** ****** ********** are ********* ******** ** *** **** *** **** ****** ********* to * **** ********. ******* *** ********* ** ******, ******, and **** ****** ********, *** *** ****** ********* ****** ** other ******* **** ********* *** *********.  ** ************ ** **** control ****** *** ****, **** * ******* ** ************** *******.

****** *********:****** **** ********** ********, ******* **** ****** ********* ** * server ** ** ***********. ***** ******* *** ** ********* ** remote ******* ** '********', *** ******* ******** ****** ***** ******** ******* ** ****. These '********' ********* *** ******** ** ***** '****-*******' ** ******** clients ********* ** ******* ************ *** *** ** ********** *********. Failover ** ******** ************* ** *** ******, *** ******* ******** servers *** ** ********** **** **** ******.

**** ****** ** **** *******:* ******** ******** ** ***'* ********* ** * **** ***** of **************** **** ********** ******* **** ** ****** **** ** '********* *********'. *** ******* ****** * **** ***** ** ********** ******* including **** *******, ***, ***, ******, *** ********* *****, ** to ***** ***** **** ****. **** ** * ********** **** is *******, ** ****** ** ****** ******* *** ****** ** a ****** *** ******* *****. ** ******** ** * *** controller **** **** ***** **** *** ***********, ***'* ******* ******** has ** *********** ** ******* *******.

*******

********'* ********* *** ************* ****** ******** ** ************, *** ********* are ***** ** ********** **** *********. *** * ******** ****, ***'* solution ********:

*** ****** ***** ******** ~$***.   ***'* *****/****** ********* *** carried ** ******** ************ *** *** ** ********* ******* ******* training.

*** **********, ******** ******* ********* **** ********, ***** * ****** door'***** *****' ************* ******** ***** ~$***.

*** *** ******, ********* ***** **** **** *****, *******, ***********, and ******** ********** *** *** ******** *** *** ****** ** widely ****** '*** ****' *****.

*********

***** **** ** ***********, ***'* ******** **** *** **** ******* notable **********:

****** *********: ** ******* *****, *** ******* ****** ******* **** *** an ****** ********** ** * ******** ******.

*** **** ************:***** ***, ******* ********, ** ****' *********** *** '****', ***'* platform ** ***********. **** *** ******** ** *********, ** *** only ** **** **** *** ********** ********. **** ***** ********* into *** ** * ******** ***** ** * **** **** users ******** *****.

******* ***********:******* ****** ******* **** ***** ************ ** *** ** *** most ****** ************ ** ******** ********, *** ***** ** *********** with *** ***** ***.

Ideal ***********

***'* ****** ********* **** ******** ******** ** ********** *** '**** security' ***********. *** *******, *** ******** ** *******-* *********, ***** with ***-****** ***/*** ***********, *** ******** '**** **/**** ***' ************ as *******. *** ******** ** ****** ** ******* *** *********, and ****************** ******** ************, ******* ** ***********.

*******, *********** *** ******** ** ***********, ************ *** *******, *** an ************ ******* ***, **** **** ****** ** **** ****** system **** *** ** **** **** ***** ****** ** ***** access ******* ******** *********.

 

Comments (10)

Good to see you back writing articles Brian!

I don't think I would be comfortable having door controllers dependent on network connections, and I'm a network guy. It's one thing if a network connection to a camera gets interrupted- so you lose some video.... If these "bridges" loose network connection, you have access issues that prevent you from getting in or maybe getting out, or permitting unrestricted access, I guess whichever way the devices default too or are configured. This possibility increases exponentially if are using wireless access points.

I wish there was more mention or a development in terminology when reviewing access or other devices like this to distinguish systems that use a "sync'd data architecture", where the controllers or bridges are actually syncing and caching data, either with a master controller or PC based server, thus allowing them to operate independently when communication issues occur, versus systems that do not, where the controller or bridge cannot function on its own.

See John, free lunches don't affect my objectivity. =)

Luis, I like the way Mercury defines things. Their single door PoE controller (which has intelligence and will make decisions if th network is down) is the EP1501. The MR51e, on the other hand, they call a door interface, because it contains all the connections to the door, but will not do any decision making on its own. It has to connect back to one of the EP controllers via the network.

I think that's a good distinction. The Viscount Liberty bridge looks to me to be a door interface, in that case.

I approached VSI many times at their booths. I was impressed with the technology however they explained the system as using IT infrastucture and Active Directory to do the management. What I quickly found was that there must be an active directory domain controller on the site that has the devices since as you say, the credentials have to be passed to a system with a database to provide a response. So if you are network dependant, intersite for example, I would not be putting this in. It is a greate idea and can work on a local area network with a domain controller available. And that is where I left the product. The cost of deploying domain controllres everywhere and supporting them far exceeds the cost of a control panel at the site. Maybe what people may want to design is AD Domain Controllers that can fit in the palm of your hand and can hold 100s of thousands or millions of records. It would make the whole system plug and play for everyone.

Viscount has had a system like this for awhile. I've always called it Mesh, though they now have a different product called Mesh.

The Mesh system I worked with was server dependent, but without a "Bridge". The reader was semi-intelligent in that it handled all the connections, including lock relay, RTE, door position switch. But it needed the server for cards. If the server went down you were screwed. A single cat5e ran back to a hub/switch which could also server as a junction point for all the additional hardware if you didn't want to go right at the reader. The switch/hub had an in from previous reader/server, in from the reader, and then out to the next one. As well as a screw terminal set for the door hardware.

We've only ever had one customer on the system (and recently upgraded to a Keyscan system) and it did work surprisingly well for 6-8 years.

I like the idea of the bridge, as it would leave me able to use any reader, where as the older Mesh style we were stuck with Viscounts readers and cards.

My R&D developed a simillr system few years back, where we use fingerprint devices to read fingerprint images from users, and send back to server for verification. Result of verification return from server to the fingerprint devices to response to the users. The idea is similar, where server stores all credentials, verification algorithm, access rules and database. This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers.

When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. The result, only 1 fingerprint device can verify 1 user at the same time, while the rest fail.

By the end, we pull back the development and change to develop bigger fingerprint storage in our products. We know no matter how big the storage of the device can achieve, it cannot compare with server-client based system.

When comes to a server-client based verification system, how many threads can the server handle? Will it accept all "input" in queue? Or it ignore the rest? I am not familiar with the VSI, but I like the idea of server-client verification. However the delay time between every read/verification is my concern.

"When comes to real operation, we noticed the software can only handle single thread of data transfer. It only receive and proceed verification for the "first reach" fingerprint images. While it ignores the rest of the fingerprint images sent from other fingerprint devices. "

Kok, I would think that should have been a simple software fix- one system process that receives data and qeues them up for processing and another process that processes the images. If you send the fingerprint straight to the imaging process without any queing then I can see how you'd miss processing requests from other devices.

"This is ideal because you will only need a server and multiple slave fingerprint readers. "

What about that would be the ideal? Is it a possibly cheaper cost of the edge devices, since they don't have to perform any or a limited amount of intelligenece and storage? That would be the only benefit I could think of.

Hi Luis

Yes I agreed my R&D missed the part (queing fingerprints for verification) thus finally we discountinue the product. Therefore I am asking, how VSI handles queing of every card ID sent from the Bridge Card, and response to every Bridge Card (door open/close) and other (sensor, alarm output etc)?

VSI's software technology seems admittedly cool. However, I've noticed over the years that cool software technology doesn't always succeed in access control because:

  1. Putting access on a door, even a wireless lockset, is more labor-intenstive and costly than hanging cameras on walls.
  2. Because of point #1, Integrators/Installers like to have a piece of the hardware revenue stream. Thus moving costs from hardware to software provides less incentive to integration partners, as their business models might not be geared to reselling software. In a similar vein, I suspect Axis will see this with their A1001 controller.

VSI will certainly find some success with this in the higher-end market wtih established IT environments. Time will tell if this can become mainstream.

Any thoughts on using the Nano Cube Server or have any experience with it? I find it interesting and am wondering when these are generally installed. I would be worried to have my access database on something that someone could potentially plug into a wall socket not in a secured room.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2018 on Apr 26, 2018
150+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management software/system? Why? Unlike the 2016 access favorites where a group...
Favorite Biometrics 2018 on Apr 23, 2018
Biometrics are on the rise, or at least integrator opposition to them is declining, according to new IPVM integrator statistics.   Almost half of...
Dedicated Vs Converged Access Control Networks (Statistics) on Apr 20, 2018
Running one's access control system on a converged network, with one's computers and phones, can save money. On the other hand, hand, doing so can...
Worst Access Control 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Key Control For Access Control Tutorial on Apr 16, 2018
End users spend thousands on advanced systems to keep themselves secure, but regularly neglect one of the lest expensive yet most important aspects...
Alarm.com Business Market Expansion on Apr 13, 2018
Alarm.com has millions of subscribers, but the company has traditionally been mostly a residential/home focused offering.  ADC's new Smart Business...
Average Access Control Project Size 2018 on Apr 10, 2018
  The most common access control project size is 5 - 16 doors per project. This 2018 result mirrors previous statistics, most recently in 2016...
ISC West 2018 Access Control Rundown on Apr 06, 2018
For ISC West 2018, what is new and interesting in access control?  This rundown will bring you up to speed on the exhibitors, what they are...
VMS New Developments Spring 2018 (Avigilon, Exacqvision, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone, Network Optix) on Apr 04, 2018
What's new with VMS software? In this report, we examine new features and releases for Spring 2018 to track different areas of potential...
Forced Door Alarms For Access Control Tutorial on Apr 04, 2018
One of the most important access control alarms is also often ignored. "Forced Door" provides a vital and even critical notification against...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2018 on Apr 26, 2018
150+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management software/system? Why? Unlike the 2016 access favorites where a group...
Last Day Save $50 - May 2018 Camera Course on Apr 26, 2018
Today is the last day to save $50 on early registration. Register now (save $50) for the Spring 2018 Camera Course This is the only independent...
Hikvision DarkfighterX Vs Darkfighter PTZ Tested on Apr 26, 2018
Hikvision has focused on improving low-light performance for PTZs, an area that has traditionally been a problem, even more so than fixed cameras,...
Digifort VMS Profile on Apr 25, 2018
Digifort, a Brazilian company, has a strong presense in their home country. In a crowded and mature Enterprise VMS market, will they be able to...
Death Of A Dummy Camera Manufacturer on Apr 25, 2018
5 years ago, IPVM gathered insights from a dummy camera manufacturer, who was then the top selling dummy camera provider on Amazon and 3rd in all...
Hikvision Critical Cloud Vulnerability Disclosed on Apr 25, 2018
Security researchers Vangelis Stykas and George Lavdanis discovered a vulnerability in Hikvision's HikConnect cloud service that: just by...
The Yolo Bro And The Death of Journalism on Apr 24, 2018
There's an old quote: The job of the newspaper is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable Unfortunately, the opposite is more...
DMP Adds Ring Video Doorbell Integration on Apr 24, 2018
Video doorbells have become one of the hottest items for security systems. After several years with no doorbell, DMP has announced integration with...
Milestone 2017 Financials Examined on Apr 24, 2018
For ISC West 2018, Milestone released ... their financials, touting "strong revenue growth in 2017". However, there were discrepancies with the...
Chinese Manufacturer Kickstarter Campaign Huge Success (EverCam) on Apr 23, 2018
In a week, a Chinese manufacturer's expertly done Kickstarter campaign has received $1.4 million in pledges, an incredible amount for a video...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact