Storage Manufacturers Enter NVR Market

Author: John Honovich, Published on May 14, 2010

Competition in the NVR market is heating up with a number of new options for video surveillance professionals to consider. In the last few months, well funded startups Intransa and Pivot3 have both launched NVR solutions.

This is a major shift, as a year ago, these companies were only providing storage, requiring the use of 3rd party servers. Now, both companies are offering their own integrated sever and storage solution.

This addresses a key negative in the use of software only and is part of the general trend of appliances making a comeback in the video surveillance market. With the growth of IP video, I expect these offerings to attract serious consideration though they are unlikely to be competitive for smaller deployments and will face strong competition for very large scale sites.

Problems these Products Solve

IP Video designers today frequently select and integrate 3 components from 3 different suppliers:

  • IP video surveillance software to manage video
  • PC/Server to process video
  • Storage arrays to store video
This exposes the designer to risks and problems in selecting the right combination of products and sizes to meet the needs of the application. Specific problems include:
  • Overerestimating the amount of cameras that a PC/Server can handle, resulting in reliability problems
  • Making mistakes in loading software and configuring the application, creating potential performance and information security issues
  • Underestimating the amount of storage the system needs
With the storage providers providing both servers and storage, this eliminates one portion of the problem. To the extent that the IP video software is pre-loaded on the server, this eliminates the other.
Indeed, this approach returns video surveillance systems to a state similar to the old DVRs where application, server and storage were bundled. However, there are important competitive differences that we will explore in the concluding section.

Application/ Market Segment Fits

Storage manufacturer NVRs fit best for deployments between 30 and 300 cameras per site where the end user values simplicity of deployment. For camera counts at the lower end of this range, Intransa is likely to be a strong fit than Pivot3.

For camera counts under 32 (approximate), less expensive and simple options exist from many hybrid DVR providers. Also, low camera count deployments tend to have analog cameras, which also favor hybrid DVRs over the storage manufacturer (as the hybrid DVR can encode video directly without the use of separate encoders).

Camera counts over 300 (approximate) often have extensive involvement from in-house IT staff may prefer to use their existing server providers given their training and expertise with such equipment. Such deployments may still choose storage from Intransa or Pivot3 but may be more motivated to use their existing servers.

The use of video analytics on cameras and integrations with 3rd party security systems should not impact the selection of NVR hardware. Neither of these applications are materially improved by choice of NVR hardware.

Operational Details of these Product Offerings

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

While both Intransa and Pivot3 bundle software, server and storage, they do so in distinct ways. While Intransa is providing real servers that look and operate like your existing Dell or HP devices, Pivot3 takes its existing storage arrays and 'virtually' loads the IP video software inside them.

Pivot3

Pivot3 manufacturers storage appliances which can be collected into groups which they call RAIGE arrays. The storage is network accessible allowing video surveillance users to connect Pivot3 storage to existing video surveillance servers. 

Recently, Pivot3 enhanced the RAIGE arrays to run application software inside. They call this serverless computing (see their datasheet and a high level marketing demo). IP video software applications will be loaded and run in virtual servers inside of the storage array. [If you are not familiar with virtualization, see an introductory video and an overview of virtualization.]

To start with Pivot3, you would purchase a databank with minimum storage of 6TB to 12TB. The IP video surveillance application could then be loaded onto the device.

Intransa

Intransa offers a combination of classic servers and a range of storage products. They call their servers VideoAppliances. The 3 options are all 1RU appliances which differ on the amount of load the servers can handle and fault-tolerances features of the units (see the AE specification for details). Each of the VideoAppliance servers can then be combined with Intransa storage offerings including the entry level StarterBlock (providing from 2TB to 16TB of storage) and a variety of large-scale offerings supporting up to hundreds of TBs of storage.

Here is a pricing overview of an entry level Intransa NVR solution:

  • The MSRP of the VA10 (the basic server supporting up to 2000 frames of 4CIF MPEG-4) is $2,775)
  • The MSRP of the 2TB StarterBlock is $4,900 or 4TB for $6,800
  • These two devices are combined with IP video software. Currently supported are Exacq, JDS, Milestone and OnSSI.
Street price will be a combination of these three elements (less than MSRP of course). Distributors, such as Anixter, will take orders for the various components. The software will be pre-loaded on the servers, allowing the components to be deployed as an integrated and tested system.

Why Pivot3 and Intransa are Motivated to enter this Market

Selling storage by itself makes it more difficult to get into accounts and increases the cost and complexity of getting into new deals. Most server providers (whether it is traditional DVRs or large IT hardware manufacturers) have their own storage offerings. Server providers have an advantage in upselling to their storage offerings. Secondly, if Intransa and Pivot3 can provide both it reduces the cost and complexity of deploying systems using their products - lowering their costs and increasing the probability of successful deployment.

Also, because of the significant VC investment into both companies, these companies need to grow revenue to meet investor's expectations. By expanding into servers, these companies significantly expand their market size potential.

How This Impacts Other Offerings in the Market

The main incumbents in this space are the DVR manufacturers and the COTS server providers (Dell, HP, etc.). 

DVR Manufacturers

The advantage of the DVR manufacturers is that they have existing deployments and existing relationships with the security channel. The disadvantage is that the DVR deployments tend to be quite costly for large scale deployments. Given the significant investment both Pivot3 and Intransa are making into building a security channel, over the next few years, I would expect a significant migration away from the DVR manufacturers for use in larger sites to solutions like Pivot3 and Intransa.

COTS Providers

The advantage of the COTS providers are that end users have existing relationships with them and technical expertise in their products. They also tend to be less expensive than traditional DVRs. The downside is that integrators need to setup and optimize the systems themselves. Less technical users/integrators will likely be attracted away from COTS servers but most will continue to be satisfied with existing providers.

1 report cite this report:

Genetec, Milestone and OnSSI NVR Appliances Launched on Jun 15, 2009
The big IP video software providers have historically been software only - meaning that you could install their software on regular computers...

Related Reports on Storage

Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Surveillance Codec Guide on Jan 03, 2019
Codecs are core to surveillance, with names like H.264, H.265, and MJPEG commonly cited. How do they work? Why should you use them? What issues may...
Cisco Meraki New Cameras and AI Analytics on Dec 14, 2018
Meraki has released their second generation of video surveillance with 3 new cameras, AI-based video analytics, and 2 cloud-based storage...
Arcules Cloud VMS Tested on Nov 19, 2018
Arcules is a big bet, or as they describe themselves a 'bold company', spun out and backed by Milestone and Canon.  But how good is Arcules cloud...
Video Surveillance Hard Drive Size Statistics 2018 on Nov 08, 2018
What is the most common hard drive size for video surveillance? 150+ integrators answered: What size hard drive do you most commonly use? What...
Kogniz Silicon Valley AI Startup Profile on Nov 07, 2018
Kogniz is a Silicon Valley company that aims to bring AI analytics to security and surveillance, centering on their own smart cameras: We spoke...
Favorite Video Surveillance Hard Drive Manufacturer 2018 on Nov 06, 2018
Who is the favorite hard drive for video surveillance use? 150+ integrators answered: What is your preferred brand/model of hard drive for...
Video Surveillance Hard Drive Failure Statistics 2018 on Nov 02, 2018
Hard drive failures can be significant service problems but how common of an issue are they in video surveillance? How long do drives last when...
Building Occupancy Codes and Access Control Tutorial on Nov 01, 2018
A building or room's classification can greatly impact which building codes must be followed. In terms of access control, these 'occupancy codes'...
Cloud Video Storage Usage 2018 on Oct 31, 2018
Storing email and documents in the cloud have long been common, with on-site email or file servers increasingly eliminated. However, what about...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have not only been big buzzwords over the past decade, but they have also become core features of video...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
Exacq Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 17, 2019
Exacq favorability amongst integrators has declined sharply, in new IPVM statistics, compared to 2017 IPVM statistics for Exacq. Now, over 5 since...
Testing Bandwidth Vs. Low Light on Jan 16, 2019
Nighttime bandwidth spikes are a major concern in video surveillance. Many calculate bandwidth as a single 24/7 number, but bit rates vary...
Access Control Records Maintenance Guide on Jan 16, 2019
Weeding out old entries, turning off unused credentials, and updating who carries which credentials is as important as to maintaining security as...
UK Fines Security Firms For Illegal Direct Marketing on Jan 16, 2019
Two UK security firms have paid over $200,000 in fines for illegally making hundreds of thousands of calls to people registered on a government...
Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact