Results are in for our 2 poll questions, "Do Video Analytics Work?" and "What, if any, improvements would you like for Video Analytics?".
Do Analytics Work?
- 64% of respondents said, "Yes," video analytics does work
- 36% responded "No."
Improvements Wanted for Analytics
The breakdown for improvements selected by respondents:
- 55% - Better Performance
- 26% - Easier Setup
- 12% - Lower Cost
- 5% - Other
- 2% - No Improvements Necessary
176 people answered the polls. They are obviously non-scientific. Specifically, respondents self-select whether to participate so people with agendas are more incited to vote (video analytic vendors, etc.)
I abstained from voting. However, I would have voted "Yes" given the choice between the two exteme options. Like many, to me, the issue is how well analytics work, in what conditions and with what setup.
What Does the Responses Mean?
It seems clear significant concerns exist about analytic's performance - both from the 55% who choose better performance as their top need and the 36% who said analytics did not work (separate polls).
While I am skeptical of polls (mine included), the results are in line with what I hear continously. Here are 3 recent on-line examples:
- SDN Editor: "Video Analytics went from being considered the holy grail of technology to end users experiencing that it was not working in real-world applications." (August 2009 on-line edition)
- ObjectVideo VP of Sales: "I am tired of hearing [Video analytics don't work]" (August 6, 2009 blog post)
- ADT Application Manager: "Everytime if I talk about Video Content Analysis most people try to convince me by the fact that it won’t work!" (August 4, 2009 blog post)
These are just the most recent ones where I could provide a link/public reference.
What to Do?
I would recommend video analytic vendors provide detailed technological and operational information including the specific setup and optimizations required and the various issues that impact performance, test results with videos and graphs, etc. - and make it ALL public. [A good example is from an integrator on deploying ioimage for perimeter protection
So much of the expectation problem and the frustration that you hear from industry people comes from unclarity about what analytics can do and how it can be made to do. Detailed, public information would be key in solving this.
At the same time, I worry that this recommendation is naive. This seems to be an obvious thing to do but it goes against the history of the video analytic market. However, given the increased dissapointment in the analytics market over the last few years, maybe it can happen now.
What do you think can or should be done?
Related Reports on Video Analytics
Top 2019 Trend - AI Video Analytics
on Dec 10, 2018
160+ Integrators answered:
What do you think the top industry trend will be in 2019? Why?
AI / video analytics was the run-away winner with...
Alarm.com "AI" Video Analytics Tested
on Nov 30, 2018
Alarm.com has announced what it calls an "artificial intelligence (AI) architecture and video analytics service", touting that
Arcules Cloud VMS Tested
on Nov 19, 2018
Arcules is a big bet, or as they describe themselves a 'bold company', spun out and backed by Milestone and Canon.
But how good is Arcules cloud...
Beware Amazon Go Store Hype (Tested)
on Nov 13, 2018
IPVM's trip to and testing of Amazon Go's San Francisco store shows a number of significant operational and economic issues that undermine the...
Genetec Privacy Protector Tested
on Nov 12, 2018
Genetec has built Kiwi Security's Privacy Protector into Security Center, an analytic which anonymizes individuals in cameras' fields of view...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Open Options Acquired By ACRE
on Dec 17, 2018
ACRE is doing deals again. A year after they sold Mercury, they are buying another access control company - Open Options.
In this note, we...