Provides metrics and analysis of deploying video analytics for perimeter violation - Editor's note
For the past 3 years, my organization, C3 Shared Services, has been deploying video analytics for many facilities with the highest level of risk in South Africa. This report shares 3 key lessons we have learned:
- Our customers demand very low levels of false alerts
- Significant differences in performance exist between different video analytic manufacturers
- Optimizing the on-site setup is crucial to performance
Low Levels of False Alerts
For our customers, it is common that a fee is charged every time a responder is dispatched to follow up on an alarm. The money for these fees can add up very quickly. In fact, one of customers used to joke how false alarms from previous systems doubled the responder's salaries. Unfortunately, high level of false alarms are not acceptable by customers - both from a cost and organization basis.
Significant Differences Between Vendors
We have been participated in numerous tests with many vendors offering video analytics for perimeter violation. The poor results can be alarming. For instance, one test had harsh environment shadows from smoke stacks and pedestrian shadows cast through concrete palisade into detection zones. We had 3 analytic vendors tested with 2 cameras each for 1 week. The results:
- 6,000 alarms
- 16,000 alarms
- 175 alarms
As you can imagine, the first two (generated by two of the most respected European manufacturers) were totally unacceptable.
We went with ioimage [link no longer available] and have been using them for many projects over the last 2 yeras. We have deployed ioimage systems along extensive perimeters in adverse environments.
Across all of our deployments, the probability of detecting a true intruder is essentially 100%. This is actually tested by most of our customers every day and night.
False alarms have been low with the amount of false alerts depending on the environment. In our best performing environments, we rarely have more than 1 false alerts per camera per month. In our most demanding environments, with rain and reflecting light, we do not average more than 1 false alarm per camera per night. In all cases, the operators find this manageable.
Optimizing On-Site Setup Crucial
On-site system optimization is crucial and consists of two major components: camera optimization and analytic configuration.
Camera optimization is the most important and significant part of our installations. The cameras must provide clear images and a wide depth of field both day and night to allow for optimal alerting.
For perimeter violation, we place cameras on posts looking down the fenceline. The distances between cameras depends whether it is a color/IR or thermal camera.
- For color/IR infrared cameras, we place cameras every 60 meters. Our tests demonstrate that the cameras can reliably alert up to 70 meters. We provide 10 meters overlap of camera coverage to ensure that there are no deadspots and to detect anyone attempting to tamper a camera.
- For thermal cameras, we place 75 mm thermal cameras every 400 meters. Our tests demonstrate that thermal camera can reliably alert up to 450 meters. We provide 50 meters overlap between each camera (because thermal cameras have a deadspot for the first 50 meters in front of the camera).
For all cameras, we position them 5 meters to 7.5 meters high. This height ensures depth perception. Short heights make it more difficult to detect movement.
The positioning and the projection of light is important. We always seek to have lighting in front of the camera rather than behind. Specifically, we want to avoid aiming the camera directly into the rising or setting sun. If we use artifical light (such as an IR illuminator), we want to ensure that the light is projected in parallel. If the light is projected too far downwards, the auto iris may reduce light entering the camera and therefore shrink the depth of the FOV.
We budget 3 or 4 hours for optimization of each camera, with tuning done during the day and a final tuning at night.
As part of this, we setup the analytics in the appliance's web-based setup. The key element in the setup is to ensure that the depth perception is accurate because cameras provide 2 dimensional images of a 3 dimensional world. A demonstration of this can be seen in the video below:
Finally, we make sure of monthly maintenace so that the lenses are clean and that the cameras are not moved. Dirty lenses or shifted cameras can both undermine performance so this is crucial.
While video analytics requires field expertise and care in selecting of manufacturers, we have had great success deploying video analytics.
1 report cite this report:
Camera Course Winter 2020
on Jan 10, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing.
Lots of manufacturer training exists...
2020 Camera Book Released
on Jan 10, 2020
This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...
2020 IP Networking Book Released
on Jan 06, 2020
The new IP Networking Book 2020 is a 280 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security systems,...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019
on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members.
It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup
on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Video Surveillance 101 Course Opened
on Dec 12, 2019
IPVM is adding a Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the most important terms,...
IPVM Opens 12,000 Sqft Testing Facility
on Dec 16, 2019
IPVM is proud to announce the opening of the world's first video surveillance testing facility that will allow us to significantly expand our...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Axis and Genetec Drop IFSEC 2020
on Jan 23, 2020
Two of the best-known video surveillance manufacturers are dropping IFSEC International 2020, joining Milestone who dropped IFSEC in 2019.
Multipoint Door Lock Tutorial
on Jan 23, 2020
Despite widespread use, locked doors are notoriously weak at stopping entry, and thousands can be misspent on locks that leave doors quite...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek
on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...
Intersec 2020 Final Show Report
on Jan 21, 2020
IPVM spent all 3 days at the Intersec 2020 show interviewing various companies and finding key trends.
Middle East Enterprise...
Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2020
on Jan 20, 2020
The past 2 years of US bans and sanctions have shaken the video surveillance industry but what impact would this have on integrators' favorite...