Video Analytics for Perimeter Violation Examined

Author: Nick Grange, Published on Dec 17, 2008

Provides metrics and analysis of deploying video analytics for perimeter violation - Editor's note

For the past 3 years, my organization, C3 Shared Services, has been deploying video analytics for many facilities with the highest level of risk in South Africa. This report shares 3 key lessons we have learned:

  • Our customers demand very low levels of false alerts
  • Significant differences in performance exist between different video analytic manufacturers
  • Optimizing the on-site setup is crucial to performance

Low Levels of False Alerts

For our customers, it is common that a fee is charged every time a responder is dispatched to follow up on an alarm. The money for these fees can add up very quickly.  In fact, one of customers used to joke how false alarms from previous systems doubled the responder's salaries.  Unfortunately, high level of false alarms are not acceptable by customers - both from a cost and organization basis.

Significant Differences Between Vendors

We have been participated in numerous tests with many vendors offering video analytics for perimeter violation. The poor results can be alarming. For instance, one test had harsh environment shadows from smoke stacks and pedestrian shadows cast through concrete palisade into detection zones. We had 3 analytic vendors tested with 2 cameras each for 1 week. The results:
  • 6,000 alarms
  • 16,000 alarms
  • 175 alarms
As you can imagine, the first two (generated by two of the most respected European manufacturers) were totally unacceptable.

We went with ioimage and have been using them for many projects over the last 2 yeras.  We have deployed ioimage systems along extensive perimeters in adverse environments.

Across all of our deployments, the probability of detecting a true intruder is essentially 100%. This is actually tested by most of our customers every day and night.

False alarms have been low with the amount of false alerts depending on the environment. In our best performing environments, we rarely have more than 1 false alerts per camera per month. In our most demanding environments, with rain and reflecting light, we do not average more than 1 false alarm per camera per night.  In all cases, the operators find this manageable.

Optimizing On-Site Setup Crucial

On-site system optimization is crucial and consists of two major components: camera optimization and analytic configuration.

Camera optimization is the most important and significant part of our installations.  The cameras must provide clear images and a wide depth of field both day and night to allow for optimal alerting.

For perimeter violation, we place cameras on posts looking down the fenceline.  The distances between cameras depends whether it is a color/IR or thermal camera.
  • For color/IR infrared cameras, we place cameras every 60 meters. Our tests demonstrate that the cameras can reliably alert up to 70 meters. We provide 10 meters overlap of camera coverage to ensure that there are no deadspots and to detect anyone attempting to tamper a camera.
  • For thermal cameras, we place 75 mm thermal cameras every 400 meters. Our tests demonstrate that thermal camera can reliably alert up to 450 meters. We provide 50 meters overlap between each camera (because thermal cameras have a deadspot for the first 50 meters in front of the camera).
For all cameras, we position them 5 meters to 7.5 meters high. This height ensures depth perception.  Short heights make it more difficult to detect movement.

The positioning and the projection of light is important. We always seek to have lighting in front of the camera rather than behind. Specifically, we want to avoid aiming the camera directly into the rising or setting sun.  If we use artifical light (such as an IR illuminator), we want to ensure that the light is projected in parallel. If the light is projected too far downwards, the auto iris may reduce light entering the camera and therefore shrink the depth of the FOV.

We budget 3 or 4 hours for optimization of each camera, with tuning done during the day and a final tuning at night.

As part of this, we setup the analytics in the appliance's web-based setup.  The key element in the setup is to ensure that the depth perception is accurate because cameras provide 2 dimensional images of a 3 dimensional world.  A demonstration of this can be seen in the video below:


Finally, we make sure of monthly maintenace so that the lenses are clean and that the cameras are not moved. Dirty lenses or shifted cameras can both undermine performance so this is crucial.

All of our deployments have been done using analog cameras connected to intelligent encoders. Learn more about the details of a few of our projects.

Conclusion

While video analytics requires field expertise and care in selecting of manufacturers, we have had great success deploying video analytics.

Nick Grange is an Owner at C3 Shared Services.

1 report cite this report:

Camera Positioning Key to Video Analytics on Apr 13, 2009
A routinely overlooked but key aspect to using video analytics is camera positioning. Not simply an implementation issue, camera positioning...

Related Reports

4MP Camera Shootout - Axis, Dahua, DW, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Sep 24, 2018
4MP usage continues to climb, especially for low cost fixed lens models. To see who was best, we bought and tested seven 4MP models from Axis,...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...
Amazon Ring Spotlight Cam Tested on Sep 17, 2018
Amazon's Ring has released their latest camera entry, the Spotlight Cam, which we bought and tested in our Consumer IP Camera Analytics...
Vivotek 4MP Camera Tested (FD8379-HV) on Sep 13, 2018
Next in our series of updated 4MP testing, we bought and tested Vivotek's FD8379-HV, and entry level 4MP model claiming "top-notch quality video in...
October 2018 Camera Course on Sep 13, 2018
Today is the last day to save $50 on the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
VMS Export Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Sep 13, 2018
When crimes, accidents or problems occur, exporting video from one's video surveillance system is critical to proving incidents. But who does it...
US DARPA Investing $2 Billion In AI on Sep 11, 2018
The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is granting more than $2 Billion to companies developing new AI technologies. The money...
Dahua Low-Cost 4MP Camera Tested (N44CL52) on Sep 10, 2018
4MP use continues to increase, especially in low-cost models, according to integrators in our 2018 Resolution Usage Statistics. We bought Dahua's...
Hikvision Value Express IP Cameras Tested Poorly on Sep 05, 2018
Even lower cost Hikvision products? Their new Value Express line is marketed for applications where "budgets are limited and performance is...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Ladders For Installers Guide on Sep 25, 2018
Ladders are one of the most important pieces of worksite equipment for the surveillance technician. Too often, however, even highly experienced...
Favorite Access Control Reader Manufacturer 2018 on Sep 25, 2018
Favorite reader votes are in, and it is not close. A global access giant ran away with the votes in a one-sided contest. But for many, the...
Genetec Takes Aim At 'Untrustworthy' 'Foreign Government-Owned Vendors' on Sep 24, 2018
Genetec is taking aim at 'untrustworthy' 'foreign government-owned vendors'. This is not a new theme for Genetec as nearly 2 years ago, Genetec...
4MP Camera Shootout - Axis, Dahua, DW, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Sep 24, 2018
4MP usage continues to climb, especially for low cost fixed lens models. To see who was best, we bought and tested seven 4MP models from Axis,...
Alexa Guard Expands Amazon's Security Offerings, Boosts ADT's Stock on Sep 21, 2018
Amazon is expanding their security offerings yet again, this time with Alexa Guard that delivers security audio analytics and a virtual "Fake...
UTC, Owner of Lenel, Acquires S2 on Sep 20, 2018
UTC now owns two of the biggest access control providers, one of integrator's most hated access control platforms, Lenel, and one of their...
BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
SIA Plays Dumb On OEMs And Hikua Ban on Sep 20, 2018
OEMs widely pretend to be 'manufacturers', deceiving their customers and putting them at risk for cybersecurity attacks and, soon, violation of US...
Axis Vs. Hikvision IR PTZ Shootout on Sep 20, 2018
Hikvision has their high-end dual-sensor DarkfighterX. Axis has their high-end concealed IR Q6125-LE. Which is better? We bought both and tested...
Avigilon Announces AI-Powered H5 Camera Development on Sep 19, 2018
Avigilon will be showcasing "next-generation AI" at next week's ASIS GSX. In an atypical move, the company is not actually releasing these...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact