End User Sues ADT/Tyco For $42 Million

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on May 06, 2013

It was the biggest drug heist in American history. Burglars drove an 18-wheeler up to the Eli Lilly distribution center in Enfield, Connecticut, disabled its security system, rappelled through the roof and made off with $75 million in pharmaceuticals. [UPDATE May 7, 2013 - case dismissed, then refiled with new claims against ADT / Tyco].

Last summer, the U.S. Attorney’s office indicted 11 people for selling drugs stolen from the facility, but the burglary case has centered around the Villa brothers, Amaury and Amed, who are now awaiting trial in Connecticut

Eli Lilly’s insurance company, National Union Fire Insurance, is suing Tyco and ADT to recover money it paid out after the heist. National Union believes ADT’s failure to protect sensitive security information led to the heist and is asking for $42 million in damages. In this note, we review the complaint and situation.

Background

According to court filings, ADT has provided security equipment and monitoring for Eli Lilly’s Enfield locations since 1974. In August 2004, ADT reviewed the distribution center’s security system and provided Eli Lilly with a report that included an inventory of all its existing security equipment and suggestions for additional surveillance. Later than year, Eli Lilly signed a 5-year contract with ADT to implement the improvements noted in the report. The contract included annual inspections and reports.

In 2009, ADT again evaluated the Enfield facility, this time to “review of the adequacy of the services provided” under the 2004 contract.

** ******** ** *** **** ******, ***** *** *** ******* any **** ** ******** ** *** ******** ** ********* *** vulnerabilities, *** **** *** ******** ******** *********** ** ****** *********, their *********** *****, *** ***** ****** ***** ****. ** ******** blueprints ** *** ******** ****** **** *********** ** “***** ****** detector, ****, **** *****, ********, ******** **** *******, ***** ******, panic ******, **** ********, ***** ***** ******, *******, ******* ***** and ******,” ********* ** *** ********* **** ******** *****. *** ****** also ***** **** *** ****** ******* **** *** *** ******* by ******* ** ****** *********.

*** “******** * ******** *** ******** ****** ** *********’* ******** security ****** ******* * “************* ***** ** ***** ******** ************* and **** ******** ** **** ******,” *** ********* ****. **** **** a ***** ***** *** ****** *** ******* ******* **** *** with * *******-******* ***** ** ***************.

Too **** ************?National Union believes thieves had access to the report and here is why (see the **** *********):

  • ***’* ******* *** ***** ** **** *****, *******. *** *** men ******** *** *** ******** **** **** *******.
  • ******* ** *** *********** ******** ****** *** *******-******* ** *** only ******* **** ******* ** **** ** *** ********'* ************ cameras.
  • *** ******** ******* ****** ****** ** *** **** *** ******* by ******* * * **** ** * **** **** ***** the ****** ******* **** -- *** **** **** *********** ** the **** ****** *** *** **** **** ****** *** ******** not ******* ** ************ *********. ****, **** ******** *** ******** system.

*** ** **** ******** ** **************, *******, *** ***** **** not **** *** **** ******* **** *** ***** ***** **** leaked *** ***** **** ** ****** ** ******* **** ***. But ******** ***** ******** ******* ***** ***-******* ********** **** *** had * **** *** *****. 

*** ********* ******** ********** ** ********** ** *******, ***** *******, Texas *** **** ******, ********. ** *** ** *** **********, which ** ** *** **** ** ****, *** ********** *** been ******** ******* ** ***.

**** ** ****** *****, *** *** ******** *** *** *** Lilly ****, **** ********* ** *** ** ****. ****** *****’* lawyer **** *** ******** ***** ** ******** ***** ***** ********** *** ******** ***** ******** ***** ***** *** *********.

******** ***** ******** **** ***'* ******* ** ********** ******* ** sensitive ************ *********** ** * ******** ** ******* *********** ** the ****. *** *******: *** **** * ************* **********, **** not **** *****, * ******** ** *********** ** ******* **** advanced ********* ** ******** *******. 

Feedback **** ******** ***** / *** *****

* ************ *** *** ***** ******** *** ********* ******* ** the **** ** ******** *****. * ************ *** ******** ***** said **** ** *** **** ***** ******* **********, *** ** would *** **** ********** *********** ** ***** ******* **** ***** what ***** ******* ** *** ********* ******** ***** *** ** ADT’s **********.  

******** ***** **** *** *** ***** ***** *** *********** *** ADT ** ********* *** ******* ** ***** *** ******* ** the ********** ********* ******** ***** ******* *** ******* ** ********* sensitive ***********. *** “*** * **** ** *** **** *** knowledge **** ******** ********** ** ********** ** ***** ** ******** security ********, *** ***** ***** ********* ************ *********** ***** *** details ** *** ******** ******* ** *********,” *** ********* *****. 

How *** ********* ******** ********* ****** ***********?

* **** ********** ******* ************** **** ** ** *** **** that **** ***** *** ***** ************ ** *** *** ***** case, *** **** ** *** ******* *** ***** ***** ** reviews ** ******* ******** *********** **** ***** ***** *** ***************. They ******* ******* * **** ** *********** ********* *** **** sometimes **** ******** *********. 

**** ********* ******* *** ********, **** *** ****** ** * secure ******* ********** ** **** **** ********* *** *************** *** not ******** *** ** *****. *** ******** ******* **** *** discussed ** ****** ** ** *** *****, **** ****. 

“** *** * *** ** ****** **** **** *********,” *** Tyco ************** ****. “**** ****** **** * **** ** ***** loss ********** ****** ***************.”

UPDATE: **** *********

** ***** ****, ******** ***** *********** ********* *** **** ******* Tyco *** ***,********* ** ***** ********* ******** *********. **** ***** *** ***** ***** **** ****** ****** ** *******. ** *** ******, **** **** *** *****’* ******** **** National ***** ****** ** **** ***** ** *** *****’* ******. Additionally, *** ****** **** *** **** *** ******* ***** ***********’* statute ** *********** *******.

* ****** *** ******** ***** ********* **** ********* **** *** case *** *********, *** ** “**** ** *** ** *** Florida ******.”

******: *******

*** **** *** *** **** ***** ** *******. ****** *** ****, ******** ***** ******** **** ****** *** **** ***** *** access ** ***'* *******. ***** ***** *****, *** *****'* ******, **** *** still **** *** **** **** ********, ** ***, ******** ***** has ********** **** ** ****** ******** *****. ***** *** *****, she ****, *** *** ***** ***** ** *** ******* ****** Eli ***** ******** ***** ** **** ** *** **********. 

“***** ********** ****’* ********. ***** *** ****** ****** *** ** civil ********** **** ****’* ****** ****,” **** *****’* ******. ***** said ******** ***** ** **** ***** *** ******.

Comments (1)

Whether the modality of the crime fits with an unsecured security assessment, it does provide a good opportunity for everyone to assess how this information is kept.

In so many cases, 'conveinience' DOES NOT EQUAL 'secure'. Keeping these reports locked up behind firewalls and granting file access on explicit permissions seems to be especially prudent. Making a point to demonstrate the data security of this information to (potential) customers/management might put them more at ease.

Having copies of these docs floating around unsecured on laptops or cell phones invites nightmarish trouble!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
US City Sued For Hiding Surveillance Camera Map on Mar 08, 2019
Should maps of public surveillance camera locations be kept a secret? That is what one US city is trying to do. Though the city admits the...
Huawei Sues US Government Over NDAA Ban on Mar 07, 2019
Chinese telecom giant Huawei is suing the US government over the NDAA ban, arguing that key provisions in it are unconstitutional.  NDAA Section...
Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...
ASCMA / Moni Problems Deepen, Lenders Terminate Support Agreement on Dec 28, 2018
Ascent Capital Group, aka ASCMA, currently branded Brinks Home Security, formerly known as Moni and Monitronics faces a troubling end to a rocky...
Sublethal Camera Gun Examined on Dec 06, 2018
Sublethal is a South African company that manufactures a remotely-controlled, camera-enabled gun called the Boomslang, which is Afrikaans for tree...
UK ICO Denies IPVM GDPR Complaint Against IFSEC, Decides Each Exhibitor Responsible on Dec 06, 2018
The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has denied IPVM's complaint against IFSEC for misuse of facial recognition. Each Exhibitor...
ADT Wins Fire Death Suit But Faces Appeal on Dec 05, 2018
ADT/Protection 1 has won a wrongful death court case in which it was sued by the estate of a deceased customer. However, the attorney for the...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...
Former Manufacturer Axcess Sues Avigilon, Genetec, Others for Patent Infringement on Oct 24, 2018
Axcess International, Inc. has sued Avigilon, Genetec and ACTi, among others for patent infringement. Who are they and what are their complaints...

Most Recent Industry Reports

19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
 Register for the Spring 2019 Access Control Course----Closed IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact