Axis App Aims to Disrupt Timelapse Recording (Timelapse ACAP)

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jan 16, 2014

Capturing timelapse images seems like a simple thing, but why is it so expensive? Especially useful for construction sites, timelapse allow a year's worth of dramatic progress to be seen very quickly. However, timelapse services typically cost thousands from speciality providers, leaving many security vendors wondering what's so difficult?

Mobile app developer EyeSpyFX has created an Axis ACAP application [link no longer available], simply called 'Timelapse ACAP' that both simplifies and greatly reduces the cost of timelapse. In this note, we take a closer look at the offering, examine its strengths and shortcomings, and compare it to alternatives.

Timelapse ACAP Explained

By integrating an iOS devices and Axis cameras, Timelapse is a no-frills, low cost utility. No hardware other than a networked Axis ACAP capable camera and an Apple device are needed to use it. A sample clip from the utility is shown below:

A 'traditional' niche for timelapse has been building projects, like the Kuwaiti Highrise shown below. The following clip IS NOT an example Timelapse ACAP clip, but illustrates its basic use in construction:

Timelapse app uses the camera's onboard app to upload snapshots taken on an interval (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mins, 1 hr, or 24 hr) to remote EyeSpyFX servers, which are then downloaded by a mobile viewing app an Apple device, assembled into a movie and stored in the local device.

The solution uses two pieces of software, both from EyeSpyFX:

  • Viewer for Axis Cameras: This app is loaded onto an iOS device and is the 'host app' to assembles the timelapse pictures. Cost: $4.99
  • Timelapse ACAP [link no longer available]: This is a 'In App Purchase', that is pushed to the camera from the Viewer app. Cost: $49.99

Inexpensive Solution

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

The onetime software cost of EyeSPyFX's Timelapse ACAP is ~$55, compared to the ~$3000+/year of other offerings.  These costs do not include the cost of cameras, housings, power options, storage, or connectivity, but in general these elements are more expensive from specialty timelapse/construction camera vendors than off the shelf hardware from security vendors.

In most cases, a service contract must be signed with specialty vendor, and even if the timelapse service is not used, it costs money. On the other hand, EyeSpyFX Timelapse is a one time cost and cameras can be 'repurposed' for general surveillance use upon completion of the project.

A Showstopping Limitation?

However, EyeSpyFX's solution will not work in all applications traditional construction cameras are used. We reached out to the developer for comment on the differences:

"This app may not be suitable for Construction, as the time interval is not long. Generally construction cams need to run over a long time like years" and "Each EyeSpyFX time-lapse account stores 370 images. Once the 370th image is saved the first is deleted…and so it scrolls on. When a user requests a Timelapse video from the  app the images are sent to the iPhone and compiled by the app as a movie. The user then has the movie for that moment saved on their phone. The images on the server continue to add and delete as time goes by."

Essentially the biggest limitation of the ACAP is that it is limited to 370 frames, because of limited storage on the company's servers. If the interval is set to collect images once per day, the maximum length of the clip is 370 days. Construction projects can run for multiple years, so EyeSpyFX's solution is limited to small, rapid projects.


Despite being a niche application, there are a number of specialty and security-related vendors to chose from for Timelapse clips. Some of these include:

  • EarthCAM: Aside from being a leader in construction video services, the company offers a full slate of 'turnkey' packages including equipment, installation, and cloud services. (We profiled EarthCAM in this note.) While offering a full suite of resolution options (including Gigapixel), the solutions range in cost between $6,000 - $45,000 and carry a monthly service cost.
  • OxBlue: Another construction market specialty vendor is OxBlue. The company does not offer as many high-resolution options (ie: no Gigapixel, but 3MP - 5MP), but is modestly less expensive than EarthCAM, with monthly services starting at ~$500 per month and with monthly contracts.
  • Mobotix: A full featured and relatively inexpensive timelapse feature is found as a default option in Mobotix's MxControlCenter or MxEasy.  While this is a default feature, it is hindered both by the relatively high cost of Mobotix cameras, cumbersome configuration, and relative difficulty the interface for casual end-users. 
  • StarDot: Another 'security vendor' timelapse offering is StarDot's Time Vision [link no longer available] offering. A NetCam XL camera (~$800 - ~$1400) is combined with a hosted service costing ~$175 per month.
Comments (19) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Directory of 30+ VSaaS / Cloud Video Surveillance Providers on Jun 07, 2019
This directory provides a list of VSaaS / cloud video surveillance providers to help you see and research what options are available. 2019...
NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 10, 2019
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, with cameras and servers left defaulted,...
Axxon Face Search Tested on Oct 26, 2018
AxxonSoft has brought facial recognition to their Axxon Next VMS for free with the simply named Face Search, claiming to allow users to find...
IP Camera Installation Tool Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Ideal, Hanwha, Triplett, Veracity on Oct 23, 2018
Setting up IP cameras has historically been challenging, with techs often precariously using a laptop on a ladder or lift. Some options for install...
IP Camera Cable Labeling Guide on Sep 14, 2018
Labeling cables can save a lot of money and headaches. While it is easy to overlook, taking time to label runs during installation significantly...
Assa Aperio Wireless Access Reader R100 Tested on Aug 23, 2018
Wireless access control is frequently promoted by manufacturers as a way to cut installation costs. Perhaps the biggest proponent of this is mega...
Axis Z-Wave IP Camera Tested Poorly on Mar 20, 2018
Z-Wave is drawing notable interest for video surveillance use. In IPVM's initial coverage, 84% expressed interest in it, with nearly half being...
Convergint Total Recall CrimeEye Product Profile on Jul 11, 2017
Deploying video surveillance in metropolitan areas often brings challenges, including lack of infrastructure or excessive costs to extend...
Varifocal Vs Fixed Lens Statistics 2017 on May 04, 2017
Varifocal camera lenses provide more flexibility at installation time, but come at a higher cost. Fixed lens cameras reduce hardware costs, but can...
DeskCamera ONVIF Screen Capture on Jan 05, 2017
Recording PC screens have historically been an expensive proposition, requiring dedicated hardware or specialized, proprietary software. However,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada: "IPVM Should Never Be Your Source of News" on Jul 02, 2020
Verkada was unhappy with IPVM's recent coverage declaring that reading IPVM is 'not a good look' and that 'IPVM should never be your source of...
Vintra Presents FulcrumAI Face Recognition on Jul 02, 2020
Vintra presented its FulcrumAI face recognition and mask detection offering at the May 2020 IPVM Startups show. Inside this report: A...
Uniview Wrist Temperature Reader Tested on Jul 02, 2020
Uniview is promoting measuring wrist temperatures whereas most others are just offering forehead or inner canthus measurements. But how well does...
Dahua USA Admits Thermal Solutions "Qualify As Medical Devices" on Jul 02, 2020
Dahua USA has issued a press release admitting a controversial point in the industry but an obvious one to the US FDA, that the thermal temperature...
Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...