NC City Surveillance Challenges

Author: Ben Wood, Published on Jun 17, 2013

City surveillance systems can be challenging, even for a small city of one hundred thousand people with just a handful of cameras. In this note, we dig into the problems that Wilmington NC faces and the solutions that it is planning to fix them.

Problems

**** ****'* ****** ** ***** **** ******** ********:

  • **** ******* ******
  • *********** ********
  • *****************
  • ***** ******** **************
  • ********** ******

**** ******* ******

*********, *** ****’* ** **** *** ******** ** ******** ** four, ***** ******* ********** ******** ** ***** **** **** ** the ****** *******. *** **** ************** $***,*** *** *** ******** ***** *** ******** ******** ********, ** * *****-**-* ***** area. *** ***** *** * *******; ******* *** ******* ****** on **** ***** ** **** *** ****** ******, ** ****** in *** ****** ***** **** **** * ***** ** *** system.

*********** ********

*** ******* **** ********** **** *** *** ****** ** *******, says ********** ****** ********** ******* ******* **** *****. ** *** instance, * ***** *** *** ***** ******'* **** ******** *** cameras *******. ***** *** **** **** *** ***** ******** **** were *** ***** ****** **** ********* **** * **** ** sight. "** ****** **** ** *** ****** *********. [** *** given ****] ***** ** ****** ** ***** *** *** ** the ******* ****. *'** **** ******* **** *** ****** *** four *****, *** ** *** ***** ********** ****** ****," *** said. 

*****************

**** ** *** *****, *** ****, ***** ** *** ********. "It ** * ******** ******* *** ***** **** ***** ** four ******** ****** **** *** ****** **** *****'* ********.*** ******** *** **** **** *** ****, '** ***** ****** our ******* *** ** ***'** ***** ***** ***** *********, ** can't ********* *** *** ***** ******** **** **** **** *** system.' *** *** ******** **'** ****** *** ******* ******** *********." 

** ******* *** **** ***** ** *** '*****' ** '******'. That ****, *** **** ***** *******, ****** *** ******** **** equipment **** ********* ******* ****** **** ***** **** *******.

***** ********* **************

**** ***** *** *** ******** *********. "**** ** ***** *********** the ******** **** ******* ** ******** **** ********* ******** ... but *** ********* ***** ******. ** ***** **** **** ***** after *** ***** ****." 

********** ******

***** **** ***** ***** "**** ************" **** *** *********** ** the ****** *** *********** ******** **** *** ********** (**** ******* Schneider ********), *** ****** ********** ********* **** ***** ***** ****** installer **** **** ***** *** ******** *** ******* ***********.

The ******* *******

*** **** ***, *** **** ******* ******* **** **** ** the ********. "... *** ****** ** ***** *** ****** ******* lost ***** *** *** *** **** *** **** *** ******,” says * *** ******** ****. 

** * **** ******* ******* **** **** ***, ********** *********** ***** *. ********** ******** ** *** ******* ********* ******* ******* ** ******* *** *******. *** ******* ***** also *** *** **** ** * ******** ** ****** *** ****** and **** ****** *** ********** ** ****** ******* **** ***** ****, the ***** ****. *** ***** **** ********, *** *** ******* will ***** **** *****.

*** ******** ******* ******* **** ****** ** ***** ******.

***** ***

*** ****** **********’* ********** ****** ****** ** *** *** *** project **** **** ******** *** ***. *** ******* ******,**** **** ***** *** ********, ** ********* *** ********* *** ************ *** ****** $**,***. *** *** **** ******** *** ***** ***. *** ******* **** ** *** ***** *** *** new ******* ** ***** ***.

***** ***

*** ****** ********** **** **** **** *** ** *** **** *** install ***** ******* ** ****** **** **** **** * ****** FoV. **** **** ***** *** ******** ** * ********* ******** so **** **** ** ********* *******. 

***** *****

*** ****** ********** ***** ** ***** *** *** **** ***** *** fixed *******. *** ***** ******* **** ** ***** ********* *** the **** **** ** ********** ** ***** ** *** ******. One *********** ***** ** **** *** ****** ********** ***** ** use *** **** ********* **** ****'* **** ** *** *** system. ********* ****** *** ******* *** ***** *** *********. ** a ******* **** ********* ***** *** ******, ********* **** **** part ** *** ****** *** ********* *** *** **** *** because **** **** ***** ** **** **** ******* ** ***** cameras, ***** ****. *** ****** ********** **** **** **** **** *** analytics **** **** ****** **** **** ****** ***** ***** *******. 

IPVM ********

**** ******* **** ******** **** *** **** ** **** *** goals ** ****** *** **** ******* -- ***** *****-******* ******* -- *** **** **** ****** ******** ********** ** ***** ******* from ***** ****. *******, ******* *** ** *** ********* ** **** hall, ***** ***** ******** *** *** *** **** ***** **** the *** ******. ***** *** ********* * *********** ******* ** the ******** **** **** *** *** ****** ******* ***** *****. There *** * ******** ******* **** ***** *********. *** ** was * ******* *** * ***** ** ***** ** *** for ** ********* ****** **** *** ***** ****. ** ** strange **** **** *** ****** **** **** ** ********* ****** that *** *** ****, *** *** ** **** ***** *** same ****** ***** ******* ** ** ********* ******* ***. * asked ***** ***** ****, *** *** **** ** ** *****'* work **** ****, **** **** "**** ** **** **** ** does." 

Comments (11)

Has Wilmington defined what the analytics are/were (trying) to be used for?

Is the plan still the same (RE: analytics) going forward as it was when the deployment failed at the begining?

Claiming analytics 'never worked' is pretty vague. Why didn't they?

How much money did they waste over 4 years (annual licensing?) by shelving the analytics after a few days once they 'didn't work'?

Also, I think you nailed one of the main system failure points. It's the familiar 'grants pay for equipment/installation while completely ignoring on-going maintenance needs' syndrome that is endemic in US cities.

Note, there's typically no 'annual licensing'. As the VMS manufacturers are at pains to tell us, those 'annual' charges are optional. In this case, I bet they did not pay any more for licensing to ActiveEye/Honywell.

Marty, here's what I can answer of those now. The others I can ask.

Has Wilmington defined what the analytics are/were (trying) to be used for?

I don't know what the analytics were being used for.

Claiming analytics 'never worked' is pretty vague. Why didn't they?

They weren't alerting them to the activity they were looking for. I'll have to find out what that activity was.

Can you clarify what you're asking on this one:

Is the plan still the same (RE: analytics) going forward as it was when the deployment failed at the beginning?

If they turned them off after the first couple of days, it is most likely that they got barraged with false alerts. If they got no alerts, there would be no reason to turn it off, right? Only when you get hammered with false alerts are you motivated to shut the system down.

I'm curious about the intended future placement of those legacy PTZs. Do the analytics need both a PTZ and a fixed camera to perform whatever the analytics were intended for?

<queue dream sequence> Long, long ago in a land far, far away (analog era) when I was with an integrator, we had a customer who was a preacher. He wanted to have a surveillance camera auto-track him as he walked back and forth and brought thunder as he preached the word during his sermons of salvation.

Since this was a customer who was refilled weekly with OPM (other peoples money) we didn't mention that having a person pan a camera back and forth physically might've saved his flock thousands.

At the time (~2006) we went with the only solution we could find: Pelco Spectra II (III?) PTZ to track movements of identified object... but this required a fixed camera placed right under the PTZ for orientation (fixed focal 'home' point) required by the Spectra to do the auto-tracking.

If tracking objects was part of Wilmington's original plan, maybe not having the fixed cameras with the PTZs was the fail? And if so, that also answers Johns last comment about how the intended result not happening can also be a reason to shelve them - not just too many false alerts... :)

For about the same money they could have fiber optics with no downtime. They could run each camera to a fiber MUX and run 10 or more on one fiber cable.

Hello, Undisclosed:

That approach still would have resulted in longer lengths of <new> fiber run to a MUX, no?

The big question is: how difficult would it be to get fiber to those points?

On the plus side, the area appears to be fairly small (e.g., an 8 block by 3 block area). Also, given how much money they have already spent and are going to spend, it might have been cheaper to use fiber.

How true is the Incompatibility statment by firetide? Do you think this is valid or the intend to sell more firetide products?

I would think the non-firetide radios has to be hardwired to Firetide for it to work. If that is the case, I would understand that they will not be part of the firetide mesh but I dont see how they would cause issues since the firetide system will see them as devices on the network.

Hello, Undisclosed:

That approach still would have resulted in longer lengths of <new> fiber run to a MUX, no?

Yes. IFS and Fiber Options are very good at video and RS 485 PTZ controls. I have personally installed large projects with fiber MUXes to the head end and was very pleased with the result. The main reason was cost and the one beneift the customer liked was insulation from lightning strikes hitting a camera and taking out the head end matrix. Of course wireless technology was in it's infancy.

How true is the Incompatibility statment by firetide? Do you think this is valid or the intend to sell more firetide products?

Personally I do not blame them because their technical support personnel are trained on their products. Why should they attempt to support a mixture of technologies with different specifications? They probably would be guessing their responses to the installer then if it didn't work would get the blame. I have been in a three manufacturer mix of products when a new install didn't work. Fingers were pointing everywhere until I took two products out of the loop by running a direct cable to the camera. The cure was to change the bias setting on the code converter into the wireless transciever contrary to the instructions.

I did once have a Chevy that I kept spending money on, hoping that it would work. Never did.

This description has me completely baffled. To remedy the issue they are going to throw in more Firetide nodes and use directional antennas (hence, this is not a mesh but a daisy chain design, which is what they were straying from). Honeywell Cameras (do they still make cameras??) on a Schneider (I am sorry...Pelco) camera platform. Are they even supported?

So I guess the answer is: Add more Firetide Nodes (8K each?? ). Oh, I forgot, you are also getting some specially calibrated Firetide 23 dbi 5 Ghz antennas replaced (which are directional, which gives you the equivalent of a $100 a radio Ubiquiti network). Firetide does not hold any magic patent over 23 dbi 5.8 GHz panel antennas (not sure why high gain would be used anyway on an $8,000 mesh radio in an 8 x 3 block area).

They really should contact someone that knows what they are doing.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

October 2018 Camera Course - Save $50 - Last Chance on Sep 13, 2018
Today is the last day to save $50 on the October 2018 Camera Course, register now. This is the only independent surveillance camera course,...
Congressional Letter Urges Sanctions Against Dahua and Hikvision For Human Rights Abuses on Sep 04, 2018
17 US Congresspeople sent a letter to the Secretary of State and Treasury urging sanctions against Chinese officials plus Dahua and Hikvision,...
France Political Scandal Reveals Video Surveillance Problems on Aug 22, 2018
In what French media describes as "the most damaging crisis yet for" French President Marcon, a political scandal has revealed major gaps in the...
Axis First IR PTZ Tested (Q6125-LE) on Aug 21, 2018
Axis is very late in releasing IR PTZs. While competitors such as Hikvision and Dahua have offered them for years, Axis has just released their...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
China Public Video Surveillance Guide: From Skynet to Sharp Eyes on Jun 14, 2018
China is expanding its video surveillance network to achieve “100%” nationwide coverage by 2020, including facial recognition capabilities and a...
French National Police Buy 10,400 Hikvision Body Cameras on May 31, 2018
France’s national police forces bought 10,400 Hikvision body cameras earlier this year, in a high-profile deal that’s coming into effect as the...
Amazon Enters Home Security Services on Apr 26, 2018
Move over ADT? It is certainly what investors have feared for ADT, especially since Amazon acquired Ring. [Update: We spoke with Amazon and have...
Hikvision DarkfighterX Vs Darkfighter PTZ Tested on Apr 26, 2018
Hikvision has focused on improving low-light performance for PTZs, an area that has traditionally been a problem, even more so than fixed cameras,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...
Chinese Government Praises Hikvision Following Xi Jinping on Sep 17, 2018
The Chinese government council responsible for managing China's state-owned companies praised Hikvision’s obedience to China’s authoritarian leader...
Amazon Ring Spotlight Cam Tested on Sep 17, 2018
Amazon's Ring has released their latest camera entry, the Spotlight Cam, which we bought and tested in our Consumer IP Camera Analytics...
European Mega Security Firm Verisure Pushing Security Fog on Sep 17, 2018
The European mega security firm Verisure (Securitas Direct), with a reported 2 million customers, is pushing security fog, as shown in this BBC...
IP Camera Cable Labeling Guide on Sep 14, 2018
Labeling cables can save a lot of money and headaches. While it is easy to overlook, taking time to label runs during installation significantly...
Favorite Intercom Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 14, 2018
Intercoms are certainly increasing in popularity, driven by the integration of video and IP networking. But who is the favorite? On the one side,...
Vivotek 4MP Camera Tested (FD8379-HV) on Sep 13, 2018
Next in our series of updated 4MP testing, we bought and tested Vivotek's FD8379-HV, and entry level 4MP model claiming "top-notch quality video in...
Ascent / MONI Faces Lender Lawsuit and Debt Crisis on Sep 13, 2018
ASCMA, aka Ascent, aka Brinks Home Security, aka MONI, aka Monitronics is being sued by a group of their lenders who allege: As of June 30,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact