The Challenge Of Securing Chemical Sites

Author: IPVM Team, Published on Jan 30, 2014

Terrorism risk for US chemical facilities has driven enhanced security requirements. In this note, we talk to chemical security expert Patrick Coyle about physical security challenges and common implementations at these facilities. 

The prevailing U.S. legislation on securing potentially hazardous chemicals, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standard (CFATS) identifies a list of more than 300 chemicals that DHS wants to keep protected. Facilities housing these chemicals are required to report to the Department of Homeland Security who does a site assessment and determines if a facility is high or low risk. Facilities are placed into one of four tiers based on that assesment.

“********** ** ***** ** ***** ** ** ********** ** *** potential ************ ** * ********** ****** ** ****** ********** **** chemicals ** ********,” *** ****. *** *****’* **** *** ******** for ****** ***** *** ** ******** ********. ********** ** *** three *******-**** ***** **** ****** ************* *********** ** ***, *** all **** **** ******* ******** ************. 

Video ************ ************

***** ***** *****, ******* *****

***** **** ***** ************ *** ****** ******** ********** ** ********* because ** *** ****** ** *** *********: **** ***** *** oddly ****** ******* ***** *** *****.

“*** *******, **** ** *** *** *** ********** *** ** crowded **** ***** *** ***** **** *** **** **** ***** sight *********. **’* ********* ** **** * ************ **** *** up ** ***** *** ***** *** **** ** ***** **** a ********** ****** ** *******,” ** ****. *** **** ******, he **** ******** ********** *** * *** ** ******** ** intrusion ********* *** ********* ********.

** *** **** ** ****** ** ***** *** * **** so *** **** ** ***** **** *** ******* *** ******** coverage. ** ******* **** **** ** ******* ***** *** * small ******** ****** (**** ***** **** ****** **** *******), **** put *** ** *** *** ***** *** ***** *** ***** three ** *** **** ********* *****.

“****’* **** *** ******* *** **** **** ******** **********. *** these *** ********** ***’** ******* *,*** *******. **’* **** *** practical,” ** ****.

**** ***** *** *** ****** ********* ** ********* **********, ** says, *** ** *** *** ****** ** *** **** ****.

******** *****’* ****

******* ** *** *** ***** ***** *** ******* *****, ******** does *** **** **** ****. *** *** ******* **** ** be ********* ***** ****** *** **** ************.

***** **********

**** *** *** ******** ********* *********, ***** ****** ** *** possibility ** ********. ********* **** ** "***** * *** *." (See *** ********* **** ************ ********.)

"**'* *********** ********* *** *** **** ** ********** ****** ** an *********** **** *** ******** ** ********* ******. ******* **** requirement ** **** *********** *** ** ****** ***** ***** **** a ******** *****," ** ****.

********* ********

**** ***** *********** ** ****, **** ********** **** ***** ****** expense ******** *** *********, ***** ****. *** **** ****** ***** facilities *** ** ***********-**** ***** **** ****** **** ** ************. ***** **** ******* ** ******* ******** *** ****** ** the ********** *********/*****.

“** ** *** **** **** **** ******* ****** *** ****** area **** ** ***’* **** ** **** ******* ** *** threat ****. *** **** ** ******** *** **** ********** ******** to ******** ***** ******** **********,” ** ****.

Conflicting ********** ** ******* ********** ****

*** ** *** ****** ******* ** ******** ******** ** ****** the ******* ** *** ** ********** **** **********.

***** ********:

“* *** ** ******** ***** *** ************* ***** *** ****** folks *** ** *** ***’* **** * *** **** ** chemical ******* *****, **** *** ***’* **** * ********, ****** or ************* ******* *******. ** ******, ***** *** ** ********** correct. ** *** ***’* **** * ******** ***** *** ***’* accidentally ******* **** ... *************, ***** *** * *** ** nasty ********* *** ***** **** *** ****** *** ******** ****** for ********* ** **** ** ** * *******. ***** **’* possible ** ********** **** *********, *** ******** ** ***** ****.”

***** **** *** ***** ******* *** ** *** ********* ** elimination ** ******** *********** ** **** **** *,*** **********.

“**** ** ***** ********** **** * ******** ******** **** ***** security ******** **** *** **** **** *** **** ***’* **** in ******** ** **** **** ** ***** ** **** ** security.”

** ***** **** ***** ***** ***** ****** ***** *********** ****** *******'* ****.

Comments (0)

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis Door Station Tested (A8105-E) on Jul 19, 2017
Axis continues their push into niche markets, especially audio, with network speakers, an IP horn, and video door stations. We tested Axis'...
Manufacturer Favorability Guide on Jul 19, 2017
This 120 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members. It covers our 20 manufacturer favorability rankings and 20 manufacturer...
$8 Billion Utility Georgia Power Enters Surveillance Business Offering Avigilon And Genetec on Jul 19, 2017
Utilities are typically considered major customers of surveillance integrators but one utility, Georgia Power, with $8+ billion in annual revenue...
Knightscope Laughs off Robot Drowning on Jul 18, 2017
A day after a Knightscope robot drowned, Knightscope has issued an 'official statement' making fun of the issue: The implied message is that...
Microsoft Video AI Cloud Services Examined on Jul 18, 2017
Microsoft has released one of the most amazing video analytics marketing videos ever. In it, they detect oil spills, track individual people giving...
Hikvision USA Head of Cybersecurity Exits on Jul 18, 2017
Hikvision USA's Head of Cybersecurity has exited the company. In this note, we review the move, share Hikvision's feedback and examine the...
'Suicidal' Knightscope Robot Drowns on Jul 17, 2017
Knightscope continues its hyper growth, at least when it comes to controversy, this time with a 'suicidal' robot in Washington DC. And here is...
March Networks Company Profile on Jul 17, 2017
March Networks was one of the most well-known video surveillance manufacturers of the 2000s. In 2012, March was acquired by Chinese / American...
Milestone Beats OnSSI In Court on Jul 17, 2017
The litigation between former partners Milestone and OnSSI has finished, confirmed by both parties. In April 2016, OnSSI sued Milestone and in...
Power For Burglar Alarms on Jul 14, 2017
In order to operate, alarm panels require the high voltages found in electrical outlets be converted to the low voltages they run on. In this...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact