Successful Facial Surveillance Case

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jan 07, 2013

Real time facial surveillance is hard to do - accuracy issues, false alerts, cost and deployment complexity all conspire against it. This is why, more than a decade after deployments started they still remain remarkably uncommon. However, one application - self exclusion list - offers great promise and at least one practical example. In this note, we examine what key features make it work where most others have failed.

Self Exclusions List

Certain municipalities establish self exclusion lists to casinos for people who have gambling addictions. The goal is to help those people stay away from casinos and, if they go, block their entry.

The challenge for casinos is that they have huge numbers of visitors plus thousands who are on the self exclusion list. This makes it very hard for even trained personnel to block those on the list.

Ontario Case

Recently, Ontario implemented a facial surveillance system to solve this. From speaking with the manufacturer, a few logistical elements greatly help the solution that are not common in other use cases:

Subject Actively Enrolled

Unlike criminals, people who are on the self exclusion list voluntarily enroll into the system as such:

This greatly improves accuracy as the system has multiple, head on, high quality images. By contrast, facial surveillance systems often depend on grainy, outdated or bad angle images.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Restricted Entrances

The manufacturer says that these casinos have few choke point entrances. This makes it far less expensive to deploy cameras / infrastructure. By contrast, many retailers and public facilities have many egresses, driving costs up significantly and creating issues when people walk in at angles to the camera.

No Need to Catch Everyone

Since the harm of having a self-excluded person enter the casino is modest, especially compared to a criminal, the system does not need to catch everyone. Even if it identifies some persons on this list, it can be viewed as successful. This allows tuning to reduce operational issues.

False Positive Minimized

Specifically, the manufacturer acknowledges that the systems are tuned for lower sensitivity, reducing the number of false positives that frequently drive operators crazy. Facial recognition sensitivity is almost always adjustable:

  • High sensitivity ensures the highest percentage of subjects on the watch list are detected but increases the number of non subjects falsely matched
  • Low sensitivity reduces the percentage of subjects on the watch list detected but decreases the number of false alarms triggered (i.e., non subjects matched)

Because of the 'adversary' being monitored, the system is tuned to help avoid one of the most common sources of system failure.

Conclusion

While this is not your typical security application, it does highlight a number of common operational issues and how they can be avoided in certain use cases.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Most Recent Industry Reports

Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Insurance Startup Coalition Profile on Mar 20, 2019
Many industry people believe cybersecurity insurance is not worth it, as the voting and debate in our Cybersecurity Insurance For Security...
Covert IP Camera Shootout - Axis, Hanwha, Hikvision, March, Vivotek on Mar 20, 2019
Covert cameras were one of the last holdout areas for analog cameras. However, in the past few years, IP / HD covert cameras have become...
Top Metrics For Ensuring Integrator Profitability - Statistics on Mar 20, 2019
How do integrators ensure the profitability of their projects? As part of our profitability study, 100+ integrators answered the following...
Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact