Stentofon Pulse Examined

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on May 31, 2012

Designing an intercom system can be maddeningly complex. Every manufacturer requires specifying a handful of pieces to bring everything together. Forgetting just one part of the system can be a huge mistake that erases any profit. Are better options out there? In this update, we profile a simple intercom system from Stentofon named Pulse, clarify its advantages and disadvantages, and contrast pricing to similar systems.

Overview

While other IP-based intercom systems require some form of head-end server, Pulse requires none.

  • No Central Server Required: Peer to Peer routing of intercom traffic
  • Up to 16 devices supported
  • Devices are PoE Powered
  • Pulse is a firmware feature included by default on all of Stentofon's IP intercoms
  • Single door station prices vary from $400 to $1100 USD street

The image below depicts a simple schematic of a Pulse system, indicating the simplified network format and compatibility with different models of intercom stations:

 

Analysis

The biggest advantage that Pulse claims is that no central server is needed to create an intercom system. A single intercom unit is assigned 'system master' status, and associates the other units to route voice traffic independently. By eliminating the server requirement, several thousand dollars of hardware can be cut of out system designs, while still supporting the full features of each station.

The 'serverless' design only supports 16 total devices. Therefore, Pulse is best applied to small, simple intercom applications. Large, distributed, and heavily integrated systems all require a central management server. Pulse cannot easily be used with complex subnetted networks and custom notification system integrations. Additionally, the system limit of 16 devices is a hard capacity limit regardless of network capacity or network capability of units selected.

Additionally, all Pulse stations are 'PoE' powered, which eliminates additional power supplies and cabling. The system is designed to work on Fast Ethernet switches, and all devices consume less than 7 watts. This means that even the lowest tier of network switches can work with a Pulse system.

Every Stentofon IP station is Pulse Enabled. While Pulse only works with Stenofon's IP line, every form factor of intercom is supported. Desktop stations, wallmount stations, and the vandal resistant/corrections models can compose an ad-hoc intercom network. This flexibility lends itself to being deployed in small/medium businesses that may require mixed intercom types.

Competitive Comparison

The major advantage of an IP based intercom systems are similar to IP video, in that the existing LAN can be utilized for an intercom system, saving the cost of discrete cabling. Additionally, integrating IP intercom systems into VMS or Command and Control platforms is less costly that analog systems, due to the elimination of intermediate digital audio encoders.

The serverless Stentofon approach can reduce product costs by more than 30% for an IP intercom system. An average single door Stentofon station costs about $850 with 4 doors ~$34000, though price varies based on the number of stations and the types of stations selected. By contrast, a comparable Commend GE 100 intercom system cost ~$1400 per station or ~$5,600 for 4 doors. The cost increase is primarily driven by the cost of a head end server and additional power supplies.

Contrast this to an analog based Aiphone AX system that costs around $550, including the cost of the head-end server. However, adding the cost of the 'IP encoder' (eg: Commend ET 901 D) brings the cost to around $2700 for a four door station. While this appears do be the 'best cost' option, it does not including the cost of additional cabling.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Cabling

Camera Cable Whip Guide on Aug 03, 2018
Cable whips are one of integrator's least favorite camera features but seem to be unavoidable, now commonplace on dome, turret, and bullet cameras...
July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration is closed. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals.  Lots of network training...
Powerline Networking For Video Surveillance Advocated By Comtrend on Jun 08, 2018
Powerline networking, using existing electrical wiring, has been around for many years. Indeed, over the years, some video surveillance providers...
Installing Cameras in Plenums Tutorial on May 15, 2018
There is often confusion about plenum ceilings, with misinformation about what is required when running cables through them and mounting cameras...
IP Network Hardware for Surveillance Guide on May 02, 2018
Video surveillance systems depend on IP networking equipment. In this guide, we explain the key pieces of equipment and features, explaining where...
Network Racks For Surveillance Guide on Mar 21, 2018
In this guide, we look at network rack infrastructure, one of the fundamentals of IP video surveillance. Inside, we cover: What is a rack unit...
Access Control Course Winter 2018 on Jan 04, 2018
Learn more below about the Winter 2018 IPVM Access Control Course. Register here. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the...
Cabling Best Practices Guide on Jan 03, 2018
Surveillance cabling can be a major problem. Poorly installed and maintained networks are often costly, lengthy, frustrating ordeals to...
2018 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 03, 2018
The new IP Networking Book 2018 is a 228-page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Dec 20, 2017
For many video system designers, deciding which ethernet cabling to use is a quick decision: go with the cheapest.  However, this overlooks the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...
Nortek Sues SDS, Battle Over Unpaid Bill and Cancelled Lines on Aug 13, 2018
Nortek and SDS legal battle continues. As IPVM reported, SDS sued Nortek alleging bribery and antitrust violation. However, Wave fired back at SDS,...
Uniview Intrusion Analytics and VMD Tested on Aug 13, 2018
IPVM's IP Camera Analytics Shootout featuring Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision created some ill will with a Uniview distributor who...
ADT Employees Protest ADT CEO on Aug 10, 2018
So many ADT employees were so upset with ADT's CEO speech reported on by IPVM, that ADT's CEO was forced to send a mass email to employees to...
Axis / Avigilon Legal Battle Rises on Aug 09, 2018
In what is shaping up to be high-powered, will-not-back-down battle, Axis and Avigilon are squaring off in multiple legal contests. In 2017, IPVM...
Camera Focusing Tutorial on Aug 09, 2018
A camera's focus is fundamental to quality imaging. Mistakes can cause important problems. In this guide, we explain focus issues and proper...
Dahua Ban Response: NOT Chinese Government Owned on Aug 08, 2018
Dahua has responded to the US Congress passing a US government ban on Dahua and Hikvision's products. While Dahua offered the now standard...
Bad Move: ADT Markets Rival Amazon on Aug 08, 2018
Amazon may be lining up ADT as its next victim but ADT is happy to promote Amazon. Amazon has made major moves recently, including acquiring...
Hikvision PanoVu Mini Tested (Multi-imager + PTZ For ~$500) on Aug 07, 2018
Hikvision has released their first PanoVu Mini multi imager, the PanoVu DS-2PT3326IZ-DE3, with four 1080p imagers, including a PTZ and integrated...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact