Stentofon Pulse Examined

By Brian Rhodes, Published on May 31, 2012

Designing an intercom system can be maddeningly complex. Every manufacturer requires specifying a handful of pieces to bring everything together. Forgetting just one part of the system can be a huge mistake that erases any profit. Are better options out there? In this update, we profile a simple intercom system from Stentofon named Pulse, clarify its advantages and disadvantages, and contrast pricing to similar systems.

Overview

While other IP-based intercom systems require some form of head-end server, Pulse requires none.

  • No Central Server Required: Peer to Peer routing of intercom traffic
  • Up to 16 devices supported
  • Devices are PoE Powered
  • Pulse is a firmware feature included by default on all of Stentofon's IP intercoms
  • Single door station prices vary from $400 to $1100 USD street

The image below depicts a simple schematic of a Pulse system, indicating the simplified network format and compatibility with different models of intercom stations:

 

Analysis

The biggest advantage that Pulse claims is that no central server is needed to create an intercom system. A single intercom unit is assigned 'system master' status, and associates the other units to route voice traffic independently. By eliminating the server requirement, several thousand dollars of hardware can be cut of out system designs, while still supporting the full features of each station.

The 'serverless' design only supports 16 total devices. Therefore, Pulse is best applied to small, simple intercom applications. Large, distributed, and heavily integrated systems all require a central management server. Pulse cannot easily be used with complex subnetted networks and custom notification system integrations. Additionally, the system limit of 16 devices is a hard capacity limit regardless of network capacity or network capability of units selected.

Additionally, all Pulse stations are 'PoE' powered, which eliminates additional power supplies and cabling. The system is designed to work on Fast Ethernet switches, and all devices consume less than 7 watts. This means that even the lowest tier of network switches can work with a Pulse system.

Every Stentofon IP station is Pulse Enabled. While Pulse only works with Stenofon's IP line, every form factor of intercom is supported. Desktop stations, wallmount stations, and the vandal resistant/corrections models can compose an ad-hoc intercom network. This flexibility lends itself to being deployed in small/medium businesses that may require mixed intercom types.

Competitive Comparison

The major advantage of an IP based intercom systems are similar to IP video, in that the existing LAN can be utilized for an intercom system, saving the cost of discrete cabling. Additionally, integrating IP intercom systems into VMS or Command and Control platforms is less costly that analog systems, due to the elimination of intermediate digital audio encoders.

The serverless Stentofon approach can reduce product costs by more than 30% for an IP intercom system. An average single door Stentofon station costs about $850 with 4 doors ~$34000, though price varies based on the number of stations and the types of stations selected. By contrast, a comparable Commend GE 100 [link no longer available] intercom system cost ~$1400 per station or ~$5,600 for 4 doors. The cost increase is primarily driven by the cost of a head end server and additional power supplies.

Contrast this to an analog based Aiphone AX system that costs around $550, including the cost of the head-end server. However, adding the cost of the 'IP encoder' (eg: Commend ET 901 D [link no longer available]) brings the cost to around $2700 for a four door station. While this appears do be the 'best cost' option, it does not including the cost of additional cabling.

Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Wireless / WiFi Access Lock Guide on Nov 12, 2019
For some access openings, running wires can add thousands in cost, and...
Access Control and Video Integration Statistics 2020 on Oct 08, 2020
Video Surveillance and Access Control are two of the most common security...
IPVM For PR / Marketing People on Apr 29, 2020
Since IPVM does not accept advertising nor sponsorships, etc., PR / marketing...
Drain Wire For Access Control Reader Tutorial on Sep 23, 2020
An easy-to-miss cabling specification plays a key role in access control, yet...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...
IP Camera Browser Support: Who's Broken / Who Works on Dec 10, 2019
For many years, IP cameras depended on ActiveX control, whose security flaws...
USA's Feevr Thermal Temperature System Examined on Mar 31, 2020
This US company has burst on to the scene, brashly naming itself 'feevr' and...
Aiphone Video Intercom Tested (IX Series 2) on Nov 05, 2019
Aiphone was one of integrator's favorite intercom manufacturers but how well...
Avigilon Open Analytics Tested on Apr 16, 2020
After years of effectively closed analytics, Avigilon decided in late 2018 to...
Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming...
Breaking Into A Facility Using Canned Air Tested on Jan 28, 2020
Access control is supposed to make doors more secure, but a $5 can of...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all...
Beware Rigged China Fever Cameras on Sep 08, 2020
Many China fever camera manufacturers have rigged algorithms dynamically...
IPVM To Disrupt Trade Shows With Launch of Online Shows on Mar 17, 2020
IPVM is launching Online Shows, a series of ongoing events that allow sellers...
Cast Presents PoE Perimeter Lighting on Apr 28, 2020
Cast Lighting presented its PoE powered Perimeter fence system during the...

Recent Reports

Panasonic Presents i-PRO Cameras and Video Analytics on Oct 19, 2020
Panasonic presented its i-PRO X-Series cameras and AI video analytics at the...
Augmented Reality (AR) Cameras From Hikvision and Dahua Examined on Oct 19, 2020
Hikvision, Dahua, and other China companies are marketing augmented reality...
18 TB Video Surveillance Drives (WD and Seagate) on Oct 19, 2020
Both Seagate and Western Digital recently announced 18TB hard drives...
Watrix Gait Recognition Profile on Oct 16, 2020
Watrix is the world's only gait recognition surveillance provider IPVM has...
Intel Presents Edge-to-Cloud Ecosystem for Video Analytics on Oct 16, 2020
Intel presented its processors and software toolkit for computer vision at...
Best Manufacturer Technical Support 2020 on Oct 16, 2020
5 manufacturers stood out as providing the best technical support to ~200...
Microsoft Azure Presents Live Video Analytics on Oct 15, 2020
Microsoft Azure presented its Live Video Analytics offering at the September...
Worst Manufacturer Technical Support 2020 on Oct 15, 2020
4 manufacturers stood out as providing the worst technical support to ~200...
Clorox Announces, Then Pulls, Fever Camera on Oct 15, 2020
For almost one week, Clorox was marketing fever cameras. The booming...
Faulty Hikvision Fever Cam Setup at Mexico City Basilica and Cathedral on Oct 14, 2020
Donated Hikvision fever cameras (claiming screening of 1,800 people/min. with...
Directory of 209 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Oct 14, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Avigilon UMD / UAD Tested on Oct 14, 2020
Avigilon's Unusual Activity Detection and Unusual Motion Detection claim to...
Longse Promoting Hikvision Partner Fullhan Chip Based Cameras on Oct 14, 2020
With Huawei HiSilicon production being shut down at TSMC, camera...
Meridian & Goodview (BEMS Relabeller) Temperature Screening Tested on Oct 13, 2020
A lot of temperature tablets look exactly alike and that is because they use...
Monitoring Alarm Systems From Home - Innovation or Danger? on Oct 13, 2020
Remote monitoring by alarm companies since COVID-19 is bringing cost savings...