Federal Offical Gets Away With Fraud

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Dec 06, 2013

You are a government official who goes out drinking and golfing with your neighbor.

Your neighbor also happens to sell surveillance equipment. You let him write the statement of work and he wins a $250,000+ USD deal.

****** ****** ******** **** ****?

The ************ *********

*** ********* ** ******** is * "***** ********** ***." ** ******** ** a ******** *** **** a ******-***** ****, ************ for ******** ** ***** cameras, ** *** ********* cameras *** * **-**** touch ****** *******. ***** are ** ********** ***** online ** ******* ** the ********* ** *** reports. ***** **** ** documents ** **** *** number ** ******* ** the ***. ***** *** purchase ** *** ******** in *** ******** ** the ******* ********** ******* (***) *******.

What ********

* ********** ** ******** Security (***) ******** ******** in ****** **** ********** *****, *********** *** **** with **** *** ****** a *********** ***** ****** that *** ** *** friend *** ****-**** ******** being ******* * $***,*** surveillance ********. ** ************ the *********** ******* *** a ********* ** **** written ** *** ****** and ****** **** *** to **** **** ** got *** ********. ** this ******, ** ****** the ****.

Slap ** *** *****

*** *** ****** ** the ********* ******* ************ the ******, ********** ***** occurred *** ********* *** case ** *** *.*. Attonery’s ****** ***** ******** to *********. **********, *** U.S. ****** ** ******* Council **** ** *** that ** ******** *** case ********’* ******* ***** **** what ** *** ***** was ***** **** ** ****** **** ******* * contract *** ***** ************ equipment *** *** ******** of ***** ***** *** who ** ***** ************ drink *** **** ****. They **** ***'* ******* lied ** ************* ***** it. * **-*** ********** was ***********, ********* ** OSC *********, *** ** was ********** ******* ** a *****-*** ********** ******** for *** *****.

Metadata ******** ********** ***** *** ***
***** ***** **** *** of *** ******* ****** to **** **** ******** in *** ****** *** training ** *** *** equipment ***** ***** ** arriving ** *** ******, the ***** ***** ** see *** *********** *********. It *** *** **** much ******** *** *** agent ** **** *** that *** ********* ** the ******* ******* *** contract *** *****’* ********, Brad *******. *********** *** ******* ** Solutions *** ** *** house.

** **** ***** *******'* name *** ****** ** the "**********" ******* ** the ******** **** ********* the ********* ** ****. When ***** ** *** agent ** ** **** that *** ******** *** written *** ********* ** work, ***** ******* ** off ****** ** *** customary *** ******* **** technical ********* ** **** draft ** ***** *********** documents.

*************

** ******** ****, *** DHS ********* ******* *** the *.*. ****** ** Special ******* *** ******** separate **** **** * whistleblower **** * ****-******* official ** *** *** involved ** * *********** fraud ****** ********* *** purchase ** ************ *********. The ******* **** *** official *** *** ******** write ** *** ********* of **** *** *** awarded *** * $***,*** for **** *** ******** only $**,*** ***** ** equipment. *** *** ****** an ************* **** *** allegations. ******* ********* ******** **** ********* online, *** ****** *** the ********** ** ***** involved.

********

*** *** *** ********** that ***** “*** ********** influence *** ********** *** award ** *** ********.” A ****** ** ****** shows **** ** *** working **** ******* ** push *** **** *******.

********** ***** *** ********* of ****

*** *** **** ** found ******** **** *** violated ******* *********** ***** when ** ********* ************ ********. *** ****** also ***** **** ***** had ****** **** ********* about *** ***** *** statement ** **** ***** the ***** ***** *******’* name ** *** ******** metadata *** * ****** of ****** ******* *** document ********** **** *******. In ** ********* **** the ***, ******* ******** that ** ******** *** documents ** *****.

**** ** * ******* because *********** *** ********** from ******* *** ********* of **** *** ********** bids, ********* ********* *********** ***********."** * ********** ******** and ********* ******** ************** covering ***-************* *****, ** be **** ** * competitive
***********, **** ********** ***** not ** ******* ** furnish ***** *****," *** rule ****.*** *********** **** ******** ****** prepare ***** *** **** statements.

"**** ********** ********** ** necessary, *** ********** ***** often ** ** * position ** ***** *** own ******** ** ************. To ******** *** *********** of ****, *********** *** prohibited **** ********* * system ** ******** ******** on *** ***** ** work ********** ******* *** of ***** ********," ** says.

**** ***** *** *** deputy ******** **** **** thought ** *** ********* to **** ******* ***** up * ********* ** work. ******* ********** **** that ** *** ** years ** *********** ********** he *** ***** ***** of * ****** ***** the *** ** ***** the ********* ** **** for * ******* ***** put ** *** ***.

************* *** *********** *******

***** **** ************* ** wasn’t **** ** ** involved ****** **** *********** in *** *******. ******* interviews, *******, ** ***** like *** **** ******* parts ** *** *********** process ** ***** *** contract. ***** *** ** independent ********** ******** ** review ** *** ******* and *** ********* *** approves ********* **** *** order *** *** ************ equipment ***** **** ******* him. ** **** ************* he ****'* **** *** contract *** ******* ***** after *** ****. *** inspector **** ** *** an ***** **** ***** asking *** ******** ** the ********* ** **** for *** ******, *** didn't **** ******** **** about ** ***** ****** six ****** ***** **** he *** **** ** go ***** *** ******** the ********. **** *** still ****** ****** *** actual ************ *** ********. 

*** *** ***** **** Olson *** ******* *** been ********** *** **** expedite *** ******* **** before *** ******** *** awarded. *** ******* ***** is **** ** ** email **** ******* ** Olson:

******** ** ********

***** ****** ** ******** the ******** ** ******** when ******** *** ********, according ** *** *** report. *** ************* ********* that **** ************ ****** golf *** *** ****** together, *** ***** ******** to *** *** **** he ****’* **** ****** about **** *****. *******, Olson **** ** ***** discussed *** ************ **** Quigley **** ****** ****** show **** **** **** discussing *** ******** ** early ** ****. *** solicitation ****’* *** *** until **** *, ****.

**** ************ *** ****** because ***** *****'* ****** bidders ** ** *** put *** ***** ** August. **** *** ******* went ** *** ** August ****, *****'* ******* was *** ****** ******.

***** *** ******

*** *** **** **** though *** ***** **** was *****, *** ***** was *** ****** ** the ********* ******* *** had * **** *** it. *** ******* ***** be **** ** **** up ******* ** *** event **** * ********'* surveillance ******* ******. ************ they *** *** **** any ******** **** *** equipment *** ***** **** than *** **** *** it.

Questions ******The OIG report doesn't answer questions about how Olson was able to push the contract through with minimal involvement with procurement officers. That is indicative of a bigger problem in DHS and FPS.

**** ***** ***’* ***** is **** ***** *** out ** **** ****. Nor **** *** *** mention *** **** ** favors ** *********. ***** is ** ********** **** the *** ****** ** Olson's **** ******** ** past ******* **** *******, which ** *********** ******* in * ****** ********** case **** *********, ******* ******** **** **** of *** **** ******* information.


Comments (3)

A government official getting away with something that would have had someone in private industry fired or even prosecuted!?!?!? Shocking! Simply shocking…..

I think you could devote your entire life to writing articles like this Carlton and even churn a few out a day dealing with surveillance and the security industry as a whole. I also don’t think anything would ever change unfortunately.

Maybe the payback was washing his balls for him.... golf balls.

What else is new. The government is one giant ball of corruption.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Acquisition

Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei US Ban Rules Released on Aug 08, 2019
The US government has released rules on how the 2018 NDAA ban of Dahua, Hikvision, and Huawei will be implemented when it takes effect in 5...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
OpenALPR Doubles Prices on Jun 06, 2019
There is no 'race to the bottom' in cloud / AI video surveillance. In May, Verkada increased their prices. Now, OpenALPR is doing the same with a...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Pelco Sold Off, Now Independent on May 28, 2019
Pelco has been sold off by Schneider Electric, completing Schneider's terrible tenure, but giving Pelco a chance at life. IPVM spoke with...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied on Apr 10, 2019
One of the most ambitious integrator rollups of the decade has reached its conclusion—selling to a mega guard company. Allied Universal has...
Panasonic Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 27, 2019
Panasonic favorability declined, as the company struggled to find its way amidst a changing market and its ill-timed decision to become a Dahua...

Most Recent Industry Reports

TMA Apologizes to Amazon / Ring on Aug 23, 2019
Not only is Amazon / Ring making major incursions into the residential security market, the organization representing the biggest incumbents, The...
China Dahua Replaces Their Software With US Pepper on Aug 22, 2019
What does a US government banned company do to improve its security positioning in the US? Well, Dahua is unveiling a novel solution, partnering...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
Anyvision Facial Recognition Tested on Aug 21, 2019
Anyvision is aiming for $1 billion in revenue by 2022, backed by $74 million in funding. But does their performance live up to the hype they have...
JCI Sues Wyze on Aug 21, 2019
The mega manufacturer / integrator JCI has sued the fast-growing $20 camera Seattle startup Wyze. Inside this note: Share the court...
Dahua 4K Camera Shootout on Aug 20, 2019
Dahua's new Pro Series 4K N85CL5Z claims to "deliver superior images in all lighting and environmental conditions", but how does this compare to...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Uniview Beats Intel In Trademark Lawsuit on Aug 19, 2019
Uniview has won a long-running trademark lawsuit brought by Intel, with Beijing's highest court reversing an earlier Intel win, centered on...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact