Security Manufacturer Sues US State Over LPR Restrictions

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Feb 18, 2014

LPR is the most successful video analytic in security, so successful that it is increasingly becoming ubiquitous. With a hundred million plus licenses plates being scanned annually, companies are bundling this information for data mining and tracking but this is raising serious security concerns. Now it has become a legal battle between security companies and state governments who are banning the technology.

*** ** *** **** successful ***** ******** ** security, ** ********** **** it ** ************ ******** ubiquitous. **** * ******* million **** ******** ****** being ******* ********, ********* are ******** **** *********** for **** ****** *** tracking *** **** ** raising ******* ******** ********. Now ** *** ****** a ***** ****** ******* security ********* *** ***** governments *** *** ******* the **********.

[***************]

*** *** ********* *** suing *** ***** ** Utah **** * **** law ******* **** *** outside ** ********** ******** for *** ***********, ****** control ** ******* ***********. See*** ********* ****.

*** ********* ******** *** security ************ ******** ********* *** ******* *********** *******(***). *** ******** *** data *** ********* ********, banks ********** ** **** ******** stolen ******** ** **** that ****** ** ***********. It **** ******** **** data ** ********, ***** **** the *********** ** ******* an ******** ******* ** law ***********.

*** *** *********, *** suing *** ***** ** Utah **** ******* ********* ******* ***** Reader ****** ***, ******* **** ****. The *** ********* ****** other **** *** *********** and ****** ********** ********** to *** *** **********. Vigilant *** *** ***** a ********* ****** *** law ******** ***** ***** and ********** ********* ******.

**** ***** **** *** law ****** **** **** “dissemination *** ********** ** license-plate **** ***** **** systems” ***** **** *** as “**************** ********* ******.” They *** ******* ** injunction ** ***** *** law *** ***** **** to ******** ********** ***** data.

ALPR *** ** ****

****** *** *** ** passed *** *** ******** in ****, ******* ** ALPR **** ** **** companies *** ** ******* of $**,*** *** **** since ****. *** **** also ***** **** ***** to *** *** ***** services ******** ***** ** cases “** ******* ** the ****,” ******* *** enforcement ****** ********* *** children.

“** **** (** *** all) *****, ******** ******** this **** **** ** charge,” *** ********* ****.

Free ******

*** ******* **** *** ban ******** *** “*********** afforded ********** ****** ******* neutral ********** ******* *** Act (*) **** *** further * *********** ************ interest, (*) **** *** directly *** ********** ******* a ************ ********, *** (3) ********* **** ****** than ** ********* ** further *** ************ ******** at *****...**** * ******* imposes * ********* *** on ******, *** ********** must ******* *** ************ and ********** ***** ** the ******* ***** ** its ******** ********* *** regulating *** ******.”

*** ********* **** *** the *** ***** **** by ********* ********* *** them **** ***** ***** jobs.

** *****'* **** *** similar **** ******* ****** outside ** *** ********** from ***** *** ******* of ****'* *** *** New ******** ******* ***** *** ******** except **** ******. ***** **'* *********** to *** ******** *** legislatures ****** ******* **** account **** ***** **** it ***** ** ***** types ** **********, **'* equally ** *********** ** see *** ************* **** push ****.

Comments (13)

Speech:

: a spoken expression of ideas, opinions, etc., that is made by someone who is speaking in front of a group of people

: the ability to speak

: spoken language

Speaking is doing something, but doing something isn't necessarily speaking. Sounds to me like they're grasping at straws.

If what they're doing is "speech", I'd guess the NSA can claim the same thing.

It wouldn't be the first time government legislates about something there was no previous legislation for.

All forms of communication is seen as covered by free speech laws and have been for a long time, though, which is why I can wave a sign saying "the mayor is a big stinkyhead" or telegraph "the governor needs to maybe lose a few pounds" via Morse code without having to open my mouth.

Even commercial speech is covered, which is why I can hand someone a leaflet saying "HDcctv is totally the best thing ever, you should buy it because of how awesome it is!" in the middle of the street.

The question is, is the collection of data by a commercial entity free speech?

Ari - I agree with you that speech can take many forms, including all of those you describe, but collection of data isn't one of them. If anything, they are listening and collecting "speech" from others, the same way that an LE agency might be collecting evidence when it's wire-tapping.

Something else. Its doubtful anyone in their right mind is ready to believe that putting a licence plate on a vehicule even qualifies as "speech"....well, maybe if it's a personalized LP.

Good for Utah and New Hampshire. More states should follow suit.

Many worry about the government's intrusion into our private lives, and rightly so. But what many are unaware of is how much private industry also intrudes. Web browsing tracking is just the tip of the iceberg. More and more retail stores are tracking customers' smart phones. I see that expanding outside of the stores themselves.

ALPR is one of the next steps. Companies like LexisNexis gather data for law enforcement, businesses and other clients. Although these companies like to tout how they help track down crime and improve business marketing as separate functions, in reality there is a large crossover between their legal and marketing branches. When you add ALPR and cell phone tracking into the mix, you will be tracked everywhere you go.

There are two old adages:

  • "They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin, 1759.
  • "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" -- George Santayana

The first applies directly to this and the second is a reminder to look at the repression of freedoms in countries like the former Soviet Union, Libya, North Korea and Sudan. Add the technology to track citizens' every move and George Orwell becomes less fiction writer and more prophet.

And then there's this.

This is slightly off topic, but have you been watching the CBS show Person of Interest?

Last night's episode was about what could potentially happen when corporate/government and personal concerns about the use of information clash and was particularly troubling.

Yes, it's drama, but the examples used in the scenario weren't that far fetched, based on everything we read and see in the news media and on the Internet these days.

From that article:

In an attempt to affirm the data's security, a rep for the Immigration Customs Enforcement agency stressed to the Post that "this database would be run by a commercial enterprise, and the data would be collected and stored by the commercial enterprise, not the government."

Should we get the warm and fuzzies because the government is trying to skirt the issue by having their "dirty" work done by a private contractor? If anything, it should make the public even more uncomfortable.

Increasingly government agencies are turning over this kind of stuff to private companies. More than one public official has said one reason is because it helps keep security information from being obtained through public records requests.

Beat me to it. Perhaps a law extending FoIA requests to the records of government contractors?

That would be nice, but big the contractors like Lockheed, General Dynamics, etc. probably have the $$ and influence to make sure that never happens. If government immunity can be granted to contractors in some cases where they are doing work for the government, I don't see why other regulations shouldn't apply.

You need to understand that if this info is used to identify the vehicle owner, there may be an issue where ANY LPR camera becomes illegal because ALL states require a liscence and a tag and they ARE interconnected. ANY LPR camera usage by ANYONE may violate the 5th amendment protection against self incrimination. Driving a vehicle is no longer a "privilige" but has become a right for anyone who has a job. You know and I know it. We can't be certain of this Administration however. If they didn't come up with the idea......

This is why I text while I drive, so I don't accidently view the license plate number of the car in front of me because I respect their privacy that much. I'll have plenty of time to write it down when I hit the car, but wait, if I write it down I'll be recognizing and recording the plate number. Sounds like the only solution is we all drive the same brand, model, color, style of car with no identifying information like plate numbers or VINS.

What I don't understand is why California wants new guns designed so the casings are imprinted with information that can trace the round back to the gun, that's crazy, I don't want anyone identifying bullets I fire. especially rounds I may fire at the LPR cameras the government is using.

Just kidding, I work in the world of data and anlytics for many years, I've worked on projects where you would not believe the level of data that is available for purchase from companies like Polk, American Express, Facebook, Twitter, Experian not to mention all the public records. LPR is a joke, why, because your phone already tracks everywhere you go, the government made that mandatory, and even though you can turn it off for marketing purpose, the government can track every movement and no way to turn it off from them. NSA & Ed Snowden are just the tip of the iceburg and nothing we can do about it.

Get prepared to see another possible suit if Massachusetts passes a law they're looking at now that would prohibit private companies from collecting license plate data (and limit law enforcement retention of that data to 48 hours, which would likely make the technology less appealing).

The bill, SB1648, limits the use of ALPR to "state, county, or municipal law enforcement agencies" and specifically exempts "any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or state or local government entity."

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on LPR

San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
Large Hospital Security End User Interview on Mar 21, 2019
This large single-state healthcare system consists of many hospitals, and hundreds of health parks, private practices, urgent care facilities, and...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
OpenALPR Acquired By Mysterious Novume on Mar 13, 2019
Startup OpenALPR has been acquired by Novume, a company virtually unknown in the industry. While there are many LPR providers (see our directory),...
Milestone Machine Learning Camera Auto-Setting Examined on Mar 13, 2019
Milestone wants to improve image quality using Machine Learning to solve the problem of "a camera doesn't know what it is being used for",...
Genetec Declares "Lead With Synergis" Access Control on Mar 04, 2019
Genetec started with and is best known for its video management software. However, the company is now imploring its partners to lead with Synergis,...
Police Department Surveillance Manager Interview on Feb 28, 2019
Former Memphis PD Surveillance Manager, Lt. Joseph Patty retired months ago, but kept busy during his decades on the force, working to build up...
PlateSmart LPR Profile on Jan 31, 2019
PlateSmart Technologies claims to "turn any conventional surveillance camera into a license plate recognition camera" We spoke with PlateSmart to...
Motorola Acquires VaaS / Vigilant LPR on Jan 08, 2019
Less than a year after Motorola Solutions spent a billion to acquire Avigilon, the company has made another major acquisition spending nearly a...
IACP 2018 Police Show Final Report on Oct 08, 2018
IPVM went to Orlando to cover the 2018 IACP conference, the country's largest police show (about as big as ASIS), examining the 700+...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact