*** *** **** ************ **** ***** categories ***** ** ********* ************* (******** in *** ***** *****) *** *** term ** *** *********** ******* ***** on **** ********:

******* **** ** ***** ***** *** days *** *** ** ******** *** product *** ********* *** ********* ****** before ********** ******* *** **** **** 600 ************ **** **** ******** ***** 2002.
Insurance ******* *********
*** **** ********* **** ******** ********* premium ********** ***** ********* * ****** Act *****.
“** [*** ********* *********] ***’* **** to **** ************ ****** *******, **** maybe **** ***’* **** ** ****** the **** ******** **** ******,” ** said.
* *******, *******, ** *** ***** protection *** ******** **** **, *** only ***** ******* *** ** * terrorist *** *** ***** **** ******* played * ****. ******* ****, ******* says **** ************* ***** ******* ** *** ********* have **** *** ** ***** ******** or **** ****** ******* *** ******* after ************ ****** ***** ************ **********. *** *******, *** ******* ******** *** premiums **** **** ***** ** ***** more ******* ** ******* ** * SAFETY *** *********** ******* *** ******* better ********* ** **** **** *** fall ******.
Companies ********
*** *** * ***** ******* *** size ** ********* ******* ****** *** labels *** * ******* ** ****** approved ************ *** ********* [**** ** longer *********].

** ******** *** **** ** *** more ****-***** *****-******* ********* *** ** found:



****, ***** ******* ************ *** *** of *** ****** ********.

*** ******** *** ***** *********** ******* in ** **-**** ***** [**** ** longer *********]. **** ******* *** ****** *** could ****** ******** **** *** ********** ** applying [**** ** ****** *********] ** ******* out **** ***********?
Comments (1)
Marc Beningson
SAFETY act can be used to certify a product, or a process. So you can develop a system that is not based on specfic brands of products.
As I recall, SAFETY act caps liability at $10m under certain circumstances (consult your lawyer, not me) so I would certainly expect lower liability premiums since you'll need less coverage.
For quite a few years, there were specs requirements for SAFETY act, since it also limits the owner's liability. Most DOD contractors and many security integrators I know obtained certification/registration for some part of a security system, and as you note many manufacturer/vendors do as well. Since the process isn't that difficult- many companies I knew used an experienced lawyer, but others did it themselves, I would consider it a no-brainer from a business point of view.
Create New Topic