How Government Certified Video Surveillance Can Reduce Insurance Premiums

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Nov 15, 2013

If you can convince the Department of Homeland Security that your technology or plan can save lives in a terrorist attack, you may be able to get lower insurance premiums, according to a DHS official on a Security Industry Association webinar.

The Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate has been pushing the SAFETY Act as an incentive for companies and manufacturers to develop and use anti-terrorism technology. In return, it provides legal liability protection to organizations that manufacture or implement “technologies and services that could save lives in the event of a terrorist attack.”

These liability protections only apply to claims that result from a terrorist attack but limit the amount a company can be held responsible for if someone decides to sue later. Once a product is SAFETY Act certified, it can assert a government contract defense in court, whether or not it is actually a contractor.

“What we do is a complete analysis of the insurance industry related to the product or technology and we determine what a fair amount of insurance is that company should carry,” said Stephen Hancock, one of Homeland Security’s security industry liaisons. “The company is absolved of anything above that insurance limit.”

These protections also extend to end users.

SAFETY Act Categories

*** *** **** ************ **** ***** ********** ***** ** ********* effectiveness (******** ** *** ***** *****) *** *** **** ** the *********** ******* ***** ** **** ********: 



******* **** ** ***** ***** *** **** *** *** ** evaluate *** ******* *** ********* *** ********* ****** ****** ********** product *** **** **** *** ************ **** **** ******** ***** 2002.

Insurance ******* *********

*** **** ********* **** ******** ********* ******* ********** ***** ********* a ****** *** *****.

“** [*** ********* *********] ***’* **** ** **** ************ ****** payouts, **** ***** **** ***’* **** ** ****** *** **** premiums **** ******,” ** ****.

* *******, *******, ** *** ***** ********** *** ******** **** do, *** **** ***** ******* *** ** * ********* *** and ***** **** ******* ****** * ****. ******* ****, ******* says **** ************* ***** ******* ** *** ********* **** **** *** ** lower ******** ** **** ****** ******* *** ******* ***** ************ better ***** ************ **********. *** *******, *** ******* ******** *** ******** **** **** ***** it ***** **** ******* ** ******* ** * ****** *** designation ******* *** ******* ****** ********* ** **** **** *** fall ******. 

Companies ********

*** *** * ***** ******* *** **** ** ********* ******* SAFETY *** ****** *** * ******* ******** ******** ************ *** *********.

** ******** *** **** ** *** **** ****-***** *****-******* ********* and ** *****:

****, ***** ******* ************ *** *** ** *** ****** ********.

*** ******** *** ***** *********** ********* ** **-**** *****. **** ******* *** ****** *** ***** ****** ******** **** *** ********** ** ******** ** ******* *** **** ***********?

Comments (1)

SAFETY act can be used to certify a product, or a process. So you can develop a system that is not based on specfic brands of products.

As I recall, SAFETY act caps liability at $10m under certain circumstances (consult your lawyer, not me) so I would certainly expect lower liability premiums since you'll need less coverage.

For quite a few years, there were specs requirements for SAFETY act, since it also limits the owner's liability. Most DOD contractors and many security integrators I know obtained certification/registration for some part of a security system, and as you note many manufacturer/vendors do as well. Since the process isn't that difficult- many companies I knew used an experienced lawyer, but others did it themselves, I would consider it a no-brainer from a business point of view.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

2Gig Gun Lock / Motion Detector Tested on Aug 17, 2018
Safer guns for families and an opportunity for security dealers to sell more services? That is the aim of Nortek's 2GIG 'Gun Motion Detector'...
Video Analytics Integration Guide on Aug 16, 2018
Video analytics is hot again (at least conceptually) but integrating video analytics with VMSes can be challenging. This is especially significant...
Hikvision IP Camera Critical Vulnerability 2018 Disclosed on Aug 16, 2018
The same day that the US government passed a prohibition on Hikvision cameras, Hikvision disclosed a critical vulnerability for its IP...
ISS VMS / Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 16, 2018
Who is ISS? In the past few months, they had one of the craziest ISC West promo items in years. Then, they hired industry veteran and ex-Dahua...
Chinese OEM Avycon Gets ADI Push on Aug 15, 2018
Who is Avycon? An American company? A Korean company? A couple of guys relabelling Chinese products? The latter is the best explanation. While...
Backboxes for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Aug 15, 2018
Backboxes are a necessity in surveillance, whether for managing cable whips, recessing cameras, adding wireless radios. But it can be confusing to...
Genetec Stratocast / Comcast 'Motion Insights' Examined on Aug 15, 2018
Comcast recently announced "SmartOffice Motion Insights", an extension to their Genetec OEMed cloud video service (covered by IPVM here). This...
SimpliSafe Violating California, Florida, and Texas Licensing Laws on Aug 14, 2018
IPVM has verified that DIY security system provider SimpliSafe, founded in 2006 and acquired in June of 2018 at a billion dollar valuation, is...
Ban of Dahua and Hikvision Is Now US Gov Law on Aug 13, 2018
The US President has signed the 2019 NDAA into law, banning the use of Dahua and Hikvision (and their OEMs) for the US government, for US...
Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact