The Laziest RFP Ever

Author: Ben Wood, Published on Aug 13, 2013

Bad RFPs - out of date, vague or just plain confusing - are common. But this RFP is on a whole other level. It is as if no one even looked at it before the project was put out for bid. A small town doing this is perhaps understandable, but it is far more perplexing when a US federal agency that should have the resources to come up with something better does this. In this update we review an RFP for a 2013 project using specs so old you might have to visit an antique shop to find some of the equipment.

The highlights from this RFP

VCR Storage

If someone can find standard 1/2 inch VHS tapes, that would be one way to fulfill the storage requirements for this RFP which lists time-lapse VCRs as an option. It says VCR must allow for repeat recording, a built in time and date generator and a tape counter. It also must have a daylight saving time setting, an automatic head cleaner and 120-second rewind.

The other option, for storing digital video, is a DVR or NVR with at least an Intel Pentium III processor (originally released in 1999) and 256 MB RAM. It should record at 30fps and have built-in motion detection and masking accessible from the Internet, Intranet or PDA. Windows 98 is the specified operating system.

According to the RFP, "The type of recording device utilized should be determined by the size and type of CCTV System designed and installed, and to what extent the system is to be utilized." One of the bidders we spoke to says the only response to questions about the spec was that if an integrator was "not supplying specified material, submittals will need to be approved as an equal," essentially leaving it up to the integrator what the final equipment will look like.

****** ************

* ** **** *** ** ***, *** ** ** ****** using ******** **** *** ******* ** *** ******** ******** *.* ** ******. Both ******* ** ********** *** ** *.* **** ********** ******** in ****. 

****** ***********

*** ** ***** **** *** ****** **** **** ****** *********** software *** ******* ** ********* "*** *********** ***********.” ******* ** response ** * ********* ******’* ******** ****** * *&* ******, ** said ********* ******** *** *** ********, *** **** **** ****** capability ** *** * **** ******* ***** ******* ****. *** the **** *&* ****

*** ** ****** *** ** *******

*** ********* ************** *** *** ****** ******* (***** *** ***) and ** *********** ** ****-* ** *****. *** *** ********* both, ******** **** ****** *** ******* **** *** ** ********** systems.  

** *** ***** *******, *** ***** *** *** **** ********. 

  • "******** ******* **** ** ******* ***** ******* ** ****** **** the ******* ******* *********."
  • ** ******* **** ******* * ******* ********** ** ** ****** camera
  • "******** ******’* **** *** *********: ****** ***********, **** **********, ***, color/black *** *****, *****’* **** *** ******* ** ******* **** from *** ******** [***]."

**** ********* 

"*** ***'* *** ***'* **** *** ******** **** ** ******** or ******** **** ** ****** ******* ** *********," *** *** ****. The *** ********** **** **** ********** **** ****** ******** *** ***-*. **** ******* ***** * ********* ****** ****** *** *** fact **** *** ******** ****** *** *** **** *********. 

"[*] ****** **** *** ***** ** ** **** **** **** compliant *** **** ***. ** ** ****** *** ** *******," the ****** *****. *** ** *********, "**** ********** ** *** required. ****** ****** *** ********** ** **** **********." *** ** might **** ** ****** ***** **** ****** **** ****** **** installed. ** ******'* ** *** ***** **** **** *** *********** **** ***** ************ *******

**********

**** **** ******* *** **** (*** ** ****** ******** ** answer ********* ***** *** *******) *** ****** ******* *** **** existing ************ **************. *** ******* ****** **** ** *********** *** re-locating *** ******** *******, ********** ******* *** ******* *** ********** eight **** ******. *** ******* ****** ** ****** **** ********* the ******** ****** ** **** **** *** *** ********* ** compatible *** ******* * ****** ** *** *********** ******* ** what ** ***** **** ** ******* *** ************.

****** ********* ******** **** ********. 

***** *****:


****** *****:

Terrible ***

**** *** ** **** **** **** **** **** ** *** for **** *******? **** ****** ** *********** *** ********* * spec **** **** ** **** ** ** ***. ** ** ***** that ** *** **** * ****** **** ** **** ***** they ****** ** *** ** ******** ***** ****** ** *** tucked **** ** *** ** ***** *** *** *** **** hoping *** *********** ***** **** ** *** ******. ************, *** solicitation **** *** *** ********* **** ********* *******. *** **** of **** ***** “*** *** ***?” ** *** ****** ***** questions **** ** ***** ***** **** ** **** ***** ** this. ******, **** ******** *** *** ***** *** ***** ****** such * ********* ******** ****.

*************, *** **** ** ** *** ** ******* ** *** winning ****** **** * *** ** ** **** *** **, it ** ***** ** ** **** *** **** ** ****** given *** *** *** *** *** *******.

 

 

Comments (11)

***** *** *** **** *** ******* ** ** ***?

** ********, **** ** *** ***** **** *** ** *** been ******* ** ****** *** ** **** **********....

* ** ****** ******** ** *** ** *** ***** ************ and ****-**** ********. *********, *** ** ******** **** ***********, *** the **** ** *** ***** ** ***** **** ******* *** specification ****'* ********** ** ***** *** ****** **. **'* **** requiring **** **** ************ **** ** **** ******* ********.

** ***** ** **** ******** *** ********* ** * ******** or ******* ****** ******* *** *** **** *** ****-**** **** because, ** ***** *********, **** **** ****** ** ****** ** out.

"**'* **** ********* **** **** ************ **** ** **** ******* Mandates."

****** *************, ****** *******, ** **. **. ******* ************

** ***-***** *** ****** ** *******...

***, * ***** ***'** ***** *****. * **** ** **** in *** **** ********** ********** *** *** **** *** * can *** **** ********** *** **** * ****** **** **** their *****... *** ** * ****** ****, *'* * *** embarrassed *** *** **.

***** *** ** *** ** **** ******** *** * *** courthouse * ****** ***** **** **** **** ***** ** ******* going **** ** * **** ***** ********. **** ***** *****, RFP *** ****** *** ********* ** * ***** ****.

*** **** **** * ************ ******* ** ******* *** ** date **************. **** **** **** **** **** ******** **** ******* specifications ******* ** ** *********** ****, **** ** *** ************** people **** ****** ** ** *** **** ******* *** ******** the ******* ***** **** **** *** **** ******** ****** *** put **** *** *** *** ******* **** ****** ** *** know ****** ** ** *** **** *** ********* ** ** otherwise. *** *********** ***** ** **** **** ****** *** ****** to ******** **** ***** ********** *** *** **** **** **** out ** *** **** *** ********* **** "*** ****** **** known ******, ***'** *** ******" *** ******* **** ** **** having ** ******* * *** **** ********* ****** ******* *** price ********.

*** *** ******* *** *** *** **** **** ******** ****** for **** **** *** ****** ***........

*** * **** **** *** *** *** **** ******* ** cash *** * **** ****** *** **** *****. * *** of **** **** **** **** *** ***** *** ** ** far *** *** **** *** **** * **** **** *** worked **.

**** *** ***** ***** *** ** **** **** ** ** although ******** *** ** ******* ** **** *******. *** ****** for **** ***** ******* ** **** ********...***** ***** ***** ** be * ******** ** ****** **** ****** ****** *** ****, defiy *****, ** ****** ***** * *.* ** *** *****-****-*-*****!

*'** **** **** *****. ** ******** *** **** *** *** university **** **** *** **** ********* ********* **** ****'* **** together, **** ** ** ******* ******* ********* **** '**** *********** on ****** ** ******' *** ********* *** ***** ********* (***** incidentally *****'* *********** ** ***** *********, *** ******** ** *** students (** *** *** * **********) ** *******. ** *** clearly **** * ****/***** ** *** ********** **** *** **** prison **** **** ***. **** **********, ************ **** ********* ***** than * ******; *** *********? :)

"******** ** *** ******** (** *** *** * **********) ** inmates"

***. ***** ** *** * ****** ***** ******!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

US Government Entities Hard Spec Hikvision on May 26, 2016
The US and Chinese governments are working together. Now, US government entities are not only buying video surveillance products from the Chinese...
Poorly Written College Town Camera RFP Examined on May 25, 2016
State College, PA issued an RFP for a neighborhood surveillance system that leaves out many key details required to invite qualified bids. We...
Face Recognition Camera Tested (Netatmo) on Jan 29, 2016
Can face recognition make home security "better"? That is the bold claim from startup Netatmo with their Welcome camera. But with face...
Large Video Surveillance Systems Guide on Oct 29, 2015
This 14 page guide explains the key uses, design factors, and players in the large system surveillance market. A global group of 80...
Simplicam Facial Recognition Tested on Jan 23, 2015
Facial recognition, available for $150? That's the offer from a startup, Simplicam, who has not only cloned Dropcam setup and user interface but...
This Spec Wizard Makes a Mockery Out of RFPs on Dec 05, 2014
Terrible RFPs are commonplace. If only there was a way to make it easy to generate terrible RFPs. Well, Honeywell, Vicon and Aiphone are working...
Japanese Stores Facial Recognition Sharing on Apr 21, 2014
A controversy is brewing in Japan after a newspaper was tipped off about a practice stores use to combat shoplifting. A network of stores uses...
Ridiculous $100K Project / Now Stalled on Oct 31, 2013
Update 10/31: When we first published this in July, we broke down how flawed the RFP was. Now, the city is delaying the project as it works through...
Bad RFP Leads to Homebrew System on Oct 29, 2013
Bad RFPs continue to plague the industry. In the case of one city, a poorly written RFP led to a contract that likely fails to address one of the...
Debunking Start-Up's FST21 Case Study on Oct 07, 2013
This company won ISC West Best in Show 2 years ago, recently received $5 million in funding and is being talked about as the next big thing in...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon Responds to Direct Sales Discussion on Jan 24, 2017
In a discussion, an integrator posted that an Avigilon inside sales rep contacted him, mistakenly believing he was an end user, looking to set an...
WDR Shootout 2017: Low vs High Cost Cameras on Jan 24, 2017
Multi-exposure WDR was once only available in expensive cameras but in the past few years, this capability has become available even in sub $200...
Scathing Honeywell Favorability Results on Jan 24, 2017
Honeywell is one of the biggest brands in security, with offerings for intrusion, fire, wire, video surveillance, access control, plus they own one...
2Gig Expands Into Commercial Intrusion With Vario on Jan 23, 2017
2GIG, an alarm product manufacturer best known for their wireless products, has introduced a new line of wired panels aimed at the commercial...
Integrator Service Vehicle Guide on Jan 23, 2017
Few assets are as commonly used by integrators and installers as their service vehicles. 125 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their...
Goodbye Samsung, Hello Wisenet X on Jan 23, 2017
Samsung is gone but Hanwha is back. Their latest generation Wisenet X, touts a slew of new high end features including H.265, WiseStream II,...
Vivotek Favorability Results on Jan 20, 2017
Financially, Vivotek is doing relatively well. The company did ~$130 million in 2015 revenue and 2016 revenue (through Q3 reported) was up more...
PR Firm Pleads Don't Scrap PR Spending on Jan 20, 2017
PR is not dying, warns pleads PR firm. Take 40+ year old industry PR firm LRG, who recently lamented the 'misconceptions' that: Traditional PR...
Getting Started With Your IPVM Membership on Jan 20, 2017
Here's how to get started and get the most out of your IPVM membership. Books for Members All members can download the 3 member-only books below...
Jim Cramer Sucks Up To Knightscope on Jan 19, 2017
Credit must be given to Knightscope. They are raising money right now and despite their $80 million pre-money valuation against a lowly sub $1...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact