The Laziest RFP Ever

Author: Ben Wood, Published on Aug 13, 2013

Bad RFPs - out of date, vague or just plain confusing - are common. But this RFP is on a whole other level. It is as if no one even looked at it before the project was put out for bid. A small town doing this is perhaps understandable, but it is far more perplexing when a US federal agency that should have the resources to come up with something better does this. In this update we review an RFP for a 2013 project using specs so old you might have to visit an antique shop to find some of the equipment.

The highlights from this RFP

VCR Storage

If someone can find standard 1/2 inch VHS tapes, that would be one way to fulfill the storage requirements for this RFP which lists time-lapse VCRs as an option. It says VCR must allow for repeat recording, a built in time and date generator and a tape counter. It also must have a daylight saving time setting, an automatic head cleaner and 120-second rewind.

The other option, for storing digital video, is a DVR or NVR with at least an Intel Pentium III processor (originally released in 1999) and 256 MB RAM. It should record at 30fps and have built-in motion detection and masking accessible from the Internet, Intranet or PDA. Windows 98 is the specified operating system.

According to the RFP, "The type of recording device utilized should be determined by the size and type of CCTV System designed and installed, and to what extent the system is to be utilized." One of the bidders we spoke to says the only response to questions about the spec was that if an integrator was "not supplying specified material, submittals will need to be approved as an equal," essentially leaving it up to the integrator what the final equipment will look like.

****** ************

* ** **** *** ** ***, *** ** ** ****** using ******** **** *** ******* ** *** ******** ******** *.* ** ******. Both ******* ** ********** *** ** *.* **** ********** ******** in ****.

****** ***********

*** ** ***** **** *** ****** **** **** ****** *********** software *** ******* ** ********* "*** *********** ***********.” ******* ** response ** * ********* ******’* ******** ****** * *&* ******, it **** ********* ******** *** *** ********, *** **** **** wanted ********** ** *** * **** ******* ***** ******* ****. See ******* *&* ****.

*** ** ****** *** ** *******

*** ********* ************** *** *** ****** ******* (***** *** ***) and ** *********** ** ****-* ** *****. *** *** ********* both, ******** **** ****** *** ******* **** *** ** ********** systems.

** *** ***** *******, *** ***** *** *** **** ********.

  • "******** ******* **** ** ******* ***** ******* ** ****** **** the ******* ******* *********."
  • ** ******* **** ******* * ******* ********** ** ** ****** camera
  • "******** ******’* **** *** *********: ****** ***********, **** **********, ***, color/black *** *****, *****’* **** *** ******* ** ******* **** from *** ******** [***]."

**** *********

"*** ***'* *** ***'* **** *** ******** **** ** ******** or ******** **** ** ****** ******* ** *********," *** *** says. *** *** ********** **** **** ********** **** ****** ******** *** ***-*. **** ******* ***** * ********* ****** ****** *** *** fact **** *** ******** ****** *** *** **** *********.

"[*] ****** **** *** ***** ** ** **** **** **** compliant *** **** ***. ** ** ****** *** ** *******," the ****** *****. *** ** *********, "**** ********** ** *** required. ****** ****** *** ********** ** **** **********." *** ** might **** ** ****** ***** **** ****** **** ****** **** installed. ** ******'* ** *** ***** **** **** *** *********** **** ***** ************ *******.

**********

**** **** ******* *** **** (*** ** ****** ******** ** answer ********* ***** *** *******) *** ****** ******* *** **** existing ************ **************. *** ******* ****** **** ** *********** *** re-locating *** ******** *******, ********** ******* *** ******* *** ********** eight **** ******. *** ******* ****** ** ****** **** ********* the ******** ****** ** **** **** *** *** ********* ** compatible *** ******* * ****** ** *** *********** ******* ** what ** ***** **** ** ******* *** ************.

****** ********* ******** **** ********.

***** *****:


****** *****:

Terrible ***

**** *** ** **** **** **** **** **** ** *** for **** *******? **** ****** ** *********** *** ********* * spec **** **** ** **** ** ** ***. ** ** clear **** ** *** **** * ****** **** ** **** after **** ****** ** *** ** ******** ***** ****** ** was ****** **** ** *** ** ***** *** *** *** bids ****** *** *********** ***** **** ** *** ******. ************, the ************ **** *** *** ********* **** ********* *******. *** none ** **** ***** “*** *** ***?” ** *** ****** other ********* **** ** ***** ***** **** ** **** ***** of ****. ******, **** ******** *** *** ***** *** ***** seeing **** * ********* ******** ****.

*************, *** **** ** ** *** ** ******* ** *** winning ****** **** * *** ** ** **** *** **, it ** ***** ** ** **** *** **** ** ****** given *** *** *** *** *** *******.

Comments (11)

***** *** *** **** *** ******* ** ** ***?

** ********, **** ** *** ***** **** *** ** *** been ******* ** ****** *** ** **** **********....

* ** ****** ******** ** *** ** *** ***** ************ and ****-**** ********. *********, *** ** ******** **** ***********, *** the **** ** *** ***** ** ***** **** ******* *** specification ****'* ********** ** ***** *** ****** **. **'* **** requiring **** **** ************ **** ** **** ******* ********.

** ***** ** **** ******** *** ********* ** * ******** or ******* ****** ******* *** *** **** *** ****-**** **** because, ** ***** *********, **** **** ****** ** ****** ** out.

"**'* **** ********* **** **** ************ **** ** **** ******* Mandates."

****** *************, ****** *******, ** **. **. ******* ************

** ***-***** *** ****** ** *******...

***, * ***** ***'** ***** *****. * **** ** **** in *** **** ********** ********** *** *** **** *** * can *** **** ********** *** **** * ****** **** **** their *****... *** ** * ****** ****, *'* * *** embarrassed *** *** **.

***** *** ** *** ** **** ******** *** * *** courthouse * ****** ***** **** **** **** ***** ** ******* going **** ** * **** ***** ********. **** ***** *****, RFP *** ****** *** ********* ** * ***** ****.

*** **** **** * ************ ******* ** ******* *** ** date **************. **** **** **** **** **** ******** **** ******* specifications ******* ** ** *********** ****, **** ** *** ************** people **** ****** ** ** *** **** ******* *** ******** the ******* ***** **** **** *** **** ******** ****** *** put **** *** *** *** ******* **** ****** ** *** know ****** ** ** *** **** *** ********* ** ** otherwise. *** *********** ***** ** **** **** ****** *** ****** to ******** **** ***** ********** *** *** **** **** **** out ** *** **** *** ********* **** "*** ****** **** known ******, ***'** *** ******" *** ******* **** ** **** having ** ******* * *** **** ********* ****** ******* *** price ********.

*** *** ******* *** *** *** **** **** ******** ****** for **** **** *** ****** ***........

*** * **** **** *** *** *** **** ******* ** cash *** * **** ****** *** **** *****. * *** of **** **** **** **** *** ***** *** ** ** far *** *** **** *** **** * **** **** *** worked **.

**** *** ***** ***** *** ** **** **** ** ** although ******** *** ** ******* ** **** *******. *** ****** for **** ***** ******* ** **** ********...***** ***** ***** ** be * ******** ** ****** **** ****** ****** *** ****, defiy *****, ** ****** ***** * *.* ** *** *****-****-*-*****!

*'** **** **** *****. ** ******** *** **** *** *** university **** **** *** **** ********* ********* **** ****'* **** together, **** ** ** ******* ******* ********* **** '**** *********** on ****** ** ******' *** ********* *** ***** ********* (***** incidentally *****'* *********** ** ***** *********, *** ******** ** *** students (** *** *** * **********) ** *******. ** *** clearly **** * ****/***** ** *** ********** **** *** **** prison **** **** ***. **** **********, ************ **** ********* ***** than * ******; *** *********? :)

"******** ** *** ******** (** *** *** * **********) ** inmates"

***. ***** ** *** * ****** ***** ******!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

US Government Entities Hard Spec Hikvision on May 26, 2016
The US and Chinese governments are working together. Now, US government entities are not only buying video surveillance products from the Chinese...
Poorly Written College Town Camera RFP Examined on May 25, 2016
State College, PA issued an RFP for a neighborhood surveillance system that leaves out many key details required to invite qualified bids. We...
Face Recognition Camera Tested (Netatmo) on Jan 29, 2016
Can face recognition make home security "better"? That is the bold claim from startup Netatmo with their Welcome camera. But with face...
Large Video Surveillance Systems Guide on Oct 29, 2015
This 14 page guide explains the key uses, design factors, and players in the large system surveillance market. A global group of 80...
Simplicam Facial Recognition Tested on Jan 23, 2015
Facial recognition, available for $150? That's the offer from a startup, Simplicam, who has not only cloned Dropcam setup and user interface but...
This Spec Wizard Makes a Mockery Out of RFPs on Dec 05, 2014
Terrible RFPs are commonplace. If only there was a way to make it easy to generate terrible RFPs. Well, Honeywell, Vicon and Aiphone are working...
Japanese Stores Facial Recognition Sharing on Apr 21, 2014
A controversy is brewing in Japan after a newspaper was tipped off about a practice stores use to combat shoplifting. A network of stores uses...
Ridiculous $100K Project / Now Stalled on Oct 31, 2013
Update 10/31: When we first published this in July, we broke down how flawed the RFP was. Now, the city is delaying the project as it works through...
Bad RFP Leads to Homebrew System on Oct 29, 2013
Bad RFPs continue to plague the industry. In the case of one city, a poorly written RFP led to a contract that likely fails to address one of the...
Debunking Start-Up's FST21 Case Study on Oct 07, 2013
This company won ISC West Best in Show 2 years ago, recently received $5 million in funding and is being talked about as the next big thing in...

Most Recent Industry Reports

The Russian SMP Security Robot on Dec 08, 2016
A Russian manufacturer, SMP, has a commercially available outdoor security robot, at a lower price and with much less marketing than their main...
How Hikvision Beats Its OEMs on Dec 08, 2016
Hikvision GM declared that they are not aggressive with their competitors. But some of their own OEM partners disagree. Inside, we reveal a key...
Dahua Discontinuing H.264 Only Products on Dec 08, 2016
Dahua has taken a stand for H.265 and is discontinuing its H.264 only products. We examine the shakeup inside this...
Last Day Save $50 IP Networking Course January 2017 on Dec 08, 2016
Today is the last day to save $50 on next month's IP networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...
Hikvision vs Dahua Mobile Apps Tested on Dec 07, 2016
With smartphone use and low-cost video recorders surging, many user's main interface to their surveillance system is their phone. With mobile video...
Paxton Drops US Reps, Plans Major Expansion on Dec 07, 2016
Paxton is gearing up to make a big run at  US access control success. The first step they have made is to cut all US Rep Firms, in anticipation of...
Axis Partner Elder Care Video Analytics (Smartervision) on Dec 07, 2016
Can video analytics be used to improve the care of the elderly? Axis and a video analytics startup, Smartervision, are working together to do so....
Sony IP Camera Backdoor Uncovered on Dec 06, 2016
A backdoor has been uncovered in ~80 Sony IP camera models, attackers can remotely enable telnet on the camera, and then potentially login as root,...
Power Drill Selection Guide on Dec 06, 2016
Boring holes is a basic part of running cables for most security system projects. To do so, you will need to choose the right drills for various...
Milestone Favorability Results on Dec 06, 2016
In our second installment of manufacturer favorability results (first was Pelco), we turn to Milestone. 100+ integrators rated and explained what...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact