Reusing Existing Coax Cabling (EoC) Tutorial

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 09, 2012

The coaxial cables which transmit most analog CCTV video can be reused when migrating to IP cameras. The technology to do so, most often referred to as Ethernet over Coax (or EoC), is mature and available from a variety of vendors. The challenge is: when should you use EoC and when should you simply pull new UTP cable? In this note, we examine the advantages and disadvantages of re-using coaxial cable.

Advantages

There are a number of advantages to reusing existing cables. The most commonly cited is money saved versus pulling new cable. However, a number of other benefits exist for niche scenarios:

  • No Cabling Costs: Since cable is already in place, there is no additional expense involved to pull new cable, install new conduits, cable supports or cable trays. There is no need to remove the existing cabling, as many end-users and code officials frown upon abandoning existing unused cables in place.  
  • Faster Installation Time and Deployment: An analog camera can be replaced with IP camera and online in less time than it would take to pull a new Cat 5e/6 cable.  
  • Minimal Impact to End User Operations: No business interruptions due to installers, ladders, open ceilings, or cabling spool boxes. There is no potential for damage to the customer’s facility and minimal jobsite clean-up. 
  • Extended Cable Distance: Ethernet using UTP cable is generally limited to a 100 meter distance, without the use of extenders, for IP data transmission.  With converters, existing coaxial cabling can transmit IP video over more than a thousand feet of cable.
  • Camera Power: Coaxial cabling, when used with converters, can also transmit PoE power to IP cameras without the need for a separate power supply at the camera location.

Disadvantages

However, there are key disadvantages to reusing existing cable, as well. The most important is that converters are needed at each end and they can be expensive.

  • Cable Converter Costs: Ethernet over coax converters cost, on average, $400-500 per camera/connection. Note that less expensive off-brand and consumer products are avaiable, which are generally not recommended for professional installation, as they generally lack the same data rates and features of professional models. UPDATE: The Altronix eBridge, a recent entrant to the EoC space, is available for much less than other options, selling online for about $200.
  • Data Transmission Speed: Coaxial cable can generally only reach 10/100 Fast Ethernet speed as opposed to gigabit speeds which can be achieved with UTP cabling.  However, 100 Mbps is usually more than enough bandwidth for a single SD or MP resolution IP camera.
  • Cable Testing & Re-Terminating:  It is generally a good idea to test the existing cabling prior to re-using it to make sure that it is functioning properly, terminated correctly, and not excessively spliced.  Existing cabling may need to be re-terminated for maximum transmission quality.
  • Warranty: Generally, most security integrators will not warranty existing cabling, whereas certified installers of copper Ethernet systems may offer warranties of ten to twenty years or longer, supported by the manufacturer.

Using Ethernet over Coax Converters

The installation of coax converters is pretty straightforward: at the camera end a small form factor media converter is installed in the camera housing, if space permits, or in an adjacent junction box.  At the network switch location, another small form factor or rack mounted converter unit with a power supply is installed.  The existing coaxial cable connects to one side of the converter and a UTP patch cable connects the other end to the camera or network switch.  Many current genereation EoC converters transmit PoE power, in addition to data, via coax, eliminating the need for a power supply at the camera end. However, not all manufacturers provide this, so users should confirm this capability.

EoC Product Options

Coaxial converters are readily available in the marketplace. Comnet’s Copperline [link no longer available] and Veracity’s Highwire PowerStar [link no longer available] coax converters are commonly cited. Last year, NVT entered this market and this month, well-known power supply and video connectivity manufacturer Altronix has released their eBridge coax converters. All of these product lines have pros and cons, with some offering PoE over coax, multi-port units, and other capabilities.

EoC Cost

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Historically, the major drawback to using coax media converters has been their cost. With most manufacturers averaging $400+ per camera, this pricing was more normally more than the cost of running a new UTP cable, $150-250 on average. However, the Altronix eBridge has been released at a price point which makes it competitive with UTP cables. 

Taking a sixteen-camera system as an example, we get the following numbers:

  • 16 x Altronix eBridge: $3,200 
  • 16 x Other options: $6,400
  • 16 x UTP drop: $2,400-4,000

If available, options which reduce hardware required at the head-end (NVT has a 4:1 transmitter/receiver ratio and Nitek offers 8- and 16-port options) will reduce these prices modestly. At shorter distances, running UTP cables is still likely less costly than the eBridge. However, reductions to disruption of business may make this difference palatable. Other EoC options, are more expensive than UTP in all but very specific cases, which we discuss below.

When to Use EoC

 

So, if EoC converters are more expensive in typical cases, when should they be used? Fundamentally, the decision to use EoC comes down to determining which applications will cost more to pull new cable than to deploy EoC converters. Historically, this has been limited to very specific cases, where building construction made cables too costly to install, or distances were beyond those UTP could serve.

However, with lower-cost products such as the eBridge available, EoC becomes a reasonable option for many more installations, as the $200 price tag is equal to or only modestly more than what a UTP drop would cost. Even very small systems may appreciate EoC in these cases, despite slightly higher price tags, simply because it reduces the amount of hours the integrator will be on-site, as well as the disruption to business. Since work only needs to be performed at the camera location and the head-end, dirt, debris, and interruptions are limited to these areas. 

EoC options which provide power via the coaxial cable may also be considered for cameras which are beyond the 100m maximum distance allowed when using UTP. Typically, fiber-optic cables are used in these applications, further increasing costs over UTP. Parking lots, outbuildings, or warehouses may all be good candidates for EoC adapters, as less costly coax cable may be used, and power may be supplied up the coax with many adapters, eliminating the need for power at the far end which a fiber media converter would require.

2 reports cite this report:

Comprehensive Surveillance Cabling Guide on Dec 17, 2014
Surveillance cabling seems mundane, yet is a critical topic. A system with the best equipment can still be a failure if the network connecting it...
New Ethernet over Coax - Altronix eBridge Plus on Oct 08, 2014
Altronix's original eBridge line pushed down prices of Ethernet over coax offering, useful for deploying IP cameras over existing coax / analog...
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Remote Access (DDNS vs P2P vs VPN) Usage Statistics 2019 on Oct 25, 2019
Remote access can make systems more usable but also more vulnerable. How are integrators delivring remote access in 2019? How many are using...
Directory of 30+ VSaaS / Cloud Video Surveillance Providers on Jun 07, 2019
This directory provides a list of VSaaS / cloud video surveillance providers to help you see and research what options are available. 2019...
Hikvision HDTVI Power Over Coax Tested on Feb 05, 2019
After years of delay, Hikvision's Power Over Coax (PoC) HDTVI models are finally shipping, aiming to make HD analog installs as simple as PoE, with...
Network Cable Shootout - Belden, Commscope, Hikvision, Honeywell, NavePoint CCA, Windy City Wire on Dec 17, 2018
Every IP camera install needs UTP cabling. But how much of a difference is there between dirt cheap generic cables found online and the bigger,...
IP Camera Cabling Installation Guide on Aug 29, 2018
This guide teaches how to install network cabling for IP cameras, including: Estimating cable run length (with video tutorial) Accounting for...
Dedicated Vs Converged Access Control Networks (Statistics) on Apr 20, 2018
Running one's access control system on a converged network, with one's computers and phones, can save money. On the other hand, hand, doing so can...
Smart Codec Guide on Feb 01, 2018
"Smart Codec" was once seemingly a marketing buzzword, but in 2020, nearly all new camera models include this tehcnology. These marketing names...
STP vs UTP for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Dec 20, 2017
For many video system designers, deciding which ethernet cabling to use is a quick decision: go with the cheapest. However, this overlooks the...
D-Link ONVIF Switch Tested on Dec 04, 2017
D-Link's surveillance switches claim to "enhance ease of use and streamline management" for network administrators, with simplified UIs and...
Hikvision Releases Network Cabling on Aug 04, 2017
Hikvision's expansion continues. From cameras to analytics to thermal to intrusion to access to... network cabling. Hikvision explained: A...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Online Show - July 2020 - With 40+ Manufacturers - Register Now on Jul 01, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our July 2020 Access Control Show. With 40+ companies presenting across 4 days, this is a unique opportunity to hear...
Hanwha Face Mask Detection Tested on Jul 01, 2020
Face mask detection or, more specifically lack-of-face-mask detection, is an expanding offering in the midst of coronavirus. Hanwha in partnership...
UK Government Says Fever Cameras "Unsuitable" on Jul 01, 2020
The UK government's medical device regulator, MHRA, told IPVM that fever-seeking thermal cameras are "unsuitable for this purpose" and recommends...
Camera Course Summer 2020 on Jun 30, 2020
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training...
Worst Over But Integrators Still Dealing With Coronavirus Problems (June Statistics) on Jun 30, 2020
While numbers of integrators very impacted by Coronavirus continue to drop, most are still moderately dealing with the pandemic's problems, June...
FLIR Screen-EST Screening Software Tested on Jun 30, 2020
In our FLIR A Series Test, the cameras' biggest drawback was their lack of face detection, requiring manual adjustment when screening each...
Dahua Buenos Aires Bus Screening Violates IEC Standards and Dahua's Own Instructions on Jun 30, 2020
Dahua has promoted Buenos Aires bus deployments as "solutions that facilitate community safety". However, they violate IEC standards and,...
UK Firm Markets False Fever Screening, Hikvision Disavows on Jun 30, 2020
A UK security firm falsely claimed its Hikvision-based thermal solution could be used for "accurately detecting fever in any person", even claiming...
Industry Study: 83% of US Temperature Screening Sellers Falsely Say Not Medical Devices on Jun 29, 2020
83% of US companies selling temperature screening devices, aka 'fever' detectors, claim they are not medical devices, contrary to FDA definition,...
Manufacturers on Virtual 'ISC West' 2020 and Potential ISC West 2021 on Jun 29, 2020
With the 2020 ISC West show now officially canceled, attention turns to Reed's new "ISC West 2020 Virtual Event" planned for October and for the...