Legal Considerations to Preserving Video Surveillance Evidence

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Feb 11, 2014

Missing surveillance video, even if you did not 'mean' to do it, can lead to sanctions and penalties in court.

We spoke with attorney Mark Berman [link no longer available] who specializes in electronic discovery issues, such as video surveillance, about when end users have the duty to preserve footage from being lost, destroyed or degraded, and how to use it.

Determining If Content Should Be Preserved

If someone receives a notice of a litigation or they reasonably should have known the information could be potentially relevant, then that is where the preservation obligation kicks in. The most common cases where these issues come up with video surveillance are personal injury.

Penalties For Lost Footage

The loss of video surveillance footage can be due to negligence and go all the way to being the result of malicious intent and sanctions increase depending on the level of intent found by the court. Those could include monetary sanctions, attorney’s fees, a court determined finding of fact, evidence preclusion or in more egregious cases, awarding a win to the other party.

When electronically stored information is lost, and there is a finding of intent that goes beyond negligence, some courts will instruct the jury about taking an adverse inference from its absence – “sometimes the juror is directed to make that inference and sometimes the jury is simply permitted to do so.”

For example, in Kramer v. Macerich Property Manage­ment, a court decided the appropriate sanction was an adverse inference to be given at trial after the management company disposed of video after viewing it, even though the plaintiff never sent a letter asking for them to preserve it. 

How to Preserve It


Images and digital information can get overwritten quickly "so preservation should be done as soon as possible to make sure it doesn’t disappear or degrade,” he said. Different organizations have different retention times, and when it’s not clear how long that footage is being retained, it’s important to preserve and review it as soon as it becomes footage of interest.

Have Someone Who Knows What They’re Doing Make the Copy

Berman recommends organizations with video surveillance footage that needs preservation to hire an outside professional to do it, even if they know their own system well. This can be a person or integrator with experience using that specific system and will know how to export it correctly.

“If possible, don’t have your own in-house IT person do it. If it is important enough that you think it needs to be preserved, have a professional do it,” he said. "You have them fill out an affidavit saying they went to the site, took possession of the original, made a copy, the original was properly maintained without any change, and copies have been made, for example.” This process also helps establish chain of custody later.

If something goes south, the organization has a better defense when they can prove they took steps to have someone knowledgeable about the system do the export.

There are many cases where an internal person electronically stored information and the copies “just don’t take -- for good reasons and for bad reasons -- and then no one realized it and no one looks at it for two years,” he said. "By that time, the original is already overwritten, and you now have to contend with a motion claiming that you spoliated (or lost) critical evidence."

The Issue of Who Maintains Footage

Video surveillance footage is sometimes stored on-site, on corporate servers, in the cloud or by security companies. It needs to be clear who has possession, custody or control of digital evidence, and it’s important to have company set policies and procedures on what happens after an incident, Berman says.

“Sometimes it is the security department or sometimes it is management that learns of an incident first, but one side does not always knows what the other side is doing, and the footage gets lost, overwritten or deleted, where departments are not speaking with each other. Management may know about a lawsuit and the security department or company doesn’t," he said.

In the case of Jennings v. Orange Regional Medical Center, the plaintiff sent a letter asking the center to hold on to the video, but the video was never forwarded to the risk management department. The video was overwritten. The court "granted plaintiff’s spolia­tion motion to the extent of precluding defen­dant from introducing evidence at trial."

When companies get sold, it’s important that they keep certain digital material concerning events that may or have been sued about. Once the computers or servers where the electronically stored information is sold, the company loses control of the evidence, and that is a potential problem as well.

Just Because Footage Isn’t Missing Doesn’t Mean Sanctions

"If the video surveillance footage is one of multiple avenues of evidence to establish a legal position, then the likelihood of sanctions being awarded is decreased and the severity of a potential sanction decreases,” Berman said.

In the case Giuliano v. 666 Old Country Road, the plaintiff was able to prove video was intentionally destroyed, but still had enough evidence to prove her case so the only sanction was "an adverse inference charge be given at trial against [the] defendant with respect to the unavail­able recording," Berman wrote in a summary of the case [link no longer available].

In contrast, if the surveillance footage was the key item that could prove the case, penalties increase. Exploring this further, I asked Berman what would happen if video footage was the only evidence of a slip and fall and the store “lost” the footage. He reminded me that court is going to say the person who was injured is evidence and that he can testify to what occurred.

"The video is the only evidence when the person is dead, and there are no other witnesses,” he said. 

Having Footage Allows You To Use It To Your Favor

Organizations should be aware of the benefits of video surveillance footage. The original must be preserved, but when presented in court, it can help prove your case.

“If you have digital evidence like video, you can color code it so you can more easily explain a situation, you can slow it down, enhance it, and show weather conditions. The beauty of having digital evidence is that you can use it to advance your case. It is just like when you have an audio tape, and you give it to an expert to get rid of the background noise,” he said.

Comments (5) : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

US City Sued For Hiding Surveillance Camera Map on Mar 08, 2019
UPDATE: The judgment is now in and updated information is at the bottom of the post. Should maps of public surveillance camera locations be kept...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
Verkada Wins $783,000 Memphis Deal on Apr 29, 2019
The US city, most famous in video surveillance for standardizing on Hikvision, has issued an RFQ for 962 Verkada cameras due Wednesday, May 1,...
San Francisco Face Recognition Ban And Surveillance Regulation Details Examined on May 14, 2019
San Francisco passed the legislation 8-1 today. While the face recognition 'ban' has already received significant attention over the past few...
First Video Surveillance GDPR Fine In France on Jul 08, 2019
The French government has imposed a sizeable fine on a small business for violating the GDPR after it constantly filmed employees without informing...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
First GDPR Facial Recognition Fine For Sweden School on Aug 22, 2019
A school in Sweden has been fined $20,000 for using facial recognition to keep attendance in what is Sweden's first GDPR fine. Notably, the fine is...
France Declares School Facial Recognition Illegal Due to GDPR on Oct 31, 2019
France is the latest European country to effectively prohibit facial recognition as a school access control solution, even with the consent of...
Arcules CEO Retracts False GDPR Claim + Dahua and Milestone Claims Examined on Dec 03, 2019
Arcules CEO has retracted a false claim about his organization being a "fully compliant GDPR company" after IPVM reporting (Arcules CEO Threatens...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Motorola / Avigilon Drops ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
Motorola Solutions has pulled out of ISC West 2020 effective immediately, because of coronavirus concerns, IPVM has learned. This is done amidst...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be canceled. New IPVM survey results of 400+ respondents show heated...
Coronavirus Hits Sony, Bosch Says Switch on Feb 26, 2020
Sony's fall in video surveillance has been severe over the past decade. Now, they may be done. In this note, we examine Bosch's new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...
Vulnerability Directory For Access Credentials on Feb 20, 2020
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be difficult to see, especially because most look and feel the same. Even insecure 125 kHz...