Legal Considerations to Preserving Video Surveillance Evidence

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Feb 11, 2014

Missing surveillance video, even if you did not 'mean' to do it, can lead to sanctions and penalties in court.

We spoke with attorney Mark Berman who specializes in electronic discovery issues, such as video surveillance, about when end users have the duty to preserve footage from being lost, destroyed or degraded, and how to use it.

Determining If Content Should Be Preserved

If someone receives a notice of a litigation or they reasonably should have known the information could be potentially relevant, then that is where the preservation obligation kicks in. The most common cases where these issues come up with video surveillance are personal injury.

******* ************ *****, **** if *** *** ***'****'** ** **, *** lead ** ********* *** penalties ** *****.

** ***** **** ******** **** ********* *********** ** ********** discovery ******, **** ** video ************, ***** **** end ***** **** *** duty ** ******** ******* from ***** ****, ********* or ********, *** *** to *** **.

Determining ** ******* ****** ** *********

** ******* ******** * notice ** * **************** ********** ****** **** known *** *********** ***** be *********** ********, **** that ** ***** *** preservation ********** ***** **. The **** ****** ***** where ***** ****** **** up **** ***** ************ are ******** ******.

[***************]

Penalties *** **** ********** **** ** ***** surveillance ******* *** ** due ** ********** *** go *** *** *** to ***** *** ****** of ********* ****** *** sanctions ******** ********* ** the ***** ** ****** found ** *** *****. Those ***** ******* ******** sanctions, ********’* ****, * court ********** ******* ** fact, ******** ********** ** in **** ********* *****, awarding * *** ** the ***** *****.

**** ************** ****** *********** is ****, *** ***** is * ******* ** intent **** **** ****** negligence, **** ****** **** instruct *** **** ***** taking ** ******* ********* from *** ******* – “sometimes *** ***** ** directed ** **** **** inference *** ********* *** jury ** ****** ********* to ** **.”

*** *******, ******** *. ******** ******** Manage­ment, * ***** ******* the *********** ******** ***** ******* ********* ** ** ***** ** trial ***** *** ********** company ******** ** ***** after ******* **, **** though *** ********* ***** sent * ****** ****** for **** ** ******** it. How ** ******** **

** ** ****

****** *** ******* *********** can *** *********** ******* "so ************ ****** ** done ** **** ** possible ** **** **** it *****’* ********* ** degrade,” ** ****. ********* organizations **** ********* ********* times, *** **** **’* not ***** *** **** that ******* ** ***** retained, **’* ********* ** preserve *** ****** ** as **** ** ** becomes ******* ** ********.

**** ******* *** ***** What ****’** ***** **** the ****


****** ********** ************* **** video ************ ******* **** needs ************ ** **** an ******* ************ ** do **, **** ** they **** ***** *** system ****. **** *** be * ****** ** integrator **** ********** ***** that ******** ****** *** will **** *** ** export ** *********.

“** ********, ***’* **** your *** **-***** ** person ** **. ** it ** ********* ****** that *** ***** ** needs ** ** *********, have * ************ ** it,” ** ****. "*** have **** **** *** an ********* ****** **** went ** *** ****, took ********** ** *** original, **** * ****, the ******** *** ******** maintained ******* *** ******, and ****** **** **** made, *** *******.” **** process **** ***** ********* chain ** ******* *****.

** ********* **** *****, the ************ *** * better ******* **** **** can ***** **** **** steps ** **** ******* knowledgeable ***** *** ****** do *** ******.

***** *** **** ***** where ** ******** ****** electronically ****** *********** *** the ****** “**** ***’* take -- *** **** reasons *** *** *** reasons -- *** **** no *** ******** ** and ** *** ***** at ** *** *** years,” ** ****. "** that ****, *** ******** is ******* ***********, *** you *** **** ** contend **** * ****** claiming **** *** ********* (or ****) ******** ********."
The ***** ** *** ********* ************ ************ ******* ** sometimes ****** **-****, ** corporate *******, ** *** cloud ** ** ******** companies. ** ***** ** be ***** *** *** possession, ******* ** ******* of ******* ********, *** it’s ********* ** **** company *** ******** *** procedures ** **** ******* after ** ********, ****** says.

“********* ** ** *** security ********** ** ********* it ** ********** **** learns ** ** ******** first, *** *** **** does *** ****** ***** what *** ***** **** is *****, *** *** footage **** ****, *********** or *******, ***** *********** are *** ******** **** each *****. ********** *** know ***** * ******* and *** ******** ********** or ******* *****’*," ** said.

** *** **** ********** *. ****** ******** Medical ******,*** ********* **** * letter ****** *** ****** to **** ** ** the *****, *** *** video *** ***** ********* to *** **** ********** department. *** ***** *** overwritten. *** ***** "******* plaintiff’s ******­**** ****** ** the ****** ** ********** defen­dant **** *********** ******** at *****."

**** ********* *** ****, it’s ********* **** **** keep ******* ******* ******** concerning ****** **** *** or **** **** **** about. **** *** ********* or ******* ***** *** electronically ****** *********** ** sold, *** ******* ***** control ** *** ********, and **** ** * potential ******* ** ****.

Just ******* ******* ***’* ******* *****’* **** *********"If the video surveillance footage is one of multiple avenues of evidence to establish a legal position, then the likelihood of sanctions being awarded is decreased and the severity of a potential sanction decreases,” Berman said.

** *** ************ *. *** *** Country ****, *** ********* *** able ** ***** ***** was ************* *********, *** still *** ****** ******** to ***** *** **** so *** **** ******** was "** ******* ********* charge ** ***** ** trial ******* [***] ********* with ******* ** *** unavail­able *********," ****** ******* * ******* ** the ****.

** ********, ** *** surveillance ******* *** *** key **** **** ***** prove *** ****, ********* increase. ********* **** *******, I ***** ****** **** would ****** ** ***** footage *** *** **** evidence ** * **** and **** *** *** store “****” *** *******. He ******** ** **** court ** ***** ** say *** ****** *** was ******* ** ******** and **** ** *** testify ** **** ********.

"*** ***** ** *** only ******** **** *** person ** ****, *** there *** ** ***** witnesses,” ** ****. Having ******* ****** *** ** *** ** ** **** *****

************* ****** ** ***** of *** ******** ** video ************ *******. *** original **** ** *********, but **** ********* ** court, ** *** **** prove **** ****.

“** *** **** ******* evidence **** *****, *** can ***** **** ** so *** *** **** easily ******* * *********, you *** **** ** down, ******* **, *** show ******* **********. *** beauty ** ****** ******* evidence ** **** *** can *** ** ** advance **** ****. ** is **** **** **** you **** ** ***** tape, *** *** **** it ** ** ****** to *** *** ** the ********** *****,” ** said.

Comments (5)

So, you're in trouble if video evidence exists and you allow it to be destroyed. What if you don't have a clear policy on the length of time you retain video for? Also, I presume nothing happens if you're notified that you should be saving that video after the video has been erased, correct?

No there could still be penalties applied by the court. Even if an organization receives notification after it has been erased, if the organization knew there was evidence there, they could be found negligent. It would be up to a judge to decide to what extent they were negligent though. The policy doesn't matter much if the organization knew it had video, but let it get erased.

Storing video footage can amount to a ton of disk space use. I assume that keeping six months worth of footage would be sufficient, but the questions is, where do you draw the line? I have seen instances where software during installation, when not setup properly, can and will overwrite video footage. I have also had to on several occasions re-install software to reset threshholds for video allocation storage. If threshholds are not setup properly with some video cameras on the initail install, video allocation will overflow to other drives causing huge space issues with the CPU C-Drive, which can cause crashes and video recording to stop.

Creating a storage policy and making sure all steps are followed during the software and allocation steps of the software install are very crucial to the success of the video surveliance. It is a shame to to have something happen and not have video footage when needed due to sloppy software setup and an insuffiecient back up plan.

Rob, my read from this interview is not that one needs to store video forever to protect themselves but that they need to be proactive in exporting video for known events that may lead to litigation. It would seem harder to argue that if an event was only 'discovered' 4 months later, that a user would be responsible for not having video available then.

If I understand this, Berman recomends having someone like an integrator pull the video. What I didn't read is...to what exposure the integrator is then exposed. I can easily see where an integrator is then dragged into a court case and becomes a potential defendant due to no ill intent simply by trying to service the customer. Do I have this all wrong?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Legal

UK Facewatch GDPR Compliance Questioned on Aug 27, 2019
Even as the GDPR strictly regulates biometrics, a UK company called Facewatch is selling anti-shoplifter facial recognition systems to hundreds of...
RaySharp Revealed - Major China OEM For Western Consumer Video Surveillance on Jul 02, 2019
RaySharp is mostly unknown, even among people in the video surveillance industry, though it is a major supplier of OEM surveillance equipment such...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Nortek and SDS Fight Over Failed Settlement on Jun 05, 2019
Distributor SDS said they reached a deal with Nortek but Nortek says no settlement was reached and the suit is still on. In this post, based on...
NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
Dahua and Hikvision Products Illegally Sold To US Government GSA on May 06, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision products are being widely and illegally sold to the US government GSA. The sellers are falsely claiming these China products to...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
Huawei Sues US Government Over NDAA Ban on Mar 07, 2019
Chinese telecom giant Huawei is suing the US government over the NDAA ban, arguing that key provisions in it are unconstitutional.  NDAA Section...
Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...

Most Recent Industry Reports

How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
ASIS GSX 2019 Show Report Final on Sep 12, 2019
IPVM went to Chicago for ASIS GSX 2019, with many exhibitors disappointed about traffic and the exhibitor schedule changing next year. Inside we...
Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...
Uniview OEM Directory on Sep 11, 2019
This directory lists 20+ companies that OEM products from Uniview, with a graphic and links to company websites below. It does not cover all...
Yi Home Camera 3 AI Analytics Tested on Sep 10, 2019
Yi Technology is claiming "new AI features" in its $50 Home Camera 3 "eliminates 'false positives' caused by flying insects, small pets, or light...
Hanwha Announces 32MP Camera + AI Line on Sep 10, 2019
In the first rise in maximum megapixel resolution in 5 years, Hanwha has announced a 32MP / 8K camera directly competing with Avigilon's H4 30MP /...
Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact