Legal Considerations to Preserving Video Surveillance Evidence

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Feb 11, 2014

Missing surveillance video, even if you did not 'mean' to do it, can lead to sanctions and penalties in court.

We spoke with attorney Mark Berman who specializes in electronic discovery issues, such as video surveillance, about when end users have the duty to preserve footage from being lost, destroyed or degraded, and how to use it.

Determining If Content Should Be Preserved

If someone receives a notice of a litigation or they reasonably should have known the information could be potentially relevant, then that is where the preservation obligation kicks in. The most common cases where these issues come up with video surveillance are personal injury.

******* ************ *****, **** if *** *** ***'****'** ** **, *** lead ** ********* *** penalties ** *****.

** ***** **** ******** **** ********* *********** ** ********** discovery ******, **** ** video ************, ***** **** end ***** **** *** duty ** ******** ******* from ***** ****, ********* or ********, *** *** to *** **.

Determining ** ******* ****** ** *********

** ******* ******** * notice ** * **************** ********** ****** **** known *** *********** ***** be *********** ********, **** that ** ***** *** preservation ********** ***** **. The **** ****** ***** where ***** ****** **** up **** ***** ************ are ******** ******.

[***************]

Penalties *** **** ********** **** ** ***** surveillance ******* *** ** due ** ********** *** go *** *** *** to ***** *** ****** of ********* ****** *** sanctions ******** ********* ** the ***** ** ****** found ** *** *****. Those ***** ******* ******** sanctions, ********’* ****, * court ********** ******* ** fact, ******** ********** ** in **** ********* *****, awarding * *** ** the ***** *****.

**** ************** ****** *********** is ****, *** ***** is * ******* ** intent **** **** ****** negligence, **** ****** **** instruct *** **** ***** taking ** ******* ********* from *** ******* – “sometimes *** ***** ** directed ** **** **** inference *** ********* *** jury ** ****** ********* to ** **.”

*** *******, ******** *. ******** ******** Manage­ment, * ***** ******* the *********** ******** ***** ******* ********* ** ** ***** ** trial ***** *** ********** company ******** ** ***** after ******* **, **** though *** ********* ***** sent * ****** ****** for **** ** ******** it. How ** ******** **

** ** ****

****** *** ******* *********** can *** *********** ******* "so ************ ****** ** done ** **** ** possible ** **** **** it *****’* ********* ** degrade,” ** ****. ********* organizations **** ********* ********* times, *** **** **’* not ***** *** **** that ******* ** ***** retained, **’* ********* ** preserve *** ****** ** as **** ** ** becomes ******* ** ********.

**** ******* *** ***** What ****’** ***** **** the ****


****** ********** ************* **** video ************ ******* **** needs ************ ** **** an ******* ************ ** do **, **** ** they **** ***** *** system ****. **** *** be * ****** ** integrator **** ********** ***** that ******** ****** *** will **** *** ** export ** *********.

“** ********, ***’* **** your *** **-***** ** person ** **. ** it ** ********* ****** that *** ***** ** needs ** ** *********, have * ************ ** it,” ** ****. "*** have **** **** *** an ********* ****** **** went ** *** ****, took ********** ** *** original, **** * ****, the ******** *** ******** maintained ******* *** ******, and ****** **** **** made, *** *******.” **** process **** ***** ********* chain ** ******* *****.

** ********* **** *****, the ************ *** * better ******* **** **** can ***** **** **** steps ** **** ******* knowledgeable ***** *** ****** do *** ******.

***** *** **** ***** where ** ******** ****** electronically ****** *********** *** the ****** “**** ***’* take -- *** **** reasons *** *** *** reasons -- *** **** no *** ******** ** and ** *** ***** at ** *** *** years,” ** ****. "** that ****, *** ******** is ******* ***********, *** you *** **** ** contend **** * ****** claiming **** *** ********* (or ****) ******** ********."
The ***** ** *** ********* ************ ************ ******* ** sometimes ****** **-****, ** corporate *******, ** *** cloud ** ** ******** companies. ** ***** ** be ***** *** *** possession, ******* ** ******* of ******* ********, *** it’s ********* ** **** company *** ******** *** procedures ** **** ******* after ** ********, ****** says.

“********* ** ** *** security ********** ** ********* it ** ********** **** learns ** ** ******** first, *** *** **** does *** ****** ***** what *** ***** **** is *****, *** *** footage **** ****, *********** or *******, ***** *********** are *** ******** **** each *****. ********** *** know ***** * ******* and *** ******** ********** or ******* *****’*," ** said.

** *** **** ********** *. ****** ******** Medical ******,*** ********* **** * letter ****** *** ****** to **** ** ** the *****, *** *** video *** ***** ********* to *** **** ********** department. *** ***** *** overwritten. *** ***** "******* plaintiff’s ******­**** ****** ** the ****** ** ********** defen­dant **** *********** ******** at *****."

**** ********* *** ****, it’s ********* **** **** keep ******* ******* ******** concerning ****** **** *** or **** **** **** about. **** *** ********* or ******* ***** *** electronically ****** *********** ** sold, *** ******* ***** control ** *** ********, and **** ** * potential ******* ** ****.

Just ******* ******* ***’* ******* *****’* **** *********"If the video surveillance footage is one of multiple avenues of evidence to establish a legal position, then the likelihood of sanctions being awarded is decreased and the severity of a potential sanction decreases,” Berman said.

** *** ************ *. *** *** Country ****, *** ********* *** able ** ***** ***** was ************* *********, *** still *** ****** ******** to ***** *** **** so *** **** ******** was "** ******* ********* charge ** ***** ** trial ******* [***] ********* with ******* ** *** unavail­able *********," ****** ******* * ******* ** the ****.

** ********, ** *** surveillance ******* *** *** key **** **** ***** prove *** ****, ********* increase. ********* **** *******, I ***** ****** **** would ****** ** ***** footage *** *** **** evidence ** * **** and **** *** *** store “****” *** *******. He ******** ** **** court ** ***** ** say *** ****** *** was ******* ** ******** and **** ** *** testify ** **** ********.

"*** ***** ** *** only ******** **** *** person ** ****, *** there *** ** ***** witnesses,” ** ****. Having ******* ****** *** ** *** ** ** **** *****

************* ****** ** ***** of *** ******** ** video ************ *******. *** original **** ** *********, but **** ********* ** court, ** *** **** prove **** ****.

“** *** **** ******* evidence **** *****, *** can ***** **** ** so *** *** **** easily ******* * *********, you *** **** ** down, ******* **, *** show ******* **********. *** beauty ** ****** ******* evidence ** **** *** can *** ** ** advance **** ****. ** is **** **** **** you **** ** ***** tape, *** *** **** it ** ** ****** to *** *** ** the ********** *****,” ** said.

Comments (5)

So, you're in trouble if video evidence exists and you allow it to be destroyed. What if you don't have a clear policy on the length of time you retain video for? Also, I presume nothing happens if you're notified that you should be saving that video after the video has been erased, correct?

No there could still be penalties applied by the court. Even if an organization receives notification after it has been erased, if the organization knew there was evidence there, they could be found negligent. It would be up to a judge to decide to what extent they were negligent though. The policy doesn't matter much if the organization knew it had video, but let it get erased.

Storing video footage can amount to a ton of disk space use. I assume that keeping six months worth of footage would be sufficient, but the questions is, where do you draw the line? I have seen instances where software during installation, when not setup properly, can and will overwrite video footage. I have also had to on several occasions re-install software to reset threshholds for video allocation storage. If threshholds are not setup properly with some video cameras on the initail install, video allocation will overflow to other drives causing huge space issues with the CPU C-Drive, which can cause crashes and video recording to stop.

Creating a storage policy and making sure all steps are followed during the software and allocation steps of the software install are very crucial to the success of the video surveliance. It is a shame to to have something happen and not have video footage when needed due to sloppy software setup and an insuffiecient back up plan.

Rob, my read from this interview is not that one needs to store video forever to protect themselves but that they need to be proactive in exporting video for known events that may lead to litigation. It would seem harder to argue that if an event was only 'discovered' 4 months later, that a user would be responsible for not having video available then.

If I understand this, Berman recomends having someone like an integrator pull the video. What I didn't read is...to what exposure the integrator is then exposed. I can easily see where an integrator is then dragged into a court case and becomes a potential defendant due to no ill intent simply by trying to service the customer. Do I have this all wrong?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Legal

RaySharp Revealed - Major China OEM For Western Consumer Video Surveillance on Jul 02, 2019
RaySharp is mostly unknown, even among people in the video surveillance industry, though it is a major supplier of OEM surveillance equipment such...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Nortek and SDS Fight Over Failed Settlement on Jun 05, 2019
Distributor SDS said they reached a deal with Nortek but Nortek says no settlement was reached and the suit is still on. In this post, based on...
NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
Dahua and Hikvision Products Illegally Sold To US Government GSA on May 06, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision products are being widely and illegally sold to the US government GSA. The sellers are falsely claiming these China products to...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
Huawei Sues US Government Over NDAA Ban on Mar 07, 2019
Chinese telecom giant Huawei is suing the US government over the NDAA ban, arguing that key provisions in it are unconstitutional.  NDAA Section...
Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...
ASCMA / Moni Problems Deepen, Lenders Terminate Support Agreement on Dec 28, 2018
Ascent Capital Group, aka ASCMA, currently branded Brinks Home Security, formerly known as Moni and Monitronics faces a troubling end to a rocky...

Most Recent Industry Reports

HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Beware African 50,000 IP Camera Contract Scam on Jul 12, 2019
A “Nigerian Prince” scam for the video surveillance market is going around. You, or at least we, could be lucky enough to be the single bidder for...
Axis ARTPEC-7 P1375-E Camera Tested on Jul 12, 2019
Axis claims the new P1375-E box camera with ARTPEC-7 chip delivers "clear, sharp images in any lighting condition." But how well does it do? We...
Last Chance - Camera Course Summer 2019 on Jul 11, 2019
Last day to register is Thursday, July 11, 2019. This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact