Legal Considerations to Preserving Video Surveillance Evidence

By: Carlton Purvis, Published on Feb 11, 2014

Missing surveillance video, even if you did not 'mean' to do it, can lead to sanctions and penalties in court.

We spoke with attorney Mark Berman who specializes in electronic discovery issues, such as video surveillance, about when end users have the duty to preserve footage from being lost, destroyed or degraded, and how to use it.

Determining If Content Should Be Preserved

If someone receives a notice of a litigation or they reasonably should have known the information could be potentially relevant, then that is where the preservation obligation kicks in. The most common cases where these issues come up with video surveillance are personal injury.

******* ************ *****, **** if *** *** ***'****'** ** **, *** lead ** ********* *** penalties ** *****.

** ***** **** ******** **** ********* *********** ** ********** discovery ******, **** ** video ************, ***** **** end ***** **** *** duty ** ******** ******* from ***** ****, ********* or ********, *** *** to *** **.

Determining ** ******* ****** ** *********

** ******* ******** * notice ** * **************** ********** ****** **** known *** *********** ***** be *********** ********, **** that ** ***** *** preservation ********** ***** **. The **** ****** ***** where ***** ****** **** up **** ***** ************ are ******** ******.

[***************]

Penalties *** **** ********** **** ** ***** surveillance ******* *** ** due ** ********** *** go *** *** *** to ***** *** ****** of ********* ****** *** sanctions ******** ********* ** the ***** ** ****** found ** *** *****. Those ***** ******* ******** sanctions, ********’* ****, * court ********** ******* ** fact, ******** ********** ** in **** ********* *****, awarding * *** ** the ***** *****.

**** ************** ****** *********** is ****, *** ***** is * ******* ** intent **** **** ****** negligence, **** ****** **** instruct *** **** ***** taking ** ******* ********* from *** ******* – “sometimes *** ***** ** directed ** **** **** inference *** ********* *** jury ** ****** ********* to ** **.”

*** *******, ******** *. ******** ******** Manage­ment, * ***** ******* the *********** ******** ***** ******* ********* ** ** ***** ** trial ***** *** ********** company ******** ** ***** after ******* **, **** though *** ********* ***** sent * ****** ****** for **** ** ******** it. How ** ******** **

** ** ****

****** *** ******* *********** can *** *********** ******* "so ************ ****** ** done ** **** ** possible ** **** **** it *****’* ********* ** degrade,” ** ****. ********* organizations **** ********* ********* times, *** **** **’* not ***** *** **** that ******* ** ***** retained, **’* ********* ** preserve *** ****** ** as **** ** ** becomes ******* ** ********.

**** ******* *** ***** What ****’** ***** **** the ****


****** ********** ************* **** video ************ ******* **** needs ************ ** **** an ******* ************ ** do **, **** ** they **** ***** *** system ****. **** *** be * ****** ** integrator **** ********** ***** that ******** ****** *** will **** *** ** export ** *********.

“** ********, ***’* **** your *** **-***** ** person ** **. ** it ** ********* ****** that *** ***** ** needs ** ** *********, have * ************ ** it,” ** ****. "*** have **** **** *** an ********* ****** **** went ** *** ****, took ********** ** *** original, **** * ****, the ******** *** ******** maintained ******* *** ******, and ****** **** **** made, *** *******.” **** process **** ***** ********* chain ** ******* *****.

** ********* **** *****, the ************ *** * better ******* **** **** can ***** **** **** steps ** **** ******* knowledgeable ***** *** ****** do *** ******.

***** *** **** ***** where ** ******** ****** electronically ****** *********** *** the ****** “**** ***’* take -- *** **** reasons *** *** *** reasons -- *** **** no *** ******** ** and ** *** ***** at ** *** *** years,” ** ****. "** that ****, *** ******** is ******* ***********, *** you *** **** ** contend **** * ****** claiming **** *** ********* (or ****) ******** ********."
The ***** ** *** ********* ************ ************ ******* ** sometimes ****** **-****, ** corporate *******, ** *** cloud ** ** ******** companies. ** ***** ** be ***** *** *** possession, ******* ** ******* of ******* ********, *** it’s ********* ** **** company *** ******** *** procedures ** **** ******* after ** ********, ****** says.

“********* ** ** *** security ********** ** ********* it ** ********** **** learns ** ** ******** first, *** *** **** does *** ****** ***** what *** ***** **** is *****, *** *** footage **** ****, *********** or *******, ***** *********** are *** ******** **** each *****. ********** *** know ***** * ******* and *** ******** ********** or ******* *****’*," ** said.

** *** **** ********** *. ****** ******** Medical ******,*** ********* **** * letter ****** *** ****** to **** ** ** the *****, *** *** video *** ***** ********* to *** **** ********** department. *** ***** *** overwritten. *** ***** "******* plaintiff’s ******­**** ****** ** the ****** ** ********** defen­dant **** *********** ******** at *****."

**** ********* *** ****, it’s ********* **** **** keep ******* ******* ******** concerning ****** **** *** or **** **** **** about. **** *** ********* or ******* ***** *** electronically ****** *********** ** sold, *** ******* ***** control ** *** ********, and **** ** * potential ******* ** ****.

Just ******* ******* ***’* ******* *****’* **** *********"If the video surveillance footage is one of multiple avenues of evidence to establish a legal position, then the likelihood of sanctions being awarded is decreased and the severity of a potential sanction decreases,” Berman said.

** *** ************ *. *** *** Country ****, *** ********* *** able ** ***** ***** was ************* *********, *** still *** ****** ******** to ***** *** **** so *** **** ******** was "** ******* ********* charge ** ***** ** trial ******* [***] ********* with ******* ** *** unavail­able *********," ****** ******* * ******* ** the ****.

** ********, ** *** surveillance ******* *** *** key **** **** ***** prove *** ****, ********* increase. ********* **** *******, I ***** ****** **** would ****** ** ***** footage *** *** **** evidence ** * **** and **** *** *** store “****” *** *******. He ******** ** **** court ** ***** ** say *** ****** *** was ******* ** ******** and **** ** *** testify ** **** ********.

"*** ***** ** *** only ******** **** *** person ** ****, *** there *** ** ***** witnesses,” ** ****. Having ******* ****** *** ** *** ** ** **** *****

************* ****** ** ***** of *** ******** ** video ************ *******. *** original **** ** *********, but **** ********* ** court, ** *** **** prove **** ****.

“** *** **** ******* evidence **** *****, *** can ***** **** ** so *** *** **** easily ******* * *********, you *** **** ** down, ******* **, *** show ******* **********. *** beauty ** ****** ******* evidence ** **** *** can *** ** ** advance **** ****. ** is **** **** **** you **** ** ***** tape, *** *** **** it ** ** ****** to *** *** ** the ********** *****,” ** said.

Comments (5)

So, you're in trouble if video evidence exists and you allow it to be destroyed. What if you don't have a clear policy on the length of time you retain video for? Also, I presume nothing happens if you're notified that you should be saving that video after the video has been erased, correct?

No there could still be penalties applied by the court. Even if an organization receives notification after it has been erased, if the organization knew there was evidence there, they could be found negligent. It would be up to a judge to decide to what extent they were negligent though. The policy doesn't matter much if the organization knew it had video, but let it get erased.

Storing video footage can amount to a ton of disk space use. I assume that keeping six months worth of footage would be sufficient, but the questions is, where do you draw the line? I have seen instances where software during installation, when not setup properly, can and will overwrite video footage. I have also had to on several occasions re-install software to reset threshholds for video allocation storage. If threshholds are not setup properly with some video cameras on the initail install, video allocation will overflow to other drives causing huge space issues with the CPU C-Drive, which can cause crashes and video recording to stop.

Creating a storage policy and making sure all steps are followed during the software and allocation steps of the software install are very crucial to the success of the video surveliance. It is a shame to to have something happen and not have video footage when needed due to sloppy software setup and an insuffiecient back up plan.

Rob, my read from this interview is not that one needs to store video forever to protect themselves but that they need to be proactive in exporting video for known events that may lead to litigation. It would seem harder to argue that if an event was only 'discovered' 4 months later, that a user would be responsible for not having video available then.

If I understand this, Berman recomends having someone like an integrator pull the video. What I didn't read is...to what exposure the integrator is then exposed. I can easily see where an integrator is then dragged into a court case and becomes a potential defendant due to no ill intent simply by trying to service the customer. Do I have this all wrong?

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Legal

ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
Dahua and Hikvision Products Illegally Sold To US Government GSA on May 06, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision products are being widely and illegally sold to the US government GSA. The sellers are falsely claiming these China products to...
UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
Huawei Sues US Government Over NDAA Ban on Mar 07, 2019
Chinese telecom giant Huawei is suing the US government over the NDAA ban, arguing that key provisions in it are unconstitutional.  NDAA Section...
Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...
ASCMA / Moni Problems Deepen, Lenders Terminate Support Agreement on Dec 28, 2018
Ascent Capital Group, aka ASCMA, currently branded Brinks Home Security, formerly known as Moni and Monitronics faces a troubling end to a rocky...
Sublethal Camera Gun Examined on Dec 06, 2018
Sublethal is a South African company that manufactures a remotely-controlled, camera-enabled gun called the Boomslang, which is Afrikaans for tree...
UK ICO Denies IPVM GDPR Complaint Against IFSEC, Decides Each Exhibitor Responsible on Dec 06, 2018
The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has denied IPVM's complaint against IFSEC for misuse of facial recognition. Each Exhibitor...
ADT Wins Fire Death Suit But Faces Appeal on Dec 05, 2018
ADT/Protection 1 has won a wrongful death court case in which it was sued by the estate of a deceased customer. However, the attorney for the...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact