Monitoring Contracts Examined

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 12, 2012

Contracts for monitoring intrusion detection / alarm monitoring systems are one of the most fundamental elements of using such solutions. The terms and conditions in those contracts have a significant impact on the cost and flexibility to the user and the profitability of the provider. In this note, we examine the key issues and common problems found in renewal clauses, notification of terminations and penalties for termination.

Pricing / General Terms

These monitoring contract agreeements often constitute the bulk of the monetary outlay for these types of systems by no small accident: in the present market, the cost of installing these systems is fiercely competitive.

A very common ‘introductory’ price of $99 to acquire alarm intrusion equipment and begin monitoring of that equipment does not approach the true acquisition cost of such equipment.

If a generic home alarm system costs $1000 - $1200 to purchase, wire, install, and configure, consider that:

  • Buying the cost of the system upfront is prohibitive to many owners
  • Monitoring contract terms of 48 – 72 months are commonly proposed to finance the amortization costs of the system equipment and install, and still render the invoiced amount as ‘reasonable’ in the marketplace.

System Hardware Ownership

It is worth noting that the equipment installed is not always purchased by the owner of the monitoring contract, and that legal ownership of the system components are an issue to be determined by the specific contract language.

Purchasing Monitoring Service

For the ongoing persistent service of ‘monitoring’ the system – that is, to actively receive and interpret alarm signals sent from the panel- pricing is commonly billed ranging from $25 - $40 per month, per alarm panel. Consider that the vast majority of smaller installing dealers (and even some larger regional installing dealers) purchase this service via subcontract from 3rd party monitoring companies at wholesale rates. Typically, the wholesaling monitoring company bills from $4 - $8 dollars per monitored account.

This pricing is based on wholesale billing to the alarm dealer/installer, who then accounts for the administration cost of discrete account invoicing and contract management.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

The ability for the installed alarm system to operate independently of a persistent monitoring service is also a matter of specific contract language. In some cases, the alarm system is disabled for use once monitoring service is cancelled or discontinued.

A persistent source of poor public opinion for the alarms industry is the rather unscrupulous and sometimes illegal practice of ‘locking a panel out’ in such a manner as it cannot be reprogrammed to work with another monitoring entity beyond the initial monitoring provider. Similar to setting an ‘administrator’ password, often the most expedient option to resolve this issue is the costly replacement of otherwise functioning hardware.

Duration of Monitoring Contracts

The contract term of agreement for which the system is monitored is commonly written to be 3 or 5 years. This length is variable depending on prevailing conditions in both the local market and company writing the contract.

For the sake of illustration for this update, consider a common ‘Terms and Conditions’ for an alarm service. In this example, the contract term is set a three (3) years.

Exceptions to this contract are highly dependent upon the specific language of the contract. For example: often times moving, being deployed in the military, or experience of other economically distressing conditions do not modify the contract and are not commonly appealed successfully. However, contracts are often transferrable from one party to another. A common first recommendation is to ‘sell the contract to a neighbor, or future home owner’ during dispute resolution.

Auto Renewal Clause

Perhaps the most despised, yet potentially profitable, element of the monitoring contract is the ‘auto renewal clause’. Here is an excerpt from an actual contract:

"The initial term of this Contract is for three (3) years. Our alarm monitoring and notification services will begin when the equipment is installed and is operational, and when the necessary communications connection is completed. This Contract will automatically renew for successive thirty (30) day terms unless terminated by either party's written notice at least thirty (30) days before the end of the then-current term. If terminated, this Contract ends on the last day of the then-current term."

In the example above, after three (3) years, the monitoring contract ‘auto renews’ for successive thirty (30) days periods, until the cancellation conditions are met. In some examples, ‘auto renew’ cycles are sometimes written for a year or multi-year intervals.

Notification of Termination

The cancellations conditions must also be met in order to ‘successfully’ cancel an auto renewing contract. Often times, some form of written notification (and outstanding balance payment) must be posted to the monitoring company via certified mail during an interval prior to the actual contract ending date. It is a common complaint for contract holders to attempt to cancel a monitoring contract before the ‘end date’, but yet after the ‘notification deadline’ and find themselves ‘auto renewed’ for another service interval.

Penalties for Termination

Examine the language from the example agreement:

YOU AGREE THAT THE CHARGES DUE UNDER THIS CONTRACT ARE BASED ON YOUR AGREEMENT TO RECEIVE AND TO PAY FOR THE SERVICES FOR THREE (3) FULL YEARS. ACCORDINGLY, YOU AGREE THAT: IF YOU TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT DURING ITS INTIAL TERM YOU WILL PAY US AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75% OF THE CHARGES TO BE PAID BY YOU DURING THE REMAINING INTITIAL THREE (3) YEAR TERM OF THIS CONTRACT. THIS AMOUNT IS AGREED UPON DAMAGES AND IS NOT A PENALTY."

You will notice the ‘early termination fee’ amounts to damages equal to 75% of the value of the remaining three (3) year contract. These penalties are wildly disparate depending entirely upon the writers of the contract.

It is important to understand these common elements of monitor contracts so that the ethical behavior behind these contracts can be contrasted. The attributes described above are common to most monitor contract agreements, but the scope and specific language of those elements can vary significantly from one provider to the next.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Monitoring

IndigoVision Control Center VMS Tested on May 30, 2019
IPVM's last test of IndigoVision's VMS was in 2010, which found enterprise VMS features and a simple client interface. but no 3rd party camera...
NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
China PRC Government New National Video Surveillance Standards on May 14, 2019
The People's Republic of China (PRC) government has released a new set of overarching standards for authorities to follow when they install video...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
Hikvision AI Problems Criticized By Chinese Publication on Apr 09, 2019
Hikvision's facial recognition works poorly, causes delays and worsens learning, according to a new investigation by one of China's leading...
Casino Security Consultant Carl Lindgren Interview on Mar 26, 2019
For more than 20 years, Carl Lindgren worked as a casino surveillance pro, while being active (and sometimes outspoken) on various online video...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
NSA Director Keynoting Dahua and Hikvision Sponsored Cybersecurity Conference [Canceled] on Jun 13, 2019
The technical director for the NSA’s Cybersecurity Threat Operations Center will be keynoting a physical security cybersecurity conference that is...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact