Monitoring Contracts Examined

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Feb 12, 2012

Contracts for monitoring intrusion detection / alarm monitoring systems are one of the most fundamental elements of using such solutions. The terms and conditions in those contracts have a significant impact on the cost and flexibility to the user and the profitability of the provider. In this note, we examine the key issues and common problems found in renewal clauses, notification of terminations and penalties for termination.

Pricing / General Terms

These monitoring contract agreeements often constitute the bulk of the monetary outlay for these types of systems by no small accident: in the present market, the cost of installing these systems is fiercely competitive.

A very common ‘introductory’ price of $99 to acquire alarm intrusion equipment and begin monitoring of that equipment does not approach the true acquisition cost of such equipment.

If a generic home alarm system costs $1000 - $1200 to purchase, wire, install, and configure, consider that:

  • Buying the cost of the system upfront is prohibitive to many owners
  • Monitoring contract terms of 48 – 72 months are commonly proposed to finance the amortization costs of the system equipment and install, and still render the invoiced amount as ‘reasonable’ in the marketplace.

System Hardware Ownership

It is worth noting that the equipment installed is not always purchased by the owner of the monitoring contract, and that legal ownership of the system components are an issue to be determined by the specific contract language.

Purchasing Monitoring Service

For the ongoing persistent service of ‘monitoring’ the system – that is, to actively receive and interpret alarm signals sent from the panel- pricing is commonly billed ranging from $25 - $40 per month, per alarm panel. Consider that the vast majority of smaller installing dealers (and even some larger regional installing dealers) purchase this service via subcontract from 3rd party monitoring companies at wholesale rates. Typically, the wholesaling monitoring company bills from $4 - $8 dollars per monitored account.

This pricing is based on wholesale billing to the alarm dealer/installer, who then accounts for the administration cost of discrete account invoicing and contract management.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

The ability for the installed alarm system to operate independently of a persistent monitoring service is also a matter of specific contract language. In some cases, the alarm system is disabled for use once monitoring service is cancelled or discontinued.

A persistent source of poor public opinion for the alarms industry is the rather unscrupulous and sometimes illegal practice of ‘locking a panel out’ in such a manner as it cannot be reprogrammed to work with another monitoring entity beyond the initial monitoring provider. Similar to setting an ‘administrator’ password, often the most expedient option to resolve this issue is the costly replacement of otherwise functioning hardware.

Duration of Monitoring Contracts

The contract term of agreement for which the system is monitored is commonly written to be 3 or 5 years. This length is variable depending on prevailing conditions in both the local market and company writing the contract.

For the sake of illustration for this update, consider a common ‘Terms and Conditions’ for an alarm service. In this example, the contract term is set a three (3) years.

Exceptions to this contract are highly dependent upon the specific language of the contract. For example: often times moving, being deployed in the military, or experience of other economically distressing conditions do not modify the contract and are not commonly appealed successfully. However, contracts are often transferrable from one party to another. A common first recommendation is to ‘sell the contract to a neighbor, or future home owner’ during dispute resolution.

Auto Renewal Clause

Perhaps the most despised, yet potentially profitable, element of the monitoring contract is the ‘auto renewal clause’. Here is an excerpt from an actual contract:

"The initial term of this Contract is for three (3) years. Our alarm monitoring and notification services will begin when the equipment is installed and is operational, and when the necessary communications connection is completed. This Contract will automatically renew for successive thirty (30) day terms unless terminated by either party's written notice at least thirty (30) days before the end of the then-current term. If terminated, this Contract ends on the last day of the then-current term."

In the example above, after three (3) years, the monitoring contract ‘auto renews’ for successive thirty (30) days periods, until the cancellation conditions are met. In some examples, ‘auto renew’ cycles are sometimes written for a year or multi-year intervals.

Notification of Termination

The cancellations conditions must also be met in order to ‘successfully’ cancel an auto renewing contract. Often times, some form of written notification (and outstanding balance payment) must be posted to the monitoring company via certified mail during an interval prior to the actual contract ending date. It is a common complaint for contract holders to attempt to cancel a monitoring contract before the ‘end date’, but yet after the ‘notification deadline’ and find themselves ‘auto renewed’ for another service interval.

Penalties for Termination

Examine the language from the example agreement:

YOU AGREE THAT THE CHARGES DUE UNDER THIS CONTRACT ARE BASED ON YOUR AGREEMENT TO RECEIVE AND TO PAY FOR THE SERVICES FOR THREE (3) FULL YEARS. ACCORDINGLY, YOU AGREE THAT: IF YOU TERMINATE THIS CONTRACT DURING ITS INTIAL TERM YOU WILL PAY US AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75% OF THE CHARGES TO BE PAID BY YOU DURING THE REMAINING INTITIAL THREE (3) YEAR TERM OF THIS CONTRACT. THIS AMOUNT IS AGREED UPON DAMAGES AND IS NOT A PENALTY."

You will notice the ‘early termination fee’ amounts to damages equal to 75% of the value of the remaining three (3) year contract. These penalties are wildly disparate depending entirely upon the writers of the contract.

It is important to understand these common elements of monitor contracts so that the ethical behavior behind these contracts can be contrasted. The attributes described above are common to most monitor contract agreements, but the scope and specific language of those elements can vary significantly from one provider to the next.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports on Monitoring

Security System Health Monitoring Usage Statistics 2018 on Oct 09, 2018
How well and quickly do integrators know if devices are offline or broken? New IPVM statistics show that typically no health monitoring is...
Fall 2018 New Products Directory on Oct 03, 2018
Fall 2018 New Products Directory We have compiled a directory of new products released fall 2018, or at least since our Spring 2018 Directory. The...
Alexa Guard Expands Amazon's Security Offerings, Boosts ADT's Stock on Sep 21, 2018
Amazon is expanding their security offerings yet again, this time with Alexa Guard that delivers security audio analytics and a virtual "Fake...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
European Mega Security Firm Verisure Pushing Security Fog on Sep 17, 2018
The European mega security firm Verisure (Securitas Direct), with a reported 2 million customers, is pushing security fog, as shown in this BBC...
Stanley Security Acquires 3xLogic, Kushner Becomes Product President on Sep 10, 2018
Stanley Security acquired 3xLogic a few months ago. However, the company has still not officially publicly announced it, leading many to wonder...
Dell Launches IoT for Surveillance on Sep 05, 2018
Historically, Dell has been a PC and server provider (e.g., "Dude, you're getting a Dell") and widely used for surveillance storage. However, in...
JCI / Napco Integration Battle on Aug 30, 2018
JCI and Napco are firing salvos at each other over integration issues which both sides blame on the other. The bigger problem is that central...
SNMP / Network Monitoring For Surveillance 2018 on Aug 21, 2018
Surveillance systems typically rely on the the VMS to report issues, but this most often just means knowing a camera is "down" with no warning or...
2Gig Gun Lock / Motion Detector Tested on Aug 17, 2018
Safer guns for families and an opportunity for security dealers to sell more services? That is the aim of Nortek's 2GIG 'Gun Motion Detector'...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Knightscope Winning Investors, Struggling With Growth on Oct 16, 2018
While Knightscope's new financials show the company only winning 11 new customers in the past 12 months, the company continues to win new...
Integrator Laptop Guide on Oct 16, 2018
This 18-page guide provides guidance and statistics about integrator laptop use. 150 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their laptops,...
Huawei Admits AI "Bubble" on Oct 16, 2018
A fascinating article from the Chinese government's Global Times: Huawei’s AI ambition to reshape industries. While the Global Times talks about...
ADI's Financials Revealed + W-Box Growth Priority on Oct 15, 2018
  ADI is one of the most powerful distributors in the security industry but how big are they? How much profit do they make? How much do they sell...
Amazon Touts Home Security Market Disruption on Oct 15, 2018
Amazon is coming for ADT and all of home security. Indeed, Amazon is advertising this as, in their own words, calling home security a: Inside...
Higher Power PoE 802.3bt Ratified, Impact on Security Products Examined on Oct 12, 2018
Power over Ethernet has become one of the most popular features of many video, access, and other security products. See our PoE for IP Video...
"New Zealand Govt Uses Chinese Cameras Banned In US", Considers Security Audit on Oct 12, 2018
Newsroom NZ has issued a report: "NZ Govt uses Chinese cameras banned in US": This comes after the US federal government banned purchases of...
Mysterious Patent Troll 'Secure Cam' Targets Industry, Sues Hanwha, Hikvison, JCI, Panasonic, More on Oct 11, 2018
A company named "Secure Cam," who is actively hiding their ownership, has acquired a slew of video patents and is systematically suing video...
Unfixed Critical Vulnerability In Millions of XiongMai Devices Disclosed on Oct 10, 2018
XiongMai, one of the biggest OEMs alongside Dahua and Hikvision, has suffered a critical vulnerability impacting millions of their devices. This...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact