Interview With Law Enforcement On Surveillance

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Apr 30, 2013

We recently interviewed International Association of Chiefs of Police experts about various issues, uses and best practices for police agencies regarding video surveillance. We touched on topics ranging from storage and codec frustrations to crime displacement and drones. In this post, we recap the conversation and provide the complete transcript.

Inside, see law enforcement comments on:

Smartphones ******** ***** **** **** *******

*** ******* ** ***** ** *** ******* ******** ******** ********** when **** *** *** ** ** ***** *** *****, *** only ** ** * *****. **** *** ****** ******* ****** and ****** ******* ******** **** ********* ******** **** **** ***** ******* are **********. *** ***** **** ***** ******* *** ******* **** to **. ***** ** ** **** ********** *** *********, **** dealers, *** *******, ** **** ** ***** ******** *****, **** after *** ******* ** **. **** ****** ***'* **** ***** the *******, ****** ** ***** ** **** ** ***** ****. 

"**** **** ** *** **** ***** ***** *** ****** ** the ************ *** ******* *** ***** ** ********** ***** ******* *********** they **** ** ... *** **** ** ******* ** *** amount ** **** *******. **** ******* ** *** ******. *** method ******* **** **********. **’* ******** ** *********.

***** *** **** ** ******* ** ***** ** *** ****** without ******** ***** *** *********** ** ***** ** *** ****** ... *’* *** **** **** *** ************ **** ***** ***** is **********. **’* ** ********** ** **** ****** *** **** of *** ****** *** ***** *******. "

*** *******, ****** **** ***** **** ******** ** **** **** obscure ***** ***** ** *** ** ************ ** ***** ** the ********* ******* **** ** ******* ********. 

**** *** *********** *** *** **** ** ** ****** ** geographically ********** ***** ** ******* **********: ***********.

“ *** ******** ************ **** *********** *** ***** ***** ** communication ******* ******** **** **** ****** ** ****** **** ** these ****** ****** ** ****** *** ******** ******** ********** ************ ** ** ***** ****** ... *** ************ ***** in ***** ** ****** ***** *** *** ****** ** ******* impacted ** *** *** **** ***** ***** ************ **** **** it ****** **** ***** ** ** *** ******.”

Public-Private ************

******-******* ************ ******* *** *********** ******** *** ******* ******** *** becoming **** ******. *** ******** ******* ******* **** *** ****** their ************ **** *** **** ***** **** ******* **** **** do *** **** ** ********. ******** *** ********** ******* ** increasing ******** ** ***** *************. ** **** *****, *** **** provides ********** *** ********** ******* ** **** **** ****** ** ***** cameras ***/** *******. **** ** **** *** ******* *** ** say ***** *** ******-******* ************ *** ******* ********: 

“**’* **** ********* *****. *** ****, ** **’* ***********, ** that *** ****** ********** *****’* **** ** **** *** **** of **** *******, *********** ***** *******, *** ** *****, ** **** it ** *********** ******* *** **** ** ****** *** ******* that ***** ******* *******.” 

************ **** *******************. **** ********* *******, ****** *** ***** ***** **** * number ** ********* *******. ************ ******* *** *********** *** ********** and *** *********** ** *********** *** *********** *** ***** ** recorded ** **** ** ****** ** ******* *****.

License ***** *********** **********

*** ********** *** ********* ** *** “******* **** ***** *** police ***** ** *** ***” **** “**** ****** ****** *********.” 

“*** * ***** ************ ** *** ***** ***** *** ****** who *****’* **** ******* *******, ******* **** *** **** ** Amber ***** ****** ***’** ******* *** * ****** *** *** *** **** abducted ** *** **** ******* *****,” *** ****** ****.

*** **** *** ******* ********* **** ********** *** **** ** standardized ******* ***** *** *** ********** -- * ********** **** gives ****** *** ******* ** ******* *** ***** **** ******* of *********** **** ***** ** **** ** ***** * ******’* movement. *** ****************** **** **** **** **** ** ****** *** *** **** the **** ** ********. 

“***** ** ************* ***** ** ***** ** *** **** * crime ** *********. [****] *****’* * ****** *** ****** **** the ******** ********* ** ***** *** ***** ***, **** *** *********** capture *** ** ***** ******* ******. ** *** **** *********** value ... ** *****’* ********** *** ***** **** *** ****** on ************* *****.”

Other ******:

** ***** *** *** ****** *** ********* ************ *** *********** had **** ************. **** ***** *******, *******, ****************, *** ***-***** performance ** ***** ********.

*******

******* ** * **** ****** **** ****** *** ******* ** ***** after * *****: 

“** *** **** ** *** ***** ******** ** ****** **** took * ***** **** ** ****** ** ** ******* *** blur *****. **** ***** ****. **’* *** ********* *** *** do ******* ** ******, **** **** *****’* ****** ******* *******. So ********* [*** ********* ***** ** *** ******], ** ** opinion, ** *** ******* *** *********** *****’* **** ** ************ **** **** * ************** ** ******* ******** ********** *** make **** ***** ******** ** *********.”

Legal ******** **** ******* *****Some of the first digital cameras used internal storage to record video which was a problem when it came time for investigators to provide original video in court. The original was on a drive inside the camcorder, (and had probably been recorded over because the same camcorder was used for multiple cases). This actually makes the first DVD copy the “original.”

******* ***** ********, ***** ** *** ******* **** ****** *** ********** ** video ** ** **** ** * ***** ** **** ** the ******** *** ** **** ********* ** *** ***** *** all ****** **** *** **** ******. *** *********** ***** ********** for ************** **** **** ********** ***** ** ***** **** *** slots (**** *** ****** **************) **** ****** **** ******** *** Rosario **********. ** ****** ******** ** **** * **** *** the ************ *** **** *** **** (*** ********) ** ** in *** **** ****. ** ***** **** ** *********** ***** in **** **** *** ********** *** ******** ** ** *****’* have ** ** **** ** ***** *** *** ** ******** if ******. 

****************

************ ******* *** ***** ***** ***** ** *****-****-****, *** ******** after *******. **************** ****** *** **********. *** *********** ******** ***** like ** *** *** **** ******* ********* *** *************. 

“*** ******** **** * *** ** **-***** *******, *** ******** we *** *** **** **** *** ******, ** *** ****** provides * ******** ******* ********. **** **** **, *** **** happens [**] * **** * ******* ***** ****** **** *** one ***’* ****** ** **, ******* ***’* ******, **** ***** party ******** ***** ** ******* *** ********* ******, *** (** something **** *****) ** ******* * ********* *********.”

***-*****

**** ******* ** ***-***** ***** ************, ****** “*****’* ***** *** issue ** ***** **** ** ******** *** ****** ** ******** in ******* **********.” 

******

*** ************************** ****** ** * *** ** ********************* ** * ********* ******. **** **** **** *******:

  • **** *** ****** ** ******** *** ****** ** ****** **** helicopters.
  • **** **** **** **** *********** (** ** *** **** ***, it *** ** ******** *** *******).
  • ** ** ***** ** *** * ***** **** * ********* area **** * ******. ************, *** ********* **** *********** *** cause ********** ****** ** ******* ********* ******** *** ***** **** can *** ** * *********. 

Dummy *******Law enforcement sentiment was that dummy cameras are a waste of money and a bad idea. If a person is worried about activity that needs to be deterred they’re “wasting everybody’s time” by opting for a dummy camera instead of a real camera. Said one interviewee, “I’ve not seen a dummy camera that looks real enough to fool most people ... The only way you can put up a camera that looks real is to put an actual camera up there. I think that’s more of a market ploy than anything.”

****: *** *** **** *** ******** ********** ** *** ****************

Comments (10)

I wonder how edge recording would play into the Rosario rule. I am thinking the video could be recorded on the data card in the camera, sent to the NVR as usual for backup and then the card could be pulled from the camera and attached to the case file. Make sense?

Brian, that does make sense. I think our Brian actually mentioned that during the call.

While the Rosario ruling is still in place, there is also the Best Evidence approach which make it a bit easier regarding evidence presentation if the original is no longer available. I really can't recall any LE agency out here on the West coast pulling the storage cards and booking those as evidence. From the IT side of things, the edge storage has some potential advantages but it would be very expensive pulling and replacing every time a criminal act was captured.

Back in the 90ds when digital cameras began to replace film there were a number of issues the courts needed to address but as time has gone on and the technology has become so common place, the issue of "Altered" video is almost never brough up. It's just accepted unless the defense feels there is some potential problem. Just think of just how many patrol officers use their digital cameras several times a day on various cases. If they booked in the card rather than download to a secure storage system just think what the costs would be.

We have had to submit numerous DVD copies of server based video to the Federal courts for lawsuits and not once has there even been a question regarding the storage or evidence aspect of the file. Even is there was an issue, all you need to to do is have the IT custododian of records appear and testify as to the method of capture and storage and that it was not altered.

For IP based system sales, it would be best to push the edge storage as a potential cost savings vs server based storage rather than the evidence aspect.

On original copies: I have never heard of an issue with video copies being suppressed if the recording has a digital watermark that can be verified in court. Having a watermark capability should be an automatic check box for anyone looking at purchasing a new system.

John, Did ya'll contact LEVA, or have you been to one of their annual conferences? They should be a go to group anytime folks want law enforcement input about video: www.leva.org .

Hi Gator, we didn't contact LEVA, however, two of the interviewees were members. It was those two who mentioned the court issues. We do plan to get in touch with LEVA for more on the law enforcement perspective.

I didn't see the full transcript -- is it elsewhere?

Michael, I'm fixing that link now and it will be back up shortly.

Great, thanks!

Michael, the link for the complete transcript is fixed.

Got it, thanks!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Hikvision Fights Ban - Claims 'Red Scare', Hires 14 Term Ex-Congressman on Jul 11, 2018
Hikvision is fighting back against the House Bill Ban of their products. Hikvision has hired one of the biggest lobbying firms, led by a 14 term...
SIA Lobbyists Working On House Bill Ban of Dahua and Hikvision on Jul 10, 2018
While SIA is most known for ISC West, SIA maintains the industry's most significant lobbying organization to influence US government action. Last...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
UK VSaaS Startup Ocucon on Jul 03, 2018
Decreasing exposure to fraudulent slip-and-fall insurance claims and lawsuits is one of the oldest selling points of video surveillance for retail....
GDPR For Access Control Guide on Jul 03, 2018
Electronic access control is common in businesses plus organizations are increasingly considering biometrics for access control. With GDPR coming...
OpenEye Apex VMS Tested on Jun 26, 2018
OpenEye is a US company, founded nearly 20 years ago. In the past few years, OpenEye has been one of a few VMS providers that have pivoted to being...
GDPR / ICO Complaint Filed Against IFSEC Show Facial Recognition on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM has filed a complaint against IFSEC’s parent company UBM based on our concern that the conference violates core GDPR principles on...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 13, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer 2018 This...
US Tariffs Hit China Video Surveillance on Jul 13, 2018
Chinese video surveillance products avoided tariffs for the first two rounds. Now, in the third round, many video surveillance products will be...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact