Hosted and Managed Access Control Statistics

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 19, 2014

'Cloud' access control - how many integrators are offering it? Why?

And for those that do, are they favoring hosted or managed options.

In the industry's first survey of integrator's adoption of cloud access control, IPVM reveals usage and in-depth commentary.

'*****' ****** ******* - *** **** *********** *** ******** **? Why?

*** *** ***** **** **, *** **** ******** ****** ** managed *******.

** *** ********'* ***** ****** ** **********'* ******** ** ***** ****** control, **** ******* ***** *** **-***** **********.

[***************]

Key *********

*** ******** ***** ******* ****** ** ******* ****** *******.

*******, ** ***** **** **, ******* ** ******* *** ********* option **** *** ****** ******* ****** ******:

** **** * ******** **** ** ***** ******** ** *** sections **** ******.

Neither ****** ** * '****-****'

* ******** ** ********* *** *****: **** **** ******* ****** or ******* ******. **** ***** *** ******* ****** ** ****** *******, since **** ****** ******* ********* *** *** ******* *** ******* support:

  • "** ** ***. *** ******** **** ** ********* ****** ** large ************* ***** ** ******* ******* *** * ****** ********."
  • "**. ** ******* ** ** *** ******* **** *** ***** benefit **** ******* ** **** ********** **** ******** **** *********** installation. ** ** *** *** ** **** *** ********* ********* that ******** ** **** **** ****."
  • "** ** *** ***** ******* ****** *******. *****'* *** *** our ******** ****, *********, **********, *********."
  • "** **** *****'*  **** ***** ******* *** ********* ****** ****** management ********** ** ***** *********."
  • "** **** **** *******, *** ** *** ***** *** ********."

***** ****** *** ******** ** ***********, ******** ** '*******' ******** are *** *************:

Managed ******* *******

******** ************, **** **** */*** ** *********** ****** **** **** remote ****** ******* ********** ********. **** ********* *** ** ** at ***** ******** ********** *** * **** *** *** ********* looking *** **** ** ********* ***** ******, *** ************* **** 3rd ***** ******* ** ******* ** *** ***** *** ******* deployed ******:

  • "** ***** ******* ****** *******, ******* ******** ***'* **** ***** solutions ******* ** **** ******** *********."
  • "***, ** *** **** **********. ** ****** ******* *** **** managed ****** ******* *** ***** ** ***** **** **** ********** had ** **** ******** *** ******. **** **** *** ************** working **** **** **** ********* ** ****** ***** ** ****** control ********."
  • " *** ******* ******** ** *** ******* **** **** ** **** which ***** ** *** ******* ** **** **** ** *** customers ***** ***** **** ***** **** ********* ** *** ***** equipment. **** ****** ** ** **** ******** **** *** ******** and **** * ******* ************ **** **** ** ** ********* potential ******."
  • "*** ******* ********* *** ****** ** *** ***** ** *** ********, some *** ***** **** ***'* ****** ***** ******* **** ****."

Hosted *** ***** *** *****

***** ***** ********* ********** ** *** ********, ******** *** ***** that ***** ***-***** *** *** **** ****** ********, ***** ******** ********** resources *** *******:

  • "***. ********** ********** ** *** ******* *************. *** ******** **** a ******** *** **** ******* ** * ******** ***** ** site **** *** ****** ** *******."
  • "**'* *** *** *********, *** *** ******* ******* ** *** companies **** ** ** ** ********* ***** **** *** * good ***."

Hosted ******* *** *******

** *** '******' ****** *******, ***** * ***** ***** ****** holds *** ******* ********** ******** ****** **** ***** ****** ** servers, ****** ** ********. **** **** **% ** ********** **** hosted ******, *** *** ** ***** ******* ** * ********** venture. **** ******* ****** ********* **** **** **** ******* *** lack ** ******** ******** ** *********** *** **** *****:

  • "** **** *****, *** **** *** ***** ** *** **** the ********* ********."
  • "** **** ** ** ***** ****** *** *** ****, ** one ***** * ******* ****."
  • "** ***** * ****** ********. ** ** **** ** **** the ********* ** *** ******* *******. **'* *** *** ********* but *** ******* ******* ** *** ********* **** ** ** or ********* ***** **** *** * **** ***."
  • "** ***** ****** ****** ******* ************ ********* ************. ** **** ***** * ******* ******* *** both. ***** **** *** **** ***** *****, ** ** *** need ** ***** ********** **** ** **** **** ******** ** our *** ******* *** ******* ************."
  • "*****, *** ****, **** ** *** ***** ** **** **."

*******, ***** *** **** *********** **** * ********* ********** **** the ********, ******* ** **********:

  • "**** ***************** **** *** **** *********. ** ** * ***** ********. Very **** *** **."
  • "** *** *** *** ******* **** *** *** ******* *** it ** * ***** ******* *** *** *********."
  • "******* **** ** ******* *** ** *** ****** ** ** a ******** ******* *** *******."
  • "** **** ***** *** ****** ****** ******* *** *** ******* to ******** **. ** *** ** ****."

Comments (3)

I think that the major players in hosted/managed access control don't think of themselves as "integrators" and probably aren't well represented in this survey.

Companies that specialize in hosted/managed access (such as Kastle) are very popular with some clients, particular property management firms who operate large high-rise buildings. These companies often manage the electronic building directory and visitor management systems in addition to the access control so that when a new employee is added, they appear in all systems automatically.

I have several clients who use hosted/managed access to whom I have pointed out the great cost savings that could be achieved if they bought and managed their own systems. Often the payback period is six months or less. My arguments have mostly fallen upon deaf ears - most of these clients love the managed access concept and are happy to pay the extra costs for it.

What are the providers charging, and how do you account for a customer's own management costs? I've seen a wide variation in SaaS monthly fees and am curious.

I am unable to provide information on what specific providers are charging, but as I recall, monthly charges in the range of $200 to $300 per month per card reader controlled door are common.

There are also additional charges when the number of transactions (card add/deletes, report requests, etc.) exceeds a certain number per month. All I know is, when I have done assessments for clients that use this type of service, the amount being spent annually seems jaw-droppingly high to me.:)

These providers contend that the end-user saves time by outsourcing the management of the system to someone else and that this offsets the monthly costs. However, many of these providers now have "web portals" where the end-user must type in cardholder name, doors to which the cardholder has access, days and times access is allowed, etc. If the end-user has to do most of his own data entry, how much time is actually saved?

Perhaps IPVM can have one of its reporters contact some of the major players in this space to validate the monthly costs I have stated and to hear their take on the benefits of managed access versus a user-owned and managed system.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Avigilon Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 15, 2019
Since IPVM's 2017 Avigilon favorability results, the company was acquired by Motorola and has shifted from being an aggressive startup to a more...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Wavelynx Access Control Manufacturer Profile on Jan 10, 2019
Denver-based WaveLynx is not well known as an access reader manufacturer, but OEMs for big industry brands including Amag, Isonas (Allegion),...
The Battle For The VSaaS Market Begins 2019 - Alarm.com, Arcules, Eagle Eye, OpenEye, Qumulex, Verkada, More on Jan 02, 2019
2019 will be the year that VSaaS finally becomes a real factor for professional video surveillance. While Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS)...
US Gov China Ban Rules Process, SIA Lobbies Against 'Blacklisting', For 'Risk-Based Protocol' on Dec 27, 2018
Details have emerged about when the rules implementing the federal ban on Hikvision, Dahua, Huawei and others will be made public for official...
Combating Vaping Epidemic - Halo Smart Sensor Profile on Dec 21, 2018
Youth vaping has become an epidemic, according to the US Surgeon General, while the market leader, Juul, just received a $12.8 billion investment...
ACRE-Acquired Open Options Access Company Profile on Dec 17, 2018
Who is the company ACRE is acquiring? In this note, we examine Open Options line for best customer fit, key features, pricing, and main...
Open Options Acquired By ACRE on Dec 17, 2018
ACRE is doing deals again. A year after they sold Mercury, they are buying another access control company - Open Options. In this note, we...
2019 Access Control Book Released on Dec 12, 2018
This is the best, most comprehensive access control book in the world, based on our unprecedented research and testing has been significantly...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Access Control Cabling Tutorial on Jan 15, 2019
Access Control is only as reliable as its cables. While this aspect lacks the sexiness of other components, it remains a vital part of every...
Gorilla Technology AI Provider, Raises $15 Million, Profiled on Jan 15, 2019
Gorilla Technology is a Taiwanese video analytics manufacturer that recently announced a $15 million investment from SBI Group, saying this...
2019 IP Networking Book Released on Jan 14, 2019
The new IP Networking Book 2019 is a 285 page in-depth guide that teaches you how IT and telecom technologies impact modern security...
Arecont Costar Layoffs on Jan 14, 2019
Arecont Vision, a Costar Company, has laid off more than 10% of their workforce in a move the company described to IPVM as a result of "important...
The False SCMP Story on Hikvision NYC AI on Jan 14, 2019
In the past week, one of Asia's largest publications, the South China Morning Post (SCMP), posted an article about "Chinese [facial recognition]...
WDR Tutorial on Jan 11, 2019
Understanding wide dynamic range (WDR) is critical to capturing high quality images in demanding conditions. However, with no real standards, any...
Pelco Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 11, 2019
Pelco had a significant favorability problem amongst integrators in our previous study (see 2016 Pelco results). Now, in the first edition of our...
Bad: Dahua Villa Video Doorbell Tested on Jan 11, 2019
Doorbells are one of the hottest segments in the residential market but Dahua's Villa Video Doorbell is the worst we have tested.   We bought and...
Last Chance - Winter 2019 IP Networking Course on Jan 10, 2019
Today is the last day to register for the Winter 2019 IP Networking course. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact