Hosted and Managed Access Control Statistics

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 19, 2014

'Cloud' access control - how many integrators are offering it? Why?

And for those that do, are they favoring hosted or managed options.

In the industry's first survey of integrator's adoption of cloud access control, IPVM reveals usage and in-depth commentary.

'*****' ****** ******* - how **** *********** *** offering **? ***?

*** *** ***** **** do, *** **** ******** hosted ** ******* *******.

** *** ********'* ***** ****** of **********'* ******** ** cloud ****** *******, **** reveals ***** *** **-***** commentary.

[***************]

Key *********

*** ******** ***** ******* hosted ** ******* ****** control.

*******, ** ***** **** do, ******* ** ******* the ********* ****** **** the ****** ******* ****** option:

** **** * ******** look ** ***** ******** in *** ******** **** follow.

Neither ****** ** * '****-****'

* ******** ** ********* are *****: **** **** neither ****** ** ******* access. **** ***** *** limited appeal ** ****** *******, since **** ****** ******* customers *** *** ******* for ******* *******:

  • "** ** ***. *** customer **** ** ********* medium ** ***** ************* where ** ******* ******* are * ****** ********."
  • "**. ** ******* ** do *** ******* **** end ***** ******* **** hosting ** **** ********** when ******** **** *********** installation. ** ** *** try ** **** *** customers ********* **** ******** us **** **** ****."
  • "** ** *** ***** managed ****** *******. *****'* fit *** *** ******** type, *********, **********, *********."
  • "** **** *****'*  **** sense ******* *** ********* assign ****** ********** ********** to ***** *********."
  • "** **** **** *******, but ** *** ***** any ********."

***** ****** *** ******** is ***********, ******** ** 'managed' ******** *** *** insignificant:

Managed ******* *******

******** ************, **** **** 1/3rd ** *********** ****** they **** ****** ****** control ********** ********. **** responses *** ** ** at ***** ******** ********** and * **** *** for ********* ******* *** help ** ********* ***** system, *** ************* **** 3rd ***** ******* ** willing ** *** ***** own ******* ******** ******:

  • "** ***** ******* ****** control, ******* ******** ***'* like ***** ********* ******* of **** ******** *********."
  • "***, ** *** **** successful. ** ****** ******* has **** ******* ****** control *** ***** ** years **** **** ********** had ** **** ******** via ******. **** **** two ************** ******* **** time **** ********* ** remote ***** ** ****** control ********."
  • " *** ******* ******** ** the ******* **** **** we **** ***** ***** us *** ******* ** take **** ** *** customers ***** ***** **** still **** ********* ** all ***** *********. **** allows ** ** **** together **** *** ******** and **** * ******* relationship **** **** ** it ********* ********* ******."
  • "*** ******* ********* *** ****** by *** ***** ** the ********, **** *** users **** ***'* ****** their ******* **** ****."

Hosted *** ***** *** *****

***** ***** ********* ********** on *** ********, ******** was ***** **** ***** end-users are *** **** ****** customer, ***** ******** ********** resources *** *******:

  • "***. ********** ********** ** the ******* *************. *** installs **** * ******** for **** ******* ** a ******** ***** ** site **** *** ****** it *******."
  • "**'* *** *** *********, but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."

Hosted ******* *** *******

** *** '******' ****** control, ***** * ***** based ****** ***** *** central ********** ******** ****** than ***** ****** ** servers, ****** ** ********. Less **** **% ** responders **** ****** ******, and *** ** ***** declare ** * ********** venture. **** ******* ****** solutions **** **** **** pricing *** **** ** customer ******** ** *********** for **** *****:

  • "** **** *****, *** most *** ***** ** not **** *** ********* payments."
  • "** **** ** ** would ****** *** *** side, ** *** ***** a ******* ****."
  • "** ***** * ****** solution. ** ** **** to **** *** ********* on *** ******* *******. It's *** *** ********* but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."
  • "** ***** ****** ****** control ************ ********* ************. ** also ***** * ******* service *** ****. ***** they *** **** ***** based, ** ** *** need ** ***** ********** cost ** **** **** standing ** *** *** servers *** ******* ************."
  • "*****, *** ****, **** to *** ***** ** push **."

*******, ***** *** **** integrators **** * ********* experience **** *** ********, calling ** **********:

  • "**** ***************** **** *** **** providers. ** ** * great ********. **** **** for **."
  • "** *** *** *** hosting **** *** *** modules *** ** ** a ***** ******* *** our *********."
  • "******* **** ** ******* and ** *** ****** to ** * ******** product *** *******."
  • "** **** ***** *** hosted ****** ******* *** are ******* ** ******** it. ** *** ** good."

Comments (3)

I think that the major players in hosted/managed access control don't think of themselves as "integrators" and probably aren't well represented in this survey.

Companies that specialize in hosted/managed access (such as Kastle) are very popular with some clients, particular property management firms who operate large high-rise buildings. These companies often manage the electronic building directory and visitor management systems in addition to the access control so that when a new employee is added, they appear in all systems automatically.

I have several clients who use hosted/managed access to whom I have pointed out the great cost savings that could be achieved if they bought and managed their own systems. Often the payback period is six months or less. My arguments have mostly fallen upon deaf ears - most of these clients love the managed access concept and are happy to pay the extra costs for it.

What are the providers charging, and how do you account for a customer's own management costs? I've seen a wide variation in SaaS monthly fees and am curious.

I am unable to provide information on what specific providers are charging, but as I recall, monthly charges in the range of $200 to $300 per month per card reader controlled door are common.

There are also additional charges when the number of transactions (card add/deletes, report requests, etc.) exceeds a certain number per month. All I know is, when I have done assessments for clients that use this type of service, the amount being spent annually seems jaw-droppingly high to me.:)

These providers contend that the end-user saves time by outsourcing the management of the system to someone else and that this offsets the monthly costs. However, many of these providers now have "web portals" where the end-user must type in cardholder name, doors to which the cardholder has access, days and times access is allowed, etc. If the end-user has to do most of his own data entry, how much time is actually saved?

Perhaps IPVM can have one of its reporters contact some of the major players in this space to validate the monthly costs I have stated and to hear their take on the benefits of managed access versus a user-owned and managed system.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

HID Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 21, 2019
HID favorability results were strong, in the 2019 IPVM integrator study of 200+ integrators, with a net +62% and low negativity as the table below...
HID Launches Origo To Fix Mobile Credential Problems on Feb 05, 2019
HID is releasing Origo, an overhaul of its mobile credential platform, this time drastically restructuring the way it is priced and packaged. HID's...
Arcules Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 08, 2019
Arcules has amazing advantages. Tens of millions of funding from Canon. Unlimited access to Milestone's source code (see our test results). But...
Eagle Eye Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 21, 2019
Eagle Eye has been the biggest spender in the cloud VMS market including (via their owner) acquiring Brivo for $50 million and CameraManager from...
Lenel Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 26, 2019
The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.  The negative news for Lenel is that integrators...
Verkada Favorability Results 2019 on May 29, 2019
Verkada has taken the industry by storm with the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever and a half billion dollar valuation....
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
Vunetrix Health Monitoring Company Profile on Nov 26, 2019
Vunetrix boasts that they make the integrators the 'HERO' by using Vunetrix's monitoring. We spoke to Vunetrix to better understand their...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Breaking Into A Facility Using Canned Air Tested on Jan 28, 2020
Access control is supposed to make doors more secure, but a $5 can of compressed air may defeat it. With no special training, intruders can...
ROG Security - Cloud AI For Remote Monitoring on Jan 28, 2020
ROG Security is offering cloud-based AI analytics to remote guard companies, by touting having "nothing to install" to "add virtual guards." We...
Brivo Business Profile 2020 on Jan 27, 2020
Brivo has been doing cloud access for more than 20 years. Is the 2020s the decade that cloud access becomes the norm? CEO Steve Van Till recently...
Favorite VMS / NVR Manufacturers 2020 on Jan 27, 2020
In 2018, a new winner emerged and a former top choice declined. Now, there is a new #1, a new top 5 finisher and 2 major VMSes in decline. Our...
"Hikvision Football Arena" Lithuania Causes Controversy on Jan 24, 2020
Controversy has arisen in Lithuania over Hikvision becoming a soccer team's top sponsor and gaining naming rights to their arena, with one local MP...
Axis and Genetec Drop IFSEC 2020 on Jan 23, 2020
Two of the best-known video surveillance manufacturers are dropping IFSEC International 2020, joining Milestone who dropped IFSEC in 2019. The...
Multipoint Door Lock Tutorial on Jan 23, 2020
Despite widespread use, locked doors are notoriously weak at stopping entry, and thousands can be misspent on locks that leave doors quite...
Avigilon Shifts Cloud Strategy - Merges Blue and ACC on Jan 23, 2020
Avigilon is shifting its cloud strategy, phasing out its Blue web-managed surveillance platform as a stand-alone brand and merging it with its ACC...
Verkada Paying $100 For Referrals Just To Demo on Jan 22, 2020
Some companies pay for referrals when the referral becomes a customer. Verkada is taking it to the next level - paying $100 referrals fees simply...
Camera Analytics Shootout 2020 - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Jan 22, 2020
Analytics are hot again, thanks to a slew of AI-powered cameras, but whose analytics really work? And how do these new smart cameras compare to top...