Hosted and Managed Access Control Statistics

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 19, 2014

'Cloud' access control - how many integrators are offering it? Why?

And for those that do, are they favoring hosted or managed options.

In the industry's first survey of integrator's adoption of cloud access control, IPVM reveals usage and in-depth commentary.

'*****' ****** ******* - how **** *********** *** offering **? ***?

*** *** ***** **** do, *** **** ******** hosted ** ******* *******.

** *** ********'* ***** ****** of **********'* ******** ** cloud ****** *******, **** reveals ***** *** **-***** commentary.

[***************]

Key *********

*** ******** ***** ******* hosted ** ******* ****** control.

*******, ** ***** **** do, ******* ** ******* the ********* ****** **** the ****** ******* ****** option:

** **** * ******** look ** ***** ******** in *** ******** **** follow.

Neither ****** ** * '****-****'

* ******** ** ********* are *****: **** **** neither ****** ** ******* access. **** ***** *** limited appeal ** ****** *******, since **** ****** ******* customers *** *** ******* for ******* *******:

  • "** ** ***. *** customer **** ** ********* medium ** ***** ************* where ** ******* ******* are * ****** ********."
  • "**. ** ******* ** do *** ******* **** end ***** ******* **** hosting ** **** ********** when ******** **** *********** installation. ** ** *** try ** **** *** customers ********* **** ******** us **** **** ****."
  • "** ** *** ***** managed ****** *******. *****'* fit *** *** ******** type, *********, **********, *********."
  • "** **** *****'*  **** sense ******* *** ********* assign ****** ********** ********** to ***** *********."
  • "** **** **** *******, but ** *** ***** any ********."

***** ****** *** ******** is ***********, ******** ** 'managed' ******** *** *** insignificant:

Managed ******* *******

******** ************, **** **** 1/3rd ** *********** ****** they **** ****** ****** control ********** ********. **** responses *** ** ** at ***** ******** ********** and * **** *** for ********* ******* *** help ** ********* ***** system, *** ************* **** 3rd ***** ******* ** willing ** *** ***** own ******* ******** ******:

  • "** ***** ******* ****** control, ******* ******** ***'* like ***** ********* ******* of **** ******** *********."
  • "***, ** *** **** successful. ** ****** ******* has **** ******* ****** control *** ***** ** years **** **** ********** had ** **** ******** via ******. **** **** two ************** ******* **** time **** ********* ** remote ***** ** ****** control ********."
  • " *** ******* ******** ** the ******* **** **** we **** ***** ***** us *** ******* ** take **** ** *** customers ***** ***** **** still **** ********* ** all ***** *********. **** allows ** ** **** together **** *** ******** and **** * ******* relationship **** **** ** it ********* ********* ******."
  • "*** ******* ********* *** ****** by *** ***** ** the ********, **** *** users **** ***'* ****** their ******* **** ****."

Hosted *** ***** *** *****

***** ***** ********* ********** on *** ********, ******** was ***** **** ***** end-users are *** **** ****** customer, ***** ******** ********** resources *** *******:

  • "***. ********** ********** ** the ******* *************. *** installs **** * ******** for **** ******* ** a ******** ***** ** site **** *** ****** it *******."
  • "**'* *** *** *********, but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."

Hosted ******* *** *******

** *** '******' ****** control, ***** * ***** based ****** ***** *** central ********** ******** ****** than ***** ****** ** servers, ****** ** ********. Less **** **% ** responders **** ****** ******, and *** ** ***** declare ** * ********** venture. **** ******* ****** solutions **** **** **** pricing *** **** ** customer ******** ** *********** for **** *****:

  • "** **** *****, *** most *** ***** ** not **** *** ********* payments."
  • "** **** ** ** would ****** *** *** side, ** *** ***** a ******* ****."
  • "** ***** * ****** solution. ** ** **** to **** *** ********* on *** ******* *******. It's *** *** ********* but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."
  • "** ***** ****** ****** control ************ ********* ************. ** also ***** * ******* service *** ****. ***** they *** **** ***** based, ** ** *** need ** ***** ********** cost ** **** **** standing ** *** *** servers *** ******* ************."
  • "*****, *** ****, **** to *** ***** ** push **."

*******, ***** *** **** integrators **** * ********* experience **** *** ********, calling ** **********:

  • "**** ***************** **** *** **** providers. ** ** * great ********. **** **** for **."
  • "** *** *** *** hosting **** *** *** modules *** ** ** a ***** ******* *** our *********."
  • "******* **** ** ******* and ** *** ****** to ** * ******** product *** *******."
  • "** **** ***** *** hosted ****** ******* *** are ******* ** ******** it. ** *** ** good."

Comments (3)

I think that the major players in hosted/managed access control don't think of themselves as "integrators" and probably aren't well represented in this survey.

Companies that specialize in hosted/managed access (such as Kastle) are very popular with some clients, particular property management firms who operate large high-rise buildings. These companies often manage the electronic building directory and visitor management systems in addition to the access control so that when a new employee is added, they appear in all systems automatically.

I have several clients who use hosted/managed access to whom I have pointed out the great cost savings that could be achieved if they bought and managed their own systems. Often the payback period is six months or less. My arguments have mostly fallen upon deaf ears - most of these clients love the managed access concept and are happy to pay the extra costs for it.

What are the providers charging, and how do you account for a customer's own management costs? I've seen a wide variation in SaaS monthly fees and am curious.

I am unable to provide information on what specific providers are charging, but as I recall, monthly charges in the range of $200 to $300 per month per card reader controlled door are common.

There are also additional charges when the number of transactions (card add/deletes, report requests, etc.) exceeds a certain number per month. All I know is, when I have done assessments for clients that use this type of service, the amount being spent annually seems jaw-droppingly high to me.:)

These providers contend that the end-user saves time by outsourcing the management of the system to someone else and that this offsets the monthly costs. However, many of these providers now have "web portals" where the end-user must type in cardholder name, doors to which the cardholder has access, days and times access is allowed, etc. If the end-user has to do most of his own data entry, how much time is actually saved?

Perhaps IPVM can have one of its reporters contact some of the major players in this space to validate the monthly costs I have stated and to hear their take on the benefits of managed access versus a user-owned and managed system.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

BluB0X Alleges Lenel, S2, Software House Are Dinosaurs on Feb 13, 2020
BluB0X is running an ad campaign labeling Lenel, S2, Software House, Honeywell, AMAG and more as dinosaurs: In a follow-up email to IPVM,...
Brivo Business Profile 2020 on Jan 27, 2020
Brivo has been doing cloud access for more than 20 years. Is the 2020s the decade that cloud access becomes the norm? CEO Steve Van Till recently...
Vunetrix Health Monitoring Company Profile on Nov 26, 2019
Vunetrix boasts that they make the integrators the 'HERO' by using Vunetrix's monitoring. We spoke to Vunetrix to better understand their...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Verkada Favorability Results 2019 on May 29, 2019
Verkada has taken the industry by storm with the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever and a half billion dollar valuation....
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
Lenel Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 26, 2019
The positive news for Lenel is that integrators do not dislike them as much as they used to.  The negative news for Lenel is that integrators...
Eagle Eye Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 21, 2019
Eagle Eye has been the biggest spender in the cloud VMS market including (via their owner) acquiring Brivo for $50 million and CameraManager from...

Most Recent Industry Reports

FLIR New Coronavirus Prioritized Temperature Screening Camera Examined on Apr 03, 2020
FLIR has announced a new series of thermal cameras "prioritized for entities working to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 virus", the A400/A700...
ADI Branch Burglary on Apr 03, 2020
A security systems distributor branch is an odd target for burglary but that happened this week at ADI's Memphis location. Vehicle Smash &...
YCombinator AI Startup Visual One Tested on Apr 02, 2020
Startup Visual One, backed by Silicon Valley's powerful Y Combinator, aims to be "Your 24/7 Watchman" with advanced analytics and object...
Free IPVM Memberships For The Unemployed on Apr 02, 2020
IPVM is giving 3-month free memberships (regular price $99) for the unemployed, no questions asked. To get it, just contact us, your request...
Dahua Faked Coronavirus Camera Marketing on Apr 01, 2020
Dahua has conducted a coronavirus camera global marketing campaign centered around a faked detection. Now, Dahua has expanded this to the USA,...
Video Surveillance Trends 101 on Apr 01, 2020
This report examines major industry factors and how they could impact video surveillance in the next 5 - 10 years. This is part of our Video...
USA's Seek Scan Thermal Temperature System Examined on Apr 01, 2020
This US company, Seek, located down the road from FLIR and founded by former FLIR employees is offering a thermal temperature system for the...
Terrible Convergint Coronavirus Thermal Camera Recommendation on Apr 01, 2020
A week after Convergint disclosed falling revenue, pay and job cuts, Convergint is touting 'extensive research' that is either grossly incompetent...
The IPVM New Products Online Show April 2020 Opens With 40+ Manufacturers on Mar 31, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce the first New Products Online show, with 40+ manufacturers, to be held April 14 to the 16th, free to IPVM members,...