Hosted and Managed Access Control Statistics

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 19, 2014

'Cloud' access control - how many integrators are offering it? Why?

And for those that do, are they favoring hosted or managed options.

In the industry's first survey of integrator's adoption of cloud access control, IPVM reveals usage and in-depth commentary.

'*****' ****** ******* - *** **** *********** *** ******** **? Why?

*** *** ***** **** **, *** **** ******** ****** ** managed *******.

** *** ********'* ***** ****** ** **********'* ******** ** ***** ****** control, **** ******* ***** *** **-***** **********.

[***************]

Key *********

*** ******** ***** ******* ****** ** ******* ****** *******.

*******, ** ***** **** **, ******* ** ******* *** ********* option **** *** ****** ******* ****** ******:

** **** * ******** **** ** ***** ******** ** *** sections **** ******.

Neither ****** ** * '****-****'

* ******** ** ********* *** *****: **** **** ******* ****** or ******* ******. **** ***** *** ******* ****** ** ****** *******, since **** ****** ******* ********* *** *** ******* *** ******* support:

  • "** ** ***. *** ******** **** ** ********* ****** ** large ************* ***** ** ******* ******* *** * ****** ********."
  • "**. ** ******* ** ** *** ******* **** *** ***** benefit **** ******* ** **** ********** **** ******** **** *********** installation. ** ** *** *** ** **** *** ********* ********* that ******** ** **** **** ****."
  • "** ** *** ***** ******* ****** *******. *****'* *** *** our ******** ****, *********, **********, *********."
  • "** **** *****'*  **** ***** ******* *** ********* ****** ****** management ********** ** ***** *********."
  • "** **** **** *******, *** ** *** ***** *** ********."

***** ****** *** ******** ** ***********, ******** ** '*******' ******** are *** *************:

Managed ******* *******

******** ************, **** **** */*** ** *********** ****** **** **** remote ****** ******* ********** ********. **** ********* *** ** ** at ***** ******** ********** *** * **** *** *** ********* looking *** **** ** ********* ***** ******, *** ************* **** 3rd ***** ******* ** ******* ** *** ***** *** ******* deployed ******:

  • "** ***** ******* ****** *******, ******* ******** ***'* **** ***** solutions ******* ** **** ******** *********."
  • "***, ** *** **** **********. ** ****** ******* *** **** managed ****** ******* *** ***** ** ***** **** **** ********** had ** **** ******** *** ******. **** **** *** ************** working **** **** **** ********* ** ****** ***** ** ****** control ********."
  • " *** ******* ******** ** *** ******* **** **** ** **** which ***** ** *** ******* ** **** **** ** *** customers ***** ***** **** ***** **** ********* ** *** ***** equipment. **** ****** ** ** **** ******** **** *** ******** and **** * ******* ************ **** **** ** ** ********* potential ******."
  • "*** ******* ********* *** ****** ** *** ***** ** *** ********, some *** ***** **** ***'* ****** ***** ******* **** ****."

Hosted *** ***** *** *****

***** ***** ********* ********** ** *** ********, ******** *** ***** that ***** ***-***** *** *** **** ****** ********, ***** ******** ********** resources *** *******:

  • "***. ********** ********** ** *** ******* *************. *** ******** **** a ******** *** **** ******* ** * ******** ***** ** site **** *** ****** ** *******."
  • "**'* *** *** *********, *** *** ******* ******* ** *** companies **** ** ** ** ********* ***** **** *** * good ***."

Hosted ******* *** *******

** *** '******' ****** *******, ***** * ***** ***** ****** holds *** ******* ********** ******** ****** **** ***** ****** ** servers, ****** ** ********. **** **** **% ** ********** **** hosted ******, *** *** ** ***** ******* ** * ********** venture. **** ******* ****** ********* **** **** **** ******* *** lack ** ******** ******** ** *********** *** **** *****:

  • "** **** *****, *** **** *** ***** ** *** **** the ********* ********."
  • "** **** ** ** ***** ****** *** *** ****, ** one ***** * ******* ****."
  • "** ***** * ****** ********. ** ** **** ** **** the ********* ** *** ******* *******. **'* *** *** ********* but *** ******* ******* ** *** ********* **** ** ** or ********* ***** **** *** * **** ***."
  • "** ***** ****** ****** ******* ************ ********* ************. ** **** ***** * ******* ******* *** both. ***** **** *** **** ***** *****, ** ** *** need ** ***** ********** **** ** **** **** ******** ** our *** ******* *** ******* ************."
  • "*****, *** ****, **** ** *** ***** ** **** **."

*******, ***** *** **** *********** **** * ********* ********** **** the ********, ******* ** **********:

  • "**** ***************** **** *** **** *********. ** ** * ***** ********. Very **** *** **."
  • "** *** *** *** ******* **** *** *** ******* *** it ** * ***** ******* *** *** *********."
  • "******* **** ** ******* *** ** *** ****** ** ** a ******** ******* *** *******."
  • "** **** ***** *** ****** ****** ******* *** *** ******* to ******** **. ** *** ** ****."

Comments (3)

I think that the major players in hosted/managed access control don't think of themselves as "integrators" and probably aren't well represented in this survey.

Companies that specialize in hosted/managed access (such as Kastle) are very popular with some clients, particular property management firms who operate large high-rise buildings. These companies often manage the electronic building directory and visitor management systems in addition to the access control so that when a new employee is added, they appear in all systems automatically.

I have several clients who use hosted/managed access to whom I have pointed out the great cost savings that could be achieved if they bought and managed their own systems. Often the payback period is six months or less. My arguments have mostly fallen upon deaf ears - most of these clients love the managed access concept and are happy to pay the extra costs for it.

What are the providers charging, and how do you account for a customer's own management costs? I've seen a wide variation in SaaS monthly fees and am curious.

I am unable to provide information on what specific providers are charging, but as I recall, monthly charges in the range of $200 to $300 per month per card reader controlled door are common.

There are also additional charges when the number of transactions (card add/deletes, report requests, etc.) exceeds a certain number per month. All I know is, when I have done assessments for clients that use this type of service, the amount being spent annually seems jaw-droppingly high to me.:)

These providers contend that the end-user saves time by outsourcing the management of the system to someone else and that this offsets the monthly costs. However, many of these providers now have "web portals" where the end-user must type in cardholder name, doors to which the cardholder has access, days and times access is allowed, etc. If the end-user has to do most of his own data entry, how much time is actually saved?

Perhaps IPVM can have one of its reporters contact some of the major players in this space to validate the monthly costs I have stated and to hear their take on the benefits of managed access versus a user-owned and managed system.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
Integrator Profitability Bonuses - Statistics on Mar 13, 2019
While winning projects typically gets the most attention, how profitable those jobs turn out to be is key to the long-term success of integrators....
Network Optix Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 11, 2019
Network Optix is arguably the last new VMS. Founded in 2010, more than a decade after most client/server VMS offerings, the company has become a...
BCDVideo Expansion And Switch From HP To Dell Examined on Mar 11, 2019
BCDVideo says they have more than tripled revenue in the past 5 years and are continuing to grow, powered most recently by switching their lead...
Arcules Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 08, 2019
Arcules has amazing advantages. Tens of millions of funding from Canon. Unlimited access to Milestone's source code (see our test results). But...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon Launches 'Renewed Products Program' on Mar 19, 2019
There are lots of 'pre-owned' cars but pre-owned IP cameras? While such programs are common in other industries, in video surveillance, they are...
Hanwha Tax Evasion Probe, Camera Division Implicated on Mar 19, 2019
A Hanwha group subsidiary was raided as part of a tax evasion probe. While a Korean news media report listed the raided entity as 'Hanwha...
Genetec Security Center 5.8 Tested on Mar 19, 2019
Genetec has released Version 5.8. This comes after a wait of more than a year that caused frustrations for many Genetec partners. Our previous...
Retired Mercury President Returns As Open Options President on Mar 18, 2019
Open Options experienced major changes in 2018, including being acquired by ACRE and losing its President and General Manager, John Berman who...
Large US University End-User Video Surveillance Interview on Mar 18, 2019
Schools have become targets in modern days of active shooters and terrorist fears. The need for video and access security is high. Universities...
Hikvision Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 18, 2019
Hikvision favorability results declined significantly in IPVM's 2019 study of 200+ integrators. While in 2017 Hikvision's favorability was...
ONVIF Favorability Results 2019 on Mar 15, 2019
In the past decade, ONVIF has grown from a reaction to the outside Cisco-lead PSIA challenge, to being the de facto video surveillance standard...
Installation Course - Last Chance on Mar 14, 2019
This is the last chance to register for the March Installation course. This is a unique installation course in a market where little practical...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
US Drafting Separate Rule for NDAA Dahua/Hikvision 'Blacklist' on Mar 14, 2019
The most debated provision of the NDAA ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, et al. is the so-called 'blacklist' provision which would ban any company...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact