Hosted and Managed Access Control Statistics

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 19, 2014

'Cloud' access control - how many integrators are offering it? Why?

And for those that do, are they favoring hosted or managed options.

In the industry's first survey of integrator's adoption of cloud access control, IPVM reveals usage and in-depth commentary.

'*****' ****** ******* - how **** *********** *** offering **? ***?

*** *** ***** **** do, *** **** ******** hosted ** ******* *******.

** *** ********'* ***** ****** of **********'* ******** ** cloud ****** *******, **** reveals ***** *** **-***** commentary.

[***************]

Key *********

*** ******** ***** ******* hosted ** ******* ****** control.

*******, ** ***** **** do, ******* ** ******* the ********* ****** **** the ****** ******* ****** option:

** **** * ******** look ** ***** ******** in *** ******** **** follow.

Neither ****** ** * '****-****'

* ******** ** ********* are *****: **** **** neither ****** ** ******* access. **** ***** *** limited appeal ** ****** *******, since **** ****** ******* customers *** *** ******* for ******* *******:

  • "** ** ***. *** customer **** ** ********* medium ** ***** ************* where ** ******* ******* are * ****** ********."
  • "**. ** ******* ** do *** ******* **** end ***** ******* **** hosting ** **** ********** when ******** **** *********** installation. ** ** *** try ** **** *** customers ********* **** ******** us **** **** ****."
  • "** ** *** ***** managed ****** *******. *****'* fit *** *** ******** type, *********, **********, *********."
  • "** **** *****'*  **** sense ******* *** ********* assign ****** ********** ********** to ***** *********."
  • "** **** **** *******, but ** *** ***** any ********."

***** ****** *** ******** is ***********, ******** ** 'managed' ******** *** *** insignificant:

Managed ******* *******

******** ************, **** **** 1/3rd ** *********** ****** they **** ****** ****** control ********** ********. **** responses *** ** ** at ***** ******** ********** and * **** *** for ********* ******* *** help ** ********* ***** system, *** ************* **** 3rd ***** ******* ** willing ** *** ***** own ******* ******** ******:

  • "** ***** ******* ****** control, ******* ******** ***'* like ***** ********* ******* of **** ******** *********."
  • "***, ** *** **** successful. ** ****** ******* has **** ******* ****** control *** ***** ** years **** **** ********** had ** **** ******** via ******. **** **** two ************** ******* **** time **** ********* ** remote ***** ** ****** control ********."
  • " *** ******* ******** ** the ******* **** **** we **** ***** ***** us *** ******* ** take **** ** *** customers ***** ***** **** still **** ********* ** all ***** *********. **** allows ** ** **** together **** *** ******** and **** * ******* relationship **** **** ** it ********* ********* ******."
  • "*** ******* ********* *** ****** by *** ***** ** the ********, **** *** users **** ***'* ****** their ******* **** ****."

Hosted *** ***** *** *****

***** ***** ********* ********** on *** ********, ******** was ***** **** ***** end-users are *** **** ****** customer, ***** ******** ********** resources *** *******:

  • "***. ********** ********** ** the ******* *************. *** installs **** * ******** for **** ******* ** a ******** ***** ** site **** *** ****** it *******."
  • "**'* *** *** *********, but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."

Hosted ******* *** *******

** *** '******' ****** control, ***** * ***** based ****** ***** *** central ********** ******** ****** than ***** ****** ** servers, ****** ** ********. Less **** **% ** responders **** ****** ******, and *** ** ***** declare ** * ********** venture. **** ******* ****** solutions **** **** **** pricing *** **** ** customer ******** ** *********** for **** *****:

  • "** **** *****, *** most *** ***** ** not **** *** ********* payments."
  • "** **** ** ** would ****** *** *** side, ** *** ***** a ******* ****."
  • "** ***** * ****** solution. ** ** **** to **** *** ********* on *** ******* *******. It's *** *** ********* but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."
  • "** ***** ****** ****** control ************ ********* ************. ** also ***** * ******* service *** ****. ***** they *** **** ***** based, ** ** *** need ** ***** ********** cost ** **** **** standing ** *** *** servers *** ******* ************."
  • "*****, *** ****, **** to *** ***** ** push **."

*******, ***** *** **** integrators **** * ********* experience **** *** ********, calling ** **********:

  • "**** ***************** **** *** **** providers. ** ** * great ********. **** **** for **."
  • "** *** *** *** hosting **** *** *** modules *** ** ** a ***** ******* *** our *********."
  • "******* **** ** ******* and ** *** ****** to ** * ******** product *** *******."
  • "** **** ***** *** hosted ****** ******* *** are ******* ** ******** it. ** *** ** good."

Comments (3)

I think that the major players in hosted/managed access control don't think of themselves as "integrators" and probably aren't well represented in this survey.

Companies that specialize in hosted/managed access (such as Kastle) are very popular with some clients, particular property management firms who operate large high-rise buildings. These companies often manage the electronic building directory and visitor management systems in addition to the access control so that when a new employee is added, they appear in all systems automatically.

I have several clients who use hosted/managed access to whom I have pointed out the great cost savings that could be achieved if they bought and managed their own systems. Often the payback period is six months or less. My arguments have mostly fallen upon deaf ears - most of these clients love the managed access concept and are happy to pay the extra costs for it.

What are the providers charging, and how do you account for a customer's own management costs? I've seen a wide variation in SaaS monthly fees and am curious.

I am unable to provide information on what specific providers are charging, but as I recall, monthly charges in the range of $200 to $300 per month per card reader controlled door are common.

There are also additional charges when the number of transactions (card add/deletes, report requests, etc.) exceeds a certain number per month. All I know is, when I have done assessments for clients that use this type of service, the amount being spent annually seems jaw-droppingly high to me.:)

These providers contend that the end-user saves time by outsourcing the management of the system to someone else and that this offsets the monthly costs. However, many of these providers now have "web portals" where the end-user must type in cardholder name, doors to which the cardholder has access, days and times access is allowed, etc. If the end-user has to do most of his own data entry, how much time is actually saved?

Perhaps IPVM can have one of its reporters contact some of the major players in this space to validate the monthly costs I have stated and to hear their take on the benefits of managed access versus a user-owned and managed system.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...
Maglock Selection Guide on May 16, 2019
One of the most misunderstood yet valuable pieces of electrified hardware is the maglock. Few locks are stronger, but myths and confusion surround...
Bank Security Manager Interview on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more. In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Milestone XProtect 2019 R1 Tested on May 15, 2019
For the past few years, Milestone has released quarterly software updates XProtect VMS platform. What is new and how much impact do the updates...
Access Control Request to Exit (RTE) Tutorial on May 13, 2019
For access controlled doors, especially those with maglocks, 'Request to Exit', or 'RTE' devices are required to override electrified locks to...
Mining Company Security Manager Interview on May 10, 2019
First Quantum Minerals Limited (FQML) is a global enterprise with offices on 4 continents and operations in 7 countries with exploratory operations...
10 Facial Recognition Providers Review (Secutech) on May 09, 2019
Adding to our 19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled report from ISC West, IPVM focused on facial recognition technology for our Day 2 coverage...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact