Hosted and Managed Access Control Statistics

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 19, 2014

'Cloud' access control - how many integrators are offering it? Why?

And for those that do, are they favoring hosted or managed options.

In the industry's first survey of integrator's adoption of cloud access control, IPVM reveals usage and in-depth commentary.

'*****' ****** ******* - *** **** *********** *** ******** **? Why?

*** *** ***** **** **, *** **** ******** ****** ** managed *******.

** *** ********'* ***** ****** ** **********'* ******** ** ***** ****** control, **** ******* ***** *** **-***** **********.

[***************]

Key *********

*** ******** ***** ******* ****** ** ******* ****** *******.

*******, ** ***** **** **, ******* ** ******* *** ********* option **** *** ****** ******* ****** ******:

** **** * ******** **** ** ***** ******** ** *** sections **** ******.

Neither ****** ** * '****-****'

* ******** ** ********* *** *****: **** **** ******* ****** or ******* ******. **** ***** *** ******* ****** ** ****** *******, since **** ****** ******* ********* *** *** ******* *** ******* support:

  • "** ** ***. *** ******** **** ** ********* ****** ** large ************* ***** ** ******* ******* *** * ****** ********."
  • "**. ** ******* ** ** *** ******* **** *** ***** benefit **** ******* ** **** ********** **** ******** **** *********** installation. ** ** *** *** ** **** *** ********* ********* that ******** ** **** **** ****."
  • "** ** *** ***** ******* ****** *******. *****'* *** *** our ******** ****, *********, **********, *********."
  • "** **** *****'*  **** ***** ******* *** ********* ****** ****** management ********** ** ***** *********."
  • "** **** **** *******, *** ** *** ***** *** ********."

***** ****** *** ******** ** ***********, ******** ** '*******' ******** are *** *************:

Managed ******* *******

******** ************, **** **** */*** ** *********** ****** **** **** remote ****** ******* ********** ********. **** ********* *** ** ** at ***** ******** ********** *** * **** *** *** ********* looking *** **** ** ********* ***** ******, *** ************* **** 3rd ***** ******* ** ******* ** *** ***** *** ******* deployed ******:

  • "** ***** ******* ****** *******, ******* ******** ***'* **** ***** solutions ******* ** **** ******** *********."
  • "***, ** *** **** **********. ** ****** ******* *** **** managed ****** ******* *** ***** ** ***** **** **** ********** had ** **** ******** *** ******. **** **** *** ************** working **** **** **** ********* ** ****** ***** ** ****** control ********."
  • " *** ******* ******** ** *** ******* **** **** ** **** which ***** ** *** ******* ** **** **** ** *** customers ***** ***** **** ***** **** ********* ** *** ***** equipment. **** ****** ** ** **** ******** **** *** ******** and **** * ******* ************ **** **** ** ** ********* potential ******."
  • "*** ******* ********* *** ****** ** *** ***** ** *** ********, some *** ***** **** ***'* ****** ***** ******* **** ****."

Hosted *** ***** *** *****

***** ***** ********* ********** ** *** ********, ******** *** ***** that ***** ***-***** *** *** **** ****** ********, ***** ******** ********** resources *** *******:

  • "***. ********** ********** ** *** ******* *************. *** ******** **** a ******** *** **** ******* ** * ******** ***** ** site **** *** ****** ** *******."
  • "**'* *** *** *********, *** *** ******* ******* ** *** companies **** ** ** ** ********* ***** **** *** * good ***."

Hosted ******* *** *******

** *** '******' ****** *******, ***** * ***** ***** ****** holds *** ******* ********** ******** ****** **** ***** ****** ** servers, ****** ** ********. **** **** **% ** ********** **** hosted ******, *** *** ** ***** ******* ** * ********** venture. **** ******* ****** ********* **** **** **** ******* *** lack ** ******** ******** ** *********** *** **** *****:

  • "** **** *****, *** **** *** ***** ** *** **** the ********* ********."
  • "** **** ** ** ***** ****** *** *** ****, ** one ***** * ******* ****."
  • "** ***** * ****** ********. ** ** **** ** **** the ********* ** *** ******* *******. **'* *** *** ********* but *** ******* ******* ** *** ********* **** ** ** or ********* ***** **** *** * **** ***."
  • "** ***** ****** ****** ******* ************ ********* ************. ** **** ***** * ******* ******* *** both. ***** **** *** **** ***** *****, ** ** *** need ** ***** ********** **** ** **** **** ******** ** our *** ******* *** ******* ************."
  • "*****, *** ****, **** ** *** ***** ** **** **."

*******, ***** *** **** *********** **** * ********* ********** **** the ********, ******* ** **********:

  • "**** ***************** **** *** **** *********. ** ** * ***** ********. Very **** *** **."
  • "** *** *** *** ******* **** *** *** ******* *** it ** * ***** ******* *** *** *********."
  • "******* **** ** ******* *** ** *** ****** ** ** a ******** ******* *** *******."
  • "** **** ***** *** ****** ****** ******* *** *** ******* to ******** **. ** *** ** ****."

Comments (3)

I think that the major players in hosted/managed access control don't think of themselves as "integrators" and probably aren't well represented in this survey.

Companies that specialize in hosted/managed access (such as Kastle) are very popular with some clients, particular property management firms who operate large high-rise buildings. These companies often manage the electronic building directory and visitor management systems in addition to the access control so that when a new employee is added, they appear in all systems automatically.

I have several clients who use hosted/managed access to whom I have pointed out the great cost savings that could be achieved if they bought and managed their own systems. Often the payback period is six months or less. My arguments have mostly fallen upon deaf ears - most of these clients love the managed access concept and are happy to pay the extra costs for it.

What are the providers charging, and how do you account for a customer's own management costs? I've seen a wide variation in SaaS monthly fees and am curious.

I am unable to provide information on what specific providers are charging, but as I recall, monthly charges in the range of $200 to $300 per month per card reader controlled door are common.

There are also additional charges when the number of transactions (card add/deletes, report requests, etc.) exceeds a certain number per month. All I know is, when I have done assessments for clients that use this type of service, the amount being spent annually seems jaw-droppingly high to me.:)

These providers contend that the end-user saves time by outsourcing the management of the system to someone else and that this offsets the monthly costs. However, many of these providers now have "web portals" where the end-user must type in cardholder name, doors to which the cardholder has access, days and times access is allowed, etc. If the end-user has to do most of his own data entry, how much time is actually saved?

Perhaps IPVM can have one of its reporters contact some of the major players in this space to validate the monthly costs I have stated and to hear their take on the benefits of managed access versus a user-owned and managed system.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
GDPR For Access Control Guide on Jul 03, 2018
Electronic access control is common in businesses plus organizations are increasingly considering biometrics for access control. With GDPR coming...
Allegion Acquires Isonas on Jun 29, 2018
Isonas failed to 'revolutionize' access control as they regularly claimed. Now, nearly 20 years after their founding, they are being acquired by...
Replacing / Switching Access Control Systems Guide on Jun 28, 2018
Ripping out and replacing access control systems is hard for important reasons. Because users typically hold on to access control systems for as...
Free Online NFPA, IBC, and ADA Codes and Standards on Jun 27, 2018
Finding applicable codes for security work can be a costly task, with printed books and pdf downloads costing hundreds or thousands. However, a...
'Secure Channel' OSDP Access Control Examined on Jun 21, 2018
Despite claiming to be better than Wiegand, OSDP's initial releases did not address the lack of encryption between reader and controller, leaving...
Most Wanted Improvements In Manufacturer Technical Support (Statistics) on Jun 21, 2018
5 key areas of improvement and 1 clear wanted support feature were voiced by 140+ integrator responses to: What improvement in manufacturer...
IFSEC 2018 Final Show Report on Jun 20, 2018
IPVM attended the IFSEC show for the first time this year. The Chinese took over the show, centered on Hikvision, flanked by Dahua, Huawei and a...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 13, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer 2018 This...
US Tariffs Hit China Video Surveillance on Jul 13, 2018
Chinese video surveillance products avoided tariffs for the first two rounds. Now, in the third round, many video surveillance products will be...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact