Hosted and Managed Access Control Statistics

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 19, 2014

'Cloud' access control - how many integrators are offering it? Why?

And for those that do, are they favoring hosted or managed options.

In the industry's first survey of integrator's adoption of cloud access control, IPVM reveals usage and in-depth commentary.

'*****' ****** ******* - how **** *********** *** offering **? ***?

*** *** ***** **** do, *** **** ******** hosted ** ******* *******.

** *** ********'* ***** ****** of **********'* ******** ** cloud ****** *******, **** reveals ***** *** **-***** commentary.

[***************]

Key *********

*** ******** ***** ******* hosted ** ******* ****** control.

*******, ** ***** **** do, ******* ** ******* the ********* ****** **** the ****** ******* ****** option:

** **** * ******** look ** ***** ******** in *** ******** **** follow.

Neither ****** ** * '****-****'

* ******** ** ********* are *****: **** **** neither ****** ** ******* access. **** ***** *** limited appeal ** ****** *******, since **** ****** ******* customers *** *** ******* for ******* *******:

  • "** ** ***. *** customer **** ** ********* medium ** ***** ************* where ** ******* ******* are * ****** ********."
  • "**. ** ******* ** do *** ******* **** end ***** ******* **** hosting ** **** ********** when ******** **** *********** installation. ** ** *** try ** **** *** customers ********* **** ******** us **** **** ****."
  • "** ** *** ***** managed ****** *******. *****'* fit *** *** ******** type, *********, **********, *********."
  • "** **** *****'*  **** sense ******* *** ********* assign ****** ********** ********** to ***** *********."
  • "** **** **** *******, but ** *** ***** any ********."

***** ****** *** ******** is ***********, ******** ** 'managed' ******** *** *** insignificant:

Managed ******* *******

******** ************, **** **** 1/3rd ** *********** ****** they **** ****** ****** control ********** ********. **** responses *** ** ** at ***** ******** ********** and * **** *** for ********* ******* *** help ** ********* ***** system, *** ************* **** 3rd ***** ******* ** willing ** *** ***** own ******* ******** ******:

  • "** ***** ******* ****** control, ******* ******** ***'* like ***** ********* ******* of **** ******** *********."
  • "***, ** *** **** successful. ** ****** ******* has **** ******* ****** control *** ***** ** years **** **** ********** had ** **** ******** via ******. **** **** two ************** ******* **** time **** ********* ** remote ***** ** ****** control ********."
  • " *** ******* ******** ** the ******* **** **** we **** ***** ***** us *** ******* ** take **** ** *** customers ***** ***** **** still **** ********* ** all ***** *********. **** allows ** ** **** together **** *** ******** and **** * ******* relationship **** **** ** it ********* ********* ******."
  • "*** ******* ********* *** ****** by *** ***** ** the ********, **** *** users **** ***'* ****** their ******* **** ****."

Hosted *** ***** *** *****

***** ***** ********* ********** on *** ********, ******** was ***** **** ***** end-users are *** **** ****** customer, ***** ******** ********** resources *** *******:

  • "***. ********** ********** ** the ******* *************. *** installs **** * ******** for **** ******* ** a ******** ***** ** site **** *** ****** it *******."
  • "**'* *** *** *********, but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."

Hosted ******* *** *******

** *** '******' ****** control, ***** * ***** based ****** ***** *** central ********** ******** ****** than ***** ****** ** servers, ****** ** ********. Less **** **% ** responders **** ****** ******, and *** ** ***** declare ** * ********** venture. **** ******* ****** solutions **** **** **** pricing *** **** ** customer ******** ** *********** for **** *****:

  • "** **** *****, *** most *** ***** ** not **** *** ********* payments."
  • "** **** ** ** would ****** *** *** side, ** *** ***** a ******* ****."
  • "** ***** * ****** solution. ** ** **** to **** *** ********* on *** ******* *******. It's *** *** ********* but *** ******* ******* or *** ********* **** no ** ** ********* staff **** *** * good ***."
  • "** ***** ****** ****** control ************ ********* ************. ** also ***** * ******* service *** ****. ***** they *** **** ***** based, ** ** *** need ** ***** ********** cost ** **** **** standing ** *** *** servers *** ******* ************."
  • "*****, *** ****, **** to *** ***** ** push **."

*******, ***** *** **** integrators **** * ********* experience **** *** ********, calling ** **********:

  • "**** ***************** **** *** **** providers. ** ** * great ********. **** **** for **."
  • "** *** *** *** hosting **** *** *** modules *** ** ** a ***** ******* *** our *********."
  • "******* **** ** ******* and ** *** ****** to ** * ******** product *** *******."
  • "** **** ***** *** hosted ****** ******* *** are ******* ** ******** it. ** *** ** good."

Comments (3)

I think that the major players in hosted/managed access control don't think of themselves as "integrators" and probably aren't well represented in this survey.

Companies that specialize in hosted/managed access (such as Kastle) are very popular with some clients, particular property management firms who operate large high-rise buildings. These companies often manage the electronic building directory and visitor management systems in addition to the access control so that when a new employee is added, they appear in all systems automatically.

I have several clients who use hosted/managed access to whom I have pointed out the great cost savings that could be achieved if they bought and managed their own systems. Often the payback period is six months or less. My arguments have mostly fallen upon deaf ears - most of these clients love the managed access concept and are happy to pay the extra costs for it.

What are the providers charging, and how do you account for a customer's own management costs? I've seen a wide variation in SaaS monthly fees and am curious.

I am unable to provide information on what specific providers are charging, but as I recall, monthly charges in the range of $200 to $300 per month per card reader controlled door are common.

There are also additional charges when the number of transactions (card add/deletes, report requests, etc.) exceeds a certain number per month. All I know is, when I have done assessments for clients that use this type of service, the amount being spent annually seems jaw-droppingly high to me.:)

These providers contend that the end-user saves time by outsourcing the management of the system to someone else and that this offsets the monthly costs. However, many of these providers now have "web portals" where the end-user must type in cardholder name, doors to which the cardholder has access, days and times access is allowed, etc. If the end-user has to do most of his own data entry, how much time is actually saved?

Perhaps IPVM can have one of its reporters contact some of the major players in this space to validate the monthly costs I have stated and to hear their take on the benefits of managed access versus a user-owned and managed system.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
Nortek Blue Pass Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jul 11, 2019
Nortek claims BluePass mobile readers are a 'more secure and easy to use approach to access', but our testing uncovered security problems and...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Maglocks Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 01, 2019
Maglocks divide access control specifiers perhaps more than any other component. Many are concerned about life safety codes, but others cite...
Directory of 60 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...
HD Analog vs IP Guide on Jul 16, 2019
For years, HD resolution and single cable signal/power were IP camera advantages, with analog cameras limited to much lower resolution and...
How To Troubleshoot Wiegand Reader Problems - Inverted Wiring on Jul 16, 2019
Wiegand is the dominant method of connecting access readers, but problems can arise for installers. In fact, one of the most difficult reader...
ZeroEyes Gun Detection Startup on Jul 16, 2019
A gun detection video analytics startup, ZeroEyes, is being led by a group of 6 former Navy SEALs, aiming to "save lives" by using AI to assist...
Motorola Acquires Watchguard, Adds to Vigilant And Avigilon on Jul 15, 2019
2 years ago, Motorola had no position nor relevancy to video surveillance. Now, they own major video surveillance, LPR and body camera providers...
Hikvision Global News Reports Directory on Jul 15, 2019
Hikvision has received the most global news reporting of any video surveillance company, ever, ranging from the WSJ, the Financial Times, Reuters,...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 15, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact