Auto Back Focus (ABF) Preference Statistics

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Nov 26, 2011

Auto back focus has become a more common feature in the past couple of years, with many, if not most, new IP camera offerings containing this capability. Manufacturers claim that auto back focus reduces installation time and makes focusing cameras easier, especially at megapixel resolutions. How do integrators, the ones actually using (or not using) the technology really feel about it, however? As part of our Fall 2011 survey, we aimed to find out.

The Question

We asked the following question of over 80 integrators, "How important is auto back focus / auto focusing capabilities?" Their response breakdown:

The Responses

Integrators overwhelmingly preferred auto back focus. Nearly 55% of respondents said ABF was strongly preferred, with 41% answering that it's a nice feature to have. Only about 3.5% responded that ABF was not important. Those answering that ABF was preferred cited two main reasons:

  • Installation savings
  • Ease of focusing megapixel cameras

Installation Savings

The first, and most commonly cited, reason integrators answered that they preferred ABF was savings on installation and maintenance of cameras. This is most often purely time savings, since the technician sets the camera's field of view, and pushes the auto back focus button. However, rental of lifts for cameras which can't be reached by stepladders is also a factor. 

  • "If it's cold outside it's hard to focus a camera without shaking. Wearing gloves and focusing is hard to do. I know thats not the purpose of ABF but it's a handy way of geting the object in focus without wasting time."
  • "Because our client hates calling a technician to focus cameras every bit as much as we hate sending them for that. Every consumer point and shoot in the world can focus itself, and they don't see why a $1000 piece of commercial grade hardware can't."
  • "Auto back focus saves time and provides reliable, consistent results. VERY important when you have to rent a lift to go back and tweak a camera because the tech didn't quite get it crisp enough."
  • "The system does the focusing both better and faster usually."
  • "Big advantage when working alone with a camera that is difficult to access."
  • "We can install the cameras so much faster and the customer can adjust the FOV for their needs when they see fit."
  • "No matter how many times you think the camera is ready, it still needs that little 'tweak'"

Focusing Megapixel Cameras

The second reason integrators preferred auto back focus was for ease of focusing megapixel cameras. Focusing cameras above standard definition can become difficult. Using composite outputs, which many megapixel cameras are equipped with, it's difficult to adjust fine focus with a handheld monitor, due to its small screen size. Carrying a laptop, which has better resolution and a bigger screen, up a ladder is also a hassle, leading many integrators to use two men to manually focus cameras, which can also be difficult to manage. 

  • "With the higher MP cameras the margin for focus error is very small. Significantly weighting this capability for camera specifications and purchases in 2012."
  • "Love auto back focus! Ever try focusing a 5mp mounted 20ft up on a pole?
  • "Anything that speeds the focusing process is a god-send, especially above SD."
  • "During night and while setting up camera, megapixel are impossible to do on a loptop."
  • "This is a must-have especially with how difficult it is to focus a mega-pixel lens."

Since focusing megapixel cameras was mentioned numerous times, we expected that those deploying more megapixel than SD cameras would more strongly prefer ABF. However, the percentages between these two groups were nearly identical, which would suggest those deploying SD cameras appreciate the benefits of ABF as much as others.

Trends Based on System Size

ABF preference increased significantly among those integrators deploying more than 32 cameras per site. Among these integrators, 71% strongly preferred ABF compared to only 39% for integrators typically deploying less than 32 cameras. While any labor savings is beneficial, even on small systems, it stands to reason that those deploying large systems would realize greater benefits than those only installing a handful of cameras at each site. It can also reduce the amount of time rented lifts are required on site, resulting in further savings.

Conclusions

Auto back focus has become a more and more common feature in IP cameras in the past 1-2 years, with manufacturers both major and minor adding it to the new products. Based on this feedback from integrators, we would expect this trend to continue or strengthen, with ABF becoming less of a nice feature to have, and more of a standard feature expected of all new IP cameras.

3 reports cite this report:

Top Features For Easy Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 05, 2018
Camera installation is the most fundamental and common task for video security technicians. Because of this, camera manufacturers market their...
Lowest Priced Auto Focus Cameras on Aug 06, 2015
Auto-focus has historically been regarded as a high-end feature, found on expensive cameras. But with prices trending ever lower, is this still the...
Surveillance Statistics Survey Directory Vol 1 on Jan 03, 2012
In this report, we aggregate and present dozens of statistics about how surveillance is being used in the real world. Recently, we conducted an in...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...
H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results. However,...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
Pole Mount Camera Installation Guide on Apr 11, 2019
Poles are a popular but challenging choice for deploying surveillance cameras outdoors. Poles are indispensable for putting cameras at the right...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact