Where End User Purchase Surveillance - Stats

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Jul 30, 2012

One of the biggest decisions surveillance end users make is how to buy their systems. Traditionally, integrators were the primary source but aggressive distributors and internet buying have opened up other options. In this note, we examine the results of our recent survey of end user and specifically ask them: "How do You Buy Surveillance Products?'

Poll Question

The chart below depicts the answers from 60 end users responses:

Disclaimer

Our survey responses primarily came from rich first world countries and mostly using large systems of 100+ cameras. As such, the group is skewed to higher end, more 'elite' users. Also, since they responded online, this group is more likely to use the Internet to cut costs, buy direct, etc.

These numbers are unlikely to represent the overall industry but may represent emerging trends. Carefully consider how applicable this is to your situation.

Key Takeaways

Here are the key drivers for each group:

  • Buy from Integrators: Driven by regulation, system complexity, or convenience.
  • Buy from Distributors: Save money when they have their own forces to install and support product. 'Buying Direct' allows them to cut out the middlemen and procure equipment more cheaply by avoiding an integrator's markup.
  • Buy from a Mix of Sources: Prefer to 'shop around' on a case by case basis for the best value. Many in this group describe using integrators for large projects, but making smaller purchases directly from distributors.

Buy from Integrators

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Responses in this group cite the 'value proposition' of integrators as the primary reason for making the choice. Typically, integrators resell equipment as part of a larger effort in installation, configuration, and maintenance of surveillance systems. Many respondents noted that they prefer to buy through integrators because it reduces their overall burden:

  • "I don't want to install it, I don't want to warrant it and I don't want to service it, I've got enough to do."
  • "Service and warranty issues all in one stop."
  • "I typically buy through our integrator because then I get their assistance in chosing the correct product for our needs as well as their support with the product. I know I pay more for it this way, but I'm ok with that."
  • "I like working with an Integrator because we can work together as a team to come up with the best solution based on the purpose and available budget."
  • "A local integrator has a good reputation and has been very receptive to meeting our needs while understanding our tight budget constraints."
  • "Installing such devices is not (and will not be one of) our core competencies so we use an integrator."
  • "We use integrators/installers to do our design, layout and installations."
  • "Our surveillance systems in our casino properties are quite complex and require a systems integrator."
  • "Our integrator has been a great partner for us over the last several years and have been a tremendous resource as our system has grown and changed. Through working together, they have developed an understanding of our business and I have gained a greater understanding of CCTV systems and surveillance."
Still others mention they are required to buy through integrators as a matter of government procurement regulation. 
  • "State regulations for open bids."
  • "Government must buy from integrator/installer."
  • "Our purchase system requires open bidding." 

Interestingly, one end user cited resell authorization limitations of certain lines as the reason they buy from integrators.

  • "We have grown to appreciate the quality and cost point of Avigilon cameras and must purchase them from authorized re-sellers."

While a single data point is not significant, one of the most hotly debated practices is to resell product exclusively through approved integrators or installers. The full impact of these policies cannot be determined by this survey, however 60% of the responses chose to buy 'uncontrolled' products all or part of the time. In the groups that follow, we investigate that majority.

Buy from Distributors

These responses are focused on 'bottom line' acquisition because they have internal resources for installation and support. These users choose to be independent of integrators, and do not have to pay additional markups on purchases.

  • "The number one reason is cost. Additionally, I'm concerned that integrators tend to be biased toward one manufacturer or another. Buying directly from a dealer allows me to buy exactly what I need for a particular location."
  • "Better pricing."
  • "We have saved over $85,000 by installing easy and small IP cameras. That savings includes many old PTZ replacements with still cameras."
  • "Have used installer previously but with have the expertise in-house to do it ourselves just as well or better."
  • "We handle all of our installs ourselves and buy through dealers whom we have contracts with."
  • "We deal directly with Distributor/Dealer when possible."
  • "We have our own IT Department that installs"
  • "We do a lot of the installation and integration ourselves with our volunteer force."
  • "If I am buying one or two IP cams to supplement an existing system I will buy them online from whomever is selling them the cheapest. Any issues I run into with IP cameras can be handled in-house by myself, IT team or the network team. We have found that once an IP camera is up and running (the majority of the time) we have no further issues with it."

Users in this group are atypical in the sense they have trained staff available to perform installation work themselves.

Buy from a Mix of Sources

Responses in this category play 'both sides of the fence' as their needs dictate:

  • "We specify our cameras, network equipment and other VMS system components rather than relying on integrator recommendations or offerings. This requires us to buy from multiple sources. Not ideal, but we have not found a single integrator that can adequately support our legacy systems and current VMS needs."
  • "Repairs and smaller installations can be purchased through a distributor. Larger installations require contracts resulting in integrators/installers."
  • "Depending on the size of the project we may opt to use an integrator or at times install and integrate ourselves."
  • "Integrators/installers on new projects. Dealers for maintaining existing system."
  • "On large purchases we run an RFP. For adding small amounts of cameras we can go direct to a distributor and install them ourselves."
  • "Either, depending on price or convenience"
  • "It all depends on the project. If I am doing a new building and need a turnkey solution I will use an integrator/installer. If I am buying a few cams for replacement I will buy them online."
  • "On large installations, we have a dealer conduct the transaction for ease of repairs during warranty periods. On smaller installations, we install to keep the cost down."
  • "Depends on which option is the cheapest and easiest to work with."
  • "I can shop around for the best price."
  • "I trust my Integrator, but buying from multiple sources gets me the best deals."

A significant percentage of end users report they solicit integrators for large, complex purchases or when internal labor is not available to perform work. However, they elect to buy equipment directly in modest amounts or for simple projects performed by their own forces. The responses acknowledge the value in having both options open depending on the scope of the purchase.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
Maglocks Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 01, 2019
Maglocks divide access control specifiers perhaps more than any other component. Many are concerned about life safety codes, but others cite...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...

Most Recent Industry Reports

How To Quickly Assess An Unknown Company on Jul 23, 2019
There are hundreds of companies in the physical security markets, ranging from a flood of new startups to small companies that may or may not be...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact