Hikvision Removed From US GSA Sales

By: John Honovich, Published on Jan 31, 2017

The US Government's GSA has removed Hikvision manufactured products for sale following IPVM's criticism of Hikvision being listed as 'Made In USA'.

In December 2016, over 1,400 Hikvision products were listed and available for sale to the US military, US federal agencies, US state governments, etc. In particular, two Hikvision re-sellers were selling hundreds of Hikvision products and falsely categorizing the Chinese government owned manufacturer's products as 'Made In USA'.

Now, those Hikvision manufactured products have been removed.

 

Remaining on the GSA are only a few products that are labelled Hikvision but listed under a different manufacturer 'UNITED DGITAL' / 'United Digital Technologies.

Clearly, Hikvision products are not made in the USA and as we explained in the original post, due to their China government origin are against the rules of being sold on the US GSA.

Explanation Earlier

The GSA initially responded to an IPVM inquiry a few weeks ago:

The [Hikvision] products offered by Global Data Center were refurbished in the United States, and therefore are TAA compliant products. We take Supply Chain Risk Management very seriously and we thank you for the information. We will look into it accordingly.

The refurbishment claim made little sense on many levels - even if the models were refurbished, such a move would only restore them to their original state, not transform it; such refurbishment could not reasonably be verified and would therefore be an easy loophole for unscrupulous sellers; and finally that it would not be feasible to have hundreds of different refurbished models available, including 'refurbished' Hikvision brackets, one of the many listed models.

GSA Removes

In the past two weeks, however, the GSA has removed those thousand plus Hikvision parts / models. The GSA responded to IPVM's request for comment but said they needed approval from their communications team to make a statement. Such approval has not been provided. We suspect they discovered that the 'refurbishment' claim was groundless.

Positive Resolution

The USA GSA should be commended for removing Hikvision products and Hikvision should be aware that IPVM shall continue to monitor for such abuses. The sale of Hikvision, Chinese government owned manufacturer's surveillance equipment, is a risk to the US government. 

9 reports cite this report:

Dahua and Hikvision Products Illegally Sold To US Government GSA on May 06, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision products are being widely and illegally sold to the US government GSA. The sellers are falsely claiming these China products to...
Chinese Government Blocks IPVM on Oct 22, 2018
IPVM has been blocked by the Chinese government without any notice or explanation. This means IPVM.com is no longer officially accessible anywhere...
Remove Dahua and Hikvision Gov Installs Required By US House Bill Ban on Jun 06, 2018
The final released US House Bill HR 5515 verifies that it not only prohibits the purchasing of Dahua and Hikvision products, it requires removing...
Hikvision Removed From US Army Base, Congressional Hearing Called on Jan 12, 2018
Hikvision has been removed from a US Army Base and a US congressional committee is planning a hearing on cybersecurity risks and specifically,...
WSJ Investigates Hikvision on Nov 13, 2017
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has released a detailed investigation into Hikvision's government ownership and cybersecurity problems, hitting the...
US Air Force Cancels Hikvision RFQ on May 01, 2017
The US Air Force has cancelled an RFQ for Hikvision video surveillance, following IPVM notifying the Air Force that Hikvision products are made in...
Q1 2017 Video Surveillance Market Review on Mar 30, 2017
These are the most notable moves and events for January - March 2017 in the video surveillance market. Cybersecurity Rising Cybersecurity, once...
'Dirty': Hikvision Attacks Genetec on Feb 20, 2017
Hikvision is angry at the growing public awareness that Hikvision is owned by the Chinese government. They took aim at Genetec,...
Hikvision False 'Made In USA', Sold to US Government on Dec 20, 2016
A China State Owned Company, Hikvision products are listed as "Made In United States of America" and for sale to US government agencies, despite...

Comments (23)

Only IPVM Members may comment. Login or Join.

This is another good example that calling out issues publicly helps get them resolved. The reason is 20% IPVM and 80% you who read IPVM. The attention these articles receive and the resulting complaints you make build a level of concern that organizations take seriously.

This started with a member's email to us. We periodically check GSA for Hikvision listings but earlier in 2016, the listings were very few. A member emailed us in December alerting us to 1,000+ new listings which triggered us doing the article, and the subsequent removal from the GSA.

Let us know (info@ipvm.com) of any issues with any manufacturer. It will be treated confidentially and we will investigate.

John -

The community of readers and your publications help all of us become better consumers, advocates and activists. As I've commented in past, the law is clear about Chinese goods in the Federal Marketplace - glad to see the GSA is now applying regulations appropriately. 

Thanks for your good work.

Ed

Well done. 

Kudos to John and the rest of the IPVM team!  

Xi Jinping is going to remove you from his Christmas card list now.  No matter.  President Trump just added you to his!  Well done!

LOL

Without getting into the politics of this, I will say that having non-USA made anything on the GSA list is absurd. How anyone allowed that to begin with should be tarred and feathered... or waterboarded, thanks to Trump.

So what practical IP PTZ cameras are actually made in the USA?   So little (if any) tech at this level is actually manufactured in the USA.... I wouldn't be surprised if GSA had to remove all cameras completely once they vetted the list for real.   And *all* mobile phones for that matter to boot.   Get my point about reality vs nationalist chest beating?

All I'm saying is there are rules about GSM money being spent on US made products. As long as that is a hard rule, it has to be obeyed. 

If the rule cannot be followed, it needs to be changed in some way. But cheating the system is low ball, scum of the earth territory. 

I agree.  However, I expect there is a lot of cheating or the list of available products would be nearly empty.   Maybe if you do final assembly of components in the US before delivering, that can be considered "made in USA" for GSA standards.   Kinda like when the guy at Walmart puts the wheels on the bike you just bought your kid.  "Made in USA" now.  Good to go.  ;-)

There are a long list of 'designated countries' that may be sold in the US GSA. It includes Korea, Japan and Taiwan to name just a few countries that regularly make surveillance cameras. China is not on the list. Full list of designated countries here.

Another serious problem that GSA contends with is counterfeit gear - approved "Western brand" equipment that has been copied or refurbished. There is a notable amount of it making its way into the supply chain via disreputable internet suppliers and disreputable contractors who purchase it outside of approved channels and don't bother to verify if it is in fact legitimate equipment.

China of course is a primary source of counterfeit networking equipment that may have back doors or weakened security built in. So, that new Cisco or HP PoE switch that may be found on an internet supply house site for half the price - probably counterfeit or an unsanctioned refurb, and installing it into your customer's secure network is malpractice of the highest order, and, when installing it in a government network can become criminal.

 

 

Interesting article.  I wonder how many other products are on the GSA Schedule that are not technically made in Trade Compliant countries?

Good job. Keep up the good work. 

Great Job!  This is a fantastic accomplishment on the part of IPVM. The industry should have a lobbying group to take on these issues. You have started to fill that void.

Thanks.

Ironically, the industry does have a lobbying group - SIA - but SIA is funded and run by the manufacturers so it is hard for them to take actions that would hurt specific members, like Hikvision.

I would be surprised if those cameras "made" in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea are not sourcing many of their parts elsewhere. Even China and Taiwan have trade agreements of  apx. $200 Billion a year. Has the GSA looked in depth as to who is really making what for whom?

 

Just saying,

James

Good Job John,

Obviously, IPVM's independence and watchdog approach on these type issues, yields far better results and actions, than that of other (unnamed) industry lobbying group(s). 

Thanks for protecting our interests!

- Terry

any other oddities?  Like... how's a Swedish camera maker meet this requirement?  Or any other import for that matter.

 

p.s. IMO one should never underestimate the creativity of beltway bandits attempting to slide things onto the GSA pricelist.  We used to watch them do amazing things to sell TCP/IP under "GOSIP" compliance...

Like... how's a Swedish camera maker meet this requirement?

Sweden is on the list of designated countries whose products may be sold on the GSA

Link didn't work for me.  I assume you meant http://info.winvale.com/taa-compliant-countries-for-gsa (hope that link worked.)  This requires it be "substantially transformed" in the US or a signatory country.  So if someone makes a camera in, say Kiribati, and they do "substantial" final assembly in the US, they'd be fine.   Which answers my question, yes.

So if someone makes a camera in, say Kiribati, and they do "substantial" final assembly in the US, they'd be fine.

No, that is wrong.

Since Kiribati is on the list, the camera can be made in Kiribati and sold on the US GSA, same thing if the camera was made in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, etc.

If the camera was 'made' in China, it would require 'substantial transformation' in the US. That was the point in the original post about the Hikvision partner claiming they refurbished cameras, which was their tactic to 'transform' the camera, which now, de facto, the GSA has rejected.

Is there a official GSA document that cites this ?

There is no document I am aware of that cites the removal. We have spoken with GSA several times on this, and they have confirmed that the Hikvision products should not be listed on GSA schedules.

 

Related Reports

Bloomberg Warns Of Huawei Hisilicon IP Camera Usage on Jan 30, 2019
Bloomberg has picked up IPVM's December exclusive - "Huawei Hisilicon Quietly Powering Tens of Millions of Western IoT Devices" and ran its own...
First US State, Vermont, Bans Dahua and Hikvision on Feb 21, 2019
The first US state, Vermont, has issued a ban on a number of Chinese and Russian manufacturers including the world's 2 largest video surveillance...
Dahua and Hikvision Products Illegally Sold To US Government GSA on May 06, 2019
Dahua and Hikvision products are being widely and illegally sold to the US government GSA. The sellers are falsely claiming these China products to...
Hikvision VP On Muslim Oppression on May 14, 2019
Hikvision has won tens of millions of dollars, at least, in direct contracts with the Chinese government that oppresses Muslims, including a forced...
Trump Signs 'Huawei Ban' - Executive Order Targeting Foreign Adversary Technology on May 16, 2019
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order targeting technology provided by 'foreign adversaries', in what is widely being called a...
Ban Proceeds But White House Requests Delay of Hikvision / Dahua Partner Blacklist on Jun 10, 2019
While the August 2019 start of the US government ban on buying Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, etc. proceeds, the White House's budget director is...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
US - China Review Commission Cites IPVM on Foreign Provider Threat on Oct 01, 2019
A bipartisan congressional commission cited IPVM twice in its analysis of how the PRC government protects its surveillance firms from foreign...
US Issues Criminal Charges Against Aventura For Fraudulently Selling Hikvision And Other China Products on Nov 07, 2019
The US government has made an unprecedented move on the video surveillance supply chain, charging a US company, Aventura for "having conspired with...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Motorola / Avigilon Drops ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
Motorola Solutions has pulled out of ISC West 2020 effective immediately, because of coronavirus concerns, IPVM has learned. This is done amidst...
Cancel or Not? Industry Split Over ISC West on Feb 26, 2020
The industry is split, polarized, over whether ISC West 2020 should run or be canceled. New IPVM survey results of 400+ respondents show heated...
Coronavirus Hits Sony, Bosch Says Switch on Feb 26, 2020
Sony's fall in video surveillance has been severe over the past decade. Now, they may be done. In this note, we examine Bosch's new...
Video Surveillance Cameras 101 on Feb 25, 2020
Cameras come in many shapes, sizes and specifications. This 101 examines the basics of cameras and features used in 2020. In this report, we...
Favorite Video Analytic Manufacturers 2020 on Feb 25, 2020
Video analytics is now as hot as ever, driven by the excitement of advancing deep learning offers. But what are actually integrator's...
Latest London Police Facial Recognition Suffers Serious Issues on Feb 24, 2020
On February 20, IPVM visited another live face rec deployment by London police, but this time the system was thwarted by technical problems and...
Masks Cause Major Facial Recognition Problems on Feb 24, 2020
Coronavirus is spurring an increase in the use of medical masks, which new IPVM test results show cause major problems for facial recognition...
Every VMS Will Become a VSaaS on Feb 21, 2020
VMS is ending. Soon every VMS will be a VSaaS. Competitive dynamics will be redrawn. What does this mean? VMS Historically...
Video Surveillance 101 Course - Last Chance on Feb 20, 2020
This is the last chance to join IPVM's first Video Surveillance 101 course, designed to help those new to the industry to quickly understand the...
Vulnerability Directory For Access Credentials on Feb 20, 2020
Knowing which access credentials are insecure can be difficult to see, especially because most look and feel the same. Even insecure 125 kHz...