HID vs NXP Credentials

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Sep 12, 2013

Two companies dominate the global market for access control credentials: HID Global and NXP Semiconductor. Both companies own or influence huge chunks of the credentials game, so which one should you choose? In this note, we explain how their offerings differ, interoperate, and how the choice impacts system selection.

Credentials Dominated by Giants

******* ** ***** ******** of *** *********** ***************** ********* ** ******************* *** *** *************.

*** ********

***** *** ****** ***** migrating **** **** '*********' credentials ** *** *** 2000's,*** ********** ** ********** **** it's ****** "****" *********. ***** ***** purchased ** *********, *** ******* ****** 'the *********** *****' *** a **** ***** ** the ******** ******, *** OEMs ******** *** ****** brands **** *****, *********, and *******. *** *******'* best-known ******* *******:

  • "*********": ** ***** ************, *** ***** ********* used *** ********* **** in *** *******
  • ******: ** *** ****** specific **.** *** '*********'

*** ** *** '*******' choice *** *********** ** the **. ******* ** commanding ****** *****, *** is **** ** ******* the *** ** *** credential ******* ** * variety ** ********** *** reader *************. **** **** marketing ******* '*** ***** compliant' *********, *** ******** follows "**** *" ********* (vs **** "*" - described ** **** ****** later).

*** ********

******** ******** *************,******-***** ********* * ****** ** 'contactless' ********** ********** **** in * ****** ** markets - ********, *******, and **********. **** ********** adoption ** *** ********* in ********** *************, *** offers * ******* ** types ***** ** ****, including:

  • ****** ****: ***'* ************ ***** ** ***** drafts ** *** *********, but *** ** ****** adopted ** ***'* "*********" lines
  • ******/*******: ** *** ********* based *** '*********' ******, also ********* ** **.** MHz *** '*******' ******* was ********** ** *** early ***** ** *********** the ****** **** '****** Classic' ***********. ******* *********** feature ******** ********** **** required ****** ********** *****. The '*******' ****** **** under ******** *** *************** ** ***** *******, *** ******* ********* this ******. ******* ***** improvements **** **** **** to ***********, *** ******** MIFARE ******* ***** ***** be ****, *** *** format ****** ***** ** 'MIFARE/DESFire'.

****** ***, ***'* ********** formats *** '*******-****' *** the ********* ********* *** available *** ********** *** for ** ****.  *** manufacturers *** *** ***** product ** "**** *" standards.

***** ***********

** * **** ******* degree, ***** ****-***** **** formats ************ *** ** in ******** ****** *******, including:

  • **************.***: **-******* ***** **** format, ********** **** *** logical ****** ************* ***** on .*** *********
  • **** ******: ********** *** ** Japan, ********** *** ******** proximity ******* (**** *******, banking)

***** *** ****** **** in ****** *******, ***** formats ********** *** **** primary **** *** *** the **** ***** ******* of ***** ** ** the '****** ******'.

US ** *** *****

******* ** *** **************'* strength ** **** *** *** **** ** licensing, ******, *******, *** the ********** *********** *** popular ***** **** ********** outside *** **.

*******, *** ******'* ********* markets *** ** *** Americas, ********** ** *** US. ******* *** ********** cost ** ********* ********* *********** and *******,*** ******* **** ******** product **** **** *** unlicensed *** ********** *** ***** ** greater *********** ** * result.

The ***/*** ***** ********

**** ****** ********* ***'*********** ***'* ****** *********, and ** *** *** ambiguous ************** ** ** ISO ********, **** ***** 'look' *** **** ** most *******. *******, ******* early ******** ** *** standard **** **** *** differentiation, *** *** *** designed ***** '*********' ********* with * ********* ********** structure.

*** *** ****** ** this ** **** ******** of ********** ***** '*** ***** **********', *** *** *** entirely ***************. ** ********* this **********, *** ******* 14443 ** ******* ***** '****/** *' ** ********* the *** *********. **** aspects ** ***** ***** are ******** ****** '*****', but *** ******* **** is ********** ******* *** two.

** *******, ******* ***** is ** ********* **** in ***** '**** *' standards, **** ***-**** *** new ******** ***** ****.

 

*********, ******* ******** ************ in *** ** ** from ******* **** * broader ****** ****** ******* use ** '**** *' compliance **** ***:

*******, *********** ***** '*****' a ****** ** ********** is ********* **** ** not ****** ******, *** confirming * ******** *****/**** of ********** *** ** used ** ********.

****************

***** *** '**** * & *' ******** ** ISO ***** ********* ******* from ***** *** ****, it **** *** ****** mean **** *** ******** with **** *****. ******** of *** ***** *** the **** ** **** parts, ********* *** '**** Serial ******'. *** **** access *******, **** ** the ****** ****** **** identifies ****** *****, *** because **** ****** ** not *******, ** **** register ** '*** ********' readers:

  • ***/*** ******:*********** *** ****'* ****** identifier ** ******** ******* it ** *** ****** in *** **** '*********' media. **** ****** *** platforms *** **** **** number ** ****** * user, *** ******* *** the ******** ******** ** assign ******, *********, *** privileges.
  • ******* ****/*****:*******, *** **** ******** of ******* ****** *** card ** ********* *** unreadable ****** ********* ******* are ****. ********** *** access ******* ***** *** credential ****** *** ******* (**: *****, ***** *******) and *** *****-****** ************** (**: **********) **** ******** deployments, *** ****** *** is *** **********.

System ******

** ***** ** ****** systems, ********** *********/******* ****** most ****** ******. ****** selection **** ******** *** credential ******, *** *** subsequent ****** ** **** must ***** **** **** choice. ** ***** ** 'Access ********** ********' *********, this ****** **** *** generally ******, ******* *** reader ****** ********** ********** communication. ** **** ** the ******** ** ********** with *** ******, ********** choice ** * ******** impact, *** **** ******* credential ***** ***** ** logistics *** **** ** purchase ****** **** ********** difference.

*******, **** **** ******** is ****, ******* *** costly ******* **** ********* require *********** ** *********** or ****** *******. ******** from *** ****** ** the ***** *** **** thousands *** ******* *** users, ** ******* *** uncommon.

Comments (5)

Philips (NXP) introduce Mifare in 1994, it is compliant to ISO 14443A, parts 1-3 while DESFire was introduced in 2002, it is compliant to ISO 14443A, parts 1-4. iClass, using Inside Contactless's chip, was introduced in 2002, it is also partially compliant to ISO 15693, primarily to operate at lower speeds over longer ranges, or, the majority of installations.

Compliance does not mean interoperability. ISO standards (ISO 14443 and 15693) do not specify: Encryption use, Key Management, IC's memory structure, memory access or application data structure which are rather important unless you are using the CSN for access control. When reading a brochure, just becuase it lists "support" for NXP Mifare, HID iClass, Legic advant, or Sony FeLica does not mean the reader is reading anything other than the CSN per the ISO standard.

ISO14443A uses 100% modulation, meaning that the reader stops emitting the field for defined periods of time. The modulation for ISO 14443B is only 10% which preserves the continuity of the clock. There was an attempt by Sony to specify FeliCa as "ISO 14443 Type C", but is now standardized under the NFC umbrella specification ISO 18092.

Just a quick question. Do I need to understand the different ISO standards in order to know what cards will work with what reader. I am not an engineer and am trying to grasp what will work with what.

Feedback welcomed. Thanks.

Agreed - I am in the same position and have the same question. I think the main point is that compliance does not mean that there will be interoperability and to look beyond what a product 'states' which credentials it supports. Hence, why Mifare and DESFire readers won't necessarily support HID iClass even though they both meet ISO 14443A standards. Possibly?

Only portions of the total data load may be read depending on which ISO14443 part is supported. Take a look at this HID chart:

(I've highlighted details in red)

Notice how support varies depending on which ISO14443 part is used.

There is provisional (very simple) support for iClass readers in both parts. The 'CSN', or 'Card Serial Number' can be read if either part is supported.

However, the 'CSN' does not use the encryption benefits of the card, and is essentially a unique number and nothing more. If the benefits of iClass are to be used, the card must be ISO14443 Part B.

Despite many products claiming 'ISO14443 compatible', on closer examination parts A & B further divide 'how compatible' they truly are.

This section is much like the Credentials Guide in the first part of the class. Emphasizing the nonexistence of interoperability of a credential unless both reader and credential utilize the same ISO standard is a great point.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Directory of 55 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
Farpointe Data Conekt Mobile Access Reader Tested on Jun 13, 2019
California based Farpointe Data has been a significant OEM supplier of conventional access readers for years to companies including DMP, RS2, DSX,...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...
OSDP Access Control Guide on Jun 04, 2019
Access control readers and controllers need to communicate. While Wiegand has been the de facto standard for decades, OSDP aims to solve major...
Vidsys New President Interviewed on May 31, 2019
A decade ago, PSIM was hot with projections then of a billion dollar market by now. This has not come close to happening. However, Vidsys, one of...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
Facial Recognition Systems Fail Simple Liveness Detection Test on May 17, 2019
Facial recognition is being widely promoted as a solution to physical access control but we were able to simply spoof 3 systems because they had no...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Security Dealer 'Social Media Contractor' Program on Jun 25, 2019
A $20,000 video surveillance system can be yours for free if you are willing to post on social media about the security dealer. Good deal, bad...
Axis Live Privacy Shield Analytics Tested on Jun 25, 2019
Privacy is becoming a bigger factor in video surveillance, driven both by increased public awareness and by GDPR. Now, Axis has released Live...
Directory of 55 Video Surveillance Startups on Jun 25, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Hikvision Colorvu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
China Subway Facial Recognition System Examined on Jun 24, 2019
A China city of 6+ million people has installed facial recognition-enabled gates in subways, allowing commuters to enter stations by simply showing...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
Briefcam Buys Frost Award* on Jun 20, 2019
Frost 'awards' are well-known and widely disrespected. Now Briefcam is touting their win. The way it has worked for many years is that Frost...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact