Favorite Surveillance Storage Type

By: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 05, 2012

When selecting storage for an IP surveillance system, there are four standard options: internal / direct-attached storage (DAS), network-attached storage (NAS), storage area networks (SAN), and on-camera edge storage. All of these have a place in surveillance applications, with different manufacturers supporting different options. In order to find out what integrators truly prefer, however, we asked the following question as part of our Winter 2012 survey:

Storage Types

Before we examine integrator favorites, let's review the terms / types:

  • Direct-Attached Storage (DAS): Direct-attached storage is as it sounds, storage attached directly to the server, either internal to the server or external. Common protocols include SATA (and eSATA), SCSI, and SAS. Direct-attached storage is most often used when a single DVR/NVR or server is used for recording, with internal drives. If a longer retention period is needed, eSATA or SCSI expansion units are used.
  • Network-Attached Storage (NAS): Network-attached storage consists of an appliance loaded with a hard drive or hard drives, which resides on the network, not attached directly to the recorder. The NAS's drive or drives may be mounted as network drives, though some NASs actually provide iSCSI services, acting as a SAN, as well.
  • Storage Area Network (SAN): The term SAN refers to more than just a storage unit, but this use has been commonly accepted. A SAN is a network, either dedicated or shared, which is used for the transmission of storage data. It differs from NAS in that a NAS device contains an operating system, and may perform other functions, while a SAN is simply used for raw storage. iSCSI is the most common SAN protocol. SANs are most often used when multiple recording servers are used, since they are typically extremely scalable, sometimes in the petabyte range. This makes data from multiple recorders stored on a single SAN simpler to manage than individual drives in numerous servers.
  • Edge Storage: This method refers to storage contained in the camera itself, either on flash or hard drive storage. This is not commonly used today but is seen by many as a potential big future option.
  • Here is the breakdown of the results:

    Direct-Attached Storage

    Nearly two-thirds (65%) preferred internal or direct-attached storage. Overwhelmingly, the reason given for this preference was that DAS was easier and simpler to deploy, and more reliable, with less to troubleshoot. Both of the other options require more network configuration and setup than simply using storage directly connected to the server. Additionally, since the network is an added variable, troubleshooting becomes more complex.

    Some comments from those favoring direct-attached storage:

    • "Easy conmfiguration and turn on for most small jobs."
    • "Easy to manage within the VMS. Most solutions we have used so far have been all-in-one."
    • "A vast majority of our camera systems run on one or two servers. For those it's easier and cheaper to utilize internal drives instead of a SAN. If the customer already has a SAN then it can be cost effective."
    • "Direct storage is fast, easily configurable, and easily managed. NAS/SAN fabrics are easily attached to VMSs, but often represent a 'second choice' if Direct Attached storage is not otherwise configurable or available."
    • "For simplicity and size. Most servers have been configured to hold sufficient internal storage. I do see that changing over time as image quality and retention increase"

    NAS/SAN Storage

    NAS (22%) and SAN (10%) storage were second and third in our results, totaling up to about one-third of all responses. Note that in examining these results, we combined these two technologies, as there seemed to be confusion between these two terms, with some respondents using them interchangeably. Further, while there are differences between NAS and SAN devices, there is now some overlap, with some NASs able to act as SANs using iSCSI protocol. We therefore found it best to look at these two options together.

    A variety of reasons were given for choosing NAS and SAN, though most common were reliability and scalability. Network-based storage may have an advantage in case of server failure. Since the storage remains in place, a new server may be brought in and configured, and continue recording to the same location as the original server. 

    Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
    Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

    Some comments from those preferring NAS/SAN storage:

    • "Solid network storage for enterprise customers that is fault-tolerant and allows for immediate recovery of sensitive customer information. Critical to most of our customers is storage that is consistent. Additionally, the only SAN architecture we use allows for serverless computing which decreases footprint for our customers. Invariably, most of our customers have indicated a need to work beyond the "borders" of the physical security and therefore integration into the central IT architecture is critical. As most enterprise storage solutions are either FC or SAN, we have chosen to use SAN as the primary."
    • "The ability to have the storage physically anywhere on the LAN as well as distribute the load adds to system scalability and reliability"
    • "I like a unit that is stand alone from other network parts. I also like the NAS can be monitored with network monitoring tools that my IT customers and my technicians are use to using."
    • "Easy to service and maintain with storage in a central location or distributed in a few locations if necessary."
    • "NAS is a very mature technology, cost effective, scalable and easy to manage"

    Two comments also touched on the benefit of using NAS storage to protect against theft. In small systems, if a thief were to make off with the PC being used for recording, all video evidence will be lost.

    • "It can be hidden away anywhere and have good backup options."
    • "We are used to having NAS in our CCTV's storage so its easy to hide them anywhere. In one case we hid the NAS near the compressor of an refrigerator, since the costumer had a robbery where the PC was stolen also, so no VIDEO recordings were left"

    Edge Storage

    With only three percent of respondents preferring edge storage, it is obviously a distant last in this survey. Given how few truly workable edge storage solutions there are in the industry, this is not surprising. Preferences for edge storage were best summed up in this comment:

    • "I prefer storage on the camera because it reduces of risk of video loss on a large scale. I believe the cost of ownership is less, and it is much easier to scale the retention requirements when adding additional cameras when the storage is on the edge."

    Respondents preferring other solutions also commented on the concept of edge storage, stating that they didn't feel it was ready for enterprise use today, but expected to see it in the next few years.

    Trends by System Size and Analog/IP Deployment

    When reviewing these results, surprisingly, system size did not play a major factor. Some may expect to see very small systems jump to near 100% DAS preference, and a higher preference for SAN storage among large systems. However, the distribution of responses remains about the same across all system sizes. Also surprising, responses were close, within a margin of error, between those deploying a majority of analog cameras vs. those deploying a majority of IP cameras.

    Historical Trends and Future Growth

    While there are no similar surveys from the past, our gut feel is that the percentage choosing network based storage has risen considerably over the last five years. In 2012, it is nearly 1/3rd of respondent's favorite but we would be surprised if it was more than 10% in 2007. Internal / Direct storage may still be the overall favorite but it is clearly under attack by network storage.

    Going forward, in the next 5 years, we expect Internal / Direct storage to fall into the minority of integrator favorites. The two biggest threats look to be NAS devices and on board storage. NAS devices offer a very low cost way to get more than enough storage for the average surveillance deployment. Storage on board cameras is getting to the point where SD card costs are reasonable for moderate duration surveillance storage and VMS support is becoming available.

1 report cite this report:

Video Surveillance Statistics Directory Vol 2 on Mar 18, 2012
In this report, we aggregate and present numerous statistics about how...
Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Video Surveillance Architecture 101 on Feb 18, 2020
Video surveillance can be designed and deployed in a number of ways. This 101...
NetApp Presents Hybrid Cloud Video Archive on May 11, 2020
NetApp presented its hybrid S3 cloud video archive at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Remote Network Access for Video Surveillance Guide on Jul 27, 2020
Remotely accessing surveillance systems is key in 2020, with more and more...
VSaaS 101 on Mar 25, 2020
Video Surveillance as a Service (VSaaS) is the common industry term for cloud...
Use Access Control Logs To Constrain Coronavirus on Apr 09, 2020
Access control users have included capabilities that are not commonly used...
Surveillance Storage 101 on Mar 23, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals of video surveillance...
BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide on Feb 11, 2020
Spend enough time around networks and eventually someone will mention BICSI,...
Euklis Presents AI Analytics on May 05, 2020
Euklis presented its AI facial recognition, LPR, and object recognition...
ISS Presents Face As A Credential and UVSS on Apr 30, 2020
ISS presented its security platform, including access control integration,...
NetApp Video Surveillance Profile on Mar 09, 2020
NetApp is increasing its efforts in video surveillance and told IPVM...
Genetec Presents Security Center for Airports on Apr 28, 2020
Genetec presented its Security Center for Airports at the April 2020 IPVM New...
VMS 101 on Mar 03, 2020
This guide teaches the fundamentals about video management...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in...
Optex Presents Outdoor Battery Powered Multitech Motion Sensors on May 07, 2020
Optex presented two outdoor rated, battery-powered motion sensors, the QX and...
SAFR Presents AI Facial Recognition on May 18, 2020
SAFR presented its AI facial recognition at the April 2020 IPVM New Products...

Recent Reports

Huawei HiSilicon Shortage Impacts Surveillance Manufacturers on Aug 14, 2020
Huawei acknowledged problems and challenges for its HiSilicon chip business,...
Final Rule Does Not Expand Hikvision Dahua Blacklist on Aug 14, 2020
The final White House rule (200.216) has been added and contrary to the...
Taiwan Lilin NDAA Compliant Cameras Tested on Aug 13, 2020
Taiwan-based manufacturer Lilin is taking direct aim at Dahua and Hikvision...
White House Expands Dahua Hikvision Blacklist To Federal Funding [Final Rule Reverses] on Aug 13, 2020
The White House is expanding the NDAA to blacklist anyone who "uses" banned...
Actual Coronavirus Testing Options Examined on Aug 13, 2020
Fever cameras have emerged as an indirect and flawed way to test for...
Video Analytics Online Show September 2020 Opened - Axis, Avigilon, Bosch, BriefCam, Genetec, Milestone + 30 More on Aug 12, 2020
IPVM's sixth online show will feature 35+ Video Analytics companies...
The German Company Powering Many China Temperature Tablets (Heimann) on Aug 12, 2020
Many fever tablet suppliers market German-made Heimann thermal sensors while...
Salesforce Drops Dahua and Hikvision on Aug 12, 2020
Salesforce has dropped Dahua and Hikvision as customers, forcing the two mega...
Access Control Course Fall 2020 - Register Now on Aug 12, 2020
IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry....
Genetec CEO Declares "We Don't Negotiate Payment With Patent Trolls" on Aug 11, 2020
Are patent trolls like terrorists? Genetec's CEO is coming out strongly...
Hanwha AI Analytics Camera Tested on Aug 11, 2020
Hanwha has released their Wisenet P AI camera, adding person and vehicle...
Alabama Schools Million Dollar Hikvision Fever Camera Deal on Aug 11, 2020
The Baldwin County, Alabama public schools purchased a $1 million, 144-camera...
Dahua Taunts Australian Government, Continues To Sell Illegal Fever Cameras on Aug 10, 2020
Dahua is effectively taunting the Australian government by continuing to sell...
HID Releases VertX Replacement Aero on Aug 10, 2020
HID is replacing two established and broadly supported types of access...
NDAA Compliant Video Surveillance Whitelist on Aug 10, 2020
This report aggregates video surveillance products that manufacturers have...