Favorite Surveillance Storage Type

Author: Ethan Ace, Published on Feb 05, 2012

When selecting storage for an IP surveillance system, there are four standard options: internal / direct-attached storage (DAS), network-attached storage (NAS), storage area networks (SAN), and on-camera edge storage. All of these have a place in surveillance applications, with different manufacturers supporting different options. In order to find out what integrators truly prefer, however, we asked the following question as part of our Winter 2012 survey:

Storage Types

Before we examine integrator favorites, let's review the terms / types:

  • Direct-Attached Storage (DAS): Direct-attached storage is as it sounds, storage attached directly to the server, either internal to the server or external. Common protocols include SATA (and eSATA), SCSI, and SAS. Direct-attached storage is most often used when a single DVR/NVR or server is used for recording, with internal drives. If a longer retention period is needed, eSATA or SCSI expansion units are used.
  • Network-Attached Storage (NAS): Network-attached storage consists of an appliance loaded with a hard drive or hard drives, which resides on the network, not attached directly to the recorder. The NAS's drive or drives may be mounted as network drives, though some NASs actually provide iSCSI services, acting as a SAN, as well.
  • Storage Area Network (SAN): The term SAN refers to more than just a storage unit, but this use has been commonly accepted. A SAN is a network, either dedicated or shared, which is used for the transmission of storage data. It differs from NAS in that a NAS device contains an operating system, and may perform other functions, while a SAN is simply used for raw storage. iSCSI is the most common SAN protocol. SANs are most often used when multiple recording servers are used, since they are typically extremely scalable, sometimes in the petabyte range. This makes data from multiple recorders stored on a single SAN simpler to manage than individual drives in numerous servers.
  • Edge Storage: This method refers to storage contained in the camera itself, either on flash or hard drive storage. This is not commonly used today but is seen by many as a potential big future option.

Results

Here is the breakdown of the results:

Direct-Attached Storage

Nearly two-thirds (65%) preferred internal or direct-attached storage. Overwhelmingly, the reason given for this preference was that DAS was easier and simpler to deploy, and more reliable, with less to troubleshoot. Both of the other options require more network configuration and setup than simply using storage directly connected to the server. Additionally, since the network is an added variable, troubleshooting becomes more complex.

Some comments from those favoring direct-attached storage:

  • "Easy conmfiguration and turn on for most small jobs."
  • "Easy to manage within the VMS. Most solutions we have used so far have been all-in-one."
  • "A vast majority of our camera systems run on one or two servers. For those it's easier and cheaper to utilize internal drives instead of a SAN. If the customer already has a SAN then it can be cost effective."
  • "Direct storage is fast, easily configurable, and easily managed. NAS/SAN fabrics are easily attached to VMSs, but often represent a 'second choice' if Direct Attached storage is not otherwise configurable or available."
  • "For simplicity and size. Most servers have been configured to hold sufficient internal storage. I do see that changing over time as image quality and retention increase"

NAS/SAN Storage

NAS (22%) and SAN (10%) storage were second and third in our results, totaling up to about one-third of all responses. Note that in examining these results, we combined these two technologies, as there seemed to be confusion between these two terms, with some respondents using them interchangeably. Further, while there are differences between NAS and SAN devices, there is now some overlap, with some NASs able to act as SANs using iSCSI protocol. We therefore found it best to look at these two options together.

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

A variety of reasons were given for choosing NAS and SAN, though most common were reliability and scalability. Network-based storage may have an advantage in case of server failure. Since the storage remains in place, a new server may be brought in and configured, and continue recording to the same location as the original server. 

Some comments from those preferring NAS/SAN storage:

  • "Solid network storage for enterprise customers that is fault-tolerant and allows for immediate recovery of sensitive customer information. Critical to most of our customers is storage that is consistent. Additionally, the only SAN architecture we use allows for serverless computing which decreases footprint for our customers. Invariably, most of our customers have indicated a need to work beyond the "borders" of the physical security and therefore integration into the central IT architecture is critical. As most enterprise storage solutions are either FC or SAN, we have chosen to use SAN as the primary."
  • "The ability to have the storage physically anywhere on the LAN as well as distribute the load adds to system scalability and reliability"
  • "I like a unit that is stand alone from other network parts. I also like the NAS can be monitored with network monitoring tools that my IT customers and my technicians are use to using."
  • "Easy to service and maintain with storage in a central location or distributed in a few locations if necessary."
  • "NAS is a very mature technology, cost effective, scalable and easy to manage"

Two comments also touched on the benefit of using NAS storage to protect against theft. In small systems, if a thief were to make off with the PC being used for recording, all video evidence will be lost.

  • "It can be hidden away anywhere and have good backup options."
  • "We are used to having NAS in our CCTV's storage so its easy to hide them anywhere. In one case we hid the NAS near the compressor of an refrigerator, since the costumer had a robbery where the PC was stolen also, so no VIDEO recordings were left"

Edge Storage

With only three percent of respondents preferring edge storage, it is obviously a distant last in this survey. Given how few truly workable edge storage solutions there are in the industry, this is not surprising. Preferences for edge storage were best summed up in this comment:

  • "I prefer storage on the camera because it reduces of risk of video loss on a large scale. I believe the cost of ownership is less, and it is much easier to scale the retention requirements when adding additional cameras when the storage is on the edge."

Respondents preferring other solutions also commented on the concept of edge storage, stating that they didn't feel it was ready for enterprise use today, but expected to see it in the next few years.

Trends by System Size and Analog/IP Deployment

When reviewing these results, surprisingly, system size did not play a major factor. Some may expect to see very small systems jump to near 100% DAS preference, and a higher preference for SAN storage among large systems. However, the distribution of responses remains about the same across all system sizes. Also surprising, responses were close, within a margin of error, between those deploying a majority of analog cameras vs. those deploying a majority of IP cameras.

Historical Trends and Future Growth

While there are no similar surveys from the past, our gut feel is that the percentage choosing network based storage has risen considerably over the last five years. In 2012, it is nearly 1/3rd of respondent's favorite but we would be surprised if it was more than 10% in 2007. Internal / Direct storage may still be the overall favorite but it is clearly under attack by network storage.

Going forward, in the next 5 years, we expect Internal / Direct storage to fall into the minority of integrator favorites. The two biggest threats look to be NAS devices and on board storage. NAS devices offer a very low cost way to get more than enough storage for the average surveillance deployment. Storage on board cameras is getting to the point where SD card costs are reasonable for moderate duration surveillance storage and VMS support is becoming available.

1 report cite this report:

Video Surveillance Statistics Directory Vol 2 on Mar 18, 2012
In this report, we aggregate and present numerous statistics about how surveillance is being used in the real world. Recently, we conducted an in...
Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Rare Video Surveillance Fundraising - Verkada $15 Million on Apr 19, 2018
Fundraising in video surveillance (and the broader physical security market) has been poor recently. Highlights are few and far in between...
GDPR For Video Surveillance Guide on Apr 12, 2018
The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force on May 25, but there is much confusion and no clear guidelines on...
Axis Launches ~$100 HD Camera on Apr 11, 2018
Chinese manufacturers, led by Hikvision, have come to dominate the low end of the Western market, driven by ~$100 cameras. While Axis has...
Understanding The 20+ Lock Functions on Mar 27, 2018
While locks can look the same, they may operate in significantly different ways. To make understanding them simpler, widely adopted industry...
Startup Image Intelligence 10X Accuracy Guarantee on Mar 26, 2018
An Australian startup, Image Intelligence, is targeting the biggest problem of video analytics, poor accuracy, with quite a claim: Is this...
Rack Mounting NVRs Tutorial on Mar 14, 2018
Rack mounting recorders is common in professional systems, but manufacturers are making it difficult, with simple design failures causing multiple...
Top Video Surveillance Service Call Problems (Statistics) on Feb 28, 2018
In our most recent statistics series, over 150 integrators told IPVM the most common problem their customers have with their video systems....
Aruba Networks Profile on Feb 22, 2018
Aruba Networks' presence in the video surveillance market has historically been limited. With a company focus on Wi-Fi first and switching...
Resolution Usage Statistics 2018 - Moving Up From 1080p on Jan 22, 2018
In 2016, IPVM statistics showed the most common camera resolution used was 1080p, rising from 2014's 720p. Now, new IPVM statistics of 200+...
VSaaS Usage Statistics 2018 on Jan 18, 2018
VSaaS has been a 'next big thing' for more than a decade. The prospect of managing, storing and streaming video from the cloud rather than...

Most Recent Industry Reports

May 2018 Camera Course on Apr 20, 2018
Save $50 on early registration until this Thursday, the 26th. Register now (save $50) for the Spring 2018 Camera Course This is the only...
Global Real-Time Video Surveillance - EarthNow on Apr 20, 2018
A new company, EarthNow, with backing from Bill Gates, Airbus and more, is claiming that: Users will be able to see places on Earth with a delay...
Dedicated Vs Converged Access Control Networks (Statistics) on Apr 20, 2018
Running one's access control system on a converged network, with one's computers and phones, can save money. On the other hand, hand, doing so can...
April 2018 IP Networking Course on Apr 19, 2018
This is the last chance to register for our IP Networking course. Register now. NEW - 2 sessions per class, 'day' and 'night' to give you double...
Rare Video Surveillance Fundraising - Verkada $15 Million on Apr 19, 2018
Fundraising in video surveillance (and the broader physical security market) has been poor recently. Highlights are few and far in between...
'Best In Show' Fails on Apr 19, 2018
ISC West's "Best In Show" has failed. For more than a decade, it has become increasingly irrelevant as the selections exhibit a cartoon level...
Security Camera Cleaning Frequency Statistics on Apr 18, 2018
150+ integrators told IPVM how often they clean cameras on customer's sites and why.  Inside we examine their answers and break down feedback...
Worst Access Control 2018 on Apr 18, 2018
Three access control providers stood out as providing the most problems for integrators. In this report, we analyze the answers to: "In the...
Axis VMD4 Analytics Tested on Apr 17, 2018
Axis is now on its 4th generation of video motion detection (VMD), which Axis calls "a free video analytics application." In this generation, Axis...
Arecont CEO And President Resign on Apr 17, 2018
This is good news for Arecont. Arecont's problems have been well known for years (e.g., most recently Worst Camera Manufacturers 2018 and starting...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact