Exacq Breaks Avigilon Integration

By: John Honovich, Published on Jan 20, 2014

IPVM testing has verified that Exacq has broken integration with Avigilon cameras. Up until mid year 2013, Exacq's releases immediately identified and recognized motion detection from Avigilon H3 cameras but now they do not. This is an especially important since Exacq does not support server side motion detection, forcing Avigilon cameras to record only continuously and with no markers to show movement.

Here is a video showing Avigilon cameras on the last Exacq release support Avigilon fully compared to the latest Exacq version:

**********, ***** *********** ********** Avigilon ******* *** ********* their ****** *********. *** they ** ***.

***** ********* ** **** questions, ******:

"**** ** *** ******** models *** **** **** listed ** ********* *************, ***************** ***** **** ****** as * ********* *** on *** ******** *******."

****** ****,

"** **** *********** ******* to *** ***** ****-** in *** *.* *** 5.6 ******** ** ******* Profile *. ** **** tested ******* ***** ***** camera ****** *** ***** we ************ ******* *******. We ****’* **** *** plug-in ****, ** ** any ****, **** *** Avigilon ******."

Avigilon *** *******

****** ***** ****** ******** cameras **** ***** ************ supported, * ************* **** used ** ***** *.* explicitly ********** ******** ****** events:

{ "************": "********", "******": { "*****": [ { "name": "**********/***************/", "****": { "name": "************", "**": "*", "off": "*" } } ] }

** ********* ******* *** Avigilon ****** ******, ***** may ******** *** **** block ** **** **** the **********.******** ***** ** *** Exacq ****** *********. ** have ************ **** ****(******* ** ** ******* 5.10.3.5366) **** *** ******** section ********.

****:***** **** **** ***** this **** ***** ******** when ****** ******* *** applied, ** ***** ****** be ******* *** ** overwrite **, ** ******** copy ** *** ******** section ***** ********).

****, ** ** *****, this ********** ** *** approved ** *****.

********

*** ******** **** ** this ******* *****'* '*****' or *** ***** ** and ********** ***** *** integration?

***** ****** ****:

"****** *** ***** ***** on *** ******** **** our ********* *** *** level ** *********** **** the ****** ******. ** maintain * **** ** requested ****** ***** ** registered *************. ** **** time *** *********** *** not ********** ** **** opportunities **** ***** ******* the *********** ** ****** Avigilon *******."

*******, ** ** ******** to **** **** '***********' considering ******** **** ******* Profile **** ** *** ******* working ** ***** ** recently ** *** ****** of ****. ****, ********* ***** ******* ***** integration**** *** **** ********** companies **** ********, **** as ***,**&*,********* *****.

**** *** *** **** to ******** ******* ***** is ***** **** ** competitive ******** / ******* to ********. ******** ** very **** ***** *** being ********** ***** ******* its *** ** *** solutions, ***** ***** **** at *** ******* ** Exacq, ** ******** **** would ****** ***** **** their *** ** ****** plus ******** ***** *********** HD *** *******.

** *** ***** ****, breaking *********** **** ******** cameras *** *** **** Exacq, ** ** **** push ********* ******* ******** to ****** ** ********'* VMS ****** ***** *** convince **** ** **** Avigilon *******.

******** *******, ******* ******* and ***** ** ******** / ***** ******* *** caught ** *** ****** of ******* ** **** *** seem ***** *** *** plans ** *******.

Comments (23)

Wow. Didn't see that coming.

Scot, are you a dealer of both? How much impact do you see this having on you?

Yes, we have good relationships with both companies, but I don't really have a dog in this fight. I honestly don't see a huge impact on us, other than just the fact that I hope we can put the genie back in the bottle rather than watching the rest of this movie.

This is a bad move by Exacq. It obviously worked before and still does with the hack, so why play games like this?

It's ironic because Avigilon's marketing about their ONVIF support is clearly worse and more misleading but this move by Exacq appears to be far pettier and more akin to actual 'sabotage'.

There's obviously a difference between providing functionality and making it disappear by spite, as opposed to simply not providing it in the first place and possibly adding it down the road, especially where you have customers who might have depended on that functionality and will no longer have access to it out of the box following an upgrade.

The other thing customers might not appreciate is being told, as you were, that Avigilon cameras were never supported by Exacq, which is blatantly false.

I'm assuming their logic was that since Avigilon typically pushes end-to-end systems, including their VMS, removing support for Avigilon cameras might not have much of an impact.

Another big mistake they are making with this move is to make it more difficult for users who might be interested in moving away from Avigilon at some point to do so without incurring large initial costs related to camera replacement, essentially locking themselves and their channel partners out of that market.

I'm sure Avigilon reps and partners will have a field day with this.

The other thing it does is send a message out that competition from Avigilon is becoming more and more of a concern for them. Coming from a company like Tyco, I'd say that's a very strong message and can be interpreted in a lot of different ways depending on who is listening.

Avigilon has been a real threat for big incumbents for at least a year, if not two. Privately, it's widely acknowledged. Publicly, you know how this industry works...

At their growth rate and now size compared to the much lower industry average growth, they are obviously taking share away from incumbents.

The Exacq move, though, is weird, because Exacq has a much stronger competitive positioning and better growth rate than most of the competitors being impacted by Avigilon.

I agree. Whatever the reason was at the time, it doesn't seem to have been thought thru very well.

I'd be curious to know how consultants and integrators reacted if they had customers using Exacq who had Avigilon cameras installed when this came about.

Tyco, Tyco, Tyco.

But Tyco/ADT sells alot of Avigilon product

On the Tyco topic: The Tyco/Exacq acquisition was announced June 19th, after 5.6 was already out (June 11th). The dates are close but it's pure speculation whether the two are related.

Possibly, but listening to the video and looking at the file version info below the script, 5.4 and 5.10 are being compared, which would imply this change was made well after the Tyco/Exacq acquisition.

Yes, 5.4 and 5.10 were compared in the video, simply to show the last version in which the motion integration worked (5.4) and the most current version (5.10). 5.6 is the release which removed the Avigilon motion events, which was released before the Tyco acquisition.

Thanks for the clarification Ethan.

Obviously, Exacq has been concerned for a while if that's the case and I'd say the comments in my first reply to John still stand.

I wouldnt be surprised that with the tight relationship betwen Avigilon and Tyco that Tyco didnt mandate this well before annoucing public purchase.

Why would Tyco mandate this? And is Tyco's relationship with Avigilon really that tight? Tyco IS carries lots of surveillance manufacturers and only recently picked up Avigilon.

I don’t really think that Tyco would have wanted it, but if it was somehow contractual with the resale agreement of Avigilon through Tyco. Avigilon reports having added pretty substantial focus on strategic accounts of which Tyco was one of them in late 2012 earnings report. I would suspect much of the focus was on the fine print of the agreement. We have in the past been vendors for specific product types in different business segments, where the manufacturer would threaten discontinuing support of us if we picked up and offered a rival product line.

This is just speculation of course, and we dont sell Avigilon, so its no worries over here with that respect, but am concered about future changes Tyco could/will make with exacq.

having worked in both large and small companies in various forms in both business and product development, my guess is that there was not an over arching plan. It probably was just one of those things that early on someone in engineering added support to the camera line becuause they thought they were doing the right thing.

However, it probably never went through the proper business/partner process & paperwork. Then somoene noticed that the config file didn't match the official list of supported cameras, so they deleted the ones that didn't match up, and didn't really think about it too much.

I could be way wrong here, and we'll probably never know for sure, but I've seen things like this way more often than I would care to admit.

Maybe but they certainly know now that it works and that people care so it begs the question: why don't they just put it back in?

Question to you John; why do you always use Exacq in your surveillance tests? Is it because Exacq is your personal favorite? Exacq could be a good platform for various experiments as long as it continues to support integration with all known camera manufacturers (including the 'competitors'). As an integrator, I'll be disappointed by such moves by Exacq where it limits integration.

Using a VMS, instead of something like VLC, is important so that we can lay out cameras side by side, digitally zoom, compare, etc.

The only question is really - what VMS to use for our IP camera tests?

Exacq has been good for testing because it's lightweight, super quick to install and upgrade and supports lots of cameras.

This move by Exacq is stupid but we have a workaound.

John,

Is this still the case that Exacq will only record Avigilon cameras continously as they dont support the cameras motion detection?

thanks!

Yup, that's correct. You can try the workaround we discuss above, but test it before counting on it, as it's now several versions past.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
Embattled $400 Million China Funded Philippines Surveillance System Proceeds on Jun 13, 2019
An embattled 12,000 camera surveillance system project that will cost ~$400 million will proceed.  The project contract was awarded, had its...
Camera Course Summer 2019 - Register Now on Jun 12, 2019
Register for the Summer 2019 Camera Course.  This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Carnegie Mellon AI Startup Zensors Profile on Jun 11, 2019
Zensors is a startup formed by Carnegie Mellon graduates from a Carnegie Mellon research project, offering customized models per camera that they...
Avigilon 32MP and 12MP H4 Multisensor Cameras Tested on Jun 11, 2019
Avigilon has released their H4 Multi-Sensor line of cameras claiming "broad scene coverage and high image detail" We bought and tested the...
Directory of 30+ VSaaS / Cloud Video Surveillance Providers on Jun 07, 2019
This directory provides a list of VSaaS / cloud video surveillance providers to help you see and research what options are available. 2019 State...
OpenALPR Doubles Prices on Jun 06, 2019
There is no 'race to the bottom' in cloud / AI video surveillance. In May, Verkada increased their prices. Now, OpenALPR is doing the same with a...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
Briefcam Buys Frost Award* on Jun 20, 2019
Frost 'awards' are well-known and widely disrespected. Now Briefcam is touting their win. The way it has worked for many years is that Frost...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
The Scheme Hikvision and China Importers Use To Avoid Tariffs on Jun 17, 2019
Hikvision and numerous China importers are avoiding 25% tariffs by including an SD card slot in their IP cameras to claim they are 'digital still...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact