Don't Trust Lux Ratings

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jan 09, 2013

Do not trust lux ratings. Do not use lux ratings to specify cameras. Period.

Lux ratings are widely, and unfortunately, used to define low light performance, with the lower the lux rating, the stronger low light performance. Here's what this commonly looks like on manfacturer specifications:

lux ratings examples

For instance, a camera with 0.02 lux is supposedly 'better' in low light than a camera with 0.05 lux. (Background - See our Lux / Lux Meter Tutorial).

[New Test Results show the reality of low light image quality.]

However, they are so riddled with fundamental problems that lux ratings must be abandoned.

Widespread Misconception

In regular IPVM assessments, we find easily half of surveillance professionals believe and use lux ratings as a viable metric for assessing low light performance.

More importantly, lux ratings are overwhelmingly used in RFPs to require specific low light performance. Cameras that do not meet the RFPs lux ratings specification are rejected.

The Fundamental Problems

Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter
Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter

Here are the fundamental problems:

  • Unrealistic numbers
  • No standard process
  • No revelation of what image looks like
  • Failure to disclose camera settings
  • Gradual image quality decline

Unrealistic Numbers

Most manufacturers have lux ratings that are incredibly unrealistic, with ratings of .001 lux or lower common. However, that is incredibly dark. Almost any camera truly in such conditions in the real world would capture nothing or be so dark and noisy as to be practically useless.

No Standard Process

Each manufacturer measures on their own, by themselves and with whatever 'standards' that they like. As such, it is impossible to compare the results of two manufacturers without more knowledge or testing of one's own.

No Revelation of What Images Look Like

No manufacturer ever releases images of what their cameras look like at their claimed lux ratings. Almost certainly, the images would be terrible.

Failure to Disclose Camera Settings

Many manufacturers use tricky settings such as using super slow shutters and fostering tricks like 'sens up'. Often they will obscure this in their specification, resulting in seemingly eye popping low lux ratings like 0.000001 lux.

Gradual Image Quality Degradation

The image quality of all cameras gradually declines as light levels fall below 50 lux, with falling signal to noise ratios, and increasing gain control levels. There is no magical point where quality turns from good to bad.

Consultant's Fault

The lion's share of the blame goes to consultants who regularly specify cameras based on minimum illumination specifications though they rarely if ever test to verify that the ratings are accurate.

Manufacturer's Trapped

This creates an ugly system where even the most ethical and responsible manufacturers are trapped. The first manufacturer to 'tell the truth' about their low light performance will be disqualified from many large projects. Because of this, no one can afford to do so.

Worse, it rewards the most unscrupulous vendors who realize that they are rarely, if ever, called on their specs.

What To Do?

The best way is to test cameras head to head in the same conditions with the same fundamental settings (especially shutter speed). For example, see our MP low light shootout. Take your finalists and place them for an evening in your desired deployment location. I can almost guarantee that the results will not match what the lux ratings suggest.

Short of that, a few specifications do deliver:

  • F Stop: While small differences in F numbers (1.2 vs 1.4) have limited practical impact, going from F1.2 vs 2.4 typically has a major impact on low light quality.
  • True Day/Night: Cameras with mechanical cut filters consistently deliver notable increases in low light performance.
  • Adding IR: If a scene is quite dark and you want to ensure maximum illumination, consider adding IR either through integrated IR or add-on illuminators.

There is no magic number. Unfortunately, lux ratings are voodoo, more smoke and mirrors than reality. Let's move past them and focus on better metrics for reliably specifying high quality low light performance.

2 reports cite this report:

4MP Low Light Weakness Tested on Jul 19, 2016
4MP cameras are an emerging force in video surveillance, with many manufacturers now focusing on 4MP as their new high end, surpassing...
Surveillance Camera Specification Guide on Aug 19, 2013
Anyone reviewing RFPs knows there are countless common problems, with 'good' specs seemingly few and far between: RFPs copied from more than 10...

Related Reports

Camera Course September 2016 on Aug 18, 2016
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
Dahua Smart H.264+ Tested on Aug 17, 2016
The smart codec trend continues, with Dahua adding Smart H.264+ to many of their models in new firmware. In this test we see how it performs and...
21 Scenes Lux Readings For Video Surveillance on Aug 11, 2016
IPVM went to numerous locations and measured the lux readings / light levels at each one. Here is an example of the approach we took and output...
External IR Illuminator Usage Statistics 2016 on Aug 10, 2016
External IR illuminators have historically been favored by many to improve video surveillance performance. But with integrated IR camera usage now...
Vivotek 12MP IR Multi-Imager Tested on Aug 09, 2016
A key weakness of multi-imager cameras is poor low light. While integrated IR has become dominant in cameras overall, it is still uncommon in...
Integrated IR Camera Use Dominates - 2016 Statistics on Aug 03, 2016
In 2014, IPVM statistics showed integrated IR camera use was surging. Now, new IPVM statistics show that the surge continues, with integrated IR...
Pelco Optera 12MP Multi-Imager Tested V2 on Aug 02, 2016
In our initial testing of Pelco's Optera multi-imager, the main issue was their ONVIF 'bowtie' video streaming which undermined third party...
Hikvision 12MP IR 360 Tested on Jul 28, 2016
Hikvision has released their latest IR panoramic camera, the DS-2CD63C2F-IV, with a 12MP sensor.  To find out, we bought one of these new models...
4MP Low Light Weakness Tested on Jul 19, 2016
4MP cameras are an emerging force in video surveillance, with many manufacturers now focusing on 4MP as their new high end, surpassing...
Samsung Wisenet HD+ Tested on Jul 18, 2016
HD analog continues to expand, now with Hanwha/Samsung offering AHD via their Wisenet HD+ line. We bought two 1080p camera models, their...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ONVIF Profile G Video Storage Test on Aug 26, 2016
A standard to retrieve video stored on 3rd party devices. This is the aim of ONVIF Profile G. The proprietary nature of accessing recorded video...
Genetec Access Control Security Center 5.5 Release on Aug 26, 2016
Inside, we examine Genetec's new Access Control features in Security Center 5.5. Enhanced Active Directory and 'Universal Groups' New, Single...
Tailgating - Access Control Tutorial on Aug 25, 2016
Despite costing thousands of dollars per door, electronic access control systems are vulnerable to an easy exploit called 'tailgating'. Unless this...
Manufacturer Trade Show Costs Analyzed - Spending Millions on Aug 25, 2016
Ten million dollars plus is spent by manufacturers at every major trade show (e.g., ISC West, ASIS, IFSEC, Essen, etc.) And the bigger booths...
Axxon Next VMS 4.0 Tested on Aug 24, 2016
AxxonSoft is one of the biggest VMS vendors (reporting 263,000 channels sold in 2015), especially strong in their home market of Russia, but not...
Milestone Declares End-To-End Is A Dead-End on Aug 24, 2016
While Axis celebrates their end to end system win at top 50 global retailer H&M, their Canon sister company Milestone is proclaiming that...
Hikvision 20% Price Cut Twice In A Month on Aug 23, 2016
Days after celebrating the Chinese government's commitment of up to $3 billion USD more in funding, Hikvision USA is now launching up to 20% across...
HD Analog DVRs With Exacq, Milestone and Genetec VMSes Tested on Aug 23, 2016
HD analog offerings have proven to deliver HD video at radically lower prices. However, the main limitation for professional applications is their...
1 New Acquisition Per Year Planned for Qognify (Former Nice Security) on Aug 23, 2016
Want to be acquired? Qognify, the former Nice Security Group, has big money behind it and the plans for multiple acquisitions. In this note, we...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact