Channel Sales Harm Security Users

Author: John Honovich, Published on Feb 14, 2011

The standard security sales model encourages bad system designs and poor integration skills. Specifically, manufacturer's varying discount levels to integrators creates incentives that work against the needs and interests of security users. While integrators should focus on providing the best design, installation and optimization of security systems, the standard sales model incents them to push products that provide them the best relative discounts. Following this path can provide a 5%+ total cost advantage, a substantial advantage in winning projects.

Background

The standard sales process consists of integrators selling end users a full solution. The integrator provides a single quote that covers all products and labor necessary to integrate the system. In most surveillance projects, products represent a majority of the total system cost, often reaching 40% - 60% of the entire project (i.e., a $100,000 project might be $50,000 in product costs and $50,000 in labor costs).

Integrators buy products from manufacturers, or their representatives, at various price levels and then re-sell them to end users. This price each integrator pays can vary greatly depending on a number of factors:

  • The more products an integrator buys from a manufacturer, the greater the discount provided
  • Being the first integrator to recommend a manufactuer's products to a user often results in bonus discounts (called 'project registration')
  • The greater the size and power of the integrator, the more likely the manufacturer will provide steeper discounts (especially if the manufacturer is small)
  • The manufacturer's perception of the tactical role of an integrator can impact discounts (Can an integrator help get the manufacturer into a new region? Does an integrator have a strong relationship with an end user the manufacturer desires?)
  • Whether an integrator can buy direct from a manufacturer rather than through a distributor (buying direct often increases discounts)
  • The negotiating skills and tenacity of the integrator

While each manufacturer's specific policies and tactics vary, some combination of the above almost always occurs. The end result is that 'most favored' integrators regularly buys products at 10% or greater discount than an integrator who only occassionally sells the manufacturer's products.

The Incentive Structure

Securing the best possible product discounts is an important advantage for integrators. Since product sales are such a large component of overall projects, small variances in product discounts can result in significant overall cost advantages. For instance, in the $100,000 project we referenced earlier, an integrator with a 10% advantage in product discount pays manufacturers $5,000 less (10% times $50,000). If labor costs were similar (as they often are), the end user would save over $5,000 from the integrator who had the better discount from a manufacturer. The product discount significantly increases the integrator's odds of winning the project.

Conflicts Arising

Since the skills needed for product procurement and system integration are so different, the standard sales model inflicts important inefficiencies. Organizations that excel at procurement need to move high amounts of products, be tough negotiators and have a lean cost structure (think Wal-Mart). By contrast, companies that excel at integration need to have great technical expertise, strong problem solving skills and personal dedication to the client (think boutique firms like software development, accounting, etc.). Forcing these two fundamentally distinct practices together, creates difficulties in excelling at both.

Furthermore, higher discounts often make integrators more dependent and aligned to specific manufacturers. 

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

Impact of the Incentive Structure

Practically, this fosters two common problems:

  1. Encourages integrators to design systems or advocate solutions based on products that they possess the best discounts
  2. Reduces the value of integration/labor skills as integrators can win projects based on superior discount structures / product sales abilities

This is almost certainly the opposite of what security end users want. Of course, they want and need product but they are poorly served when product sales interfere with the best overall design and implementation.

While many integrators put the interest of their users first, doing so puts them at a competitive disadvantage to those who play the game more shrewdly.

From the perspective of manufacturers, incenting customers to buy more products is quite rational. However, since the proportional cost of products in a project are so large, those incentives can help align the integrator more to the manufacturer than the customer.

Many decry falling product margins yet if integrators only sold their services ('smarts'), we'd likely reward better integrators and foster stronger overall security solutions.

What Do You Think?

Related Reports

Tri-Ed Favorability Results on Apr 25, 2017
Tri-Ed, owned by Anixter, far outranked Anixter, the lowest ranked company in our distributor favorability series. Still, Anixter's ownership did...
Axis Posts Strong Q1 2017 Financial Results on Apr 24, 2017
Axis posted strong numbers for Q1 2017, after having some challenges in 2016 (Q1 2016, Q3 2016). Inventory levels and overall spending show...
Dell EMC Surveillance Division Profile on Apr 20, 2017
With revenue growth from traditional IT customers slowing, Dell has set a focus on the security industry as a market where the company can offer...
Top Selling Video Surveillance Distributors on Apr 17, 2017
These are the top selling video surveillance distributors in North America, as reported by 150 integrator survey respondents. In this report, we...
Hide or Show Models on Quotes - Integrator Statistics on Apr 13, 2017
Customers like to know what they are buying, but they might use an integrator's detailed quote to shop the system designed. This is a challenge...
Hikvision Major OEM LTS Now Distributing Hikvision on Apr 12, 2017
In a rare move, one of Hikvision's top North American OEMs, LTS, has become a Hikvision distributor, as demonstrated in LTS' ISC West booth: In...
PSA Distributor Favorability Results on Apr 11, 2017
To most integrators, PSA is is a vague unknown entity but to some, PSA is exactly what a distributor should be.  In this report we provide an...
Best and Worst - ISC West 2017 Show Report on Apr 10, 2017
IPVM went to Las Vegas, examining what vendors are showcasing and what is new. Attendance was up, according to the show, and was certainly well...
VMS Vs NVR Usage Statistics on Apr 07, 2017
What is used more often? VMS software or NVR appliances? 160 integrators told us what they most commonly use and why. [premium_content] Key...
Q1 2017 Video Surveillance Market Review on Mar 30, 2017
These are the most notable moves and events for January - March 2017 in the video surveillance market. Cybersecurity Rising Cybersecurity, once...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IPVM First Dean's List W2017 - Thomas Atkinson, Matt Hurly and Fredrik Lundqvist on Apr 24, 2017
IPVM is happy to congratulate and celebrate our first "Dean's List", the top students in our courses. For the Winter 2017 IP Networking course...
Axis Posts Strong Q1 2017 Financial Results on Apr 24, 2017
Axis posted strong numbers for Q1 2017, after having some challenges in 2016 (Q1 2016, Q3 2016). Inventory levels and overall spending show...
Axis Lowest Cost Outdoor IR Camera M2025-LE Tested on Apr 24, 2017
Axis has lagged offering low cost IR cameras while their Asian competitors have made IR standard even in their most entry level cameras. Recently,...
Splicing Alarm Circuits Guide on Apr 23, 2017
Alarm installers commonly connect multiple sensors to a single zone. They do this by splicing the wires together. In this report, we will explain...
IP Networking Course May 2017 on Apr 21, 2017
NOTE: Registration ends this Thursday. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals plus it...
PureTech Video Analytics Examined on Apr 21, 2017
PureTech's analytics were chosen for a US border protection system (see related post), which the company claims no other analytics vendor was able...
US Border RVSS / Video Analytics System Examined on Apr 21, 2017
US Customs and Border Protection has been rolling out a video analytics-based detection system along the US/Mexico border, with detection ranges...
Beware The "Hit List" Ranking on Apr 21, 2017
The hit list. Kirschenbaum's recent newsletter complained about a 'hit list', bemoaning how a company took aim at ADT. Alas, that's the Google...
Ring Floodlight Cam Tested on Apr 20, 2017
Ring has released their latest entry, the Floodlight Cam, calling it the "Evolution of Outdoor Security", touting motion activated floodlights,...
Lenel President Is Out on Apr 20, 2017
Lenel's challenges continue. Now, Lenel's President is out, suddenly. This follows increasing challenges for the company who has broadly upset...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact