Secret Surveillance Approved Inside Patient's Room

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Mar 26, 2014

The family of an elderly man found a hidden camera in his hospital room. Already frustrated from what they felt was substandard care, they were outraged when they noticed the camera in a fake smoke detector mounted to the ceiling.

It prompted both a VA investigation and the creation of a bill aimed at restricting cameras in veteran’s hospital rooms. The investigation uncovered emails and hospital records that show the hospital was concerned that his family members interfering with his care.

In this post we review the investigation and its impact on the use of surveillance cameras.

*** ****** ** ** ******* *** ***** * ****** ****** in *** ******** ****. ******* ********** **** **** **** **** *** substandard ****, **** **** ******** **** **** ******* *** ****** in * **** ***** ******** ******* ** *** *******.

** ******** **** * ** ************* *** *** ******** ** a **** ***** ** *********** ******* ** *******’* ******** *****. The ************* ********* ****** *** ******** ******* **** **** *** hospital *** ********* **** *** ****** ******* *********** **** *** care.

** **** **** ** ****** *** ************* *** *** ****** on *** *** ** ************ *******.

[***************]

**********

** ****, *** ****** ** **** **-****-*** ****** ********, ***** a ****** ****** ** *** **** ** ***** *. ***** VA ******* ******. ********’* ***-**-*** *** *** ***** ** **** *** camera. *** ****** ********* *** ******** ********* *** ****** ******* they **** *********** ***** *** **********. ****'* ***:

***** ***** **** * ******** *** * ***** *****-******* ******* while ** ******** ** ********* ** ** *********. ***** ********* and ************ ** * ** ******** ****** ** ****, *** family **** ** ******** ***** ****** ***** **** *****-** **** a ******* **** *** *** *** ****** ******* ***** ****** presumably **** **** ** ******.

*** ****** ********** ** *** *** ********, *** ******* ***** the ****** **** **.

*** ** ******** **** ** ********* *** ****** ** ** able ** ******* *********’* ****** ** *** ***** *** ****** suggest *** ****** *** ** **** *** ***, ** ******, was *********** **** ******’* ******. ******* *** ******** ******* ********* changing ******** ** ********* **** *** ******* ****.

*** ******** ****** ** **** “*** ** **** *** ... changing *** ******* ******** ** *** *******’* ***, ******** *** rate ** ******** ** *** *******’* ******* *** ********** *****, and/or ************* *** *******.”

*** **** ***** *** **** **** ***** * **** * incident:


The ******

*** ****** ********* *** ************.

******** ************** ********** **** ** *** *** ***** ** ** a ****** ****** “****** **** ***** *** ******* *** **** selected **** ********** *****,”******** *** ***** *** *****. *** ****** *** ****-********* *** ******** *** ** **** before ** *** *******.

****** ******** ** **** ** * ** ************* ***** ***** show *** ******** ****’* **** *** ****** ** ****.

VA ********

***** *** ***** ****** ** ** *** *****, *** ** Office ** ********* **************** ** *************. ** **** ***** ** *** *******'* ******* ****** **** reports ** “******** ******* *** ******** ******* ** **** *******, bed ********, **********/****** ******** ***** **** ******* **** **** ** the ******.”

***** ********** ************** *** ****** ****** *** ********* *** **** ******* ******* was *** ****** ******* ** *** ***** **** *** *********. It **** ********** **** ******* ******** ******** ****-******* **** **** the ******** *****.

Other ********

** *** **** ** *** *************, ** ***** ** ********* reported ***** ****** *******, *** ***** ******** ** ***** **** in *** ****, *** ** *********** **** *** *********** **************.

*** ************* **** ******** *** ***** ********* ** ** *********. For *******, ** ********* ********* *** *** ********* ******** ** have ******* ** ******* *****, **** ********* *** *****, ******** areas *** ****** ***** ********** ********** *** ******. ** ****** all ***** ***** *** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *******.

** ******** *** ** ********* *** ***** **** ** ******* of **** **** ******* ** ******** ***** ** **** **** are ***** ********* ** ******* *****. *** ******* ******** ********* both ***** *** *****. ***** ******** **** **********, ****** ****** seclusion ***** *** ***** ****.

***********

*** ***** ********* **** *** ** *********** ** ********************** *** *** ** ******’* ** ** ******** *****. *** legislation *** ***** ** ****** *** **** **** *** *** released **** ******. ** *** **** ** *** ******, ***** showed *** ********* ******** ***** *** ******, ******* **** ** **** *********.

****

**** ** *** *****?

Comments (4)

Yes. Especially for older patients who are more susceptible to getting infections in hospitals and who may not be in their right minds. Someone suffering dementia may very likely fiddle with their own feeding tubes, IV drips, etc. Having a camera in a patient room also allows one nurse to monitor multiple rooms and is hardly an uncommon practice in non-VA hospitals.

What is curious about this case is the reason the VA installed the camera in the first place. It looks like they were trying to gather evidence of family misbehavior to use in their defense in a lawsuit, but it's just as easy to spin it into a case where the hospital administration was concerned about a specific patient's safety based on incidents and inventory counts.

Case by case basis, and they should run their reasons by a lawyer first.

Maybe one day there will be clearly defined paramters that cover special circumstances where, as Kathleen pointed out, the patient may intentionaly or unintentionaly harm themselves, that allows a hospital to automatically video monitor a patient. Then for other cases where nefarious activity is suspected, a procedure the hospital can follow to get approval from a 3rd party, impartial entity for surveillance, similar to the way law enforcement is required to justify a warrant or injunction from a judge.

Where I think the hospital made a mistake was using a covert camera. A camera in plain view could be argued that safety was the only concern of the hospital. A covert camera means the hospotal went beyond the concern for safety into the realm of criminal investigation. If they suspected the man's family of interferering with his care, they should have notified police and left it up to police to justify and run a covert camera.

Actually, it should not be hidden and should be required for all patients and video provided to hopital and the patient upon request.

I have installed a hidden camera in a labor delivery wing where there was suspected ongoing family issues. Don't know of they actually ever used it. Was 10 years ago.

I just finished installing 28 cameras in patient rooms feeding three dvrs with the monitors located in the stations where the vital signs are monitored. They are for baker act patients, but many times the rooms are used for other patients. The dvrs have no hard drives, recording is against Hippa regulations. A patient has already complained and we now have to train the staff on how to mask views. This is a cost saver as a staff member has to sit in those rooms 24 hours unless there is another way to monitor the patient. I have done this probably 15 times in hospitals over the years.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

25% China Tariffs Finalized For 2019, 10% Start Now, Includes Select Video Surveillance on Sep 18, 2018
A surprise move: In July, when the most recent tariff round was first announced, the tariffs were only scheduled for 10%. However, now, the US...
Central Stations Face Off Against NFPA On Fire Monitoring on Sep 18, 2018
Central stations are facing off against the NFPA over what they call anti-competitive language in NFPA 72, the standard that covers fire alarms....
Hikvision USA Starts Layoffs on Sep 18, 2018
Hikvision USA has started layoffs, just weeks after the US government ban was passed into law. Inside this note, we examine: The important...
Chinese Government Praises Hikvision Following Xi Jinping on Sep 17, 2018
The Chinese government council responsible for managing China's state-owned companies praised Hikvision’s obedience to China’s authoritarian leader...
Amazon Ring Spotlight Cam Tested on Sep 17, 2018
Amazon's Ring has released their latest camera entry, the Spotlight Cam, which we bought and tested in our Consumer IP Camera Analytics...
European Mega Security Firm Verisure Pushing Security Fog on Sep 17, 2018
The European mega security firm Verisure (Securitas Direct), with a reported 2 million customers, is pushing security fog, as shown in this BBC...
IP Camera Cable Labeling Guide on Sep 14, 2018
Labeling cables can save a lot of money and headaches. While it is easy to overlook, taking time to label runs during installation significantly...
Favorite Intercom Manufacturers 2018 on Sep 14, 2018
Intercoms are certainly increasing in popularity, driven by the integration of video and IP networking. But who is the favorite? On the one side,...
Vivotek 4MP Camera Tested (FD8379-HV) on Sep 13, 2018
Next in our series of updated 4MP testing, we bought and tested Vivotek's FD8379-HV, and entry level 4MP model claiming "top-notch quality video in...
Ascent / MONI Faces Lender Lawsuit and Debt Crisis on Sep 13, 2018
ASCMA, aka Ascent, aka Brinks Home Security, aka MONI, aka Monitronics is being sued by a group of their lenders who allege: As of June 30,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact