Secret Surveillance Approved Inside Patient's Room

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Mar 26, 2014

The family of an elderly man found a hidden camera in his hospital room. Already frustrated from what they felt was substandard care, they were outraged when they noticed the camera in a fake smoke detector mounted to the ceiling.

It prompted both a VA investigation and the creation of a bill aimed at restricting cameras in veteran’s hospital rooms. The investigation uncovered emails and hospital records that show the hospital was concerned that his family members interfering with his care.

In this post we review the investigation and its impact on the use of surveillance cameras.

*** ****** ** ** ******* *** ***** * ****** ****** in *** ******** ****. ******* ********** **** **** **** **** *** substandard ****, **** **** ******** **** **** ******* *** ****** in * **** ***** ******** ******* ** *** *******.

** ******** **** * ** ************* *** *** ******** ** a **** ***** ** *********** ******* ** *******’* ******** *****. The ************* ********* ****** *** ******** ******* **** **** *** hospital *** ********* **** *** ****** ******* *********** **** *** care.

** **** **** ** ****** *** ************* *** *** ****** on *** *** ** ************ *******.

[***************]

**********

** ****, *** ****** ** **** **-****-*** ****** ********, ***** a ****** ****** ** *** **** ** ***** *. ***** VA ******* ******. ********’* ***-**-*** *** *** ***** ** **** *** camera. *** ****** ********* *** ******** ********* *** ****** ******* they **** *********** ***** *** **********. ****'* ***:

***** ***** **** * ******** *** * ***** *****-******* ******* while ** ******** ** ********* ** ** *********. ***** ********* and ************ ** * ** ******** ****** ** ****, *** family **** ** ******** ***** ****** ***** **** *****-** **** a ******* **** *** *** *** ****** ******* ***** ****** presumably **** **** ** ******.

*** ****** ********** ** *** *** ********, *** ******* ***** the ****** **** **.

*** ** ******** **** ** ********* *** ****** ** ** able ** ******* *********’* ****** ** *** ***** *** ****** suggest *** ****** *** ** **** *** ***, ** ******, was *********** **** ******’* ******. ******* *** ******** ******* ********* changing ******** ** ********* **** *** ******* ****.

*** ******** ****** ** **** “*** ** **** *** ... changing *** ******* ******** ** *** *******’* ***, ******** *** rate ** ******** ** *** *******’* ******* *** ********** *****, and/or ************* *** *******.”

*** **** ***** *** **** **** ***** * **** * incident:


The ******

*** ****** ********* *** ************.

******** ************** ********** **** ** *** *** ***** ** ** a ****** ****** “****** **** ***** *** ******* *** **** selected **** ********** *****,”******** *** ***** *** *****. *** ****** *** ****-********* *** ******** *** ** **** before ** *** *******.

****** ******** ** **** ** * ** ************* ***** ***** show *** ******** ****’* **** *** ****** ** ****.

VA ********

***** *** ***** ****** ** ** *** *****, *** ** Office ** ********* **************** ** *************. ** **** ***** ** *** *******'* ******* ****** **** reports ** “******** ******* *** ******** ******* ** **** *******, bed ********, **********/****** ******** ***** **** ******* **** **** ** the ******.”

***** ********** ************** *** ****** ****** *** ********* *** **** ******* ******* was *** ****** ******* ** *** ***** **** *** *********. It **** ********** **** ******* ******** ******** ****-******* **** **** the ******** *****.

Other ********

** *** **** ** *** *************, ** ***** ** ********* reported ***** ****** *******, *** ***** ******** ** ***** **** in *** ****, *** ** *********** **** *** *********** **************.

*** ************* **** ******** *** ***** ********* ** ** *********. For *******, ** ********* ********* *** *** ********* ******** ** have ******* ** ******* *****, **** ********* *** *****, ******** areas *** ****** ***** ********** ********** *** ******. ** ****** all ***** ***** *** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *******.

** ******** *** ** ********* *** ***** **** ** ******* of **** **** ******* ** ******** ***** ** **** **** are ***** ********* ** ******* *****. *** ******* ******** ********* both ***** *** *****. ***** ******** **** **********, ****** ****** seclusion ***** *** ***** ****.

***********

*** ***** ********* **** *** ** *********** ** ********************** *** *** ** ******’* ** ** ******** *****. *** legislation *** ***** ** ****** *** **** **** *** *** released **** ******. ** *** **** ** *** ******, ***** showed *** ********* ******** ***** *** ******, ******* **** ** **** *********.

****

**** ** *** *****?

Comments (4)

Yes. Especially for older patients who are more susceptible to getting infections in hospitals and who may not be in their right minds. Someone suffering dementia may very likely fiddle with their own feeding tubes, IV drips, etc. Having a camera in a patient room also allows one nurse to monitor multiple rooms and is hardly an uncommon practice in non-VA hospitals.

What is curious about this case is the reason the VA installed the camera in the first place. It looks like they were trying to gather evidence of family misbehavior to use in their defense in a lawsuit, but it's just as easy to spin it into a case where the hospital administration was concerned about a specific patient's safety based on incidents and inventory counts.

Case by case basis, and they should run their reasons by a lawyer first.

Maybe one day there will be clearly defined paramters that cover special circumstances where, as Kathleen pointed out, the patient may intentionaly or unintentionaly harm themselves, that allows a hospital to automatically video monitor a patient. Then for other cases where nefarious activity is suspected, a procedure the hospital can follow to get approval from a 3rd party, impartial entity for surveillance, similar to the way law enforcement is required to justify a warrant or injunction from a judge.

Where I think the hospital made a mistake was using a covert camera. A camera in plain view could be argued that safety was the only concern of the hospital. A covert camera means the hospotal went beyond the concern for safety into the realm of criminal investigation. If they suspected the man's family of interferering with his care, they should have notified police and left it up to police to justify and run a covert camera.

Actually, it should not be hidden and should be required for all patients and video provided to hopital and the patient upon request.

I have installed a hidden camera in a labor delivery wing where there was suspected ongoing family issues. Don't know of they actually ever used it. Was 10 years ago.

I just finished installing 28 cameras in patient rooms feeding three dvrs with the monitors located in the stations where the vital signs are monitored. They are for baker act patients, but many times the rooms are used for other patients. The dvrs have no hard drives, recording is against Hippa regulations. A patient has already complained and we now have to train the staff on how to mask views. This is a cost saver as a staff member has to sit in those rooms 24 hours unless there is another way to monitor the patient. I have done this probably 15 times in hospitals over the years.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

VMS Server Sizing on May 25, 2018
Specifying the right sized PC/server for VMS software is one of the most important yet difficult decisions in IP video surveillance. In the past...
China: Foreign Video Surveillance Is Security Risk on May 25, 2018
The Chinese government has long acknowledged that foreign video surveillance is a 'risk to national security' and has increasingly and almost...
US House Passes Bill Banning Gov Use of Dahua and Hikvision on May 24, 2018
Today, the US House of Representatives passed H.R. 5515, a bill that includes a ban on the US government's use of Dahua and Hikvision. This follows...
Hanwha Wisenet X Analytics and VMD Test on May 24, 2018
Continuing our updated testing of camera analytics, we tested Hanwha's Wisenet X analytics for over two weeks in multiple scenes, indoors and out,...
Ambitious Mobile Access Startup: Openpath on May 24, 2018
This team sold their last startup for hundreds of millions of dollars, now they have started Openpath to become a rare access control small...
Amazon's "Dangerous New Face Recognition Technology" Says ACLU on May 23, 2018
The ACLU has caused a stir, with a new report Amazon Teams Up With Law Enforcement to Deploy Dangerous New Face Recognition Technology,...
Software Only VMS vs NVR Appliances on May 23, 2018
Should you buy your own PC/server and load VMS software on it or get a turnkey appliance (both hardware and software, e.g., NVR, Hybrid DVR) from a...
Buy Arecont: Top Bid $10 Million Cash on May 22, 2018
Last year, Arecont had a deal for a purchase price of $170 million (see Failed Arecont China Acquisition). This year, Arecont has a deal for a...
Installing Box Cameras Indoors Tutorial on May 22, 2018
This tutorial starts our physical installation for video surveillance series, starting with Box Cameras, one of the oldest and most basic types....
The Hikvision Smart Classroom Behavior Management System on May 22, 2018
Hikvision's rapidly growing offering of analytics, which we most recently examined with Hikvision's ethnic minority analytics, is now going into...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact