Secret Surveillance Approved Inside Patient's Room

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Mar 26, 2014

The family of an elderly man found a hidden camera in his hospital room. Already frustrated from what they felt was substandard care, they were outraged when they noticed the camera in a fake smoke detector mounted to the ceiling.

It prompted both a VA investigation and the creation of a bill aimed at restricting cameras in veteran’s hospital rooms. The investigation uncovered emails and hospital records that show the hospital was concerned that his family members interfering with his care.

In this post we review the investigation and its impact on the use of surveillance cameras.

*** ****** ** ** ******* *** ***** * ****** ****** in *** ******** ****. ******* ********** **** **** **** **** *** substandard ****, **** **** ******** **** **** ******* *** ****** in * **** ***** ******** ******* ** *** *******.

** ******** **** * ** ************* *** *** ******** ** a **** ***** ** *********** ******* ** *******’* ******** *****. The ************* ********* ****** *** ******** ******* **** **** *** hospital *** ********* **** *** ****** ******* *********** **** *** care.

** **** **** ** ****** *** ************* *** *** ****** on *** *** ** ************ *******.

[***************]

**********

** ****, *** ****** ** **** **-****-*** ****** ********, ***** a ****** ****** ** *** **** ** ***** *. ***** VA ******* ******. ********’* ***-**-*** *** *** ***** ** **** *** camera. *** ****** ********* *** ******** ********* *** ****** ******* they **** *********** ***** *** **********. ****'* ***:

***** ***** **** * ******** *** * ***** *****-******* ******* while ** ******** ** ********* ** ** *********. ***** ********* and ************ ** * ** ******** ****** ** ****, *** family **** ** ******** ***** ****** ***** **** *****-** **** a ******* **** *** *** *** ****** ******* ***** ****** presumably **** **** ** ******.

*** ****** ********** ** *** *** ********, *** ******* ***** the ****** **** **.

*** ** ******** **** ** ********* *** ****** ** ** able ** ******* *********’* ****** ** *** ***** *** ****** suggest *** ****** *** ** **** *** ***, ** ******, was *********** **** ******’* ******. ******* *** ******** ******* ********* changing ******** ** ********* **** *** ******* ****.

*** ******** ****** ** **** “*** ** **** *** ... changing *** ******* ******** ** *** *******’* ***, ******** *** rate ** ******** ** *** *******’* ******* *** ********** *****, and/or ************* *** *******.”

*** **** ***** *** **** **** ***** * **** * incident:


The ******

*** ****** ********* *** ************.

******** ************** ********** **** ** *** *** ***** ** ** a ****** ****** “****** **** ***** *** ******* *** **** selected **** ********** *****,”******** *** ***** *** *****. *** ****** *** ****-********* *** ******** *** ** **** before ** *** *******.

****** ******** ** **** ** * ** ************* ***** ***** show *** ******** ****’* **** *** ****** ** ****.

VA ********

***** *** ***** ****** ** ** *** *****, *** ** Office ** ********* **************** ** *************. ** **** ***** ** *** *******'* ******* ****** **** reports ** “******** ******* *** ******** ******* ** **** *******, bed ********, **********/****** ******** ***** **** ******* **** **** ** the ******.”

***** ********** ************** *** ****** ****** *** ********* *** **** ******* ******* was *** ****** ******* ** *** ***** **** *** *********. It **** ********** **** ******* ******** ******** ****-******* **** **** the ******** *****.

Other ********

** *** **** ** *** *************, ** ***** ** ********* reported ***** ****** *******, *** ***** ******** ** ***** **** in *** ****, *** ** *********** **** *** *********** **************.

*** ************* **** ******** *** ***** ********* ** ** *********. For *******, ** ********* ********* *** *** ********* ******** ** have ******* ** ******* *****, **** ********* *** *****, ******** areas *** ****** ***** ********** ********** *** ******. ** ****** all ***** ***** *** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *******.

** ******** *** ** ********* *** ***** **** ** ******* of **** **** ******* ** ******** ***** ** **** **** are ***** ********* ** ******* *****. *** ******* ******** ********* both ***** *** *****. ***** ******** **** **********, ****** ****** seclusion ***** *** ***** ****.

***********

*** ***** ********* **** *** ** *********** ** ********************** *** *** ** ******’* ** ** ******** *****. *** legislation *** ***** ** ****** *** **** **** *** *** released **** ******. ** *** **** ** *** ******, ***** showed *** ********* ******** ***** *** ******, ******* **** ** **** *********.

****

**** ** *** *****?

Comments (4)

Yes. Especially for older patients who are more susceptible to getting infections in hospitals and who may not be in their right minds. Someone suffering dementia may very likely fiddle with their own feeding tubes, IV drips, etc. Having a camera in a patient room also allows one nurse to monitor multiple rooms and is hardly an uncommon practice in non-VA hospitals.

What is curious about this case is the reason the VA installed the camera in the first place. It looks like they were trying to gather evidence of family misbehavior to use in their defense in a lawsuit, but it's just as easy to spin it into a case where the hospital administration was concerned about a specific patient's safety based on incidents and inventory counts.

Case by case basis, and they should run their reasons by a lawyer first.

Maybe one day there will be clearly defined paramters that cover special circumstances where, as Kathleen pointed out, the patient may intentionaly or unintentionaly harm themselves, that allows a hospital to automatically video monitor a patient. Then for other cases where nefarious activity is suspected, a procedure the hospital can follow to get approval from a 3rd party, impartial entity for surveillance, similar to the way law enforcement is required to justify a warrant or injunction from a judge.

Where I think the hospital made a mistake was using a covert camera. A camera in plain view could be argued that safety was the only concern of the hospital. A covert camera means the hospotal went beyond the concern for safety into the realm of criminal investigation. If they suspected the man's family of interferering with his care, they should have notified police and left it up to police to justify and run a covert camera.

Actually, it should not be hidden and should be required for all patients and video provided to hopital and the patient upon request.

I have installed a hidden camera in a labor delivery wing where there was suspected ongoing family issues. Don't know of they actually ever used it. Was 10 years ago.

I just finished installing 28 cameras in patient rooms feeding three dvrs with the monitors located in the stations where the vital signs are monitored. They are for baker act patients, but many times the rooms are used for other patients. The dvrs have no hard drives, recording is against Hippa regulations. A patient has already complained and we now have to train the staff on how to mask views. This is a cost saver as a staff member has to sit in those rooms 24 hours unless there is another way to monitor the patient. I have done this probably 15 times in hospitals over the years.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

Milestone Disrupts Milestone With Arcules on Nov 19, 2018
Milestone is now competing against... Milestone's own spinout Arcules New IPVM testing shows that Arcules has incorporated a substantial amount of...
Pressure Mounts Against Dahua and Hikvision Xinjiang Business on Nov 19, 2018
Pressure is mounting against Hikvision, Dahua, and other companies operating in Xinjiang as an international outcry brews against the Chinese...
Arcules Cloud VMS Tested on Nov 19, 2018
Arcules is a big bet, or as they describe themselves a 'bold company', spun out and backed by Milestone and Canon.  But how good is Arcules cloud...
'Sticker' Surveillance Camera Developed (CSEM Witness) on Nov 16, 2018
The Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM) has announced what it calls the: world’s first fully autonomous camera that can be...
ISC East 2018 Mini-Show Final Report on Nov 16, 2018
This is our second (updated) and final show report from ISC East. ISC East, by its own admission, is not a national or international show, billed...
Facial Detection Tested on Nov 16, 2018
Facial detection and recognition are increasingly offered by video surveillance manufacturers. Facial detection detects faces in an image/video...
Throughtek P2P/Cloud Solution Profile on Nov 15, 2018
Many IoT manufacturers either do not have the capabilities or the interest to develop their own cloud management software for their devices....
ASIS Offering Custom Research For Manufacturers on Nov 15, 2018
Manufacturers often want to know what industry people think about trends and, in particular, the segments and product they offer.  ASIS and its...
Hikvision Silent on "Bad Architectural Practices" Cybersecurity Report on Nov 14, 2018
A 'significant vulnerability was found in Hikvision cameras' by VDOO, a startup cybersecurity specialist. Hikvision has fixed the specific...
French Government Threatens School with $1.7M Fine For “Excessive Video Surveillance” on Nov 14, 2018
The French government has notified a high-profile Paris coding academy that it risks a fine of up to 1.5 million euros (about $1.7m) if it...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact