Secret Surveillance Approved Inside Patient's Room

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on Mar 26, 2014

The family of an elderly man found a hidden camera in his hospital room. Already frustrated from what they felt was substandard care, they were outraged when they noticed the camera in a fake smoke detector mounted to the ceiling.

It prompted both a VA investigation and the creation of a bill aimed at restricting cameras in veteran’s hospital rooms. The investigation uncovered emails and hospital records that show the hospital was concerned that his family members interfering with his care.

In this post we review the investigation and its impact on the use of surveillance cameras.

*** ****** ** ** ******* *** ***** * ****** ****** in *** ******** ****. ******* ********** **** **** **** **** *** substandard ****, **** **** ******** **** **** ******* *** ****** in * **** ***** ******** ******* ** *** *******.

** ******** **** * ** ************* *** *** ******** ** a **** ***** ** *********** ******* ** *******’* ******** *****. The ************* ********* ****** *** ******** ******* **** **** *** hospital *** ********* **** *** ****** ******* *********** **** *** care.

** **** **** ** ****** *** ************* *** *** ****** on *** *** ** ************ *******.

[***************]

**********

** ****, *** ****** ** **** **-****-*** ****** ********, ***** a ****** ****** ** *** **** ** ***** *. ***** VA ******* ******. ********’* ***-**-*** *** *** ***** ** **** *** camera. *** ****** ********* *** ******** ********* *** ****** ******* they **** *********** ***** *** **********. ****'* ***:

***** ***** **** * ******** *** * ***** *****-******* ******* while ** ******** ** ********* ** ** *********. ***** ********* and ************ ** * ** ******** ****** ** ****, *** family **** ** ******** ***** ****** ***** **** *****-** **** a ******* **** *** *** *** ****** ******* ***** ****** presumably **** **** ** ******.

*** ****** ********** ** *** *** ********, *** ******* ***** the ****** **** **.

*** ** ******** **** ** ********* *** ****** ** ** able ** ******* *********’* ****** ** *** ***** *** ****** suggest *** ****** *** ** **** *** ***, ** ******, was *********** **** ******’* ******. ******* *** ******** ******* ********* changing ******** ** ********* **** *** ******* ****.

*** ******** ****** ** **** “*** ** **** *** ... changing *** ******* ******** ** *** *******’* ***, ******** *** rate ** ******** ** *** *******’* ******* *** ********** *****, and/or ************* *** *******.”

*** **** ***** *** **** **** ***** * **** * incident:


The ******

*** ****** ********* *** ************.

******** ************** ********** **** ** *** *** ***** ** ** a ****** ****** “****** **** ***** *** ******* *** **** selected **** ********** *****,”******** *** ***** *** *****. *** ****** *** ****-********* *** ******** *** ** **** before ** *** *******.

****** ******** ** **** ** * ** ************* ***** ***** show *** ******** ****’* **** *** ****** ** ****.

VA ********

***** *** ***** ****** ** ** *** *****, *** ** Office ** ********* **************** ** *************. ** **** ***** ** *** *******'* ******* ****** **** reports ** “******** ******* *** ******** ******* ** **** *******, bed ********, **********/****** ******** ***** **** ******* **** **** ** the ******.”

***** ********** ************** *** ****** ****** *** ********* *** **** ******* ******* was *** ****** ******* ** *** ***** **** *** *********. It **** ********** **** ******* ******** ******** ****-******* **** **** the ******** *****.

Other ********

** *** **** ** *** *************, ** ***** ** ********* reported ***** ****** *******, *** ***** ******** ** ***** **** in *** ****, *** ** *********** **** *** *********** **************.

*** ************* **** ******** *** ***** ********* ** ** *********. For *******, ** ********* ********* *** *** ********* ******** ** have ******* ** ******* *****, **** ********* *** *****, ******** areas *** ****** ***** ********** ********** *** ******. ** ****** all ***** ***** *** ******* **** ********* ******* **** *******.

** ******** *** ** ********* *** ***** **** ** ******* of **** **** ******* ** ******** ***** ** **** **** are ***** ********* ** ******* *****. *** ******* ******** ********* both ***** *** *****. ***** ******** **** **********, ****** ****** seclusion ***** *** ***** ****.

***********

*** ***** ********* **** *** ** *********** ** ********************** *** *** ** ******’* ** ** ******** *****. *** legislation *** ***** ** ****** *** **** **** *** *** released **** ******. ** *** **** ** *** ******, ***** showed *** ********* ******** ***** *** ******, ******* **** ** **** *********.

****

**** ** *** *****?

Comments (4)

Yes. Especially for older patients who are more susceptible to getting infections in hospitals and who may not be in their right minds. Someone suffering dementia may very likely fiddle with their own feeding tubes, IV drips, etc. Having a camera in a patient room also allows one nurse to monitor multiple rooms and is hardly an uncommon practice in non-VA hospitals.

What is curious about this case is the reason the VA installed the camera in the first place. It looks like they were trying to gather evidence of family misbehavior to use in their defense in a lawsuit, but it's just as easy to spin it into a case where the hospital administration was concerned about a specific patient's safety based on incidents and inventory counts.

Case by case basis, and they should run their reasons by a lawyer first.

Maybe one day there will be clearly defined paramters that cover special circumstances where, as Kathleen pointed out, the patient may intentionaly or unintentionaly harm themselves, that allows a hospital to automatically video monitor a patient. Then for other cases where nefarious activity is suspected, a procedure the hospital can follow to get approval from a 3rd party, impartial entity for surveillance, similar to the way law enforcement is required to justify a warrant or injunction from a judge.

Where I think the hospital made a mistake was using a covert camera. A camera in plain view could be argued that safety was the only concern of the hospital. A covert camera means the hospotal went beyond the concern for safety into the realm of criminal investigation. If they suspected the man's family of interferering with his care, they should have notified police and left it up to police to justify and run a covert camera.

Actually, it should not be hidden and should be required for all patients and video provided to hopital and the patient upon request.

I have installed a hidden camera in a labor delivery wing where there was suspected ongoing family issues. Don't know of they actually ever used it. Was 10 years ago.

I just finished installing 28 cameras in patient rooms feeding three dvrs with the monitors located in the stations where the vital signs are monitored. They are for baker act patients, but many times the rooms are used for other patients. The dvrs have no hard drives, recording is against Hippa regulations. A patient has already complained and we now have to train the staff on how to mask views. This is a cost saver as a staff member has to sit in those rooms 24 hours unless there is another way to monitor the patient. I have done this probably 15 times in hospitals over the years.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Most Recent Industry Reports

Testing Bandwidth vs. Frame Rate on Jan 23, 2019
Selecting frame rate has a major impact on surveillance bandwidth and storage consumption. But with smart codecs now common and cameras more...
Camera Course January 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. Lots of manufacturer training exists...
Bosch Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 23, 2019
Bosch's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2017, with 2019 results showing strong net...
Intersec 2019 Show Report on Jan 23, 2019
The 2019 Intersec show, held annually in Dubai, is now complete. IPVM attended for 3 days, interviewing numerous Chinese and Western video...
2019 Camera Book Released on Jan 22, 2019
This is the best, most comprehensive security camera training in the world, based on our unprecedented testing. Now, all IPVM PRO Members can get...
Milesight Company Profile on Jan 22, 2019
Milesight Technology, a Chinese company building an International branded business, says they are slowly building their presence through a series...
Cable Trenching for Surveillance on Jan 21, 2019
Trenching cable for surveillance is surprisingly complex. While using shovels, picks, and hoes is not advanced technology, the proper planning,...
Milestone Favorability Results 2019 on Jan 21, 2019
Milestone's favorability moderately strengthed, in new IPVM integrator statistics over their results from 2016. While the industry has been...
The IP Camera Lock-In Trend: Meraki and Verkada on Jan 18, 2019
Open systems and interoperability have become core features of video surveillance systems, as virtually all professional IP cameras integrate with...
NYPD Refutes False SCMP Hikvision Story on Jan 18, 2019
The NYPD has refuted the SCMP Hikvision story, the Voice of America has reported. On January 11, 2018, the SCMP alleged that the NYPD was using...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact