Camera Vibration / Stabilizer Solutions

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Mar 13, 2013

Shaky images can severely undermine image quality, strain operator eyesight and make monitoring more difficult. What can be done about the problem? In this note, we explain the issues and examine what to do:

  • Harmonics / Vibrations
  • Differences between Dynamic and Fixed Vibrations
  • 3rd Party Devices
  • Integrated Electronic Image Stabilization
  • Dampening Mounts

Background

Keeping cameras steady can be a real challenge. Cameras mounted outside are often subject to wind or shaky mounts, and units mounted indoors can be prone to vibrations from air handler vents or from machinery. In the clip below, the a stabilizing device manufacturer shows a 'before' and 'after' example that demonstrates just how disruptive vibrations can be and limitations on what stabilization can do:

A discussion question posed the question of what options are available to combat this issue? We take a look at the root cause of the problem and the different solutions available for dealing with it.

Harmonics

Fundamentally, vibrations are waves of pressure. The rapidity, consistency, and strength of vibrations can be measured by frequency and amplitude.  Resolving intermittent, dynamic, and very strong vibrations, as in the case of wind sway, are difficult to correct while repeatable, constant, less intense vibrations, like cyclic machine vibrations are more easily resolved.

The frequency, or how rapidly vibrations occur, play a key role in how they are addressed. For example, low frequency movements like rolling waves can be corrected by mechanical, motion cancelling mounts. However, mechanical mounts are unsuited to cancel high frequency movements, because they often cannot register and respond quickly enough to be effective.

For surveillance cameras, dynamic vibrations are more difficult to correct. The more predictable movement becomes, the simpler it is to adjust images to compensate. Many tough vibration issues require more than a single 'remedy' and the best results come from 'stacking' solutions to minimize the impacts. Often, the best solution comes from a mix of software mitigation, mounting solutions, and camera placement.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Three Methods

The techniques in dealing with camera vibrations take three basic forms:

  • Dampening Mounts
  • 3rd Party Devices
  • Integrated Electronic Image Stabilization

Each method comes with its own advantages and disadvantages in dealing with the issues. We examine each in detail below: 

Dampening Mounts/Hardware

Hardware solutions that dampen vibrations range from inexpensive vibration dampeners costing a few dollars to gyroscopically stabilized positioners costing thousands of dollars that mechanically compensate for movement. If vibration amplitudes are small (weak), then the addition of common rubber or neoprene bushings at the mount can absorb vibrations, especially those arising from ambient machinery or air handler units. The image below shows an assortment of bushing dampeners than can be adapted for use on camera mounts:

The ultimate effectiveness of dampening hardware depends on how it is used. Hardware installed between the camera and the mount is usually the least expensive to install, however hardware between housing and the mounting surface, while more expensive, generally offers a better result.

In tougher cases, where vibrations or sway is dynamic and has powerful amplitude (eg: ocean waves, driving winds, high tower mounts), mounts featuring internal gyroscopes or floating bases that maintain the camera in a level position regardless of external deflection, can be used. While these units are suited to deal with a wide range of vibration, they are costly and may not be sensitive enough to adjust for high frequency vibrations. 

Pros

  • Mechanical Dampeners can mitigate the widest range of vibration sources.
  • Dampening Bushings are inexpensive and commonly available supply items.

Cons

  • Adding dampeners to mounts can complicate install, and 'surveillance mount' specific kits are not common.
  • Heavy-duty Gyroscopic stabilizers cost thousands of dollars, and may require separate controllers.

3rd Party Devices

This stabilization option takes place externally of the camera and mount, and is connected midspan between the camera and recorder. The device mitigates camera shake by post-processing video streams.

While several different appliances are available [link no longer available], the high cost of the solutions (~$5000 per channel) restricts their adoption in many cases.

Pros 

  • 3rd Party Appliances not limited to certain frequencies or vibration intensities.
  • Other 'image enhancement features' may be provided in appliance

Cons

  • Expensive, often costing more per channel than several cameras
  • Limited resolution often (analog / SD)

Integrated Electronic Image Stabilization

Image stabilization processing taking place within the camera itself is often noted as "electronic image stabilization", or simply "EIS" on spec sheets. While implementations of EIS vary among manufacturers, they frequently deliver modest results. These features typically have the best results normalizing low-intensity, high-frequency, fixed vibrations, and have mixed effectiveness where movement is more intense and less patterned. 

The manufacturer's promotional image illustrates the effect of an integrated EIS feature:

Pros

  • Unlike 3rd Party Appliance, EIS is built in
  • EIS does not add significant cost compared to other stabilization options.

Cons

  • Modest impact, and not effective in correcting vibrations with wide amplitude.
  • May result in resolution reduction at edges of frame 
  • Only available on a minority of cameras

Recommendations

Figuring out the right anti-vibration solution to use can be tricky. Consider these guidelines:

  • For slight, high frequency vibrations like machinery or air handling units, using cameras with integrated EIS or applying vibration dampening hardware offers the least expensive solution.
  • For high-intensity, low-frequency, and dynamic vibrations, mounting hardware like gyroscopic mounts offer the best solution.
  • When cameras that do not support EIS are in use, a 3rd Party Appliance may be considered. However, due to high cost this is usually the last option chosen among the available options.

Not all vibrations follow a single pattern, and the above options may be layered atop each other for the best result.

1 report cite this report:

Strong Poles Profile on Sep 06, 2016
One of the trickiest places to install surveillance cameras is on poles. Common issues like pole vibration, sway, and even mounting the camera...
Comments (2) : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Security Installation Tools Guide - 22 Tools Listed on Feb 19, 2019
In this guide, we cover 22 tools that security installers frequently use. This is one part of our upcoming Video Surveillance...
Cable Firestopping Installation Guide on Mar 06, 2019
Installing cables through firewalls is a critical installation issue. Failing to properly seal a penetration can cause smoke and fire to spread,...
Camera Pendant Mounting Guide on Mar 07, 2019
It is often necessary to suspend a camera from a high open ceiling. This is commonplace in retail, warehouse, industrial sites, hangars, and other...
Outdoor Camera Installation Guide on Mar 25, 2019
Outdoor camera installation can be fraught with problems. Creating a sturdy and weather tight mount is key for camera performance and longevity,...
Pole Mount Camera Installation Guide on Apr 11, 2019
Poles are a popular but challenging choice for deploying surveillance cameras outdoors. Poles are indispensable for putting cameras at the right...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Lasers Impact on Surveillance Cameras Tested on Sep 25, 2019
Hong Kong protests have brought global attention to video surveillance and the ongoing attempts of protesters to disable or undermine those cameras...
Camera Cable Whip Guide on Oct 02, 2019
Cable whips are one of integrator's least favorite camera features but seem to be unavoidable, now commonplace on dome, turret, and bullet cameras...
Horizontal Cabling for Video Surveillance Guide on Jan 03, 2020
There are a few options when it comes to professionally installing horizontal cabling for video surveillance networks. The three options examined...
Network Cabling for Video Surveillance on Jan 15, 2020
In this guide, we explain the fundamentals of network cabling for video surveillance networks, how they should be installed, and the differences in...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hanwha Wisenet X Plus PTRZ Tested on Feb 14, 2020
Hanwha has released their PTRZ camera, the Wisenet X Plus XNV-6081Z, claiming the "modular design allows for easy installation". We bought and...
PRC Warns Against China Video Surveillance Hacks, Hikvision Targeted on Feb 14, 2020
Hackers are targeting China video surveillance manufacturers and systems, according to the PRC's main cyber threat monitoring body. The hackers...
IPVM Conference 2020 on Feb 13, 2020
IPVM is excited to announce our 2020 conference. This is the first and only industry event that will be 100% sponsor-free. Like IPVM online, the...
Bosch Dropping Dahua on Feb 13, 2020
Bosch has confirmed to IPVM that it is in the process of dropping Dahua, over the next year, as both IP camera contract manufacturer and recorder...
BluB0X Alleges Lenel, S2, Software House Are Dinosaurs on Feb 13, 2020
BluB0X is running an ad campaign labeling Lenel, S2, Software House, Honeywell, AMAG and more as dinosaurs: In a follow-up email to IPVM,...
London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select areas of the UK capital, sparking significant controversy. IPVM...
Converged vs Dedicated Networks For Surveillance Tutorial on Feb 12, 2020
Use the existing network or deploy a new one? This is a critical choice in designing video surveillance systems. Though 'convergence' was a big...
Monitoreal "Completely Autonomous" Home AI Tested on Feb 12, 2020
Monitoreal claims to allow users to "see the things you want (people, vehicles, animals) and ignore the things you don’t”, using AI to distinguish...
Cisco Video Surveillance Is Dead, Long Live Cisco Meraki Video Surveillance on Feb 11, 2020
A dozen years ago much of the industry thought that Cisco was destined to dominate video surveillance. They stumbled repeatedly, failing. Now it is...
BICSI For IP Video Surveillance Guide on Feb 11, 2020
Spend enough time around networks and eventually someone will mention BICSI, the oft-referenced but only vaguely known standards body prevalent in...