Camera Vibration / Stabilizer Solutions

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Mar 13, 2013

Shaky images can severely undermine image quality, strain operator eyesight and make monitoring more difficult. What can be done about the problem? In this note, we explain the issues and examine what to do:

  • Harmonics / Vibrations
  • Differences between Dynamic and Fixed Vibrations
  • 3rd Party Devices
  • Integrated Electronic Image Stabilization
  • Dampening Mounts

Background

Keeping cameras steady can be a real challenge. Cameras mounted outside are often subject to wind or shaky mounts, and units mounted indoors can be prone to vibrations from air handler vents or from machinery. In the clip below, the a stabilizing device manufacturer shows a 'before' and 'after' example that demonstrates just how disruptive vibrations can be and limitations on what stabilization can do:

A discussion question posed the question of what options are available to combat this issue? We take a look at the root cause of the problem and the different solutions available for dealing with it.

Harmonics

Fundamentally, vibrations are waves of pressure. The rapidity, consistency, and strength of vibrations can be measured by frequency and amplitude.  Resolving intermittent, dynamic, and very strong vibrations, as in the case of wind sway, are difficult to correct while repeatable, constant, less intense vibrations, like cyclic machine vibrations are more easily resolved.

The frequency, or how rapidly vibrations occur, play a key role in how they are addressed. For example, low frequency movements like rolling waves can be corrected by mechanical, motion cancelling mounts. However, mechanical mounts are unsuited to cancel high frequency movements, because they often cannot register and respond quickly enough to be effective.

For surveillance cameras, dynamic vibrations are more difficult to correct. The more predictable movement becomes, the simpler it is to adjust images to compensate. Many tough vibration issues require more than a single 'remedy' and the best results come from 'stacking' solutions to minimize the impacts. Often, the best solution comes from a mix of software mitigation, mounting solutions, and camera placement.

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

Three Methods

The techniques in dealing with camera vibrations take three basic forms:

  • Dampening Mounts
  • 3rd Party Devices
  • Integrated Electronic Image Stabilization

Each method comes with its own advantages and disadvantages in dealing with the issues. We examine each in detail below: 

Dampening Mounts/Hardware

Hardware solutions that dampen vibrations range from inexpensive vibration dampeners costing a few dollars to gyroscopically stabilized positioners costing thousands of dollars that mechanically compensate for movement. If vibration amplitudes are small (weak), then the addition of common rubber or neoprene bushings at the mount can absorb vibrations, especially those arising from ambient machinery or air handler units. The image below shows an assortment of bushing dampeners than can be adapted for use on camera mounts:

The ultimate effectiveness of dampening hardware depends on how it is used. Hardware installed between the camera and the mount is usually the least expensive to install, however hardware between housing and the mounting surface, while more expensive, generally offers a better result.

In tougher cases, where vibrations or sway is dynamic and has powerful amplitude (eg: ocean waves, driving winds, high tower mounts), mounts featuring internal gyroscopes or floating bases that maintain the camera in a level position regardless of external deflection, can be used. While these units are suited to deal with a wide range of vibration, they are costly and may not be sensitive enough to adjust for high frequency vibrations. 

Pros

  • Mechanical Dampeners can mitigate the widest range of vibration sources.
  • Dampening Bushings are inexpensive and commonly available supply items.

Cons

  • Adding dampeners to mounts can complicate install, and 'surveillance mount' specific kits are not common.
  • Heavy-duty Gyroscopic stabilizers cost thousands of dollars, and may require separate controllers.

3rd Party Devices

This stabilization option takes place externally of the camera and mount, and is connected midspan between the camera and recorder. The device mitigates camera shake by post-processing video streams.

While several different appliances are available, the high cost of the solutions (~$5000 per channel) restricts their adoption in many cases.

Pros 

  • 3rd Party Appliances not limited to certain frequencies or vibration intensities.
  • Other 'image enhancement features' may be provided in appliance

Cons

  • Expensive, often costing more per channel than several cameras
  • Limited resolution often (analog / SD)

Integrated Electronic Image Stabilization

Image stabilization processing taking place within the camera itself is often noted as "electronic image stabilization", or simply "EIS" on spec sheets. While implementations of EIS vary among manufacturers, they frequently deliver modest results. These features typically have the best results normalizing low-intensity, high-frequency, fixed vibrations, and have mixed effectiveness where movement is more intense and less patterned. 

The manufacturer's promotional image illustrates the effect of an integrated EIS feature:

Pros

  • Unlike 3rd Party Appliance, EIS is built in
  • EIS does not add significant cost compared to other stabilization options.

Cons

  • Modest impact, and not effective in correcting vibrations with wide amplitude.
  • May result in resolution reduction at edges of frame 
  • Only available on a minority of cameras

Recommendations

Figuring out the right anti-vibration solution to use can be tricky. Consider these guidelines:

  • For slight, high frequency vibrations like machinery or air handling units, using cameras with integrated EIS or applying vibration dampening hardware offers the least expensive solution.
  • For high-intensity, low-frequency, and dynamic vibrations, mounting hardware like gyroscopic mounts offer the best solution.
  • When cameras that do not support EIS are in use, a 3rd Party Appliance may be considered. However, due to high cost this is usually the last option chosen among the available options.

Not all vibrations follow a single pattern, and the above options may be layered atop each other for the best result.

1 report cite this report:

Strong Poles Profile on Sep 06, 2016
One of the trickiest places to install surveillance cameras is on poles. Common issues like pole vibration, sway, and even mounting the camera...
Comments (2) : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Most Recent Industry Reports

How To Quickly Assess An Unknown Company on Jul 23, 2019
There are hundreds of companies in the physical security markets, ranging from a flood of new startups to small companies that may or may not be...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact