Bad News for Face Recognition (FTC)

By: John Honovich, Published on Oct 22, 2012

Cold water is being thrown on renewed dreams of using facial recognition and demographic analysis. This time it is coming from an unlikely source and country. The United States Federal Trade Commission has issued 'best practices' that recommend fairly stringent approaches that could have a chilling effect on the use of these emerging technologies. This is all the more surprising given that the US has a much more relaxed general stance on privacy issues than the European Union. In this note, we dig through recommendations and the ones with the most practical impact for IP camera use.

Potential Impacts

Of the dozen recommendations made in the full FTC "Facing Facts' report, three of them may apply to IP cameras.

First, the FTC recommends receiving 'affirmative express consent when collecting a person's biometric data:

"Obtain a consumer’s affirmative express consent before using a consumer’s image or any biometric data derived from that image in a materially different manner than they represented when they collected the data"

This could be a significant problem because in surveillance, consumers typically have no idea that facial recognition is occurring and certainly never express 'affirmative consent'. On the web, this is more straightforward to accomplish as a person is interacting with a site. However, with surveillance cameras this could result in a shutdown of facial recognition systems if followed.

Second, adding signs that disclaim the use of demographic detection is recommended:

"Companies using digital signs capable of demographic detection – which often look no different than digital signs that do not contain cameras – should provide clear notice to consumers that the technologies are in use, before consumers come into contact with the signs."

In the case study, the FTC emphasizes that the sign should be prominent:

"Depending upon the size of the store, the notice may be a prominent notice at the entrance to the store itself or at the entrance to a particular section of the store – and on or near the sign itself"

Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News
Get Notified of Video Surveillance Breaking News

The grey area here is that the examples are for displaying live ads. Potentially a VMS or video analytics supplier could claim an exception if it is only being used to chart demographic trends

Finally, a vague practice is encouraged about retention periods:

"Should establish and maintain appropriate retention and disposal practices for the consumer images and biometric data that they collect."

However, since no quantitative metrics nor further guidelines or given, this may be easier for providers to defend or justify.

Not Relevant to Surveillance / Camera Use

A handful of other recommendations might apply but, in practice, are not typically relevant.

Sharing biometric information is against best practices:

"Companies should not use facial recognition to identify anonymous images of a consumer to someone who could not otherwise identify him or her, without obtaining the consumer’s affirmative express consent."

Since security applications is typically limited to only use by security this is unlikely to be an issue.

Additionally, restrictions are recommended for camera placement:

"Companies developing digital signs equipped with cameras using facial recognition technologies should consider carefully where to place such signs and avoid placing them in sensitive areas, such as bathrooms, locker rooms, health care facilities, or places where children congregate."

However, facial recognition cameras are not typically placed in such areas.

Finally, protection is recommended:

"Companies that store such images should consider putting protections in place that would prevent unauthorized scraping"

However, 'scraping' is an issue of information posted on websites whereas most network cameras are used in internal networks only.

Questions of Enforcement

However, the FTC does not have legal authority as they disclaim:

"To the extent the recommended best practices go beyond existing legal requirements, they are not intended to serve as a template for law enforcement actions or regulations under laws currently enforced by the FTC."

As such, regardless of what an organization does, they will not likely be going to jail. However, the FTC does have the power to fine plus not following these guidelines can increase litigation risks. The biggest issue will likely be a practical one as potential buyers consider what risks they take if they are seen as violating FTC best practices.

Comments : Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Facial Recognition 101 on Mar 18, 2020
Facial recognition interest, use and fear is increasing. This guide aims to...
London Live Police Face Recognition Visited on Feb 13, 2020
London police have officially begun using live facial recognition in select...
HID Releases Lower-Cost Signo Readers on Mar 06, 2020
HID Global is releasing a new line of readers called Signo they claim read...
The Problem With Fever Detecting Thermal Sunglasses on Apr 15, 2020
While the media has promoted using thermal sunglasses to detect fevers, this...
Bias In Facial Recognition Varies By Country, NIST Report Shows on Jul 15, 2020
While many argue that face recognition is inherently racist, results from one...
FLIR A Series Temperature Screening Cameras Tested on Jun 04, 2020
FLIR is one of the biggest names in thermal and one of the most conservative....
Face Shields Impact On Temperature Measurement And Mask Detection on Jul 27, 2020
First, the use of face masks, and now, plastic face shields are rising...
Use Access Control Logs To Constrain Coronavirus on Apr 09, 2020
Access control users have included capabilities that are not commonly used...
Injes Tiny Temperature Terminal Tested on Jul 17, 2020
While temperature terminals have trended bigger, the Injes DFace801 is...
NetApp Presents Hybrid Cloud Video Archive on May 11, 2020
NetApp presented its hybrid S3 cloud video archive at the April 2020 IPVM New...
Trueface Presents AI Face Recognition, Mask and Temperature Detection on Jun 10, 2020
Trueface presented its AI facial recognition, mask and temperature detection...
USA ICI Elevated Skin Temperature Detectors Examined on Apr 06, 2020
Infrared Cameras, Inc. (ICI) is aiming to help slow the spread of COVID-19...
Hazardous & Explosion Proof Access Control Tutorial on Feb 27, 2020
Controlling access to hazardous environments requires equipment meeting...
Camio Presents Coronavirus Social Distancing Analytics on Apr 20, 2020
Camio presented its social distancing analytics for responding to coronavirus...
Avigilon Open Analytics Tested on Apr 16, 2020
After years of effectively closed analytics, Avigilon decided in late 2018 to...

Recent Reports

Dangerous Hikvision Fever Camera Showcased by Chilean City on Aug 07, 2020
Deploying a fever camera outdoors, in the rain, with no black body, is...
"Grand Slam" For Pelco's PE Firm, A Risk For Motorola on Aug 07, 2020
The word "Pelco" and "grand slam" have not been said together for many years....
FLIR Stock Falls, Admits 'Decelerating' Demand For Temperature Screening on Aug 07, 2020
Is the boom going to bust for temperature screening? FLIR disappointed...
VSaaS Will Hurt Integrators on Aug 06, 2020
VSaaS will hurt integrators, there is no question about that. How much...
Dogs For Coronavirus Screening Examined on Aug 06, 2020
While thermal temperature screening is the surveillance industry's most...
ADT Slides Back, Disappointing Results, Poor Commercial Performance on Aug 06, 2020
While ADT had an incredible start to the week, driven by the Google...
AHJ / Authority Having Jurisdiction Tutorial on Aug 06, 2020
One of the most powerful yet often underappreciated characters in all of the...
SIA Coaches Sellers on NDAA 889B Blacklist Workarounds on Aug 05, 2020
Last month SIA demanded that NDAA 899B "must be delayed". Now that they have...
ADI Returns To Growth, Back To 'Pre-COVID Levels' on Aug 05, 2020
While ADI was hit hard in April, with revenue declining 21%, the company's...
Exposing Fever Tablet Suppliers and 40+ Relabelers on Aug 05, 2020
IPVM has found 40+ USA and EU companies relabeling fever tablets designed,...
Indian Government Restricts PRC Manufacturers From Public Projects on Aug 04, 2020
In a move that mirrors the U.S. government’s ban on Dahua and Hikvision...
Directory of 201 "Fever" Camera Suppliers on Aug 04, 2020
This directory provides a list of "Fever" scanning thermal camera providers...
Face Masks Increase Face Recognition Errors Says NIST on Aug 04, 2020
COVID-19 has led to widespread facemask use, which as IPVM testing has shown...
Dahua Loses Australian Medical Device Approval on Aug 04, 2020
Dahua has cancelled its medical device registration after "discussions" with...
Google Invests in ADT, ADT Stock Soars on Aug 03, 2020
Google has announced a $450 million investment in the Florida-based security...