Bad News for Face Recognition (FTC)

By: John Honovich, Published on Oct 22, 2012

Cold water is being thrown on renewed dreams of using facial recognition and demographic analysis. This time it is coming from an unlikely source and country. The United States Federal Trade Commission has issued 'best practices' that recommend fairly stringent approaches that could have a chilling effect on the use of these emerging technologies. This is all the more surprising given that the US has a much more relaxed general stance on privacy issues than the European Union. In this note, we dig through recommendations and the ones with the most practical impact for IP camera use.

Potential Impacts

Of the dozen recommendations made in the full FTC "Facing Facts' report, three of them may apply to IP cameras.

First, the FTC recommends receiving 'affirmative express consent when collecting a person's biometric data:

"Obtain a consumer’s affirmative express consent before using a consumer’s image or any biometric data derived from that image in a materially different manner than they represented when they collected the data"

This could be a significant problem because in surveillance, consumers typically have no idea that facial recognition is occurring and certainly never express 'affirmative consent'. On the web, this is more straightforward to accomplish as a person is interacting with a site. However, with surveillance cameras this could result in a shutdown of facial recognition systems if followed.

Second, adding signs that disclaim the use of demographic detection is recommended:

"Companies using digital signs capable of demographic detection – which often look no different than digital signs that do not contain cameras – should provide clear notice to consumers that the technologies are in use, before consumers come into contact with the signs."

In the case study, the FTC emphasizes that the sign should be prominent:

"Depending upon the size of the store, the notice may be a prominent notice at the entrance to the store itself or at the entrance to a particular section of the store – and on or near the sign itself"

Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox
Get Video Surveillance News In Your Inbox

The grey area here is that the examples are for displaying live ads. Potentially a VMS or video analytics supplier could claim an exception if it is only being used to chart demographic trends

Finally, a vague practice is encouraged about retention periods:

"Should establish and maintain appropriate retention and disposal practices for the consumer images and biometric data that they collect."

However, since no quantitative metrics nor further guidelines or given, this may be easier for providers to defend or justify.

Not Relevant to Surveillance / Camera Use

A handful of other recommendations might apply but, in practice, are not typically relevant.

Sharing biometric information is against best practices:

"Companies should not use facial recognition to identify anonymous images of a consumer to someone who could not otherwise identify him or her, without obtaining the consumer’s affirmative express consent."

Since security applications is typically limited to only use by security this is unlikely to be an issue.

Additionally, restrictions are recommended for camera placement:

"Companies developing digital signs equipped with cameras using facial recognition technologies should consider carefully where to place such signs and avoid placing them in sensitive areas, such as bathrooms, locker rooms, health care facilities, or places where children congregate."

However, facial recognition cameras are not typically placed in such areas.

Finally, protection is recommended:

"Companies that store such images should consider putting protections in place that would prevent unauthorized scraping"

However, 'scraping' is an issue of information posted on websites whereas most network cameras are used in internal networks only.

Questions of Enforcement

However, the FTC does not have legal authority as they disclaim:

"To the extent the recommended best practices go beyond existing legal requirements, they are not intended to serve as a template for law enforcement actions or regulations under laws currently enforced by the FTC."

As such, regardless of what an organization does, they will not likely be going to jail. However, the FTC does have the power to fine plus not following these guidelines can increase litigation risks. The biggest issue will likely be a practical one as potential buyers consider what risks they take if they are seen as violating FTC best practices.

Comments : PRO Members only. Login. or Join.

Related Reports

Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 22, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Amazon Ring Public Subsidy Program Aims To Dominate Residential Security on May 20, 2019
Amazon dominates market after market. Quitely, but increasingly, they are doing so in residential security, through a combination of significant...
Inside Look Into Scam Market Research on May 17, 2019
Scam market research has exploded over the last few years becoming the most commonly cited 'statistics' for most industries, despite there clearly...
Vivotek Talks About Taiwan, China, Bans, AI And Business Development on May 10, 2019
Vivotek, Taiwan's biggest manufacturer by revenue, did not have a booth at Taiwan's Secutech 2019 (which we are covering). However,...
Verkada False Allegations Against Avigilon Exposed on May 08, 2019
Verkada has leveled false allegations against Avigilon, as part of their aggressive marketing tactics against the 'dinosaurs' in the 'ancient'...
ADT's Top Dealer "The Defenders" Sued 20+ Times on May 07, 2019
ADT's largest authorized dealer, The Defenders, has been sued more than 20 times since 2012, IPVM has verified through analyzing legal...
Knightscope Adds Just 2 Total Customers In Past Year, Yet Raising Money at $300 Million Valuation on May 02, 2019
This is no longer funny. While Knightscope has laughed it up promoting robot selfies, joking about a 'suicidal robot', the man who attacked a...
Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...

Most Recent Industry Reports

NJ Law Requires Apprenticeship For Public Works Integrators on May 24, 2019
Few integrators do a formal apprenticeship program. However, now a NJ law is requiring any integrator on public works projects (such as state...
Security / Privacy Journalist Sam Pfeifle Interview on May 24, 2019
Sam Pfeifle is best known as the outspoken former Editor of Security Systems News. After that, he was publications director at the International...
Verkada Video Quality Problems Tested on May 23, 2019
Verkada suffers from numerous video quality problems, not found in commercial IP cameras, new IPVM testing of Verkada vs Axis and Hikvision...
Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2019 on May 23, 2019
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? In IPVM's 2011 statistics, the average was 6-8fps increasing to ~10fps in...
Access Control Job Walk Guide on May 22, 2019
Significant money can be saved and problems avoided with an access control job walk if you know what to look for and what to ask. By inviting...
ASCMA / Monitronics Declares Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan on May 22, 2019
Monitronics is entering into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company, also called Ascent Capital Group Inc., aka ASCMA, aka Brinks Home Security,...
US Considers Sanctions Against Hikvision and Dahua on May 22, 2019
The US government is considering blacklisting "up to 5" PRC surveillance firms, including Hikvision and Dahua, Bloomberg reported, with human...
Dahua USA Celebrates 5 Years of Errors on May 21, 2019
Dahua USA is, in their own words, 'celebrating' 5 years in North America or as trade magazine SSN declared: Dahua Technology finds success in...
Axis ~$150 Outdoor Camera Tested on May 21, 2019
Axis has released the latest in their Companion camera line, the outdoor Companion Dome Mini LE, a 1080p integrated IR model aiming to compete with...
Covert Facial Recognition Using Axis and Amazon By NYTimes on May 20, 2019
What if you took a 33MP Axis camera covering one of the busiest parks in the US and ran Amazon Facial Recognition against it? That is what the...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact