Avigilon Strong Growth Continues Q2 2013

By: John Honovich, Published on Aug 08, 2013

Continuing to buck the trends of the broader surveillance market, Avigilon's revenue was up 61% year over year for Q2 2013. Here is the full financial report. [Bonus - at the end, we break down the revenue of Avigilon's recent acquisition of RedCloud.]

Here are a few details gleaned from Avigilon's Q2 call:

  • *** ************* **** ** 8.6%, ***** ** * significant *********** **** **** year *** *********** *** rates ** ****** ************ companies (**** ** **** and *******), ********** **** Avigilon ** *** **** 'buying' ****** *****.
  • ****** ** *** ** was *** ****** ** all ********** ******* ** just **%. ** ****** half ** ********'* ***** revenue ($** ******* *** the *******), **** ***** be ** ********* ** increasing ********* ** ********* in * ****** ********* market. ** *** ***** hand, ******** **** ~**% outside ** *** **, which ***** ******** ** fuel ******* *********** ******.
  • ***** ******* ********* * points **** **% ** 53%, ***** **** **** in **** **** **** historically ********** *** ****** surveillance ********** (**** ** Axis).
  • ***** *** ********* ******** were ** **%, ***** than ***** ******* ****** rate, ***** ******************* ** *********.
  • ***** *&* ************ **** up **** **%, * good **** ******** ** historical ******** ** ************** in *&*.
  • ****** *****: ******** ***** both *** *** *** for ****** **********. ******** cites * **% **** for ** ****** ***** from *** ****** *** other ****** **** **** from *** ******** * CAGR **** ****. *******, that **** ***** ** not *********.
  • ****** *** ** *** ~$725 *******, ** *** time ****, **** **** 150% ****** **** * year ******.
  • ** ******** **** **** their ********-****“*** ****** ******” ******* at******* $*** **** **** to **** **** *** reasons ** *** **** would **** ******. ******* from *** ****-**** ** not ********* ** ** results*** **** ****** ** to ** * *** selling *******. **** ****, there *** * *** of ******** ***** ******* **** *********.
  • ******** **** **** ** six *** ************* *** *** ***** acquisition*** **** *** *********** was *** ***** ******* its ********* ** *** revenue - ******* ** was * ********** ***** company - *** ***** combing ** ******* **********.
  • *** ******* ******* ****** growth ** *** ******* and ******* ******** ******* as ** ******* ***** operations.


****** ** *** *** of ********'* ********** ** a ********** ** ********'* revenue *** ******. *** the ***** **** ** 2013, ********'* ******* *** just ***** $* *******, putting **** ** * $2 ******* ****** ****. Given *** $** ******* price ****, ****'* ** extremely **** *+ ***** revenue.

**** ****, ********'* *** revenue ** ************. ******** is ******* ****** **** for ********* '*********' ** targeting *** ** *** security *******, ********** **** larger ********* **** ****** value ****.

**** *** **********, *** worth ******, ** **** RedCloud *** ****** * fairly *********** ****** ** money. ******** **** ******* double ******* ******* ** a ******** **% *** loss. ******* ***** * years ***, ******** *** likely ************* ****** ** acquisition ** *** ******* round. ***** ***** ********, RedCloud *** **** **** with **** ****.

****'* *** ******* **** the ********* ****** ******** RedCloud:

****: ***** *** ****** way **** ** ******, you **** ** ****** relative ** ***** ****** financials *** *** ****.

Comments (13)

Avigilon deserves such growth...

Most economical yet evident end to end surveillance solution in security industry in recent years.

How is Avigilon more cost effective then Arecont + Axis/Panasonic cameras managed with Milestone/Exacq/Aimetis/Luxriot?

The cost of just about any of the above combinations will be more economical then Avigilon.

I don't get what the fuss is about with Avigilon?

I think they just have very good marketing people, as reflected in the quality of their website.

Please correct me if I have been naive and wrong.

Do I need to write a post "Why Avigilon is So Wonderful"? :)

We've talked about this before but it's a number of things, in no particular order:

  • Having the 11MP / 16MP / 29MP cameras is a nice differentiator and starting point.
  • Having a restricted dealer channel is a big plus for many integrators, because even if their cost is the same, they probably can make more on Avigilon vs Axis (or Arecont or Pelco or anyone else that can be bought on the Internet).
  • Being an end to end solution is a plus. While there are a lot of other ones, most are from lower quality players (indeed all the companies you mentioned are primarily one side or the other).
  • Their analog / migration pricing is attractive with the encoders and the licensing deal (see encoders vs hybrid DVRs).
  • Their IR cameras are quite strong.

Super & Correct Answer John.

Totally Agree.

Hey, when I say good things about Avigilon, I am super and correct. It's only when I say negative things that I am biased and stupid!

Unless you're looking from a camera only perspective it's hard to compare Avigilon to Axis, Arecont, etc. I think Avigilon compares more to Exacq, both have awesome growth and a solid product. If exacq sold cameras as well that were good quality would they be in same boat as Avigilon?

Avigilon enable the integrator to deliver an end to end solution in a shorter time period, with less uncertainty, and with functionality promised and expected by the end user. By using a combination of technologies there always longer set up periods, unexpected integration "work arounds" etc. Avigilon leads to more certain installation and shorter time on site = lower total cost of installation. Added to this less uncertainty around installation is more stable margins.

For example switching 150 analogue cameras over to Avigilon in a week and starting the client on IP migration.

All the above makes this business owner an Avigilon "fan boy"

Undisclosed Integrator: what you wrote actually makes a lot of sense.

Avigilon really does have a broader end-to-end solution than others I know of.

It definitely is a great business model.

Question: is there no other company that does this - the Avigilon concept is great but I don't see why Axis can't do the same - they have there own VMS and encoders and I am sure they can knockup a multi sensor camera and a 29MP camera here and there.

What I found intriguing is the 29MP + LPR camera + multi sensor panoramic strategy - because it really does seem like these three product categories are positioning Avigilon as THE end-to-end providor.

--> Is it the "reassuring that these exotic options are available" or the "we want to deploy these next gen technologies" factor that makes this USP attractive to dealers and end-users?

Finally the protected channel - surely a SINGLE integrator cannot possibly service ALL the clients in an area? Won't they run out of time and manpower? It seems this part of the Avigilon USP is not a very sustainable aspect in the medium to long term? From the client point of view though I would say this is actually a positive - as the end-user does not have to waste any time (i.e. money) quote shopping.

I would imagine it takes a lot of work. You need to find programmers, project amangers, etc. Not just any people but the right people to ensure you produce a quality product. It's a pretty daunting proposition, if you put all that money into doing that and it fails you face possible bankruptcy. Plus Axis and others have a model of working with other VMS manufacturers and if they all of the sudden put together their own VMS and hardware they would damage those relationships. Avigilon is great but VMS with third party cameras is very strong and that model isn't going away anytime soon.

Bohan, interesting questions, thanks.

  • Why can't Axis do the same? On the VMS side, it's clearly a fear of upsetting partners. Why doesn't ACS support ONVIF? Why do they sell AVHS through a crazy multi-tier dealer structure? Why doesn't Camera Companion support Axis one click? Axis certainly has the skill to rectify these problems, but they are clearly done not to upset existing partners.
  • Regarding Axis and others (Sony, Panasonic) not doing a 29MP camera. I think they clearly made a mistake here. They typically justify that decision by pointing out technical limitations (poor low light sensitivity, super low frame rate, super inefficient bandwidth consumption, etc.). While those things are largely true, not having their own makes them appear to be technological laggards, especially to those you simply equate more megapixels with higher quality. And it's not as if Avigilon's 29MP cameras are some form of exotic technology that cannot be replicated. But Avigilon grasped the marketing benefits of such positioning while their rivals did not.
  • How can Avigilon scale with a protected channel? It's not a single integrator per territory. I don't what the max number is, and I suppose it varies with the density of the market (i.e., New York has more dealers than New Mexico). That said, I agree with you that a protected channel hits scalability limits. If Avigilon chooses to add more dealers in a region, than it increases competition, likely drives down prices and demotivates dealers. However, if they do not add dealers, they will certainly miss opportunities that are driven or won by non Avigilon integrators. I am not sure how it will all play out but it's a fascinating element.

"Avigilon enable the integrator to deliver an end to end solution in a shorter time period, with less uncertainty, and with functionality promised and expected by the end user.

Shorter time period, less uncertainty = cookie cutter solution + lower integration w/3rd party. There simply is no other way to achieve this 'goal'.

"..functionality promised and expected by the end user."

You mean like that convenience store, 1 camera-covers-all, 'not an actual image' ad they stopped using after being crushed to dust right here on IPVM?

"By using a combination of technologies there always longer set up periods, unexpected integration "work arounds" etc."

This is generally because end-user customers sometimes have other systems that they wish to integrate with their security apparatus.

These end-user customers are able to justify the margins they pay their chosen integrators because the integrator is the well-trained party with the experience, skills, and knowledge to provide robust solutions that sometimes require troubleshooting interoperability with the customers disparate systems.

Lacking that, just show the customer some fancy uber-MP cameras that have limited practical use and hope they don't notice they could've done everything the installer did, all by themselves (if they were allowed to buy the stuff themselves - which they are not)...

Value is the key word - and there are different levels of perceived value.

'End to end' is a better fit for certain solutions, and not for others.

The Avigilon scheme works, simply because there are numerous dealers who value simplicity and marketing hype over multi-system, robust solutions.

Hello Mr. Purvis, thank you for good analysis.

By the way, I don't understand how to calculate net profitability.

Could you make me clear how the 8.6% comes from?

Undisclosed, the formula for Profit Margin is Net Income divided by Sales Revenue. In this case it was $6,189,000 over $71,244,000 (see pg. 2 of Avigilon's financial report).

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
Startup Vaion Launching End-to-End AI Solution Backed with $20 Million Funding on Jun 17, 2019
An EU / USA video surveillance startup, Vaion, founded by ex-Cisco Senior Directors is launching an end-to-end VSaaS platform with $20 million in...
Sighthound Transforms Into Enterprise AI Provider Profile on Jun 14, 2019
Sighthound is now rapidly expanding its R&D team, building an enterprise AI service. This may come as a surprise given their origins 6 years...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
False Verkada 'Unrivaled' Low Light Performance Claim Removed on Jun 12, 2019
Verkada falsely claimed that it delivered 'UNRIVALED LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE' until IPVM questioned. In fact, Verkada's low light performance is...
Carnegie Mellon AI Startup Zensors Profile on Jun 11, 2019
Zensors is a startup formed by Carnegie Mellon graduates from a Carnegie Mellon research project, offering customized models per camera that they...
OpenALPR Doubles Prices on Jun 06, 2019
There is no 'race to the bottom' in cloud / AI video surveillance. In May, Verkada increased their prices. Now, OpenALPR is doing the same with a...
"New" Arecont Fixes Failures "Without A Fight" on Jun 05, 2019
The "old" Arecont was infamous not only for its camera failures but for making their "partners" fight to get them fixed. IPVM drew the ire of...
Startup Rhombus Systems Says Twice the Features, Half the Price of Verkada on Jun 04, 2019
Closed cloud systems may be the fastest growing segment of video surveillance with Meraki and Verkada. Now another California company is joining...
China / US Trade War Impact Splits Industry on Jun 04, 2019
As the trade war continues to heat up, 170+ integrators told us "What impact will the US / PRC China conflict have on the industry?" Respondents...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Hikvision Colorvu Camera Tested on Jun 24, 2019
Hikvision says their new ColorVu line captures "vivid chromatic images in darkness", with unconventional white light illuminations whereas most...
China Subway Facial Recognition System Examined on Jun 24, 2019
A China city of 6+ million people has installed facial recognition-enabled gates in subways, allowing commuters to enter stations by simply showing...
HID Mobile Tested on Jun 21, 2019
HID Global is one of the largest access brands, but their mobile access has had challenges. Indeed, the company has already restructured their...
Genetec Beats Milestone For IHS #1 on Jun 21, 2019
For years, Milestone has touted that they are the #1 VMS. Now, Genetec has beaten them in IHS rankings. But what is this? Even other manufacturers...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Exacq Remote Cloud Access Tested on Jun 20, 2019
Remote cloud access has been missing from most VMSes (including Exacq and Milestone). Now, Exacq, after releasing Cloud Drive Storage earlier in...
Briefcam Buys Frost Award* on Jun 20, 2019
Frost 'awards' are well-known and widely disrespected. Now Briefcam is touting their win. The way it has worked for many years is that Frost...
IFSEC 2019 Show Report on Jun 19, 2019
The UK's largest trade show, IFSEC, is underway and IPVM has been examining what is new and happening at the show. Inside, we cover: Huawei...
Repositionable Multi-Imager Camera Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Panasonic, Vivotek on Jun 19, 2019
Repositionable multi-imager cameras are one of the fastest growing segments in video surveillance, with a slew of new offerings being recently...
Genetec Synergis Cloud Link - Complex, Costly and Confusing on Jun 18, 2019
Genetec's Synergis Cloud Link is complex, costly and confusing compared to competitor access control architectures. Inside this note, we examine...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact