We question the economic significance of IndigoVision's marketing campaign around 'green' NVRs.
Here's the core of their case:
- "In a RAID 5 system, typical power consumption for a video storage server and attached RAID disk unit would be 900W, whereas the latest green standalone NVR units typically consume around 50W.'
- "The storage requirements for a 500 camera system archiving continuous video at 4SIF 25/30fps for 30 days would typically be 300TB. With energy costs at US$0.10 KW/hr, this relates to an annual running cost of: Typical storage server solution: US$10,512 -- Standalone green NVR: US$2,365 And this doesn’t take into account the extra power consumption of the air-conditioning system!"
Let's accept at face value the economic claims (not because we blindly believe them but to simply run the best case scenario for them).
IndigoVision claims $8,000 per year savings across 500 cameras. This works out to $16 per year per camera. Over a 5 year period, this is $80 per camera.
Let's contrast this potential $80 per camera total savings to the cost of their system. Easily an enterprise system using IndigoVision will cost $1,000 or more per camera (given the cost of the cameras, their installation, the servers, storage, etc.)
Assuming the best case vendor assumptions, this results in reducing long term operational costs by 8% of the installed cost. It's close to be a rounding error and since it's based on future savings, it's less valuable than up front expenses.
Making this worse, IndigoVision assumes a 500 camera deployment with maximum frame rate, 4CIF resolution. These type of deployments are statistically quite rare (maybe a few percentage of all deployments). Sites using less cameras and lower recordings settings will achieve even less benefits.
IndigoVision is not the first to make this claim. Ironically, Aimetis made a similar pitch comparing their 'green savings' versus DVRs. read our critique of Aimetis's green claims
Related Reports on Storage
Smart CODEC Usage Statistics 2019
on Jun 03, 2019
Smart codecs are now nearly a standard feature in IP cameras, but our statistics show integrator adoption has not increased at the same rate.
Verkada Favorability Results 2019
on May 29, 2019
Verkada has taken the industry by storm with the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever and a half billion dollar valuation....
Bank Security Manager Interview
on May 15, 2019
Bank security contends with many significant threats - from fraudsters to robbers and more.
In this interview, IPVM spoke with bank security...
Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested
on May 02, 2019
Verkada is arguably the most ambitious video surveillance startup in many years. The company is developing their own cameras, their own VMS, their...
LenelS2 Launches VRx Video Platform
on Apr 29, 2019
For years, S2's video management platform, the NetVR, was based on Exacq.
Now, after years of internal development, S2 has launched its own...
H.265 Usage Statistics
on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
Most Recent Industry Reports
Manufacturer Favorability Guide 2019
on Jun 12, 2019
The 259 page PDF guide may be downloaded inside by all IPVM members.
It includes our manufacturer favorability rankings and individual...
Camera Course Summer 2019 - Register Now
on Jun 12, 2019
Register for the Summer 2019 Camera Course.
This is the only independent surveillance camera course, based on in-depth product and technology...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019
on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites?
170 integrators answered the question: