Lancaster City Surveillance Case Study

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on May 31, 2013

Most city surveillance systems are owned by local governments and paid for by taxpayer dollars, but shrinking budgets can cause cities to skimp on a system or neglect maintenance. However, one Pennsylvania city has created a citizen-run network of cameras and an adopt-a-camera program to keep up with its maintenance. In this note, we examine this program based on an interview with their managing director and analysis of their operational reports.

Operation and Adoption

The Lancaster Community Safety Coalition (LCSC) is a non-profit in Pennsylvania best known for its 161 camera city surveillance network. The organization runs primarily on donations so this month it launched an adopt-a-camera fundraiser to make sure the cameras stay on and working.

“We went through a significant downturn because of the recession, but so far we’ve been able to keep the camera system running,” LCSC Managing Director Wes Farmer says. “We hope this program will help us continue to maintain the cameras.” 

Farmer estimates the cost of the system at $2,300 per camera, per year (A total budget of $379,000. See the breakdown below) This includes maintenance, monitoring, rent for the building that houses the control room and pay for the LCSC staff.

********-*-****** *********** ********* ** ****** $*,*** ****** *** *********** ** * camera ** ***** ********. ** *** *** ** *** **** supporters *** ******** * ****** ** ***** ****** **** ******** maintenance ******* *** *** ***** ****** *** **** **** **** (to *********** * ***** ** **** ******** * **** ** a ***** ****, *** *******). *** ********** *** ********** ********* May *, *** ** ** *** **, ********* ******* (*** ** ***) *** **** ** ** *******.

****** **** ****** *** ****** **** ** ******* ** **** maintain *** ******* ***** ****** *** **** ******** *** ***** played ** ********* ******* *************. “** **** ******* ***** ***** ******* **** **** **** were ***** ****** ** ****** *** **** ******* ** *** the ************ **** *** ****** ** ** ****** ******** ** support **** ********** ******,” ****** ****.

*** ************ *** **** ******** *** ****** *** ****** $***,*** each **** *** ******** ********’* ****** *** *** ****. *** DA’s ****** **** *** ******* **** ****** ***** ***** ****** footage “*** ********** ** ***** ******,” ********** ** ***** ********* $20,000 *** **** **** **** **** ** *****.

The ******

*** ***** ******* **** ********** ********* ** **** ** **** of * ********* ***** ********** **********. *** *** ****** ** made ** ** *** ******* (*** ****** ******* *** ********, 16 ** *******, ********* *** ***), ********* ********, ************* ******* *** ***** ***** ***** **** *** **** ****** the ******’* ******** ************.

*** **** *** **** ** **** ***** ** ****** *** cable **** ** *** **** **** *** **** *** ******* in *** **** *** *** **** ******, *** *** ************ was **** ** *** ******* **** ***** (*** ** **** based ** *********) *** ********** ****** ** ******** *** ****** them * ******** ** **** *** ********.

*** *******, ***** **** ***** ***** ** ******* ** *********, record **/*. *** ********* *** **** ***** *** ******* *** cameras **** **-** ***** ***** *** ****** ** *** ****** scanner *** ********* *** **** * ******* **** *** *********** can **** ** ******* *** ******* ******* * ******* ****. Additionally, **** *** **** **** ***** ** *** *********** *** the ****** *******

***** ** ****** *** ** ****. **** **** ** ** willing ** ******* ******* ** **** ****** *** *********** *** defense ********* **** * ********.

Results ** *** ******

***** **** **** **** *** ****'* ****** ****** *********:

  • ****** ********* ****** ********* *********** 491 ***** to alert them of a crime in progress.
  • **** **** *** **** ** ********* *********** 8,735 *****.
  • **** ******** 1600 ******** ** ****** ***** *** ******** ******** ** *** ** *** 922 *********.
  • ******* ******** ******** *** 133 *******, ** *********

*** ****** ** ************. ** *******, *** ****** ********* **** called ******** ***** *.* ***** *** ****** **** **** ******** ******** *** ** ****** ***** *** day. *** *** ****** $**** ******* **** **** *** ******** to *******, ** **** ****** ***** **?

Future *****“*** ****** ***** **** *** ****** ** ********* ** **** * ******* **** ** ************* *** **** cameras,” **** ******. “* ***** **** ** ****** ***, *** I **** ** **** ***** * **** *** ********* ******* in *** **** ** ********* ** ** **** ** ******* that."

IPVM *********** **** *** ******** ********’* *************** ** ******** ****** ****** ** *** **** ******* **** have ** ******** ** ******* *** ******* **, *** *** amount *** **** ** *** ******. ** *** **** ** cameras **** **** *******, *** ** ********* *** *** **** program ** *** ******* ** ***** ** * *** ** keep *** ******* ****** *** *** **** *** *****. *******, at **** *****, *** ******* **** **** ** ** ********, requiring * **** **** *********** **********.

*** ***** **** *** ********* ************ ******* *** *********** *** public “****” *** ******, *** *** *****-*-****** ******* ***** ****** more ** * ***** ** *********. ** ** *** ** both************, ***** **** ** *** ******* *** *** ****, ******** ***** ****** ****** *** *** * ******** ***** ******* *** murdered, ****** ***** **** ******* *********** ***** ********** ***** ** ****** ************** **** ******** *** **********. *** *** ** **** ******* **** **** **** **** **** *********** *** *** *** ******* are **** *** **********. *** ****** ** **** ****** ** *** questions ***** *** * ****** ** *** ******* **** **** receive ******* ******* ** ***** ****** *** **** **** $*,*** to **** **** *******.

** *** ***** ****, ***** *** ****** ******* ** *** system, **** ** *** ****** *** ** **********, **** ** the **** ***** ** ****?

Comments (7)

I think it's difficult to quantify the value of a camera simply by how many times it's used to provide evidence or triggers a dispatch. The real question is how much (if anything) was saved in court costs or investigative manpower by having that video available. Likely, that varies depending on the crime or the court case, too.

Ethan, let's say we estimate an average total savings - $5,000? $10,000? There must be some reasonable number or range. 150 incidents x $5,000 is 3/4 million, I guess that would be a positive point.

Another way to look at it is as a percentage of all crimes in the city. Lancaster City has 3,000 - 4,000 crimes per year (police stats). That's 1.5 - 2% of crimes caught on these cameras. From what I can find, it seems the Lancasty city police budget is $2.7 million (see budget report - Lancaster only has ~60,000 people - not big).

If that's accurate, investments in police deliver 50x greater return than cameras.

Btw, this is rough and I think we should investigate this more.

I wonder how that 1.5-2% compares to other cities and what percentage of crimes are typically caught on camera/what percentage of cases end up using video evidence?

I agree that further investigation would be interesting. My point isn't a determination of good/bad one way or the other. I was looking at say, a murder case. If evidence caught on camera can point to a murder weapon location, for example (which actually happened in Allentown), and result in a guilty plee or cut trial time substantially, I'd think it would probably go a long way toward paying for the system, if not more, no?

Disclaimer - Bosch rep firm - It will be interesting to see how statistics weigh in versus public opinion. The fact is that city-wide video not only captures images of crimes, not all but enough in a few big cases, and gives the public a sense of security while they are on their neighborhood streets. It will be an interesting few years to see how the push and pull of economics and public opinion play out in cities and neighborhoods of all sizes. The great news is that as camera technology continues to develop, these cities will get more improvements in technology for their dollar. Image resolution improvements, low light performance improvements, and deeper camera/VMS integration will be a great benefit to neighborhood video systems.

"At the end of the year supporters are provided a report on their camera that includes maintenance history and how their camera was used that year"

And at least the camera won't be showing up at your doorstep one day looking for a place to live.

"LCSC says it is willing to provide footage to both police and prosecutors and defense attorneys with a subpoena."

And that's how it should be.

You would turn away a 7 year old Bosch analog PTZ at your doorstep? How heartless!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Police

UK Camera Commissioner Calls for Regulating Facial Recognition on Apr 15, 2019
IPVM interviewed Tony Porter, the UK’s surveillance camera commissioner after he recently called for regulations on facial recognition in the...
Bezos-Funded Deep Sentinel Tested on Mar 28, 2019
Backed by Jeff Bezos, the Silicon Valley startup, Deep Sentinel, has declared: No One Does Home Security Like We Do Our Surveillance Team has...
IBM / Genetec Surveillance System Investigated Over Philippines Human Rights Abuses on Mar 22, 2019
A lengthy investigation into an IBM video surveillance project in the Philippines, raising concerns IBM helped local police conduct a bloody...
City Physical Security Manager Interview on Mar 14, 2019
This physical security pro is the Physical Security Manager for the City of Calgary. He is a criminologist by training with an ASIS CPP credential....
US City Sued For Hiding Surveillance Camera Map on Mar 08, 2019
Should maps of public surveillance camera locations be kept a secret? That is what one US city is trying to do. Though the city admits the...
Verified Response Discontinued in Silicon Valley San Jose on Feb 28, 2019
Almost all security alarms are false. This has driven some municipalities to require verified response before dispatching police. However, now San...
Police Department Surveillance Manager Interview on Feb 28, 2019
Former Memphis PD Surveillance Manager, Lt. Joseph Patty retired months ago, but kept busy during his decades on the force, working to build up...
Massive Leak Of Chinese VMS Provider Exposes Xinjiang Surveillance on Feb 20, 2019
A subsidiary of China’s claimed largest VMS provider is tracking the precise location and ethnicity of millions in China’s Xinjiang region,...
Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....

Most Recent Industry Reports

Verkada Salesman: IPVM "Stuck In A The Stone Age" on Apr 25, 2019
Verkada is 'tackling dinosaurs' and battling those, like IPVM, who are 'stuck in a the stone age'. Verkada's recent sales recruiting promotion...
The HIVIDEO $31 Face Detection DVR Tested on Apr 25, 2019
Face detection in a $31 DVR? That is what "HIVIDEO" (not to be confused with Hikvision, even if the company intends to do that) was promoting at...
Amazon Marketing Pro Installs of Amazon Security Systems on Apr 25, 2019
Is Amazon a threat to conventional providers like ADT, Vivint and Brinks Home Security? Many say no. Now, Amazon is advertising free in-home...
Ex-Integrator Now Growth Strategist Interviewed on Apr 24, 2019
For more than a decade, Scot MacTaggart was a security integrator (at PA-based PSX). In late 2018, he left the industry. He is now a Growth...
19 Facial Recognition Providers Profiled on Apr 23, 2019
IPVM interviewed 19 facial recognition providers at ISC West to understand their claimed accuracy, success and positioning. 9 from China, where...
Locking Down Network Connections Guide on Apr 23, 2019
Accidents and inside attacks are risks when network connections are not locked down. Security and video surveillance systems should be protected...
Hikvision Admits USA Sales Falling on Apr 22, 2019
Hikvision, in a new Chinese financial filing, has admitted that its USA sales are now falling. Less than a year after the US government passed a...
Speco Ultra Intensifier Tested on Apr 22, 2019
While ISC West 2019 named Speco's Ultra Intensifier the best new "Video Surveillance Cameras IP", IPVM testing shows the camera suffers from...
Arecont Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 22, 2019
Arecont's net negativity remained the same in IPVM's 2019 integrator study, though integrator's feeling became relatively more neutral compared to...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact