Lancaster City Surveillance Case Study

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on May 31, 2013

Most city surveillance systems are owned by local governments and paid for by taxpayer dollars, but shrinking budgets can cause cities to skimp on a system or neglect maintenance. However, one Pennsylvania city has created a citizen-run network of cameras and an adopt-a-camera program to keep up with its maintenance. In this note, we examine this program based on an interview with their managing director and analysis of their operational reports.

Operation and Adoption

The Lancaster Community Safety Coalition (LCSC) is a non-profit in Pennsylvania best known for its 161 camera city surveillance network. The organization runs primarily on donations so this month it launched an adopt-a-camera fundraiser to make sure the cameras stay on and working.

“We went through a significant downturn because of the recession, but so far we’ve been able to keep the camera system running,” LCSC Managing Director Wes Farmer says. “We hope this program will help us continue to maintain the cameras.” 

Farmer estimates the cost of the system at $2,300 per camera, per year (A total budget of $379,000. See the breakdown below) This includes maintenance, monitoring, rent for the building that houses the control room and pay for the LCSC staff.

********-*-****** *********** ********* ** ****** $*,*** ****** *** *********** ** * camera ** ***** ********. ** *** *** ** *** **** supporters *** ******** * ****** ** ***** ****** **** ******** maintenance ******* *** *** ***** ****** *** **** **** **** (to *********** * ***** ** **** ******** * **** ** a ***** ****, *** *******). *** ********** *** ********** ********* May *, *** ** ** *** **, ********* ******* (*** ** ***) *** **** ** ** *******.

****** **** ****** *** ****** **** ** ******* ** **** maintain *** ******* ***** ****** *** **** ******** *** ***** played ** ********* ******* *************. “** **** ******* ***** ***** ******* **** **** **** were ***** ****** ** ****** *** **** ******* ** *** the ************ **** *** ****** ** ** ****** ******** ** support **** ********** ******,” ****** ****.

*** ************ *** **** ******** *** ****** *** ****** $***,*** each **** *** ******** ********’* ****** *** *** ****. *** DA’s ****** **** *** ******* **** ****** ***** ***** ****** footage “*** ********** ** ***** ******,” ********** ** ***** ********* $20,000 *** **** **** **** **** ** *****.

The ******

*** ***** ******* **** ********** ********* ** **** ** **** of * ********* ***** ********** **********. *** *** ****** ** made ** ** *** ******* (*** ****** ******* *** ********, 16 ** *******, ********* *** ***), ********* ********, ************* ******* *** ***** ***** ***** **** *** **** ****** the ******’* ******** ************.

*** **** *** **** ** **** ***** ** ****** *** cable **** ** *** **** **** *** **** *** ******* in *** **** *** *** **** ******, *** *** ************ was **** ** *** ******* **** ***** (*** ** **** based ** *********) *** ********** ****** ** ******** *** ****** them * ******** ** **** *** ********.

*** *******, ***** **** ***** ***** ** ******* ** *********, record **/*. *** ********* *** **** ***** *** ******* *** cameras **** **-** ***** ***** *** ****** ** *** ****** scanner *** ********* *** **** * ******* **** *** *********** can **** ** ******* *** ******* ******* * ******* ****. Additionally, **** *** **** **** ***** ** *** *********** *** the ****** *******

***** ** ****** *** ** ****. **** **** ** ** willing ** ******* ******* ** **** ****** *** *********** *** defense ********* **** * ********.

Results ** *** ******

***** **** **** **** *** ****'* ****** ****** *********:

  • ****** ********* ****** ********* *********** 491 ***** to alert them of a crime in progress.
  • **** **** *** **** ** ********* *********** 8,735 *****.
  • **** ******** 1600 ******** ** ****** ***** *** ******** ******** ** *** ** *** 922 *********.
  • ******* ******** ******** *** 133 *******, ** *********

*** ****** ** ************. ** *******, *** ****** ********* **** called ******** ***** *.* ***** *** ****** **** **** ******** ******** *** ** ****** ***** *** day. *** *** ****** $**** ******* **** **** *** ******** to *******, ** **** ****** ***** **?

Future *****“*** ****** ***** **** *** ****** ** ********* ** **** * ******* **** ** ************* *** **** cameras,” **** ******. “* ***** **** ** ****** ***, *** I **** ** **** ***** * **** *** ********* ******* in *** **** ** ********* ** ** **** ** ******* that."

IPVM *********** **** *** ******** ********’* *************** ** ******** ****** ****** ** *** **** ******* **** have ** ******** ** ******* *** ******* **, *** *** amount *** **** ** *** ******. ** *** **** ** cameras **** **** *******, *** ** ********* *** *** **** program ** *** ******* ** ***** ** * *** ** keep *** ******* ****** *** *** **** *** *****. *******, at **** *****, *** ******* **** **** ** ** ********, requiring * **** **** *********** **********.

*** ***** **** *** ********* ************ ******* *** *********** *** public “****” *** ******, *** *** *****-*-****** ******* ***** ****** more ** * ***** ** *********. ** ** *** ** both************, ***** **** ** *** ******* *** *** ****, ******** ***** ****** ****** *** *** * ******** ***** ******* *** murdered, ****** ***** **** ******* *********** ***** ********** ***** ** ****** ************** **** ******** *** **********. *** *** ** **** ******* **** **** **** **** **** *********** *** *** *** ******* are **** *** **********. *** ****** ** **** ****** ** *** questions ***** *** * ****** ** *** ******* **** **** receive ******* ******* ** ***** ****** *** **** **** $*,*** to **** **** *******.

** *** ***** ****, ***** *** ****** ******* ** *** system, **** ** *** ****** *** ** **********, **** ** the **** ***** ** ****?

Comments (7)

I think it's difficult to quantify the value of a camera simply by how many times it's used to provide evidence or triggers a dispatch. The real question is how much (if anything) was saved in court costs or investigative manpower by having that video available. Likely, that varies depending on the crime or the court case, too.

Ethan, let's say we estimate an average total savings - $5,000? $10,000? There must be some reasonable number or range. 150 incidents x $5,000 is 3/4 million, I guess that would be a positive point.

Another way to look at it is as a percentage of all crimes in the city. Lancaster City has 3,000 - 4,000 crimes per year (police stats). That's 1.5 - 2% of crimes caught on these cameras. From what I can find, it seems the Lancasty city police budget is $2.7 million (see budget report - Lancaster only has ~60,000 people - not big).

If that's accurate, investments in police deliver 50x greater return than cameras.

Btw, this is rough and I think we should investigate this more.

I wonder how that 1.5-2% compares to other cities and what percentage of crimes are typically caught on camera/what percentage of cases end up using video evidence?

I agree that further investigation would be interesting. My point isn't a determination of good/bad one way or the other. I was looking at say, a murder case. If evidence caught on camera can point to a murder weapon location, for example (which actually happened in Allentown), and result in a guilty plee or cut trial time substantially, I'd think it would probably go a long way toward paying for the system, if not more, no?

Disclaimer - Bosch rep firm - It will be interesting to see how statistics weigh in versus public opinion. The fact is that city-wide video not only captures images of crimes, not all but enough in a few big cases, and gives the public a sense of security while they are on their neighborhood streets. It will be an interesting few years to see how the push and pull of economics and public opinion play out in cities and neighborhoods of all sizes. The great news is that as camera technology continues to develop, these cities will get more improvements in technology for their dollar. Image resolution improvements, low light performance improvements, and deeper camera/VMS integration will be a great benefit to neighborhood video systems.

"At the end of the year supporters are provided a report on their camera that includes maintenance history and how their camera was used that year"

And at least the camera won't be showing up at your doorstep one day looking for a place to live.

"LCSC says it is willing to provide footage to both police and prosecutors and defense attorneys with a subpoena."

And that's how it should be.

You would turn away a 7 year old Bosch analog PTZ at your doorstep? How heartless!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Police

Austria’s First GDPR Fine Is For Video Surveillance on Jan 29, 2019
Should EU businesses be concerned if police see a business' surveillance cameras filming public areas? This is what happened with Austria’s first...
Mobile Surveillance Trailers Guide on Jan 17, 2019
Putting cameras in a place for temporary surveillance where power and communications are not readily available can be complicated and expensive....
The False SCMP Story on Hikvision NYC AI on Jan 14, 2019
In the past week, one of Asia's largest publications, the South China Morning Post (SCMP), posted an article about "Chinese [facial recognition]...
Infinova's Xinjiang Business Examined on Dec 07, 2018
As pressure mounts for companies to stop doing business in China’s Xinjiang region amid a severe human rights crisis, IPVM has found Infinova sold...
ADT Wins Fire Death Suit But Faces Appeal on Dec 05, 2018
ADT/Protection 1 has won a wrongful death court case in which it was sued by the estate of a deceased customer. However, the attorney for the...
Evidence of Dahua's Involvement In Xinjiang Surveillance on Nov 28, 2018
IPVM adds new details about Dahua’s activities in Xinjiang, a Chinese region where mass surveillance used to facilitate grave human rights...
Pressure Mounts Against Dahua and Hikvision Xinjiang Business on Nov 19, 2018
Pressure is mounting against Hikvision, Dahua, and other companies operating in Xinjiang as an international outcry brews against the Chinese...
Directory of Access Control and Intrusion Startups on Oct 30, 2018
This directory catalogs access control and intrusion detection startups IPVM has found noteworthy. The directory is provided for your review to...
IACP 2018 Police Show Final Report on Oct 08, 2018
IPVM went to Orlando to cover the 2018 IACP conference, the country's largest police show (about as big as ASIS), examining the 700+...
Evidence Of Hikvision's Involvement With Xinjiang IJOP And Re-Education Camps on Oct 02, 2018
IPVM reveals as-yet unreported details about Hikvision’s activities in Xinjiang - a region of China where massive human rights abuses are being...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Casino Surveillance Pro Interview: James Lathrop on Feb 15, 2019
James Lathrop has been working in casinos for almost 25 years. During that time, he says he has held "just about every job you can do in the...
Hikvision 2018 Revenue Tops $7 Billion USD But Growth Slows To Low on Feb 15, 2019
Hikvision's annual revenue topped $7 billion for the first time in 2018, although growth slowed sharply. In this post, we analyze the latest...
Hanwha Smaller Multi Imager Tested (PNM-9000VQ) on Feb 14, 2019
Hanwha's first repositionable multi imager PNM-9081VQ tested well, but was huge, over 12" wide and weighing in at over 10 pounds. Now, they have...
ADT And 'The Defenders' Silent About Massive Complaints on Feb 14, 2019
ADT's largest dealer, "The Defenders" has been the subject of a massive number of complaints over many years and many forums, most recently a CBS...
Hikvision Chairman Praises United Front on Feb 14, 2019
Hikvision’s controlling shareholder held a meeting last month praising the United Front, a Communist Party organization known for its secretive...
Sales Turnover At Anyvision on Feb 13, 2019
Anyvision raised a $43 million Series A and according to their newest investor: what you need to do is push the gas pedal and build an...
Cisco Meraki Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested on Feb 13, 2019
Cisco Meraki says their cameras "bring Meraki magic to the enterprise video security world". According to Meraki, their magic is their management...
Uniview / UNV Favorability Results 2019 on Feb 12, 2019
Uniview / UNV, the self-proclaimed #3 China manufacturer, while starting late, has been working to make inroads internationally. In IPVM's 2019...
Nortek Mobile Access Reader BluePass Examined on Feb 12, 2019
Nortek's Linear access control division claims to make mobile credentials "more secure and easier to use than ever before" with their BluePass...
Solink Raises $12 Million - Company Profile on Feb 12, 2019
Most industry professionals have never heard of Solink, a company whose tagline is: It's time to revolutionize the way business uses...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact