Lancaster City Surveillance Case Study

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on May 31, 2013

Most city surveillance systems are owned by local governments and paid for by taxpayer dollars, but shrinking budgets can cause cities to skimp on a system or neglect maintenance. However, one Pennsylvania city has created a citizen-run network of cameras and an adopt-a-camera program to keep up with its maintenance. In this note, we examine this program based on an interview with their managing director and analysis of their operational reports.

Operation and Adoption

The Lancaster Community Safety Coalition (LCSC) is a non-profit in Pennsylvania best known for its 161 camera city surveillance network. The organization runs primarily on donations so this month it launched an adopt-a-camera fundraiser to make sure the cameras stay on and working.

“We went through a significant downturn because of the recession, but so far we’ve been able to keep the camera system running,” LCSC Managing Director Wes Farmer says. “We hope this program will help us continue to maintain the cameras.” 

Farmer estimates the cost of the system at $2,300 per camera, per year (A total budget of $379,000. See the breakdown below) This includes maintenance, monitoring, rent for the building that houses the control room and pay for the LCSC staff.

********-*-****** *********** ********* ** ****** $*,*** ****** *** *********** ** * camera ** ***** ********. ** *** *** ** *** **** supporters *** ******** * ****** ** ***** ****** **** ******** maintenance ******* *** *** ***** ****** *** **** **** **** (to *********** * ***** ** **** ******** * **** ** a ***** ****, *** *******). *** ********** *** ********** ********* May *, *** ** ** *** **, ********* ******* (*** ** ***) *** **** ** ** *******.

****** **** ****** *** ****** **** ** ******* ** **** maintain *** ******* ***** ****** *** **** ******** *** ***** played ** ********* ******* *************. “** **** ******* ***** ***** ******* **** **** **** were ***** ****** ** ****** *** **** ******* ** *** the ************ **** *** ****** ** ** ****** ******** ** support **** ********** ******,” ****** ****.

*** ************ *** **** ******** *** ****** *** ****** $***,*** each **** *** ******** ********’* ****** *** *** ****. *** DA’s ****** **** *** ******* **** ****** ***** ***** ****** footage “*** ********** ** ***** ******,” ********** ** ***** ********* $20,000 *** **** **** **** **** ** *****.

The ******

*** ***** ******* **** ********** ********* ** **** ** **** of * ********* ***** ********** **********. *** *** ****** ** made ** ** *** ******* (*** ****** ******* *** ********, 16 ** *******, ********* *** ***), ********* ********, ************* ******* *** ***** ***** ***** **** *** **** ****** the ******’* ******** ************.

*** **** *** **** ** **** ***** ** ****** *** cable **** ** *** **** **** *** **** *** ******* in *** **** *** *** **** ******, *** *** ************ was **** ** *** ******* **** ***** (*** ** **** based ** *********) *** ********** ****** ** ******** *** ****** them * ******** ** **** *** ********.

*** *******, ***** **** ***** ***** ** ******* ** *********, record **/*. *** ********* *** **** ***** *** ******* *** cameras **** **-** ***** ***** *** ****** ** *** ****** scanner *** ********* *** **** * ******* **** *** *********** can **** ** ******* *** ******* ******* * ******* ****. Additionally, **** *** **** **** ***** ** *** *********** *** the ****** *******

***** ** ****** *** ** ****. **** **** ** ** willing ** ******* ******* ** **** ****** *** *********** *** defense ********* **** * ********.

Results ** *** ******

***** **** **** **** *** ****'* ****** ****** *********:

  • ****** ********* ****** ********* *********** 491 ***** to alert them of a crime in progress.
  • **** **** *** **** ** ********* *********** 8,735 *****.
  • **** ******** 1600 ******** ** ****** ***** *** ******** ******** ** *** ** *** 922 *********.
  • ******* ******** ******** *** 133 *******, ** *********

*** ****** ** ************. ** *******, *** ****** ********* **** called ******** ***** *.* ***** *** ****** **** **** ******** ******** *** ** ****** ***** *** day. *** *** ****** $**** ******* **** **** *** ******** to *******, ** **** ****** ***** **?

Future *****“*** ****** ***** **** *** ****** ** ********* ** **** * ******* **** ** ************* *** **** cameras,” **** ******. “* ***** **** ** ****** ***, *** I **** ** **** ***** * **** *** ********* ******* in *** **** ** ********* ** ** **** ** ******* that."

IPVM *********** **** *** ******** ********’* *************** ** ******** ****** ****** ** *** **** ******* **** have ** ******** ** ******* *** ******* **, *** *** amount *** **** ** *** ******. ** *** **** ** cameras **** **** *******, *** ** ********* *** *** **** program ** *** ******* ** ***** ** * *** ** keep *** ******* ****** *** *** **** *** *****. *******, at **** *****, *** ******* **** **** ** ** ********, requiring * **** **** *********** **********.

*** ***** **** *** ********* ************ ******* *** *********** *** public “****” *** ******, *** *** *****-*-****** ******* ***** ****** more ** * ***** ** *********. ** ** *** ** both************, ***** **** ** *** ******* *** *** ****, ******** ***** ****** ****** *** *** * ******** ***** ******* *** murdered, ****** ***** **** ******* *********** ***** ********** ***** ** ****** ************** **** ******** *** **********. *** *** ** **** ******* **** **** **** **** **** *********** *** *** *** ******* are **** *** **********. *** ****** ** **** ****** ** *** questions ***** *** * ****** ** *** ******* **** **** receive ******* ******* ** ***** ****** *** **** **** $*,*** to **** **** *******.

** *** ***** ****, ***** *** ****** ******* ** *** system, **** ** *** ****** *** ** **********, **** ** the **** ***** ** ****?

Comments (7)

I think it's difficult to quantify the value of a camera simply by how many times it's used to provide evidence or triggers a dispatch. The real question is how much (if anything) was saved in court costs or investigative manpower by having that video available. Likely, that varies depending on the crime or the court case, too.

Ethan, let's say we estimate an average total savings - $5,000? $10,000? There must be some reasonable number or range. 150 incidents x $5,000 is 3/4 million, I guess that would be a positive point.

Another way to look at it is as a percentage of all crimes in the city. Lancaster City has 3,000 - 4,000 crimes per year (police stats). That's 1.5 - 2% of crimes caught on these cameras. From what I can find, it seems the Lancasty city police budget is $2.7 million (see budget report - Lancaster only has ~60,000 people - not big).

If that's accurate, investments in police deliver 50x greater return than cameras.

Btw, this is rough and I think we should investigate this more.

I wonder how that 1.5-2% compares to other cities and what percentage of crimes are typically caught on camera/what percentage of cases end up using video evidence?

I agree that further investigation would be interesting. My point isn't a determination of good/bad one way or the other. I was looking at say, a murder case. If evidence caught on camera can point to a murder weapon location, for example (which actually happened in Allentown), and result in a guilty plee or cut trial time substantially, I'd think it would probably go a long way toward paying for the system, if not more, no?

Disclaimer - Bosch rep firm - It will be interesting to see how statistics weigh in versus public opinion. The fact is that city-wide video not only captures images of crimes, not all but enough in a few big cases, and gives the public a sense of security while they are on their neighborhood streets. It will be an interesting few years to see how the push and pull of economics and public opinion play out in cities and neighborhoods of all sizes. The great news is that as camera technology continues to develop, these cities will get more improvements in technology for their dollar. Image resolution improvements, low light performance improvements, and deeper camera/VMS integration will be a great benefit to neighborhood video systems.

"At the end of the year supporters are provided a report on their camera that includes maintenance history and how their camera was used that year"

And at least the camera won't be showing up at your doorstep one day looking for a place to live.

"LCSC says it is willing to provide footage to both police and prosecutors and defense attorneys with a subpoena."

And that's how it should be.

You would turn away a 7 year old Bosch analog PTZ at your doorstep? How heartless!

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports on Police

IACP 2018 Police Show Final Report on Oct 08, 2018
IPVM went to Orlando to cover the 2018 IACP conference, the country's largest police show (about as big as ASIS), examining the 700+...
Evidence Of Hikvision's Involvement With Xinjiang IJOP And Re-Education Camps on Oct 02, 2018
IPVM reveals as-yet unreported details about Hikvision’s activities in Xinjiang - a region of China where massive human rights abuses are being...
BluePoint Aims To Bring Life-Safety Mind-Set To Police Pull Stations on Sep 20, 2018
Fire alarm pull stations are commonplace but police ones are not. A self-funded startup, BluePoint Alert Solutions is aiming to make police pull...
Congressional Letter Urges Sanctions Against Dahua and Hikvision For Human Rights Abuses on Sep 04, 2018
17 US Congresspeople sent a letter to the Secretary of State and Treasury urging sanctions against Chinese officials plus Dahua and Hikvision,...
France Political Scandal Reveals Video Surveillance Problems on Aug 22, 2018
In what French media describes as "the most damaging crisis yet for" French President Marcon, a political scandal has revealed major gaps in the...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
China Public Video Surveillance Guide: From Skynet to Sharp Eyes on Jun 14, 2018
China is expanding its video surveillance network to achieve “100%” nationwide coverage by 2020, including facial recognition capabilities and a...
French National Police Buy 10,400 Hikvision Body Cameras on May 31, 2018
France’s national police forces bought 10,400 Hikvision body cameras earlier this year, in a high-profile deal that’s coming into effect as the...
Amazon Enters Home Security Services on Apr 26, 2018
Move over ADT? It is certainly what investors have feared for ADT, especially since Amazon acquired Ring. [Update: We spoke with Amazon and have...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Knightscope Winning Investors, Struggling With Growth on Oct 16, 2018
While Knightscope's new financials show the company only winning 11 new customers in the past 12 months, the company continues to win new...
Integrator Laptop Guide on Oct 16, 2018
This 18-page guide provides guidance and statistics about integrator laptop use. 150 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their laptops,...
Huawei Admits AI "Bubble" on Oct 16, 2018
A fascinating article from the Chinese government's Global Times: Huawei’s AI ambition to reshape industries. While the Global Times talks about...
ADI's Financials Revealed + W-Box Growth Priority on Oct 15, 2018
  ADI is one of the most powerful distributors in the security industry but how big are they? How much profit do they make? How much do they sell...
Amazon Touts Home Security Market Disruption on Oct 15, 2018
Amazon is coming for ADT and all of home security. Indeed, Amazon is advertising this as, in their own words, calling home security a: Inside...
Higher Power PoE 802.3bt Ratified, Impact on Security Products Examined on Oct 12, 2018
Power over Ethernet has become one of the most popular features of many video, access, and other security products. See our PoE for IP Video...
"New Zealand Govt Uses Chinese Cameras Banned In US", Considers Security Audit on Oct 12, 2018
Newsroom NZ has issued a report: "NZ Govt uses Chinese cameras banned in US": This comes after the US federal government banned purchases of...
Mysterious Patent Troll 'Secure Cam' Targets Industry, Sues Hanwha, Hikvison, JCI, Panasonic, More on Oct 11, 2018
A company named "Secure Cam," who is actively hiding their ownership, has acquired a slew of video patents and is systematically suing video...
Unfixed Critical Vulnerability In Millions of XiongMai Devices Disclosed on Oct 10, 2018
XiongMai, one of the biggest OEMs alongside Dahua and Hikvision, has suffered a critical vulnerability impacting millions of their devices. This...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact