Favorite Biometrics 2014

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 18, 2014

This IPVM integrator survey reveals the favorite biometric of professional integrators, with stats and color commentary.

The contenders are:

  • Face
  • Finger
  • Palmvein
  • Retina
  • No Biometrics

**** **** ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ********* ** ************ integrators, **** ***** *** ***** **********.

*** ********** ***:

  • ****
  • ******
  • ********
  • ******
  • ** **********

[***************]

Key *********

****** **** ** ********* ****** '************' ** *** ********* *********, but **** ****** ****** **** ******** ****** **** '*******' ** 44%.  **** ******* ********** *** ********** ******* **** ********* *********:

** *** ******** ***** ** ***** **** *** ***** ****** emerging **** **********'* ********.

Fingerprints, ** *******

** * *********, *********** ***** *********** ******* *** **** ****** type ** ********* **** *** *** ****** ****. *******, **** integrators ****** *********** *********** ***** ****** ** ***** **** *** not ******** ****:

  • "** *** **** ***** **** *** ******** ******** **********, ** use *********** *******."
  • "***********. ****** **** ** ******* ****** ** ***** ****** ***** and *******. ****** **** **** *********** **** * ****** ***** solution."
  • "**** ******* *** ** *** ******** **** *** *********** ** the **** *********."
  • "*********** **** ***-****** ** *** *** **** ***** ******** / false ******** ***** *** **** ***** **** ** **** ***********. Can **** ** **** ********** *** ******** ** ******** *********."
  • "*********** - ****** ******* ** ** *** ** **** **** in *** ****. ** ***'* *** **** **** *** ********* units."
  • "****** ******, ******* **** *** *** **** **** ** **** used **** **** ******** ******."

Limited ***** ***************

******* *********** ****** ********** ****** ** *********** ****** ********* **** have **** ******* ****. *******, **** ******** ********** **** ***** reader ***** *** ****** *** *******, ****** ***** **** ** ******:

  • "** **** **** **** ******* ** ** ****** ** *** past. **** *** ****** ************ *** **** ** **** **** for ********** ************."
  • "** *** ******* *********** ******* *** *** *** ********** ********* these *** *** ****. "
  • "** ****** **** *** *********** ** *** *********, *** **** we **, ** *** *** *** ******** *******."
  • "*********** ** ** **** *** **** ********** **** *****. *** technology **** ** *************** *** **** ******* ******* *** ***** *** *** *** best, ******."
  • "*******, *** ***** *** ****** ******* ********, ** ** **** for **** ********** **** ***** ****** ********* *******."

'Nothing' ****** ****

******, ****** *** **** ********** ** ***** ******** '*******' ** their ****** *** ***** ********* **** ****** ****:

  • "****, ****'** *** ********. **'** ****** **** **** ******** ** fingerprint."
  • "** **** ***** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* ** any ** *** *****."
  • "** ***'* *** ********* *******."
  • "** *** ******* ****, * ** *** **** ** *** "biometric" ******. * ******* ***** ** ***** **** ** ** done ** *** "*********" *******."
  • "** ** *** **** **********. *** **** ********, *** *********, no ******."
  • "************ ***** *** *** ********* **** ***** **** *** *********."
  • "** ****** *** ********** ******* ** ***** ******* ***********."

*********** ****** ***** **** ******** ********** **** ********** ********* ***, or **** (** **** *****: ***********) ****** ** *** **** in ****** *******. *******, **** ******* ********* ********* *** ********* near *** ****** ** ****** ******* ******* *** *** ********** at ***.

Other ***** ********

*** ********* ***** *% - *% ** ***** **** ******* among ***** ***** ********* *****:********, **** *********, *** ******/**** ********. **** **** ********** ***** methods, *******, ***** **** ** **** ********* ** ******* ** success:

  • "********** * **** ****** ** * *** ****** ******* ** allows *** *********** *********** ********* *** **** ** *** ****** but *** ***** ***** ******* ** ** ***** ****** *** not * **** ****** *** *** ************."
  • "* ***** *** ***** ** *** ** ** ***********. **** done * **** ******."
  • "*** **** ******* ******* * ********* *** *** *** ***, and ** *** *** ***** *** *** ** **** *** matching **** ** * ***** ***** ** ****'* ***** *****."
  • "*** ***** ***** ** *** ******* *** **** *** ** use **** ****. *** ********** ** **** **** *** **** reliable, **** ***-***** *** **** *** ******* **** *********** *** cleaning."
  • "** **** **** **** **** *** ****** *****. ** ***'* have * ******** *********, *** ** *** **** ******** ** high ******** ************."
  • "**** ********. **'* * ***** *** *** **** ***** ** the ****, **** ************ ******* ***** ** **. ** *** less ***** ******* ***** *** ** **** ***** **** ***** than *** ** *** ******."
  • "**** *********** ******* **** * *******, *** ***-******* **** ***** work ****** **** ** **** ************."
  • "**********. ******** **** ****** *** *** ***** ********."

******* ********* ****** ** *** ********, ****** ******* ********* *** is ****** ** ****.

Comments (13)

Just a quick question? Is there a report by IPVM on where Biomertics work and don't work with respect to the client?

In general terms, no.

However, questions regarding specific biometric types might help get good answers. What questions do you have?

Here is a sample of question types:

-In what business scenarios do Biometrics best fit?

-At what scale can one expect a biometric system to size up to in terms of people enrollments, frequency of authorized access?

-Would one restrict their biomtric architecture to reside solely on a LAN or is it acceptable to allow it to cover wider networks. This relates to enrollment system and authentication/authorization processes.

-At what point does one determine a central database enrollment and authorization system is acceptable. Consider the aspect of holding personal information in a database that is used for authorization across international borders.

DISCLAIMER: I work for Stanley

I use an iris scanner called Eyelock. It has been very reliable for us due to a few things about its technology.

Otherwise, I haven't found a reliable biometric reader; at least one that stretches beyond 2 years of use

On the flipside, we (and other members) called an Eyelock demo The Deadliest Tradeshow Booth.

We use Sagem fingerprint readers for the past 5 years. They are fantastic. We understand that +-5% of the user's fingers don't read well especially older people. We shall provide PIN and card to the users whom have difficulty using the fingerprint readers. Our customers have not need to carry access cards and provide a high level of security.

We have implemented some of the largest fingerprints systems in the world in retail as well as industrial, our biggest site is retail 20,000 people transacting 8 times a day we have very little problems if you enroll correctly you will have a successfull implentation. More that 90% of our sites are fingerprint only and are combinations of access control in industrial sites and time and attendance. We have used Sagem for all of our implementations over an 8 - 10 year period

I would like to discuss this further with you if possible.

sure how would you like to do this

Can we email direclty - vasiles1@slb.com

Multi-state Bank, we have been using IRIS readers since 1999. Well received and used, started in our data center now also using in our retail enviroment for Safe Deposit Box access.

After many disappointing years with the fingerprint readers I ran a pilot using the Techsphere VP-II at FDNY Headquarters in NYC. Three turnstiles had fingerprint readers and 1 had the vascular. The results were excellent, the Techsphere vascular was always faster, more reliable and with a significantly less failure rate. Currently I am using it on all new installs that require biometric validation.

Hello John:

Thanks for the feedback. Here is the info page for the VP-II.

The big operational difference with this vascular unit is that it reads the back of the hand, not palms or fingers.:

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

2019 Access Control Book Released on Dec 12, 2018
This is the best, most comprehensive access control book in the world, based on our unprecedented research and testing has been significantly...
Multi-Factor Access Control Authentication Guide on Dec 10, 2018
Can a stranger use your credentials? One of the oldest problems facing access control is making credentials as easy to use as keys, but restricting...
Top 2019 Trend - AI Video Analytics on Dec 10, 2018
160+ Integrators answered: What do you think the top industry trend will be in 2019? Why? AI / video analytics was the run-away winner with...
ADT Wins Fire Death Suit But Faces Appeal on Dec 05, 2018
ADT/Protection 1 has won a wrongful death court case in which it was sued by the estate of a deceased customer. However, the attorney for the...
ADT Promotes DIFY - "Do It For You" on Nov 30, 2018
"Do It Yourself" (DIY) is a popular expression and has become such a common word that it has even made the Cambridge English dictionary. But why...
Strong Outlook For 2019 on Nov 29, 2018
Integrators are bullish for 2019, with nearly 80% showing a positive outlook in our integrator results from 160+ respondents: This is almost...
Cybersecurity Insurance For Security Integrators on Nov 29, 2018
Most security industry professionals carry insurance to cover themselves in the event of a general loss. However, most are not carrying cyber...
Startup Qumulex Aims For Unified Platform, Adds Infinias Access Founder on Nov 29, 2018
The startup founded by former Exacq executives, Qumulex has hired Wayne Jared, founder of access control manufacturer Infinias and most recently a...
HID Product Configurator Examined on Nov 26, 2018
HID is widely used. However, figuring out all the different configurations of features for a final credential or reader part number can be a real...
Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2018 on Nov 26, 2018
This is the 5th year IPVM has tracked manufacturers gaining and losing: Top Manufacturers Gaining and Losing 2014 Top Manufacturers Gaining and...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference 2018 Review - ADT, Resideo, Alarm.com, Arlo, Eagle Eye, ACRE, More on Dec 14, 2018
Imperial Capital Security Investor Conference is an event matching industry executives with financiers that frequently leads to future funding...
Cisco Meraki New Cameras and AI Analytics on Dec 14, 2018
Meraki has released their second generation of video surveillance with 3 new cameras, AI-based video analytics, and 2 cloud-based storage...
Foolish Strategy: OEMing Facial Recognition on Dec 13, 2018
Almost as 'hot' as face recognition marketing right now is OEMing facial recognition. Last year, they were a who's who of company's with...
DVR Examiner - Video Recovery from Recorder Hard Drives on Dec 13, 2018
Bypassing passwords and long download times on-site, DVR Examiner collects and organizes video evidence directly from a hard drive extracted from...
2019 Access Control Book Released on Dec 12, 2018
This is the best, most comprehensive access control book in the world, based on our unprecedented research and testing has been significantly...
Huawei Hisilicon Quietly Powering Tens of Millions of Western IoT Devices on Dec 12, 2018
Huawei Hisilicon chips are powering, at least, tens of millions of Western IoT devices, such as IP cameras and surveillance recorders, a fact that...
FLIR Launches Body Cameras Unified With VMS (TruWitness) on Dec 11, 2018
While FLIR is best known for their thermal cameras, now they have expanded into body cameras, launching TruWITNESS, a public safety focused body...
Startup Sunflower Labs' Autonomous Drone Security System on Dec 11, 2018
Startup Sunflower Labs is claiming a unique design on a home security system, combining autonomous drones and 'Sunflower' sensors. Imagine an...
The 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide on Dec 10, 2018
The 300 page, 2019 Video Surveillance Industry Guide, covers the key events and the future of the video surveillance market, is now available,...
Multi-Factor Access Control Authentication Guide on Dec 10, 2018
Can a stranger use your credentials? One of the oldest problems facing access control is making credentials as easy to use as keys, but restricting...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact