Favorite Biometrics 2014

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 18, 2014

This IPVM integrator survey reveals the favorite biometric of professional integrators, with stats and color commentary.

The contenders are:

  • Face
  • Finger
  • Palmvein
  • Retina
  • No Biometrics

**** **** ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ********* ** ************ integrators, **** ***** *** ***** **********.

*** ********** ***:

  • ****
  • ******
  • ********
  • ******
  • ** **********

[***************]

Key *********

****** **** ** ********* ****** '************' ** *** ********* *********, but **** ****** ****** **** ******** ****** **** '*******' ** 44%.  **** ******* ********** *** ********** ******* **** ********* *********:

** *** ******** ***** ** ***** **** *** ***** ****** emerging **** **********'* ********.

Fingerprints, ** *******

** * *********, *********** ***** *********** ******* *** **** ****** type ** ********* **** *** *** ****** ****. *******, **** integrators ****** *********** *********** ***** ****** ** ***** **** *** not ******** ****:

  • "** *** **** ***** **** *** ******** ******** **********, ** use *********** *******."
  • "***********. ****** **** ** ******* ****** ** ***** ****** ***** and *******. ****** **** **** *********** **** * ****** ***** solution."
  • "**** ******* *** ** *** ******** **** *** *********** ** the **** *********."
  • "*********** **** ***-****** ** *** *** **** ***** ******** / false ******** ***** *** **** ***** **** ** **** ***********. Can **** ** **** ********** *** ******** ** ******** *********."
  • "*********** - ****** ******* ** ** *** ** **** **** in *** ****. ** ***'* *** **** **** *** ********* units."
  • "****** ******, ******* **** *** *** **** **** ** **** used **** **** ******** ******."

Limited ***** ***************

******* *********** ****** ********** ****** ** *********** ****** ********* **** have **** ******* ****. *******, **** ******** ********** **** ***** reader ***** *** ****** *** *******, ****** ***** **** ** ******:

  • "** **** **** **** ******* ** ** ****** ** *** past. **** *** ****** ************ *** **** ** **** **** for ********** ************."
  • "** *** ******* *********** ******* *** *** *** ********** ********* these *** *** ****. "
  • "** ****** **** *** *********** ** *** *********, *** **** we **, ** *** *** *** ******** *******."
  • "*********** ** ** **** *** **** ********** **** *****. *** technology **** ** *************** *** **** ******* ******* *** ***** *** *** *** best, ******."
  • "*******, *** ***** *** ****** ******* ********, ** ** **** for **** ********** **** ***** ****** ********* *******."

'Nothing' ****** ****

******, ****** *** **** ********** ** ***** ******** '*******' ** their ****** *** ***** ********* **** ****** ****:

  • "****, ****'** *** ********. **'** ****** **** **** ******** ** fingerprint."
  • "** **** ***** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* ** any ** *** *****."
  • "** ***'* *** ********* *******."
  • "** *** ******* ****, * ** *** **** ** *** "biometric" ******. * ******* ***** ** ***** **** ** ** done ** *** "*********" *******."
  • "** ** *** **** **********. *** **** ********, *** *********, no ******."
  • "************ ***** *** *** ********* **** ***** **** *** *********."
  • "** ****** *** ********** ******* ** ***** ******* ***********."

*********** ****** ***** **** ******** ********** **** ********** ********* ***, or **** (** **** *****: ***********) ****** ** *** **** in ****** *******. *******, **** ******* ********* ********* *** ********* near *** ****** ** ****** ******* ******* *** *** ********** at ***.

Other ***** ********

*** ********* ***** *% - *% ** ***** **** ******* among ***** ***** ********* *****:********, **** *********, *** ******/**** ********. **** **** ********** ***** methods, *******, ***** **** ** **** ********* ** ******* ** success:

  • "********** * **** ****** ** * *** ****** ******* ** allows *** *********** *********** ********* *** **** ** *** ****** but *** ***** ***** ******* ** ** ***** ****** *** not * **** ****** *** *** ************."
  • "* ***** *** ***** ** *** ** ** ***********. **** done * **** ******."
  • "*** **** ******* ******* * ********* *** *** *** ***, and ** *** *** ***** *** *** ** **** *** matching **** ** * ***** ***** ** ****'* ***** *****."
  • "*** ***** ***** ** *** ******* *** **** *** ** use **** ****. *** ********** ** **** **** *** **** reliable, **** ***-***** *** **** *** ******* **** *********** *** cleaning."
  • "** **** **** **** **** *** ****** *****. ** ***'* have * ******** *********, *** ** *** **** ******** ** high ******** ************."
  • "**** ********. **'* * ***** *** *** **** ***** ** the ****, **** ************ ******* ***** ** **. ** *** less ***** ******* ***** *** ** **** ***** **** ***** than *** ** *** ******."
  • "**** *********** ******* **** * *******, *** ***-******* **** ***** work ****** **** ** **** ************."
  • "**********. ******** **** ****** *** *** ***** ********."

******* ********* ****** ** *** ********, ****** ******* ********* *** is ****** ** ****.

Comments (13)

Just a quick question? Is there a report by IPVM on where Biomertics work and don't work with respect to the client?

In general terms, no.

However, questions regarding specific biometric types might help get good answers. What questions do you have?

Here is a sample of question types:

-In what business scenarios do Biometrics best fit?

-At what scale can one expect a biometric system to size up to in terms of people enrollments, frequency of authorized access?

-Would one restrict their biomtric architecture to reside solely on a LAN or is it acceptable to allow it to cover wider networks. This relates to enrollment system and authentication/authorization processes.

-At what point does one determine a central database enrollment and authorization system is acceptable. Consider the aspect of holding personal information in a database that is used for authorization across international borders.

DISCLAIMER: I work for Stanley

I use an iris scanner called Eyelock. It has been very reliable for us due to a few things about its technology.

Otherwise, I haven't found a reliable biometric reader; at least one that stretches beyond 2 years of use

On the flipside, we (and other members) called an Eyelock demo The Deadliest Tradeshow Booth.

We use Sagem fingerprint readers for the past 5 years. They are fantastic. We understand that +-5% of the user's fingers don't read well especially older people. We shall provide PIN and card to the users whom have difficulty using the fingerprint readers. Our customers have not need to carry access cards and provide a high level of security.

We have implemented some of the largest fingerprints systems in the world in retail as well as industrial, our biggest site is retail 20,000 people transacting 8 times a day we have very little problems if you enroll correctly you will have a successfull implentation. More that 90% of our sites are fingerprint only and are combinations of access control in industrial sites and time and attendance. We have used Sagem for all of our implementations over an 8 - 10 year period

I would like to discuss this further with you if possible.

sure how would you like to do this

Can we email direclty - vasiles1@slb.com

Multi-state Bank, we have been using IRIS readers since 1999. Well received and used, started in our data center now also using in our retail enviroment for Safe Deposit Box access.

After many disappointing years with the fingerprint readers I ran a pilot using the Techsphere VP-II at FDNY Headquarters in NYC. Three turnstiles had fingerprint readers and 1 had the vascular. The results were excellent, the Techsphere vascular was always faster, more reliable and with a significantly less failure rate. Currently I am using it on all new installs that require biometric validation.

Hello John:

Thanks for the feedback. Here is the info page for the VP-II.

The big operational difference with this vascular unit is that it reads the back of the hand, not palms or fingers.:

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

ISS VMS / Video Analytics Company Profile on Aug 16, 2018
Who is ISS? In the past few months, they had one of the craziest ISC West promo items in years. Then, they hired industry veteran and ex-Dahua...
RealNetworks Free School Facial Recognition on Aug 03, 2018
The company that created RealPlayer is moving beyond media delivery and into the security space with a new facial recognition platform they have...
Door Swing Tutorial on Jul 24, 2018
The direction a door swings might seem minor, but it can greatly impact door hardware selection. There are four basic ways a door can swing, and...
Improved Security And Surveillance Bidding - 2018 MasterFormat Divisions Examined) on Jul 19, 2018
Navigating the world of system specifications and bidding work can be complex and confusing, but a standard format exists, and understanding it...
FST Fails on Jul 17, 2018
FST was one of the hottest startups of the decade, selected as the best new product at ISC West 2011 and backed with tens of millions in...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Belgium Bans Private Facial Surveillance on Jul 06, 2018
Belgium has effectively banned the use of facial recognition and other biometrics-based video analytics in surveillance cameras for private,...
GDPR For Access Control Guide on Jul 03, 2018
Electronic access control is common in businesses plus organizations are increasingly considering biometrics for access control. With GDPR coming...
Allegion Acquires Isonas on Jun 29, 2018
Isonas failed to 'revolutionize' access control as they regularly claimed. Now, nearly 20 years after their founding, they are being acquired by...
Replacing / Switching Access Control Systems Guide on Jun 28, 2018
Ripping out and replacing access control systems is hard for important reasons. Because users typically hold on to access control systems for as...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Chinese OEM Avycon Gets ADI Push on Aug 15, 2018
Who is Avycon? An American company? A Korean company? A couple of guys relabelling Chinese products? The latter is the best explanation. While...
Backboxes for Video Surveillance Tutorial on Aug 15, 2018
Backboxes are a necessity in surveillance, whether for managing cable whips, recessing cameras, adding wireless radios. But it can be confusing to...
Genetec Stratocast / Comcast 'Motion Insights' Examined on Aug 15, 2018
Comcast recently announced "SmartOffice Motion Insights", an extension to their Genetec OEMed cloud video service (covered by IPVM here). This...
SimpliSafe Violating California, Florida, and Texas Licensing Laws on Aug 14, 2018
IPVM has verified that DIY security system provider SimpliSafe, founded in 2006 and acquired in June of 2018 at a billion dollar valuation, is...
Ban of Dahua and Hikvision Is Now US Gov Law on Aug 13, 2018
The US President has signed the 2019 NDAA into law, banning the use of Dahua and Hikvision (and their OEMs) for the US government, for US...
Cut Milestone Licensing Costs 80% By Using Hikvision and Dahua NVRs (Tested) on Aug 13, 2018
Enterprise VMS licensing can be quite expensive, with $200 or more per channel common, meaning a 100 camera system can cost $20,000 in VMS...
Nortek Sues SDS, Battle Over Unpaid Bill and Cancelled Lines on Aug 13, 2018
Nortek and SDS legal battle continues. As IPVM reported, SDS sued Nortek alleging bribery and antitrust violation. However, Wave fired back at SDS,...
Uniview Intrusion Analytics and VMD Tested on Aug 13, 2018
IPVM's IP Camera Analytics Shootout featuring Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision created some ill will with a Uniview distributor who...
ADT Employees Protest ADT CEO on Aug 10, 2018
So many ADT employees were so upset with ADT's CEO speech reported on by IPVM, that ADT's CEO was forced to send a mass email to employees to...
Axis / Avigilon Legal Battle Rises on Aug 09, 2018
In what is shaping up to be high-powered, will-not-back-down battle, Axis and Avigilon are squaring off in multiple legal contests. In 2017, IPVM...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact