Favorite Biometrics 2014

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 18, 2014

This IPVM integrator survey reveals the favorite biometric of professional integrators, with stats and color commentary.

The contenders are:

  • Face
  • Finger
  • Palmvein
  • Retina
  • No Biometrics

**** **** ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ********* ** ************ integrators, **** ***** *** ***** **********.

*** ********** ***:

  • ****
  • ******
  • ********
  • ******
  • ** **********

[***************]

Key *********

****** **** ** ********* ****** '************' ** *** ********* *********, but **** ****** ****** **** ******** ****** **** '*******' ** 44%.  **** ******* ********** *** ********** ******* **** ********* *********:

** *** ******** ***** ** ***** **** *** ***** ****** emerging **** **********'* ********.

Fingerprints, ** *******

** * *********, *********** ***** *********** ******* *** **** ****** type ** ********* **** *** *** ****** ****. *******, **** integrators ****** *********** *********** ***** ****** ** ***** **** *** not ******** ****:

  • "** *** **** ***** **** *** ******** ******** **********, ** use *********** *******."
  • "***********. ****** **** ** ******* ****** ** ***** ****** ***** and *******. ****** **** **** *********** **** * ****** ***** solution."
  • "**** ******* *** ** *** ******** **** *** *********** ** the **** *********."
  • "*********** **** ***-****** ** *** *** **** ***** ******** / false ******** ***** *** **** ***** **** ** **** ***********. Can **** ** **** ********** *** ******** ** ******** *********."
  • "*********** - ****** ******* ** ** *** ** **** **** in *** ****. ** ***'* *** **** **** *** ********* units."
  • "****** ******, ******* **** *** *** **** **** ** **** used **** **** ******** ******."

Limited ***** ***************

******* *********** ****** ********** ****** ** *********** ****** ********* **** have **** ******* ****. *******, **** ******** ********** **** ***** reader ***** *** ****** *** *******, ****** ***** **** ** ******:

  • "** **** **** **** ******* ** ** ****** ** *** past. **** *** ****** ************ *** **** ** **** **** for ********** ************."
  • "** *** ******* *********** ******* *** *** *** ********** ********* these *** *** ****. "
  • "** ****** **** *** *********** ** *** *********, *** **** we **, ** *** *** *** ******** *******."
  • "*********** ** ** **** *** **** ********** **** *****. *** technology **** ** *************** *** **** ******* ******* *** ***** *** *** *** best, ******."
  • "*******, *** ***** *** ****** ******* ********, ** ** **** for **** ********** **** ***** ****** ********* *******."

'Nothing' ****** ****

******, ****** *** **** ********** ** ***** ******** '*******' ** their ****** *** ***** ********* **** ****** ****:

  • "****, ****'** *** ********. **'** ****** **** **** ******** ** fingerprint."
  • "** **** ***** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* ** any ** *** *****."
  • "** ***'* *** ********* *******."
  • "** *** ******* ****, * ** *** **** ** *** "biometric" ******. * ******* ***** ** ***** **** ** ** done ** *** "*********" *******."
  • "** ** *** **** **********. *** **** ********, *** *********, no ******."
  • "************ ***** *** *** ********* **** ***** **** *** *********."
  • "** ****** *** ********** ******* ** ***** ******* ***********."

*********** ****** ***** **** ******** ********** **** ********** ********* ***, or **** (** **** *****: ***********) ****** ** *** **** in ****** *******. *******, **** ******* ********* ********* *** ********* near *** ****** ** ****** ******* ******* *** *** ********** at ***.

Other ***** ********

*** ********* ***** *% - *% ** ***** **** ******* among ***** ***** ********* *****:********, **** *********, *** ******/**** ********. **** **** ********** ***** methods, *******, ***** **** ** **** ********* ** ******* ** success:

  • "********** * **** ****** ** * *** ****** ******* ** allows *** *********** *********** ********* *** **** ** *** ****** but *** ***** ***** ******* ** ** ***** ****** *** not * **** ****** *** *** ************."
  • "* ***** *** ***** ** *** ** ** ***********. **** done * **** ******."
  • "*** **** ******* ******* * ********* *** *** *** ***, and ** *** *** ***** *** *** ** **** *** matching **** ** * ***** ***** ** ****'* ***** *****."
  • "*** ***** ***** ** *** ******* *** **** *** ** use **** ****. *** ********** ** **** **** *** **** reliable, **** ***-***** *** **** *** ******* **** *********** *** cleaning."
  • "** **** **** **** **** *** ****** *****. ** ***'* have * ******** *********, *** ** *** **** ******** ** high ******** ************."
  • "**** ********. **'* * ***** *** *** **** ***** ** the ****, **** ************ ******* ***** ** **. ** *** less ***** ******* ***** *** ** **** ***** **** ***** than *** ** *** ******."
  • "**** *********** ******* **** * *******, *** ***-******* **** ***** work ****** **** ** **** ************."
  • "**********. ******** **** ****** *** *** ***** ********."

******* ********* ****** ** *** ********, ****** ******* ********* *** is ****** ** ****.

Comments (13)

Just a quick question? Is there a report by IPVM on where Biomertics work and don't work with respect to the client?

In general terms, no.

However, questions regarding specific biometric types might help get good answers. What questions do you have?

Here is a sample of question types:

-In what business scenarios do Biometrics best fit?

-At what scale can one expect a biometric system to size up to in terms of people enrollments, frequency of authorized access?

-Would one restrict their biomtric architecture to reside solely on a LAN or is it acceptable to allow it to cover wider networks. This relates to enrollment system and authentication/authorization processes.

-At what point does one determine a central database enrollment and authorization system is acceptable. Consider the aspect of holding personal information in a database that is used for authorization across international borders.

DISCLAIMER: I work for Stanley

I use an iris scanner called Eyelock. It has been very reliable for us due to a few things about its technology.

Otherwise, I haven't found a reliable biometric reader; at least one that stretches beyond 2 years of use

On the flipside, we (and other members) called an Eyelock demo The Deadliest Tradeshow Booth.

We use Sagem fingerprint readers for the past 5 years. They are fantastic. We understand that +-5% of the user's fingers don't read well especially older people. We shall provide PIN and card to the users whom have difficulty using the fingerprint readers. Our customers have not need to carry access cards and provide a high level of security.

We have implemented some of the largest fingerprints systems in the world in retail as well as industrial, our biggest site is retail 20,000 people transacting 8 times a day we have very little problems if you enroll correctly you will have a successfull implentation. More that 90% of our sites are fingerprint only and are combinations of access control in industrial sites and time and attendance. We have used Sagem for all of our implementations over an 8 - 10 year period

I would like to discuss this further with you if possible.

sure how would you like to do this

Can we email direclty - vasiles1@slb.com

Multi-state Bank, we have been using IRIS readers since 1999. Well received and used, started in our data center now also using in our retail enviroment for Safe Deposit Box access.

After many disappointing years with the fingerprint readers I ran a pilot using the Techsphere VP-II at FDNY Headquarters in NYC. Three turnstiles had fingerprint readers and 1 had the vascular. The results were excellent, the Techsphere vascular was always faster, more reliable and with a significantly less failure rate. Currently I am using it on all new installs that require biometric validation.

Hello John:

Thanks for the feedback. Here is the info page for the VP-II.

The big operational difference with this vascular unit is that it reads the back of the hand, not palms or fingers.:

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Higher Power PoE 802.3bt Ratified, Impact on Security Products Examined on Oct 12, 2018
Power over Ethernet has become one of the most popular features of many video, access, and other security products. See our PoE for IP Video...
Door Hinges Guide on Oct 10, 2018
Some of the trickiest access control problems are caused by bad door hinges. From doors not closing right, to locks not locking, worn or warped...
Security System Health Monitoring Usage Statistics 2018 on Oct 09, 2018
How well and quickly do integrators know if devices are offline or broken? New IPVM statistics show that typically no health monitoring is...
IP Camera Installability Shootout - Avigilon, Axis, Bosch, Dahua, Hanwha, Hikvision, Uniview, Vivotek on Oct 08, 2018
What are the best and worst cameras from an installation standpoint? Which manufacturers make it harder or easier to install their cameras? We...
UTC Merges Lenel and S2, Creates LenelS2 on Oct 03, 2018
UTC has completed the acquisition of S2, launching literally Lenel's2 LenelS2 with UTC declaring that "LenelS2 unites two world-class teams with...
Anti-Tailgating Startup: Spyfloor on Oct 03, 2018
A Canadian startup, Spyfloor, is using a different approach to warn against tailgating, a common access control problem. By counting feet,...
ASIS GSX 2018 Mixed Manufacturer Reviews With Declining Overall Attendance on Oct 02, 2018
ASIS GSX 2018 show drew 9% fewer total registrants, however, it gained 15% more paid registrations, according to ASIS. In this note, we look...
Network Cable Testing Guide on Oct 02, 2018
Proper cable installation is key to trouble-free surveillance systems. However, testing is often an afterthought, with problems only discovered...
VMS Mobile App Shootout - Avigilon, Dahua, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Milestone on Oct 01, 2018
Mobile VMS apps are a critical interface for the modern surveillance user. But who does it best and worst? We tested 6 manufacturers - Avigilon,...
Favorite Power Supply Manufacturer 2018 on Sep 28, 2018
While power supplies are becoming less important as PoE matures, they remain vital to access control systems, where increased power for locks,...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Knightscope Winning Investors, Struggling With Growth on Oct 16, 2018
While Knightscope's new financials show the company only winning 11 new customers in the past 12 months, the company continues to win new...
Integrator Laptop Guide on Oct 16, 2018
This 18-page guide provides guidance and statistics about integrator laptop use. 150 integrators explained to IPVM in detail about their laptops,...
Huawei Admits AI "Bubble" on Oct 16, 2018
A fascinating article from the Chinese government's Global Times: Huawei’s AI ambition to reshape industries. While the Global Times talks about...
ADI's Financials Revealed + W-Box Growth Priority on Oct 15, 2018
  ADI is one of the most powerful distributors in the security industry but how big are they? How much profit do they make? How much do they sell...
Amazon Touts Home Security Market Disruption on Oct 15, 2018
Amazon is coming for ADT and all of home security. Indeed, Amazon is advertising this as, in their own words, calling home security a: Inside...
Higher Power PoE 802.3bt Ratified, Impact on Security Products Examined on Oct 12, 2018
Power over Ethernet has become one of the most popular features of many video, access, and other security products. See our PoE for IP Video...
"New Zealand Govt Uses Chinese Cameras Banned In US", Considers Security Audit on Oct 12, 2018
Newsroom NZ has issued a report: "NZ Govt uses Chinese cameras banned in US": This comes after the US federal government banned purchases of...
Mysterious Patent Troll 'Secure Cam' Targets Industry, Sues Hanwha, Hikvison, JCI, Panasonic, More on Oct 11, 2018
A company named "Secure Cam," who is actively hiding their ownership, has acquired a slew of video patents and is systematically suing video...
Unfixed Critical Vulnerability In Millions of XiongMai Devices Disclosed on Oct 10, 2018
XiongMai, one of the biggest OEMs alongside Dahua and Hikvision, has suffered a critical vulnerability impacting millions of their devices. This...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact