Favorite Biometrics 2014

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 18, 2014

This IPVM integrator survey reveals the favorite biometric of professional integrators, with stats and color commentary.

The contenders are:

  • Face
  • Finger
  • Palmvein
  • Retina
  • No Biometrics

**** **** ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ********* ** ************ integrators, **** ***** *** ***** **********.

*** ********** ***:

  • ****
  • ******
  • ********
  • ******
  • ** **********

[***************]

Key *********

****** **** ** ********* ****** '************' ** *** ********* *********, but **** ****** ****** **** ******** ****** **** '*******' ** 44%.  **** ******* ********** *** ********** ******* **** ********* *********:

** *** ******** ***** ** ***** **** *** ***** ****** emerging **** **********'* ********.

Fingerprints, ** *******

** * *********, *********** ***** *********** ******* *** **** ****** type ** ********* **** *** *** ****** ****. *******, **** integrators ****** *********** *********** ***** ****** ** ***** **** *** not ******** ****:

  • "** *** **** ***** **** *** ******** ******** **********, ** use *********** *******."
  • "***********. ****** **** ** ******* ****** ** ***** ****** ***** and *******. ****** **** **** *********** **** * ****** ***** solution."
  • "**** ******* *** ** *** ******** **** *** *********** ** the **** *********."
  • "*********** **** ***-****** ** *** *** **** ***** ******** / false ******** ***** *** **** ***** **** ** **** ***********. Can **** ** **** ********** *** ******** ** ******** *********."
  • "*********** - ****** ******* ** ** *** ** **** **** in *** ****. ** ***'* *** **** **** *** ********* units."
  • "****** ******, ******* **** *** *** **** **** ** **** used **** **** ******** ******."

Limited ***** ***************

******* *********** ****** ********** ****** ** *********** ****** ********* **** have **** ******* ****. *******, **** ******** ********** **** ***** reader ***** *** ****** *** *******, ****** ***** **** ** ******:

  • "** **** **** **** ******* ** ** ****** ** *** past. **** *** ****** ************ *** **** ** **** **** for ********** ************."
  • "** *** ******* *********** ******* *** *** *** ********** ********* these *** *** ****. "
  • "** ****** **** *** *********** ** *** *********, *** **** we **, ** *** *** *** ******** *******."
  • "*********** ** ** **** *** **** ********** **** *****. *** technology **** ** *************** *** **** ******* ******* *** ***** *** *** *** best, ******."
  • "*******, *** ***** *** ****** ******* ********, ** ** **** for **** ********** **** ***** ****** ********* *******."

'Nothing' ****** ****

******, ****** *** **** ********** ** ***** ******** '*******' ** their ****** *** ***** ********* **** ****** ****:

  • "****, ****'** *** ********. **'** ****** **** **** ******** ** fingerprint."
  • "** **** ***** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* ** any ** *** *****."
  • "** ***'* *** ********* *******."
  • "** *** ******* ****, * ** *** **** ** *** "biometric" ******. * ******* ***** ** ***** **** ** ** done ** *** "*********" *******."
  • "** ** *** **** **********. *** **** ********, *** *********, no ******."
  • "************ ***** *** *** ********* **** ***** **** *** *********."
  • "** ****** *** ********** ******* ** ***** ******* ***********."

*********** ****** ***** **** ******** ********** **** ********** ********* ***, or **** (** **** *****: ***********) ****** ** *** **** in ****** *******. *******, **** ******* ********* ********* *** ********* near *** ****** ** ****** ******* ******* *** *** ********** at ***.

Other ***** ********

*** ********* ***** *% - *% ** ***** **** ******* among ***** ***** ********* *****:********, **** *********, *** ******/**** ********. **** **** ********** ***** methods, *******, ***** **** ** **** ********* ** ******* ** success:

  • "********** * **** ****** ** * *** ****** ******* ** allows *** *********** *********** ********* *** **** ** *** ****** but *** ***** ***** ******* ** ** ***** ****** *** not * **** ****** *** *** ************."
  • "* ***** *** ***** ** *** ** ** ***********. **** done * **** ******."
  • "*** **** ******* ******* * ********* *** *** *** ***, and ** *** *** ***** *** *** ** **** *** matching **** ** * ***** ***** ** ****'* ***** *****."
  • "*** ***** ***** ** *** ******* *** **** *** ** use **** ****. *** ********** ** **** **** *** **** reliable, **** ***-***** *** **** *** ******* **** *********** *** cleaning."
  • "** **** **** **** **** *** ****** *****. ** ***'* have * ******** *********, *** ** *** **** ******** ** high ******** ************."
  • "**** ********. **'* * ***** *** *** **** ***** ** the ****, **** ************ ******* ***** ** **. ** *** less ***** ******* ***** *** ** **** ***** **** ***** than *** ** *** ******."
  • "**** *********** ******* **** * *******, *** ***-******* **** ***** work ****** **** ** **** ************."
  • "**********. ******** **** ****** *** *** ***** ********."

******* ********* ****** ** *** ********, ****** ******* ********* *** is ****** ** ****.

Comments (13)

Just a quick question? Is there a report by IPVM on where Biomertics work and don't work with respect to the client?

In general terms, no.

However, questions regarding specific biometric types might help get good answers. What questions do you have?

Here is a sample of question types:

-In what business scenarios do Biometrics best fit?

-At what scale can one expect a biometric system to size up to in terms of people enrollments, frequency of authorized access?

-Would one restrict their biomtric architecture to reside solely on a LAN or is it acceptable to allow it to cover wider networks. This relates to enrollment system and authentication/authorization processes.

-At what point does one determine a central database enrollment and authorization system is acceptable. Consider the aspect of holding personal information in a database that is used for authorization across international borders.

DISCLAIMER: I work for Stanley

I use an iris scanner called Eyelock. It has been very reliable for us due to a few things about its technology.

Otherwise, I haven't found a reliable biometric reader; at least one that stretches beyond 2 years of use

On the flipside, we (and other members) called an Eyelock demo The Deadliest Tradeshow Booth.

We use Sagem fingerprint readers for the past 5 years. They are fantastic. We understand that +-5% of the user's fingers don't read well especially older people. We shall provide PIN and card to the users whom have difficulty using the fingerprint readers. Our customers have not need to carry access cards and provide a high level of security.

We have implemented some of the largest fingerprints systems in the world in retail as well as industrial, our biggest site is retail 20,000 people transacting 8 times a day we have very little problems if you enroll correctly you will have a successfull implentation. More that 90% of our sites are fingerprint only and are combinations of access control in industrial sites and time and attendance. We have used Sagem for all of our implementations over an 8 - 10 year period

I would like to discuss this further with you if possible.

sure how would you like to do this

Can we email direclty - vasiles1@slb.com

Multi-state Bank, we have been using IRIS readers since 1999. Well received and used, started in our data center now also using in our retail enviroment for Safe Deposit Box access.

After many disappointing years with the fingerprint readers I ran a pilot using the Techsphere VP-II at FDNY Headquarters in NYC. Three turnstiles had fingerprint readers and 1 had the vascular. The results were excellent, the Techsphere vascular was always faster, more reliable and with a significantly less failure rate. Currently I am using it on all new installs that require biometric validation.

Hello John:

Thanks for the feedback. Here is the info page for the VP-II.

The big operational difference with this vascular unit is that it reads the back of the hand, not palms or fingers.:

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
Register for the Spring Access Control Course. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike manufacturer...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Strong ISC West 2019 For Manufacturers But Concerns For 2020 March Move on Apr 16, 2019
ISC West 2019 was strong for manufacturers, according to new IPVM survey results of 100+ manufacturers, consistent with 2018 results. However,...
Alarm.com Favorability Results 2019 on Apr 15, 2019
The once dot com startup has evolved to become a core provider for home security and is now expanding into commercial. In their first entry in...
ISC West 2019 Report on Apr 12, 2019
The IPVM team has finished at the Sands looking at what companies are offering and how they are changing their positioning. See below for 50+...
Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied on Apr 09, 2019
One of the most ambitious integrator rollups of the decade has reached its conclusion—selling to a mega guard company. Allied Universal has...
Spring 2019 50+ New Products Directory on Apr 08, 2019
We are compiling a list of new products for Spring 2019 and have over 50 already. Contrast to Fall 2018 New Products Directory and Spring 2018...

Most Recent Industry Reports

H.265 Usage Statistics on Apr 19, 2019
H.265 has been available in IP cameras for more than 5 years and, in the past few years, the number of manufacturers supporting this codec has...
ACRE Acquires RS2, Explains Acquisition Strategy on Apr 19, 2019
ACRE continues to buy, now acquiring RS2, just 5 months after buying Open Options. One is a small access control manufacturer from Texas, the...
Access Control Course Spring 2019 - Last Chance on Apr 19, 2019
Register for the Spring Access Control Course. IPVM offers the most comprehensive access control course in the industry. Unlike manufacturer...
Riser vs Plenum Cabling Explained on Apr 18, 2019
You could be spending twice as much for cable as you need. The difference between 'plenum' rated cable and 'riser' rated cable is subtle, but the...
Verint Victimized By Ransomware on Apr 18, 2019
Verint, which is best known in the physical security industry for video surveillance but has built a sizeable cybersecurity business as well, was...
Milestone Drops IFSEC on Apr 18, 2019
Milestone has dropped out of Europe's largest annual security trade show (IFSEC 2019), telling IPVM that they "have found that IFSEC in EMEA no...
The Fastest Growing Video Surveillance Sales Organization Ever - Verkada on Apr 17, 2019
Verkada has the fastest growing video surveillance sales organization ever. In less than 2 years, they already have more salespeople in the US...
Door Operators Access Control Tutorial on Apr 17, 2019
Doors equipped with door operators, specialty devices that automate opening and closing, tend to be quite complex. The mechanisms needed to...
Securadyne CEO: IPVM 'Entertaining For An Ignorant Few' on Apr 16, 2019
Securadyne's CEO Carey Boethel is unhappy with IPVM's report - Failed Integrator Rollup, Securadyne Sells to Guard Giant Allied. Indeed, he...
Dahua Repositionable IR Multi-Imager Camera Tested on Apr 16, 2019
Dahua has released their first repositionable multi-imager camera, the Multi-Flex 4x2MP, claiming integrated IR, true WDR, and flexible...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact