Favorite Biometrics 2014

Author: Brian Rhodes, Published on Aug 18, 2014

This IPVM integrator survey reveals the favorite biometric of professional integrators, with stats and color commentary.

The contenders are:

  • Face
  • Finger
  • Palmvein
  • Retina
  • No Biometrics

**** **** ********** ****** ******* *** ******** ********* ** ************ integrators, **** ***** *** ***** **********.

*** ********** ***:

  • ****
  • ******
  • ********
  • ******
  • ** **********

[***************]

Key *********

****** **** ** ********* ****** '************' ** *** ********* *********, but **** ****** ****** **** ******** ****** **** '*******' ** 44%.  **** ******* ********** *** ********** ******* **** ********* *********:

** *** ******** ***** ** ***** **** *** ***** ****** emerging **** **********'* ********.

Fingerprints, ** *******

** * *********, *********** ***** *********** ******* *** **** ****** type ** ********* **** *** *** ****** ****. *******, **** integrators ****** *********** *********** ***** ****** ** ***** **** *** not ******** ****:

  • "** *** **** ***** **** *** ******** ******** **********, ** use *********** *******."
  • "***********. ****** **** ** ******* ****** ** ***** ****** ***** and *******. ****** **** **** *********** **** * ****** ***** solution."
  • "**** ******* *** ** *** ******** **** *** *********** ** the **** *********."
  • "*********** **** ***-****** ** *** *** **** ***** ******** / false ******** ***** *** **** ***** **** ** **** ***********. Can **** ** **** ********** *** ******** ** ******** *********."
  • "*********** - ****** ******* ** ** *** ** **** **** in *** ****. ** ***'* *** **** **** *** ********* units."
  • "****** ******, ******* **** *** *** **** **** ** **** used **** **** ******** ******."

Limited ***** ***************

******* *********** ****** ********** ****** ** *********** ****** ********* **** have **** ******* ****. *******, **** ******** ********** **** ***** reader ***** *** ****** *** *******, ****** ***** **** ** ******:

  • "** **** **** **** ******* ** ** ****** ** *** past. **** *** ****** ************ *** **** ** **** **** for ********** ************."
  • "** *** ******* *********** ******* *** *** *** ********** ********* these *** *** ****. "
  • "** ****** **** *** *********** ** *** *********, *** **** we **, ** *** *** *** ******** *******."
  • "*********** ** ** **** *** **** ********** **** *****. *** technology **** ** *************** *** **** ******* ******* *** ***** *** *** *** best, ******."
  • "*******, *** ***** *** ****** ******* ********, ** ** **** for **** ********** **** ***** ****** ********* *******."

'Nothing' ****** ****

******, ****** *** **** ********** ** ***** ******** '*******' ** their ****** *** ***** ********* **** ****** ****:

  • "****, ****'** *** ********. **'** ****** **** **** ******** ** fingerprint."
  • "** **** ***** *** *** ******** ** *** ********* ** any ** *** *****."
  • "** ***'* *** ********* *******."
  • "** *** ******* ****, * ** *** **** ** *** "biometric" ******. * ******* ***** ** ***** **** ** ** done ** *** "*********" *******."
  • "** ** *** **** **********. *** **** ********, *** *********, no ******."
  • "************ ***** *** *** ********* **** ***** **** *** *********."
  • "** ****** *** ********** ******* ** ***** ******* ***********."

*********** ****** ***** **** ******** ********** **** ********** ********* ***, or **** (** **** *****: ***********) ****** ** *** **** in ****** *******. *******, **** ******* ********* ********* *** ********* near *** ****** ** ****** ******* ******* *** *** ********** at ***.

Other ***** ********

*** ********* ***** *% - *% ** ***** **** ******* among ***** ***** ********* *****:********, **** *********, *** ******/**** ********. **** **** ********** ***** methods, *******, ***** **** ** **** ********* ** ******* ** success:

  • "********** * **** ****** ** * *** ****** ******* ** allows *** *********** *********** ********* *** **** ** *** ****** but *** ***** ***** ******* ** ** ***** ****** *** not * **** ****** *** *** ************."
  • "* ***** *** ***** ** *** ** ** ***********. **** done * **** ******."
  • "*** **** ******* ******* * ********* *** *** *** ***, and ** *** *** ***** *** *** ** **** *** matching **** ** * ***** ***** ** ****'* ***** *****."
  • "*** ***** ***** ** *** ******* *** **** *** ** use **** ****. *** ********** ** **** **** *** **** reliable, **** ***-***** *** **** *** ******* **** *********** *** cleaning."
  • "** **** **** **** **** *** ****** *****. ** ***'* have * ******** *********, *** ** *** **** ******** ** high ******** ************."
  • "**** ********. **'* * ***** *** *** **** ***** ** the ****, **** ************ ******* ***** ** **. ** *** less ***** ******* ***** *** ** **** ***** **** ***** than *** ** *** ******."
  • "**** *********** ******* **** * *******, *** ***-******* **** ***** work ****** **** ** **** ************."
  • "**********. ******** **** ****** *** *** ***** ********."

******* ********* ****** ** *** ********, ****** ******* ********* *** is ****** ** ****.

Comments (13)

Just a quick question? Is there a report by IPVM on where Biomertics work and don't work with respect to the client?

In general terms, no.

However, questions regarding specific biometric types might help get good answers. What questions do you have?

Here is a sample of question types:

-In what business scenarios do Biometrics best fit?

-At what scale can one expect a biometric system to size up to in terms of people enrollments, frequency of authorized access?

-Would one restrict their biomtric architecture to reside solely on a LAN or is it acceptable to allow it to cover wider networks. This relates to enrollment system and authentication/authorization processes.

-At what point does one determine a central database enrollment and authorization system is acceptable. Consider the aspect of holding personal information in a database that is used for authorization across international borders.

DISCLAIMER: I work for Stanley

I use an iris scanner called Eyelock. It has been very reliable for us due to a few things about its technology.

Otherwise, I haven't found a reliable biometric reader; at least one that stretches beyond 2 years of use

On the flipside, we (and other members) called an Eyelock demo The Deadliest Tradeshow Booth.

We use Sagem fingerprint readers for the past 5 years. They are fantastic. We understand that +-5% of the user's fingers don't read well especially older people. We shall provide PIN and card to the users whom have difficulty using the fingerprint readers. Our customers have not need to carry access cards and provide a high level of security.

We have implemented some of the largest fingerprints systems in the world in retail as well as industrial, our biggest site is retail 20,000 people transacting 8 times a day we have very little problems if you enroll correctly you will have a successfull implentation. More that 90% of our sites are fingerprint only and are combinations of access control in industrial sites and time and attendance. We have used Sagem for all of our implementations over an 8 - 10 year period

I would like to discuss this further with you if possible.

sure how would you like to do this

Can we email direclty - vasiles1@slb.com

Multi-state Bank, we have been using IRIS readers since 1999. Well received and used, started in our data center now also using in our retail enviroment for Safe Deposit Box access.

After many disappointing years with the fingerprint readers I ran a pilot using the Techsphere VP-II at FDNY Headquarters in NYC. Three turnstiles had fingerprint readers and 1 had the vascular. The results were excellent, the Techsphere vascular was always faster, more reliable and with a significantly less failure rate. Currently I am using it on all new installs that require biometric validation.

Hello John:

Thanks for the feedback. Here is the info page for the VP-II.

The big operational difference with this vascular unit is that it reads the back of the hand, not palms or fingers.:

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

The Dumb Ones: PSA's Bozeman On Cybersecurity on Jun 15, 2018
The smart ones are the hundred people who flew to Denver and spent $500+ on a 1.5-day conference featuring Dahua as a 'cyber responsible partner',...
Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...
Access Control - Time & Attendance, Mustering and Mantraps Guide on Jun 13, 2018
Electronic access offers features that traditional mechanical locks cannot. While these features may not be as fundamental as keeping doors secure,...
ReconaSense - The AI / Access Control / Analytics / IoT / Video Company Profile on Jun 12, 2018
One company's ISC West booth stood out for displaying a light-up tower of buzzwords. The company, ReconaSense, pledged to be 'making sense of it...
The Benefits of An Access Control Test Door on Jun 08, 2018
Security system dealers can benefit from having their own access control test door both for demonstrations and training. Inside, we explain the...
Worst Features for Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 07, 2018
4 clear worst features for installing were identified by 140+ integrator respondents to: What feature(s) make a camera hard to install? The...
Princeton Identity Access 200 Iris Scanners Examined on Jun 05, 2018
Iris recently registered a big jump as a preferred biometric in our Favorite Biometrics survey, but access-ready options can be difficult to...
Top Features For Easy Camera Installation (Statistics) on Jun 05, 2018
Camera installation is the most fundamental and common task for video security technicians. Because of this, camera manufacturers market their...
Stats: IP Camera Dead On Arrival (DOA) Decline, Near Zero on Jun 01, 2018
New IPVM integrator statistics show that IP camera DoA rates have declined with zero dead on arrival units for many integrators and effectively...
Keypads For Access Control Tutorial on May 31, 2018
Keypad readers present huge risks to even the best access systems. If deployed improperly, keypads let people through locked doors almost as if...

Most Recent Industry Reports

July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jun 16, 2018
The last chance to save $50 on registration is this Thursday, June 21st. Register now and save. This is the only networking course designed...
The Dumb Ones: PSA's Bozeman On Cybersecurity on Jun 15, 2018
The smart ones are the hundred people who flew to Denver and spent $500+ on a 1.5-day conference featuring Dahua as a 'cyber responsible partner',...
Amazon Ring Launches $10 Monthly Professional Alarm Monitoring on Jun 15, 2018
Amazon's Ring has announced an alarm system with 24/7 professional alarm monitoring for $10 per month, a fraction of the $30+ per month traditional...
Axis Releases First New Access Controller In 5 Years (A1601) on Jun 15, 2018
It has been 5 years since Axis 2013 entry in the physical access control market, with the A1001 (IPVM test). Now, Axis has released its second...
Hikvision 12MP Fisheye Camera Tested (DS-2CD63C2F-IV) on Jun 14, 2018
Hikvision's DS-2CD63C2F-IV is their flagship panoramic camera, with a 12MP imager, 15m integrated IR, smart codec, and more. We tested the 63C2 in...
Four Major Outdoor Camera Install Problems on Jun 14, 2018
Over 140 integrators told us the top four camera installation mistakes that lead to unexpected problems and failures. Their comments often...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jun 14, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer...
China Public Video Surveillance Guide: From Skynet to Sharp Eyes on Jun 14, 2018
China is expanding its video surveillance network to achieve “100%” nationwide coverage by 2020, including facial recognition capabilities and a...
IPVM For PR / Marketing People on Jun 13, 2018
This post helps PR and Marketing people understand and productively work with IPVM (as much as possible given our independent, often critical,...
Avigilon H4 Multi-Sensor Adds 32MP, H.265, Analytics on Jun 13, 2018
Avigilon has announced the H4 Multisensor, the successor to their repositionable multi imager line, adding features like H.265, integrated IR,...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact