A Solid Proposal For a City on a Budget

Author: Carlton Purvis, Published on May 16, 2013

It is far too common to find RFPs and proposals with missing details, inadequate equipment, and out of date specs. Indeed, it is a top industry complaint. While we find a lot of examples of what not to do, recently we came across a good example of an uncommonly thorough proposal. For this note, we spoke with the integrator, Digital Surveillance Solutions (DSS) about a winning bid they put together for a small upstate NY city. 

The Proposal

*** ***** ** ****** ** **** ***** **** ******** **** (**** * **** ** *** **-**** **********). *** ********* **** **** ** ********* *** ******** ** other *****-******* ****** ********, *** *** ******* ********, **** **** and ********* *** ******* *******. **** ******** ******** *** **********'* ********, ******** a ****** ** ******** ************* ********* *** ****** ** ****, ********* ********* (*** *****) *** ****** ** ******* ******** to **** ******** *** *** ******* ***** *** ** **** the ********** ** ********. 

**** ** * ******* **** ***** ** ******* **** ** placement *** **** ******:

****'* * ****** ***** ** **** **** ****** **** ****:

************, *** ******** ******** ** ****** *** ******* ***** ** the ****** **** ** **** *** ****'* *****, ******** ********* and ********* ** ***** *** **** **** ** *** **** will ** ****, **** * ******* *********, ******** ********** *** staffing *** **** ******* *** ********** ********** **** ************** -- for *******,******** **** *** ******* ******* ***** ** ***** ****** *******.

*** ******** ******** ** ******** ****** ***** ***** **** **** fixed ******* *** ** ***** ** *** ****** ******, ******* providing * ******** ***** *** **** *** **** ******* ** expand. “*********, ***** **** ** * ***** *** *** * phase ***** ** ********** ****** ******,” *** ****.

**********

***** ******, *** ******** **** ************ ********* ** ********, ****** ** **** * ***** ** the ****’* ******* **** ***** ******* *** ****. ***** ***** *****, the **** ****** ** ******* ************ ************* ****** *** ***** ******* *********, ********* ***, ** *** on *** *******. ******** *** * **** ****** ($**,***) *** wanted ** *** ** **** ******* ********** *** ****.

*** **** ****** ** *** *** $*,*** ** ****** *** project *** ******* * ******** ********. “** ***** **** ** ********** the ** ***** ***** **** ****** *** *******. **** ** sent *** ********* ** *** ***** ** ****** ** ***** ************ *** **** **** ***********,” *** ****. 

*** ***** **** ***** ****** ** ****, *** ********** ****. ********** is ********* ** *** *****, ********* ** *** ******** -- just ** **** *** ***** ****** ******. 

IPVM ********

****** *** ******** ***** ********, ** ~$**,*** *** ******, ** is ******** * ********** *** **** *** * **** **** wireless ************ ****** ***** ***** ********** ********** (****,*****, ********). ******* ** ******* **** **** ****** ** $**,*** *** ******.

** *** ***** ***, ******* ** * ******* ** ********, **, ******* ***** **** ******* ** * ***** ******. ******** had * ****** ***** *** ****** $**,*** *****. *************, *** integrators *** **** ******* **** **** ** * “**** ** can ** **, ** *******” ********, ******* ** ******* *** the ****’* ************ *** ******* ** **** ** ********** ****** and ***** *****$**,*** ********. ** **** ****, *** *** *** ****** * bulleted **** ** ***** *** **** ******. ** ****** **** got * ******** ***** *** **** ****** **** * ******** list ** ***** *** * ***** *****. 

*** ******** **** ******** ** ** ******* ** * ******** and ********* ********* ** ****. ** ******** ** ***** ********* that *** **** ***** **** ****** ******, **** ************ ****** decisions *** ***** ********, **** ** ** ******* ** * proposal **** *** **** *** *** ********* *** * ******** for ******. 

** *** ***** ****, **** ****** ****** ** ******* ** have * ******** ********** ******* *** ******* ** ****** ** not **** (** ****) ** ***** ***** ** ** **-***** design. ****, **** ******* ** ** ********** *** ****** ********* of *** ****, ***** ** * **** ** **** ****** a **** ******* ** ************ **********.

Comments (7)

Generally, you don't see lat level of detail for a $50,000 system proposal. In this case, the city paid the integrator $5K to do the study and prpare the proposal, so that explains the amount of detail. For a complemetary proposal, it's doubtful that many integrators will deliver that level of detail, including myself.

It's not very often you get a customer willing to pay for a a proposal and a study done by an integrator. More often than not, they will do an RFP to hire a professional engineer (that might not have a significant surveillance background) several times that amount to prepare (possibly inadequate) plans and specifications for a public bid. In the long run, the city propbably saved money, time and aggrivation with this delivery method. Conversely, The City of Hazelton did neither and they got what they paid for.

Just curious, did the integrator DSS have an existing continuing services contract with the City? Was the systems part of the project competitively bid? It's my experience that most city purchasing agents won't let a project go sole source without public bids unless the vendor has an existing fixed price continuing services contract with the city or a "piggyback"-able contract with another city or government entity that the city will accept.

I think most of the intergrators here would love to know more about the methodology of how they arranged this delivery method with the city and be able to apply that to their own business. Can you shed any light on that?

Hi John,

The integrator did have an existing contract with the city to maintain its original system. The new contract is separate from the old one, however. A request for bids was put out for this project, and from what I understand, the city specifically asked DSS to bid on this one.

It is an impressive proposal. However, for a $5000.00 fee to spec the system and a chance to bid I would have given them at least 60 pages in hand written calligraphy on gold leaf artisan paper in a leather bound work of art.

^^^ They'd probably ask for at least 5 copies in index tabbed 3 ring binders.

It is an impressive proposal. However, for a $5000.00 fee to spec the system and a chance to bid I would have given them at least 60 pages in hand written calligraphy on gold leaf artisan paper in a leather bound work of art.

Thus I would hope you would loose the contract for being too wasteful and "not being a green company". (insert sarcastic icon here)

My last proposal to a college campus was filled with example photos of the cameras and the views. Emphasis was on the zoomed in programmed set views for the tours they wanted. It was lost by the campus calling the camera and NVR manufacturers speaking to them directly without our input about the interoporability between the cameras and the NVR system. The NVR system said they didn't have an interface to the camera for programming.

If the campus had asked us, we had already addressed the issue and had a fix for it. Besides that, it was a new camera model from Pelco and the NVR manufacturer had not integrated it yet. The Pelco camera had a web interface that would work for now but the campus never asked before awarding the contract.

John Grocke,

Our customer the City of Saratoga Springs PD initially asked us to bid on the project as we did do some service work on their existing system. The told us they had 55K in grant money to spend and that they wanted 10 cameras spread out in the city. The asked...can you do it? We responded... "We don't know... we have to do the site assessment to figure it out". We described to them what the deliverables would be and that they could take the deliverables and have us do the implementation or someone else. We also told them, we can't give them the level of detail necessary for a successful project if they couldn't pay us for our time to do the research and create the proposal. If they chose to do implemenation with us, they could utilize the New York State buying contract, on which DSS participates. They agreed and the results are what you see here. Not every customer is wiling to do this but it certainly can be good business for both parties when they do.

In this situation I think the onus is on the customer to choose an integrator with the skill set and ethics to do a good job at a fair price.

What a bizarre concept that we should get paid (reasonably) for doing due diligence on research and design and then get to implement our plan!

Best Regards,

Mike Blumenson

President, DSS

Mike,

Yes, we should all get paid for doing this kind of work. I do work for many municipalities and from time to time have been successful with a somewhat similar approach. Unfortunately, it's more of the exception and not the rule.

It pays off to have a relationship with the customer and to be on a state contract or have municipal contracts that other localities and agencies can "piggyback" upon. It is a vital tool for doing business in the municiapal marketplace. Too often, many municiaplities have a "purchasing weenie" that demands that everything goes out to bid, usually without any specifications or plans, and that's where "Low Bid Security" (see City of Hazelton) does what they do. They get what thay pay for.

It's a beautiful proposal and I'm glad you got paid for the work that you put into it. The quality is better than what many engineers would provide. However, I doubt that many integrators would put that level of detail into a gratis proposal, for a $50K project. A $500K project, that might be a different story.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
S2 Access Control / 'Unified Security Management' Profile on May 08, 2018
In our 13th access control company profile, we examine S2 Security's Netbox platform: Unified Security Management Platform positioning Core...
IP Network Hardware for Surveillance Guide on May 02, 2018
Video surveillance systems depend on IP networking equipment. In this guide, we explain the key pieces of equipment and features, explaining where...
Favorite Access Control Manufacturers 2018 on Apr 26, 2018
150+ Integrators told IPVM "What is your favorite access control management software/system? Why? Unlike the 2016 access favorites where a group...
ISC West 2018 Access Control Rundown on Apr 06, 2018
For ISC West 2018, what is new and interesting in access control?  This rundown will bring you up to speed on the exhibitors, what they are...
The 5 Major Lock Profiles Guide - Euro, Oval, KIK, Interchangeable Core, Mortise on Apr 03, 2018
Locks are used everywhere, but they are not all the same. In fact, even the shape of the lock changes, sometimes for no other reason than...
70+ New Products Directory Spring 2018 on Apr 02, 2018
We have compiled a list of new products for Spring 2018 in the categories: Video Surveillance Access Control Fire and Intrusion Other...
Wireless Networking For Video Surveillance Guide on Mar 29, 2018
Wireless networking is a niche in video surveillance applications, but it can be a difficult one to understand with proper wireless design,...
IPVM Camera Calculator User Manual / Guide on Mar 09, 2018
Learn how to use the IPVM Camera Calculator. The guide below includes instructions, images, gifs, and videos demonstrating and explaining the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis ~$100 Camera Tested on Jul 17, 2018
Axis has released their lowest cost camera ever, the Companion Eye Mini L, setting their sights on a market dominated by Hikvision and Dahua. Can...
Amazon Ring Alarm System Tested on Jul 16, 2018
Amazon Ring is going to hurt traditional dealers, and especially ADT, new IPVM test results of Ring's Alarm system underscore. IPVM found that...
Hikvision Wins Chinese Government Forced Facial Recognition Project Across 967 Mosques on Jul 16, 2018
Hikvision has won a Chinese government tender which requires that facial recognition cameras be set up at the entrance of every single mosque...
Installing Dome Cameras Indoors Guide on Jul 16, 2018
IPVM is producing the definitive series on installing surveillance cameras. This entry covers one of the most common scenarios - installing dome...
Security Sales Course Summer 2018 on Jul 13, 2018
Based on member's interest, IPVM is offering a security sales course this summer. Register Now - IPVM Security Sales Course Summer 2018 This...
US Tariffs Hit China Video Surveillance on Jul 13, 2018
Chinese video surveillance products avoided tariffs for the first two rounds. Now, in the third round, many video surveillance products will be...
Last Chance - July 2018 IP Networking Course on Jul 12, 2018
Registration ends today, Thursday. Register now. This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance...
4 Most Difficult Camera Installs (Statistics) on Jul 12, 2018
Heavy housings, cumbersome brackets, heavy ladders required, and tricky field of view requirements will cause difficulties no matter the camera...
Axis Perimeter Defender Video Analytics Tested on Jul 12, 2018
Axis 'high security' video analytics offering is Perimeter Defender, OEMed / developed with Digital Barriers. But how good is Perimeter Defender?...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact