Stop Using IE

I know this is the security industry and we lag the Amish but... Please stop using Internet Explorer (IE).

First of all, Chrome is far faster (recent tests even against IE10 show that - see here and

*.***/*******/*******-*****-*****-******-**-*******-**-********-********-**-***-*****-****" ******="******">****). ** *** ***** **** ****, *** ******.

********, ********* ***** ******** ** ** ********* *** **** ******** because ** ****** **** ********* *** **** ********** ** *** develop ** **.

****, ****'* **** *** ***** ****** *** *****. *** ********, only **% ** **** ******** *** ** *******.

* ********** **** **** ****** ***'* **** ************** ********** *** are ******* ** **, ********* * ****** ** *** **, gulp, ***. ****, **** **** ** *** ******** ****** ************.

*******, ** *******, **** **** **** ** ****** ****** **** from ** *** ***** ** ****** ** ***** ****** ********.

*** *** ***** **?******** ****** ***.

I hope this is directed at manufacturers. Tell them to stop writing ActiveX controls so we can move away from IE. (Though I prefer Firefox myself.)

Well, it's directed at everyone :)

There's still a lot of integrators who use IE as their default web browser. I just don't get it. It's one thing to have it available/installed but using it as the default web browser is generally less efficient than using Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

I stopped using IE back in 2006 since IE 6 was so succeptable to ad-ware and viruses. It took Speco years to make their DDNS viewer not just be IE only.

HTML5! I use IE as infrequently as possible.

IE10's HTML5 support is improved but still lacks that of Chrome and pretty much every other major browser (see this chart).

I have been using Firefox/Chrome exclusively for upwards of 4 years now. Never looked back.

Since none of the other 32% apprently want to admit it, I will. I use IE all the time. But it's not a preference, nor an aversion of other browsers - I use them all, interchangeably, depending on what I'm doing.

While I am posting this from Chrome, I really don't even care what browser I use unless I'm forced to care. I have IE, Chrome and Firefox installed on both my laptop and desktop. Certain things I use work better on specific browsers (JAVA crashes more often when I'm using Chrome, for instance), and some (like ActiveX-based apps) only work on one specific browser. Firefox has some cool plug-ins that the other two browsers don't have...

If speeds were significantly different, then I would prefer the faster, obviously.... but I don't perceive much of one so I continue to not really care... :)

Marty, the problem I suspect is the people who only use IE, because that's the default and they've never considered alternatives or heard someone make the case for another browser. Ergo, this discussion.

One thing I might add is that posting comments to these discussions using IE is not suggested... it (more often than not) literally takes two clicks of the Post Reply button to add comments to a string like this one.

1st click has no noticeable effect on anything (no matter how long u wait), 2nd click engages and posts your comments. This does this same thing from both my machines. Also, edits of existing comments do not 'take' using IE... it appears to update, but never shows the edit.

So whenever I post here, I use Chrome - because it works 'right' every time... :)

I'm curious if anyone else can validate my findings above RE: IE and posting comments?

Chrome installs into the user folder and does not need Administrator priveledges to install on any Windows platform.

You can also use one of many USB-based / virtualized executables. Check out Cameyo here.

Thanks, Seth.

Anyone on IE with issues, like Marty, please let us know.

That said, IE almost always is going to produce more issues, especially when using older IE versions with different implementations of javascript, etc.

Bottom line, if you haven't tried out Chrome, Firefox, etc., you really should.

So far, of the 100 of you who have visited this post, only 5 were using IE. Unfortunately, then, I am preaching to the choir :(

Netscape... I knew someone who paid for the "Gold" version in the store.

I wish it were that simple. I need all three and occasionally even use Safari... I normally have ~15 browser pages open and 2 browsers. Way too many systems/platforms/extensions have been IE-Specific for many reasons and with embedded systems firmware in devices like printers, FAX machines, Cameras, other AV equipment, Routers, Switches, banking/vendor sites with Java, Active-X, etc...

There is *no* way all the vendors will reach back and "fix" their embedded web interfaces on old systems. (Would you? How far back?) Everything not currently for sale (2yr sales life) is considered "legacy" since there is no new revenue stream.

For many years IE was not perfect and was certainly buggy, but lest we forget, for the majority of the last 10 years, (yes we use/support equipment 5+ years old), the other browsers so popular today either did not exist (FF 2004, Chrome 2008), were not well standardized, lacked features, had integration limitations, were not installed on enough systems to be worth writing for, etc... (And still do...) 18 years ago Netscape had ~95% of a very much smaller market. 10 years after that, IE had about the same 90%+ percentage. Another 8 years and the trend is similar. IE is 25-50% depending and trending downward...

Firefox is only about 9 years old and Chrome is only about 5.

It would be awesome if there we only needed one browser, but I believe that will not happen soon... We are the tech-savvy bunch who are less likely to be put off by the various issues, the real numbers for the population are not so clear at all and are certainly no where near the 5% for this post.

Clearly Chrome is gaining the most in many uses and IE is the biggest loser across the board, but none are truly universal. IMHO, if it were not for the hostile guerilla-style marketing of usurping the users browser and search engines with nearly every downloaded utility/installer, IE would still rule the web due to the fact that Windows is still ~80-90% of the desktop/laptop market. Not that this is a good or bad, thing, just an observation. I do have less trouble with Chrome than IE

Try this for some interesting reading...




Corey, my point is that for people who are doing general web browsing - company websites, linkedin/facebook/twitter/youtube, news sites, espn, etc., etc., Chrome is a much better default choice.

It's one thing to use multiple browsers as needed, it's another to only use IE and not recognize what else is better out there.

I bet IE would have less than 5% marketshare if it wasn't preloaded ;)

Yes I hope manufacturers are reading this. Active X is a huge pain in the butt, its pretty terrible when you have to go through several steps just to get the active x settings to work right.

A couple of points:

I have to use IE at work. IT doesn't support other browsers and certain intranet programs don't work on anything but IE. Plus, we are not given priviledges to install anything on our computers.

Google Chrome? HAH!!! If I wasn't careful, I'd have it at least 100 times over. Many programs will auto-install Chrome during updates if I don't carefully uncheck the box. Even worse, a couple of shareware programs I've tried installed it despite my unchecking the box. For that reason, I refuse to install Chrome and will delete it every time. Any company that pushes their program that blatantly will never get my business.

By the way, I use Firefox at home - not necessarily because it's better but a Windows Update screwed up IE and nothing I've done short of re-installing Win7 has fixed the problem (hyperlinks don't work).

I have to agree with Carl there and it's probably why I have a slight aversion to it.

Google pays third parties a small sum for every installation. Based on this logic, both Firefox and Chrome both deserve your ire, since Firefox was guilty of this for some time as well.

While I can appreciate your distaste for Chrome getting pushed down your throat, Chrome is still the best browser on the market. Perhaps you should check out Chromium, which is the open-source project that develops a non-Google browser... as non-Google you can get when they do most of the development.

As for IT departments out there, there's no excuse to not roll it out. Google has tools to implement Group Policies and control Google from Windows Active Directory, as well as deploy automatically. In fact, you can implement 'Legacy' browser support, which means that Chrome will load IE in a frame for websites that require it.

In other words, most IT departments are just lazy and don't appreciate true security protocols since the biggest vector for attacks is client browsers.

Anywho... </rant over>.

Carl, as I mentioned above, I can certainly understand company IT restrictions, forcing one to use IE.

As for Chrome being bundled with shareware, I doubt that is of Google's doing. More importantly, if you download Chrome directly from Google, I don't see what security risk this would pose.

Btw, that's pretty ironic that a Window update screwed up IE :)

"As for Chrome being bundled with shareware, I doubt that is of Google's doing. More importantly, if you download Chrome directly from Google, I don't see what security risk this would pose."

Google Chrome and Toolbar, and the Ask Toolbar and search engine are among the biggest "pay per install" bundles. My understanding is that Google and Ask pay bundlers between $1 and $2 per installation.

Although some programs and updates have an option to "opt out" of the bundles by unchecking them on the install web page see here, other programs either hide the "opt out" settings under a "Custom Installation" tab or don't even offer an "opt out" option. There are a number of posts from disgruntled Adobe Flash users here.

Firefox or bust!

They are not "just lazy"..... they are also myopic.

I have no problems with IE at all. I also use FireFox and maybe sometimes Chrome. I like the fact that IE does not constantly try to get me to sign-in like every other Google product. All that does is allow Google to data mine and resell regional profile data to third parties. Not sure why everyone thinks anything but IE is 'so secure' when I see exploits for everything out there on a monthly basis. If you wanted to expolit something would you code for a product used by 10-15% of the world population or the majority? Besides, Chrome is like Apple products which people only even look at initially because they want to feel special and use something 'the rest of us mouth breathers' somehow dont appreciate. "Apple products never have problems!" Would you complaign about something that you bought at three times the cost of a PC then install software (limited selection) that costs three times as much all for a computer used by maybe 10 percent of the population? I digress...Chrome is okay I guess even if every download out there tries to sneak it in on you.

Not sure why everyone thinks anything but IE is 'so secure' when I see exploits for everything out there on a monthly basis.

This is patently untrue. You see bug reports for everything out there, not exploits. Exploits require something to actually happen. Bugs are just reported as potential issues.

What makes Chrome so 'special' is it's sandboxed design and the rapid release cycle and quick bug repair. IE fails in this regard because Microsoft has repeatedly failed to quickly work around some of these issues, due to them being fundamental to the design of their software. One of these fundamental design flaws is called ActiveX. Look it up.

Now, to discuss exploits, you have to see what actual researchers do. Take a look at competitions like Pwn2Own that allow closely held exploits get used without dangerous disclosure to the black hat community, and allow the developers to fix it.

And, by the way, Chrome went unhacked until 2012- and that exploit was debatable.

Chrome is like Apple products which people only even look at initially because they want to feel special and use something 'the rest of us mouth breathers' somehow dont appreciate.

Keep on believing that. Chrome now has the largest share of browsers on the web and is still growing. Probably because they're paying to get that access. I disagree with the methodology, but I'd rather see a secure browser that never allows crap on PC's from MySpace and Facebook than the security hole that is IE. Which, by the way, in the fleet of desktops that my company manages, is the only browser we have substantial user issues with- such as malware, trojans, and bloatware.

All, thanks for the detailed feedback.

One point I don't understand is why so many people are on old IE versions. For instance, 40% of those using IE that come to IPVM are still using IE8 or IE7. Many sites do not even support those browsers any more plus I wonder how out of date those browsers might be, in terms of patches, etc.

If you are determined to use IE, fine but can you at least use IE9 or 10?

"One point I don't understand is why so many people are on old IE versions. For instance, 40% of those using IE that come to IPVM are still using IE8 or IE7. Many sites do not even support those browsers any more plus I wonder how out of date those browsers might be, in terms of patches, etc."


There are a lot of Windows XP systems out there. IE8 is the highest version you can install. More reasons to go to other browsers. However, as a security advisor, I am leary of any software that tracks, records and ARCHIVES, my every click and navigation on the web. Google/Chrome does this. Most browsers do this locally. Google stores your history on the cloud and uses it to control your choices. I am not Google adverse. I use it every day. But, with FF browser. Like the others, I use what I need to get the job done. Chrome has the best html5 browser for rendering video, so I use that too. But I never use Chrome for personal browsing.

I use 2 browsers on a daily basis. Chrome and IE. I keep both at the most current build. I'm also the network admin for a network with over 2000 endpoints. On all of our computers we have the option of chrome, Firefox, and of course IE. Most users use IE and it works fine for them 98% of the time. There are certain times that a user will call with an issue and we suggest they try Chrome. For general browsing I like to use Chrome but there are many sites that IE works better on. I'll be honest, now that Chome has come into maturity I almost never use FireFox, but I also don't use any plugins that a lot of people use Firefox for. One of the issues I have about Chrome is not so much the browser but the constant insistance that Google wants to know and report on my every click and step. I think browsers, like most computer related items, have a following and a lot of it is personal preference for one reason or another. There will always be multiple options and a debate offer which is better.

"One point I don't understand is why so many people are on old IE versions." Well, some people are still on Windows XP so they're limited to IE8 I believe. But another common reason I've found is the way Microsoft keeps dumbing down the browser and taking away funcitons people like. One of the more common complaints is how they took away the seperate search box in Internet Explorer, instead making the URL address box also a search box. So mentally they may still be stuck on Internet Explorer but don't want to upgrade to newer versions they don't like.

Luis, They didn't take away the search box. I use <Control> L.

I love the Chrome interface. But, I do find it extremely slow at times though when under XP. Under Win7 it is fine.

We use about 60% IE8 and the rest are a mix of IE9 and IE10. (systems also can use Chrome and/or FF) IE8 is kept because there are so many sites that are IE8 specific or at least IE9/10 Hostile. We deal with hundreds of remote/vendor/provider sites every day and many of them have trouble with IE9/10. Sometimes we can fix them with a workaround, sometimes we cannot. I would be fine with IE9 or IE10 across the board, but no way that would work for many, of our users.

At work I use Chrome except for when using cameras that utilize active X controls to display their configuration screens and video streams. On some I have to literally install three separate times and it may or may not work. Definitely makes my life difficult. We also see issues with IE9 and IE10 when displaying some of our GUI items on some newer client machines until we go into and activate some IIS items that are normally disabled that is needed. (Thanks Microsoft).

Everything that IE has now that is a good feature has been stolen from other browsers. Everything that is not a good feature they developed. At least that is the way it always feels. Though venting on here doesn't make it any better.

I am in same boat as Carl, corporate standard is IE even though everyone hates it. We can venture outside of IE, but we lose any/all support from the corporate IT department. Of course the IT department uses Chrome and Firefox to do what they want...

Anyway, we have no choice but to use IE and I would wager the vast majority of the Fortune 500, 1000 and even 2000 is in the same boat. Microsoft is still in business for a reason and it is not because of their hardware.

Excellent comments and discussions!

Randy, thanks! I forgot about the Windows XP connection (and also that people use XP :). It turns out 12% of our visitors use Windows XP!

Corey, interesting points about sites being IE8 specific. I am assuming those are older enterprise applications? It seems the opposite with more recent web based applications. For instance, I was waiting at the car dealer for service for last week and tried to use Github on their courtesy PCs running IE8 and had all kinds of problems. Also, I see Google, Gmail etc dropped IE8 support last year.