This is a news to me. It really is a false narrative. The statistics do not warrant this type of ordinance. User error is far and away the single largest issue with false alarms, according to any data you wish you site. I don't live in that area, but if I did, I simply would stop offering monitoring service to those customers and I would tell them why when they ask. When/if enough customers complain the City will change it's position. An integrator will not change the City's mind on this.
I have seen with my own eyes, using CCTV, that burglars will create an alarm, hear the siren and leave. When LEO shows up, with no apparent cause, they will mark it false alarm. I have even had it at my own home. Law enforcement knows this, but they will never admit it. Without video verification it is nearly impossible to prove.
Verified alarm response is one answer to most of these issues, but it definitely will add cost to the end user, the end user by the way, who statistically is at the root of the problem. Another answer is to buy your alarm and have it programmed for local alarm only, with no Central Station dispatch. At least you will have something. The larger companies of course do not want to participate in a "buy only" program because it eliminates the reoccurring revenue gravy train. Local alarm companies should be able to compete more effectively.